REVIEW FOR THE MOVIE "THE INTERVIEW."

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America and how is the world treating you?

I was asked by a few people to  give a review of the  movie "The Interview."
Okay, here it is folks: "The Interview" is a dumb, stupid comedy.  It was aimed at fans and followers of  the humor set down by Seth Rogen and his sometimes collaborator James Franco.

The film was eventually made available by Sony to a few Independent theaters and online. This movie, turns out, isn't as sharp or politically motivated as the producers and stars suggested. The movie is  chock full of silly sight  gags --- fifth grader comedy and raunchy jokes. The movie suggests that the talk show host named David Skylark (Franco)  and his producer Aaron(Rogen) has a show that is one of Kim's (leader of North Korea) favorite shows. One day after a drug induced mind bender trip along comes an attractive CIA agent (Lizzy Caplan) who asks the two idiots to do the CIA and the country a big favor and  "take Kim out."

The Interview doesn't stray much from a stupid, party-heavy  scenario defined by these two men and is a repeat of prior comedies with  Rogen (if you want to call them that). The movie is heavy on cameos, childish acting, vulgar language and crass material. For adult enjoyment, this is a loser.

The stunt where Kim's head graphically explodes could have been left out of the film and I think the use of Kim's name could have been changed for the movie. Why provoke and agitate people when it would have been so easy to make a few cosmetic changes.

Personally, these two guys brand of comedy is not funny to me. There used to be a time in show business when comedians could make a movie and/or do stand up comedy without resorting to vulgarity and filth in order to get a laugh.

My conclusion: This movie is 112 minutes of constant profanity, an attempt at crude, sexual humor, it has some drug use and bloody violent scenes. My rating for this film gets a big C-, at best. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions, You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

NORTH KOREA IS  NOT THE HACKER- LOOK INSIDE SONY.

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?


 A supplemental note to my earlier blog regarding the SONY hacking and movie "The Interview."
Sony caved to president Obama's criticism. Obama, movie stars and politicians said Sony caved in to North Korea when they refused to release the movie. Obama also said it was a "mistake" for Sony to not release the film. Again, Obama and these talking heads automatically jumped to the conclusion that the cyberattack hack job of Sony came from North Korea. So  now it appears Sony will show the movie in approximately 200 theaters in America. Keep in mind that most of these theaters are Independent exhibitors but there are still a number of  large major movie chains that have not agreed to to reverse their decision about not showing the movie. I think these theaters are being prudent and using common sense because if there is a movie attack  guess who will be liable-- yep, the theater owners - -NOT SONY.

And, get this. A  national security official said U.S. authorities did  not rate the threats by the hackers against theatergoers seriously, But I submit, the authorities did not rate the prior behavior of the killers involved in the 2012 mass shooting at a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado seriously, either. Wouldn't you think that the government would want to err on the side of caution? Apparently not.

As mentioned in my previous blog a couple days ago regarding the Sony breach  I do not believe that North Korea is the culprit in this particular case. I certainly agree North Korea is a bad thug on the block and they are in fact, a rogue nation. But that is no reason for president Obama to make a blanket statement telling the world that North Korea hacked into Sony. I think he, president Obama got bad advice and is being fed bad advice by his circle around him. If that's not the case I would suspect he has a hidden agenda by targeting North Korea.

Folks, I said before and I say again that I believe  the Sony cyberattack was an inside job. I  would suggest Obama  rethink the situation and have his so-called investigators and the FBI direct their attention to Sony rather that North Korea. If I had to offer a profile  on who actually committed the cyberattack on Sony I would submit and offer some of the following: The person in charge of the cyberattack hack job is possibly a disgruntled ex-employee; an ex-employee that feels they were wronged by Sony (for whatever reason) possibly because the person may have been fired; a person who may want some sort of revenge; this person and/or persons had knowledge of Sony's servers; had access to protocol to infiltrate the servers and the capabilities to retrieve the information from Sony servers. I would also suggest that this person is a member and had or has connections to the  group ("The Guardians of Peace") who released the private information. It would not surprise me if this person set up the Guardians of Peace so as to cover their possible connection to Sony.

I should also note that based on my experience as an investigator it is my opinion the person who selected the information to be released from Sony files in all probability is a FEMALE. I base that opinion on  the type of information that was leaked. A female hacker, you say. I would say it's a good bet. I would also suggest that the female cyber thief is very well educated and clearly has knowledge of the programming language and techniques currently used world-wide by numerous hackers and hacking groups, thus, the selection of using  the Korean connection to act as (red herring), a false lead to mislead investigators. Keep in mind the same techniques used to hack Sony are used frequently on a daily basis by global hackers. The  type of cyberattack hacking used against Sony is clearly not  unique ONLY to North Korea.

All in all, I predict that this is not the last anyone will hear from the "Guardians of Peace." Once the movie " The Interview" is released , the group will in all likelihood rear its ugly head to speak out again. I only hope that there will be no actual bombing because of the Sony decision reversal. I am delighted to see there still are many large movie chains that refuse to show the movie. I concur with those movie theaters owners decision.

My concern is, if in fact, any member of the "Guardians of Peace" and/or any of their followers do commit a heinous act, such as a bombing in and/on American theater or property(whether it be tomorrow, a week from now, a month from now , etc.) how will all of these same people which may include but not limited to: president Obama,  named actors and actresses', media/television talk show gurus and lawmakers on the Hill in Washington  explain their position of shouting from the highest hill: "North Korea did it!" "North Korea repressed our  free speech." The blame game will run rampant and finger pointing will be the activity of the day. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, PH.D., O.M.D.
__________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

 

NIGHT AT THE MUSEUM-THREE TRIPS TO MUSEUM IS TOO MUCH.

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

Trudy, from New Orleans asked me to review the movie :"Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb." She wanted my opinion - -so, here it is, Trudy.

To begin, it's stale and filled with childish humor. I would say the movie is only made for a children's audience. This is the third in the series of the Museum pics. This movie is like a tire retread and should be  way down on the bottom of your movie list.

All the producers did was  take a new location from New York's Natural History Museum to the British Museum.This movie franchise is putting out moldy and repetitious pieces  of work. The second  film, 2009 version, : Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian should have been the final in this franchise. Come on! A bunch of  old museum artifacts coming to life. That doesn't make for a funny movie, especially after three go-rounds.

However, it was good to see the late Robin Williams in his role as  Teddy Roosevelt. That was about the only good thing I can say about this movie. Trudy, this movie is just a recycle of the previous two versions. In fact, same old jokes and action too. This movie package ran out of steam two movies ago. It should be  put out of its misery. It should be buried in a secret  tomb with the mummies, forever. A THIRD trip to the museum, "yuck."

The running time on the film is 100 minutes; It has a rating of PG. It also has some crude, rude attempt at humor, same with the language. As to action, I would grade it tepid to mild, at best.
My grade for this bombaroo: (C- to D). - And, that'd my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

Thanks for the request, Trudy.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

MUCH OF DR. OZ ADVICE QUESTIONABLE ACCORDING TO STUDY.

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

Getting your health advice off of television shows can be a hazard to your health. According to the British Medical Journal, who recently published a study analyzing Dr. Oz's claims along with those made on another medical talk show. What they found was startling.
Dr. Oz is called "America's Doctor", and syndicated talk show host Mehmet Oz  says he speaks in a way anyone can understand. Dr. Oz shouts to his millions of viewers about "miracles" and "revolutionary medical breakthroughs", which more than not are very questionable and may be totally false.

Has Dr.Oz , who frequently peddles miracle cures for weight loss and other medical ailments, threw medical truths and veracity under the bus and traded  them in for television ratings and crass entertainment value?

Is there smoke to the accussioins or is there a hint of fire surrounding his medical circus. He was recently called before Congress, where Senator Claire McCaskill, D-MO told him to his face that he was giving people false hope and blasted him for his television segments as a : "recipe for disaster."

Example of his advice: Last month , a study he touted, promoted and praised  about a coffee bean weight-loss pill was RETRACTED  dispite Dr. Oz's assertions that the weigh-loss pills could "burn fat fast for everyone who wants to lose weight."

The claims made by Dr. Oz was closely looked at by the researchers led by  Christina Korownyk of the University of Alberta and she and her team concluded that medical research didn't substantiate Dr. Oz's claims ... or outright contradicted ... more than HALF of Dr. Oz's recommendations.

Personally I believe these  goofy medical talk shows are dangerous. They clearly lack specific and adequate information and/or the magnitude of how their advice will affect the viewer who tries  the medical cures. I suggest that the television viewer take all of this television medical advice with a grain of salt,-- be suspicious, be skeptical.

Currently the "Dr. Oz Show" ranks in the top five talk shows in the U.S. and has an estimated  2.9 million viewers and another medical talk show "The Doctors", which was also studied in the report paper reports viewership at  2.3  million a day.

It appears Dr. Oz and others medical television shows only look at medical ailments as how they can market it for themselves. In fact, Oz told the New Yorker: "Cancer is our Angelina Jolie. We could sell that show every day." A  published article implied that Dr. Oz has to  get real. The article titled "Reality Check" said "There Is No Such Thing As A  Miracle Food ." The journal of Nutrition and Cancer slammed Dr. Oz's assertions that endive,, red onion and sea bass can decrease the likelihood of ovarian cancer by, get this -- a whopping  SEVENTY-FIVE (75%) PERCENT.

Folks, look at these medical shows like "Dr. Oz" as entertainment. Oz comes across as nothing more that a performer, an entertainer. An example: He said data  shouldn't stop patients from testing out things like raspberry ketone ...a " miracle in a bottle to burn your fat" ... EVEN IF IT'S NEVER BEEN TESTED. Really? Wow!

Oz told a U.S. Senate hearing he"personally believes in the items I talk about in my shows." " I give my audience the advice I give my family all the time." Is that scary or not, folks? Why, because the researchers with the British Medical Journal selected at least 40 episodes from past year, and examined 479 separate medical recommendations Oz made. The result was that the researchers found evidence enough only to support 46 percent of Oz's recommendations, contradicted 15 percent and wasn't available for 39 percent regarding Oz's recommendations So Basically the British Medical Journal research. "discredits" more than half the claims made by Dr. Mehmet Oz on his talk show.

Bottom line people - - these television doctors are only there for entertainment value and many can come up with some far out crazy ideas. They are marketing their brand folks and that's their end game. -- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
__________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

OBAMA MADE RIGHT DECISION ON CUBA. SENATOR RUBIO PLAYING POLITICS.

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

Senator Marco Rubio, who is considering a presidential run said Sunday that president Obama has thrown away valuable leverage to bring about a political change in Cuba. What a bunch of political garbage that is. President Obama made the right decision to resume a better relationship with Cuba. The move is long over due. Rubio also attacked his potential presidential Republican opponent, Kentucky Senator  Rand Paul who, like me, agrees with president Obama's decision. Rubio, who is Cuban-American says that Obama's new policy will not bring democracy to Cuba. He said:  "What the president has done will not do anything to further the cause of "democratization" Is he kidding?!

When all of the young Cubans living in Cuba see a level of openness between the USA and Cuba and such things as, the lifting of many restrictions on travel, imports and the transfer of monies , Internet use and other areas that now hold back the Cuban people, Cuba will be brought into a whole new world of wonder. Democracy as we know it, probably not, but Cuban president,  Raul Castro has already said that we, the United States should respect their form of government just as they respect ours.

The young Cuban generations love American things. A recent 20/20 news program interviewed some of the young adult Cubans in their country and the majority want the United States and Cuba to come together. Fact is, these young Cuban adults don't remember why the embargo and restrictions were started in the first place.

Rubio and his ilk still doesn't get it: It's people like him that try to force the United States way of democracy down the throats of other countries. How did that work out so far? People,  look at Iraq and, Afghanistan for starters. We started wars saying we the USA will bring our form of democracy to these countries, instead, all we did was instigate, provoke and instill hard feeling and hatred with the peoples of these countries, and in the process killed, maimed and destroyed causing the people of those nations to come to hate America. Rubio's thinking is totally lopsided. It's childish thinking. And this guy wants to be president --

Hell, for decades now we have  been carrying on  relationships with such countries as Vietnam, China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, just to name a few and clearly the U.S. is always saying these countries are violating human rights against both men and women.These countries have anything BUT a democracy like the United States, yet we deal with them on a daily basis and think nothing of it. So why should we enforce a 50 year embargo and inflict restrictions on Cuba when they do not do half as much bad things these other countries do? My answer is: We shouldn't. I submit we, the USA should have had normal relations with Cuba all those 50 years.

Rubio also said: Cuban democracy activists "feel betrayed" by Obama. What he doesn't tell you is these Cuban activists are the older generations of Cubans that came to Americas shores in  the  1970's and in the  boat lifts era. The beliefs and thoughts of those older Cuban generations regarding Cuba's democracy and independence fight doesn't even  connect with the young Cuban generation.

However,  Senator Rubio in his quest to be a nominee  for president of the United States apparently has a hidden agenda by fanning the flames of the millions of old generation Cubans in exchange for votes in a presidential bid.

It appears Rubio is afraid of the competition from Rand Paul  in a presidential face off. He states that the Senator from Kentucky,  Rand Paul does not know what he is talking about. What? It is Rubio who looks like he wants to suppress Cubans from breaking out into the world. He essentially wants to "isolate" Cuba and it's people and maintain a 50 year old status quo situation. And Rubio's obsession with Rand Paul is such that he is continually trying to tie Paul to Obama's coat tails. saying Paul agrees with everything Obama does. What a crock, folks. Don't believe that poop. It takes a good politician to say they agree with the other side of the aisle and compliment the other side when they do WHAT IS RIGHT. On this Cuban matter Obama did very good in formulating the package and Paul agreed with Obama's policy in this case. That my friends is a mark of a good politician.

I say to Rubio, if the rigid constraints that was put on the Cuban people has not made a change in FIFTY (50) YEARS ,doesn't one  believe that changing that stance and loosening any embargo and penalties will certainly make the Cuban people's  life much better. My answer would be a resounding YES.

The deal that president Obama made with Cuba was in the making for a long time and behind the scenes talks between the two presidents had the support of other leaders of the world which included a large piece of work by the POPE himself, who took a special interest in the  matter. After due and careful consideration all parties involved came up with the final deal that was  announced  by president Obama. It was and is a good deal. Personally, I do not think it went far enough. I suggest that Obama use his powers to remove any and all restrictions only leaving ONE small item on the books so as to satisfy the current law. The president could do this if he should chose to do so and I I would like to see that step taken. It's time to treat Cuba as a friend NOT a foe.

Another personal observation of mine is that I suspect Rubio has his nose bent out of joint only because he was not asked by president Obama to participate in the important talks taking place. Secondly, because  Rubio himself didn't have the where with all and the foresight to bring Cuba into the 21st. century and Obama accomplished what he could not do and that fact sticks in his craw.

In all probability Rubio's only interest in the Cuban situation is garnering votes from the old school senior citizen generation of Cubans living in Florida and around the country.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions You decide.

BRADLEY W> KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

SONY MADE RIGHT DECISION-OBAMA BLAMES NORTH KOREA: I WOULD LOOK ELSEWHERE 

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

Sony canceled the release of the movie "THE INTERVIEW" after hackers said they would bomb theaters that showed the film. Many movie stars and politicians started to snivel and cry that it was a cave in on the part of Sony which restricted "free speech." President Obama even put his two cents in by criticizing  Sony. These people apparently believe that daring terrorists to bomb theaters and places here in America  is a good thing. They're saying, in effect, "knock the chip off my shoulder, I dare you." How dumb is that?

This is not a case of another country trying to impose "censorship" on the United States like some want you to believe. The threat by the Guardians of Peace should be take seriously. They want to make a point and bomb theaters if the movie is shown. So I would say, why agitate and provoke these crazies? Just stop the release of  a movie that many critics gave the thumbs down to who said the film was basically a piece of junk . You can't blame the theaters. They wanted to protect their moviegoer patrons and I am in total agreement with their actions. What  movie theater owner would want  the death of one or more people their hands? Their liability would be over the top if an attack occurred after being warned. And you can bet all of the politicians, actors and headline grabbing people would be the first to bad mouth any and all theaters that showed the crummy movie "The Interview" after experiencing a bombing.

I think Sony's C.E.O. Michael Lynton did the right thing by pulling the movie. They, in fact though about the  welfare of the American people. Sony said they were concerned about the possibility of a cyber terrorist bombing and the killing of people in theaters located in shopping malls and communities around the United States. One of the main reasons Sony did pulled the movie is because many movie theaters around the country REFUSED to show it. I believe they acted prudently and correctly in making the decision to  stop any showing of the movie. You also can't blame the the theaters. They wanted to protect their moviegoer patrons and I am in total agreement with their actions. What  movie theater owner would want  the death of one or more people their hands? Their liability would be over the top if an attack occurred after being warned that the attack would occur. And you can bet all of the politicians, actors and headline grabbing people would be the first to bad mouth any and all theaters  that showed the crummy movie "The Interview" after a bombing.

Can you imagine if Sony went ahead and  allowed the film to be shown in  theaters around the country and even just one theater was bombed somewhere in  the U.S.  killing a number of moviegoers? All of the talking heads and the president would be the first to accuse Sony of total disregard for the American peoples safety. They would accuse Sony of being greedy and only interested in making money. In all likelihood  the people blasting Sony for their decision would insist that Sony should have known the terrorists claim was sincere. These same idiots would want to sue Sony for the deaths of God knows how many people who may have died in a bombing.

I guess the president, politicians and others fail to learn from experience. The  terrorists we are now fighting in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria told us (the USA) years ago they did not want us on their soil and/or meddling in their internal affairs but the arrogance of the USA, the White House, and war monger lawmakers initiated and commenced a war, one lasting 13 years and still going. The terrorists recently beheaded a number of Americans telling America that the reason for their vicious acts was because the USA would not leave their country. It is very clear that terrorists say what they mean and have no compunction about retaliating against would-be enemies.

Folks, this cyber attack on Sony was planned in advance by the "Guardians of Peace." They knew exactly what they wanted to do -- and did it. They intentionally released private information to the Internet like they said they were going to do; they then released a second batch of information like they said they were going to do  -- SO, what makes these clowns in Washington, the White House and the movie industry think that the group would not bomb one or more theaters ... killing people here in America and elsewhere.

The president, some over-the-hill politicians in Congress and others including some movie stars that want their fifteen minutes before the cameras claim it is a matter of free speech and democracy. Come on! It's  nice to wave the flag and be patriotic but to outright dare terrorists from around the world to bomb theaters and kill Americans is lunacy . Hell, it's ONLY a movie people and from what I understand from some  movie critics, a bad one. Get a grip. Sony erred on  the side of caution and clearly did  not want to be responsible for any theater bombing and/or the  death of even one American. Plus, keep in mind Sony lost MILLIONS of DOLLARS by pulling the film off of the market. And get this, some of these billionaire actors and actresses are currently SUING SONY because information about them was released on the Internet. I would wonder why they are suing Sony. It is acknowledged that this information release was a cyber-terrorist act. Sony certainly didn't have any control of what the terrorists did.

And, to complicate the matter even further  we have race-baiters like Al Sharpton jumping into this situation screaming that there is a divide between whites and blacks at Sony after hearing about some comments made  in Sony emails. Here he goes again trying to mine gold by inflaming racial hatred. That is how Sharpton and others exist.  He and others make their living in front of the news media pretending to ask for justice (as they see it in their own mind.)  I personally wouldn't trust Sharpton or believe anything he said.  He has a reputation of slimy, sleazy acts going back decades for stirring up mobs and  encouraging racial hatred even before the days of the Tawana Brawley rape hoax of 1987. Lets not forget the Duke  University rape hoax of 2006 Sharpton got involved in nor the Ferguson riots that he also took part in.

Lets not forget sleazy Sharpton's  past actions. He  counseled and represented a teenager (15-year-old)  Tawana Brawley years ago.  Sharpton and others concocted a story and accused police officers and a prosecutor of a gang rape against this teenager. In October 1988, a Grand Jury concluded that there was no rape whatsoever. The attorneys representing Brawley had their  legal license revoked and Sharpton was found "guilty" of defamation brought by prosecutor Steven Pagones.

But still, today, in 2014, he was at the side of New York City Mayor deBlasio a few weeks ago where both men made anti-police comments. Sharpton also demanded and got an audience with Sony executives.  If I were the Sony executives I wouldn't have let Sharpton and others like him who agitate, provoke and stir the flames of racial hate to set one foot in the office. His gobbly-goop is the same as it has been even before the Brawley rape fiasco years ago. Basically, he says, hire more blacks and fire some of your executives or my Network organization will picket, march and boycott your organization. To me those tactics sound a lot like extortion. But Sharpton  and a few other groups spouting his same point of view and game plan have been making such demands on corporations and businesses for decades and many corporations and businesses have caved to his demands. This from a man who has, LIED, CHEATED , manipulated a 15-year-old teenager to take part in his offensive, deceitful race hating  plan of accusing police officers and a prosecutor of gang rape. My question: Why is Sony even allowing this type person in their office?

It appears many people are jumping on the band wagon to attack Sony for their decision making. Yet, if a bomb did explode in any theater anywhere in America these same looney tunes would talk out of the other side of their mouth saying they were not expecting a terror group to carry out a threat.

As a side note it is reported in American media and by the FBI that North Korea is responsible for the theft and release of the Sony information. I would pose the question: What if North Korea didn't do the cyber attack? These accusations against North Korea appear to be the Iraq weapons of mass destruction  (WMD's)  scenario all over again. Hussein kept insisting that his country did  not have WMD's but our lawmakers and people in power in Washington made up stories, manipulated and manufactured documents and information to tell the American people that Iraq had WMD's so there would be an excuse to start a war. In the Sony case some politicians and war hawks look for someone to blame and rationalize their acts. Now Washington, with the complicity of the FBI is BLAMING North Korea even though no one really knows who, where or why and how Sony was hacked. It's a blame game people -- like always. But the administration is determined to make North Korea the boogy-man for reasons only know to Washington.

I don't believe North Korea is behind the hacking. I have always maintained from the get-go that the information accessed and released ,especially about the movie stars that came out suggested to me that the Sony hack was an INSIDE job. I also believe that the FBI once again  jumped to the conclusion that North Korea did the hacking just to "stir the pot" so to speak. As always the FBI wanted to look like the white hat good guys but in reality may have an agenda to incite the powers to be in Washington and the White House to take action against North Korea.

Let me put it this way: The so called programming hacking  format that was used to hack Sony had a lot written in Korean but rather than investigate thoroughly the G-Men jumped the gun and already made flat out statements that they knew FOR CERTAIN and had evidence that the hack came from North Korea. What some of the lame FBI investigators didn't know was that the  program language and methods used that contained some Korean indices is used by tens of thousands of hackers and hacking groups around the world and those same characteristics used in the Sony hack are used daily by millions of hackers world-wide. Talk about bad investigation - -it looks like the FBI continues to bungle investigations by using innuendo, suppositions and manipulation in order to make a case. This is not the first time the FBI had egg on its face and it won't be their last. As a former criminal investigator myself it's hard for me to understand the mind set of some of these investigative agencies when they overlook obvious connections and try to shortcut investigations.

Again, my take on the Sony hack job is: It was an inside job. Someone who had an ax to grind with Sony. Revenge, extortion, etc. Someone that had knowledge and access to the servers at Sony. I would tell the FBI and any investigating body looking into the Sony breach to look for an ex-employee, possibly one that was fired in the not to distant past; one that knew the Sony server protocols and one who had the knowledge and capabilities to reach into the Sony servers. The selected information that was leaked about the actors and actresses SCREAMS --- INSIDE JOB because it appears the hacker(s) specifically wanted those persons to take action against Sony.

So, president Obama, FBI and all the lame-headed lawmakers on capitol hill that is  going off half cocked  rallying the American people against North Korea based on suspect information  told them by the FBI I say your sniffing up the wrong skirt. Look inside Sony FIRST.


Kudos to Sony, their administration and staff for not trying to be macho and dare any terrorist group to bomb America, to kill Americans and kudos to all of the movie theaters who REFUSED to show the film. Both Sony and the movie theater owners used common sense in making the decision to pull the film from theaters. --  And,  that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

BRADLEY KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com