Gadhafi Gone? One Of Libya's Own Could Do It

THE DOCTOR IS IN _______________

Obama's wars- Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and now Libya. For an anti-war president it appears Obama loves to play war.

This attack on Libya should never have involved the United States. If other countries in Europe wanted to invade Libya that is their decision. Can't anyone fight a war without United States intelligence, equipment and manpower?

I applaud the Soviet Union, China and Germany for not going along with an attack on another nation without provocation or in response to an attack on their country. The only reason Obama led this unwarranted attack is because he doesn't like Gadhafi and says "Gadhafi has got to go." A second excuse is Gadhafi is killing his people. Obama, many countries in the Middle East is currently killing their people to stop revolutions. What makes Libya different?

President Obama and the administration could have saved us taxpayers billions of dollars in costs of fighting this useless mini-war on Libya while at the same time ridding Libya of Gadhafi for about $2.00 . Let me pose a hypothetical situation:

The CIA and other intelligence agencies from around the world that want this guy gone could pony up a few thousand dollars each from their countries coffers. For discussion sake let's settle on (one million dollars) and these countries could use the one million dollars to buy off one of Gadhafi's close confidants in his inner circle or even a person in his military. Add an additional $2.00 for the cost of a bullet and Gadhafi could be gone in a second. As an incentive, offer the shooter asylum in a neighboring Muslim country. Result:-Gadhafi gone by one of his own.

A United States citizen didn't take him out nor did a citizen from another allied country. It would read in papers around the world as: " Ridding Libya from Gadhafi was done by a Libyan freedom fighter" who in my opinion would probably be hailed as a hero by the Libyan people.

If Gadhafi was taken out by one of his own there would at least be a plan for some sort of regime change. The new leader could possibly be a high ranking Libyan military person and the transition would be a fairly smooth operation which it clearly isn't now..

Right now Obama and his so called coalition doesn't have any sort of plan once Gadhafi is gone. All this attack force is doing is destroying Libya infrastructure, killing civilians and ruining the country, similar to what was done in Iraq and which Obama says we, the United States taxpayer, has to rebuild for the Libyan people.

This hypothetical scenario could be compared to other real instances where the leader and/or high ranking official of another country was targeted. I'm not condoning an assassination squad like the one that was covertly dispatched to Italy a few years ago to kill an official in a hotel or the CIA's attempt to eliminate Castro decades ago or the Bulgarian that was killed by poison on the tip of an umbrella or the writer that was poisoned by radiation. Those were real instances. I'm talking hypothetical.

However, if it did happen by a Libyan for the cost of a bullet we in the United States and other allied countries could save billions of dollars that are now being spent on this stupid attack of Libya. Once again, my view is: let the Libyan people handle their own problems but if one Libyan wanted to be paid for their efforts and endeavors it would clearly make things a lot easier. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

Bradley W. Kuhns,Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com