THE DOCTOR IS IN
_________________
LAS VEGAS-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
We Americans are suffering here at home while this administration is spending billions of dollars in Afghanistan. People, lets just take one area and analyze it. "The Afghanistan police training." Fact, to date, the USA has spent ($7 Billion Dollars) to train the Afghans. Let me tell you about the Afghan people and those training to be police officers. Afghans-(98 percent) of the people are addicted to drugs and use drugs on a daily basis. A whopping (95 percent) of the Afghan's in police training are "illiterate", they cannot either read nor write. The United States has also spent (1 Billion dollars)to outside contractors to help train these Afghan's for police work.
These illiterate, drug addicted Afghans who are training to be police just yesterday, slaughtered SIX American soldiers. There is a high rate of attrition in the Afghan police security forces. Some sign up and stay for only one day and then go AWOL and join the insurgents. Some Afghan's enroll in the police security force just so they can kill American soldiers.
Folks, Obama and his cohorts are throwing good money after bad. My view is that you cannot make these people "literate". They have been illiterate for CENTURIES.
Further, I predict it would take 75 to 100 years to even get to the point where anyone or any nation could instill literacy in these ignorant, back country tribesmen and the Afghan people as a whole. Also, lets not forget the task of trying to have 98% of the Afghan population weened off of drugs. Can't happen! Won't Happen!
Can you imagine what $7 billion dollars could do here in the good ol' USA? In addition to this wasteful spending of the billions of dollars on these drug addicted and stupid uneducated police recruits, Obama is dumping billions and billions of dollars more into building Afghanistan's roads, schools,(that's a laugh) electric grids, water supplies and infrastructure while setting up a puppet government.
When is enough, enough? Where is the protests, the marching in the streets, like there was during Vietnam?
The United States is sinking in debt, our own infrastructure is in shambles with bridges and water mains bursting and causing havoc in most major American cities. Our power grids are obsolete and we experience power outages on a regular basis. But, hey! No worry - - Obama and our lawmakers would rather spend our tax dollars on countries that are useless and does not contribute anything to the United States in any way shape or form.
What is needed is a government and lawmakers with backbone to stand up and say: Bring our troops home, stop spending the billions to have hundreds of thousands of troops inserted into another country.Do you remember Obama's promise? "I'll bring the troops home?" Lie! In fact, he's said that he is going to keep troops in Afghanistan for years to come.
My view,we need a president that is going to bring troops home and not talk out of both sides of their mouth. Bringing military home wouldn't be a difficult thing to do. Say it! I'm bringing the military home and DO IT! The Russians left Afghanistan in a few weeks after they made the decision to leave that country.We could do the same.
I predict that if all of our military in Afghanistan and Iraq would be brought home "NOW" and the war machine shut down, the saving we would realize from that move alone could replenish our treasury, cut our debt obligations drastically, finance our own infrastructure repairs, put tens of thousands of returning military into jobs here at home while employing millions of civilians in the private sector.-And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Body Scans,Pat Downs? Sexual Assault? Could Be! Read About Lois's Treatment
THE DOCTOR IS IN
________________
LAS VEGAS-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
I was asked to respond to the controversy surrounding the TSA and it's enhanced security measures. Yes, I believe they are very intrusive and further believe that if they are challenged in court they will be found to be unconstitutional.
FIRST, lets talk about PAT DOWNS: Some of my objections to these new measure are that the aggressive pat downs by TSA personnel violates one's privacy rights. I am not a lawyer but in my opinion I would submit that if any other person other than these TSA government employee's put their hands on another person as these employees are currently doing they would immediately be arrested for but not limited to such things as: physical assault, battery, sexual assault, sexual perversion, and the list could go on, and on.
No prudent married man would want anyone groping, touching and feeling his wife or his daughter or son in this gross, inappropriate manner. And that goes for President Obama. Oh, by the way,because of the recent complaints the incompetent Director of Homeland Security said that "children under 12 years old" will also be exempt from pat downs. Oh, Boy! Really? What about the 13 year old through 18 years old? Don't they deserve not to be felt up by strangers? Let's even go one further-what about those 18 year old through 30's something?
A SIDE NOTE:TSA just exempted airline pilots in uniform and those pilots who are off duty traveling on airline business from any pat downs and body scans. You can bet that all of those pilots out of uniform who are going to fly are going to claim they are on airline business.Also exempt--CONGRESS and the Washington LAWMAKERS. These idiots make laws that we have to abide by each and every day but they most always exempt themselves from these same laws. They refuse to abide by the laws they make for United States residents over and over again.
Why should Congress be treated differently than some 13 year old flying passenger? Based on the track record of some of these Congress people some have proven to be cheats, liars and corrupt individuals yet they cloak themselves in immunity from scrutiny while at the same time implying that the young child or senior citizen cannot be trusted. That is hypocrisy in its highest form.
EXAMPLE-CITE: House Republican Leader, John Boehner who recently had occasion to fly was permitted to bypass both the "body Scan and the aggressive pat down." The TSA employees walked him around both security measures. Fair? No Way! But it is happening everyday. Politicians,lawmakers and alleged movers and shakers in this country fail to abide by the laws they impose on everyone else.
Here's a story to consider: Lets look at one recent case of TSA patting down a flying traveler. Let's call the lady LOIS. At the airport Lois went through the body scanner and the TSA agent saw something he/she could not understand so Lois was told to submit to a pat down. She was taken to a secluded area and was patted down with the "aggressive techniques." The agent ran her hands up the woman's legs, between her crotch and around her private areas. The agent then ran their hands around Lois's breasts and felt something. Lois told the TSA agent that she had breast surgery and that she wore a prosthetic. The agent told her to take off her blouse, Lois complied and removed the blouse. Again, Lois said that she was wearing a prosthetic because of the breast surgery. The TSA agent still was not satisfied and told Lois to remove the prosthetic. Lois was surprised at the request but was also frightened following the very intrusive pat down and again, complied with the TSA agents instructions.
My thoughts regarding Lois - - this TSA federal employee clearly over stepped his/her bounds. This agents need to exert what little power they possess to show they can do what they want is ridiculous. No one was there to supervise the agent or tell that agent not to do what they did. There was no video monitoring anywhere in the room so that what I would describe as -(assault, both physical and mental)could be documented for Lois's protection.
Here's one thought: The government has dogs that can sniff out, drugs, weapons, chemicals and liquids, etc. - - There are also dogs that are trained and being used here in the United States to sniff out various diseases that a person may have. Dogs have been used to detect such things as diabetes, kidney disease, cancer(s) (i.e.) prostate. There is a dog that can sniff anyone or anything for most items,products and chemicals on the market today. Using the dogs and the present technology to scan for explosives, weapons and chemicals there should be no reason to institute these high risk body scans or aggressive pat downs on people. I submit that with the metal detector walk through by travelers, the scans of the carry on baggage and checked luggage,and use of dogs for the various liquids, chemicals, powders, etc., that should suffice. Naturally, if a person looks suspicious or fits a profile they should be asked to go to another area and be interviewed more thoroughly.
Suggestion: If these invasive, aggressive body pat downs continue they should only be made by: a medical doctor or physicians assistant. The only other persons that should be able to touch another persons body or feel and touch in and around an individuals private parts is a health professional in the privacy of an examination room. That is how it has been since the beginning of time and that relationship should still be held inviolate. I would say that any reasonable person only trusts themselves and a doctor to feel, touch, probe, their body parts and/or their family members body.
SECOND:- Lets talk about the intrusive Body Scans: Are they radiation driven? Yes, they are. Should people be exposed to radiation? My opinion, No! Folks, one CAT scan, only ONE,is equivalent to THIRTY (30) dental x-rays. Radiation builds up in one's body.Radiation causes cancer just to mention one disease let alone all the other possible side effects radiation may incur on one's body. Again, my opinion is that radiation "kills!" People, there have been controversial studies that even the slight radiation from one's cell phone may be very detrimental to a person's body and health. It has even been suggested that the small amounts of radiation from that cell phone use may even cause cancer of the brain to some extent.
The Director of Home Land Security and the government lapdogs that have an agenda tell us citizens that the amount of radiation given off by these super body scanners is very low dose and does not harm the body of the traveler. Do you trust governments reports and believe everything the government tells you?
In the past the government told us there was no dangerous arsenic, mercury, pesticides and other chemical levels in the water we drink.Guess what, the pollutants in the water are changing male fish and frogs into the female gender even changing their genitalia They have told us that certain medications were not harmful to us yet look at the medications constantly being pulled off of the market on a daily basis for killing people.
Reports,promises and assurances put out by the government in most every area of life often have proven to be false, misleading and outright lies. So, my question: If the government has been predisposed to put out false and misleading or inaccurate information in the past what makes you believe that any new reports or pronouncements by government officials will be reliable and honest?
There have been instances where the government have had their experts change official reports to fit their political agenda (i.e)for one, climate change. There are numerous other examples where government reports have been skewed or altered, especially in the scientific field of study.
Do I trust what the Director of Homeland Security tells me about the radiation scanners? Personally, No! Can you image a business man or woman who has to fly each and every day because of their employment and these people going through these super body scanners at least twice a day, too and from work, five or six days a week? What will be the long term effects of that radiation exposure on those business travelers? Can the government tell you with "medical certainty" that long exposure to the radiation from the body scans will not harm you? I doubt it!
While you're thinking about that I want you to remember that no airline pilot will have to be concerned about those health risks and our lawmakers in Washington, D.C. also exempted themselves from any health dangers.
Obama says that he understands the furor over the screenings and said he relies on the advice of his counter terrorism team to advise him as to when he can alter or change the intrusive procedures. That's nice. He doesn't have to expose himself or his daughters or spouse to these humiliating and intimidating security checks so he really has no understanding of the situation. I would suggest that his counter terrorism team and his advisor' s want to look good in his eyes so they feed him misinformation to justify their position and employment.
Fact is, at what point do these rubber gloved strangers stop harassing the disabled in wheelchairs, the elderly and the young fresh-faced high school and college kids and use common sense and competent judgment when it come to choosing who might be a clear and present danger and whom to search. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to make a reasonable evaluation that an 80 year old senior citizen in a wheelchair or a high school or college student wearing flip flops and shorts is not a mass murderer or bomber. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
________________
LAS VEGAS-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
I was asked to respond to the controversy surrounding the TSA and it's enhanced security measures. Yes, I believe they are very intrusive and further believe that if they are challenged in court they will be found to be unconstitutional.
FIRST, lets talk about PAT DOWNS: Some of my objections to these new measure are that the aggressive pat downs by TSA personnel violates one's privacy rights. I am not a lawyer but in my opinion I would submit that if any other person other than these TSA government employee's put their hands on another person as these employees are currently doing they would immediately be arrested for but not limited to such things as: physical assault, battery, sexual assault, sexual perversion, and the list could go on, and on.
No prudent married man would want anyone groping, touching and feeling his wife or his daughter or son in this gross, inappropriate manner. And that goes for President Obama. Oh, by the way,because of the recent complaints the incompetent Director of Homeland Security said that "children under 12 years old" will also be exempt from pat downs. Oh, Boy! Really? What about the 13 year old through 18 years old? Don't they deserve not to be felt up by strangers? Let's even go one further-what about those 18 year old through 30's something?
A SIDE NOTE:TSA just exempted airline pilots in uniform and those pilots who are off duty traveling on airline business from any pat downs and body scans. You can bet that all of those pilots out of uniform who are going to fly are going to claim they are on airline business.Also exempt--CONGRESS and the Washington LAWMAKERS. These idiots make laws that we have to abide by each and every day but they most always exempt themselves from these same laws. They refuse to abide by the laws they make for United States residents over and over again.
Why should Congress be treated differently than some 13 year old flying passenger? Based on the track record of some of these Congress people some have proven to be cheats, liars and corrupt individuals yet they cloak themselves in immunity from scrutiny while at the same time implying that the young child or senior citizen cannot be trusted. That is hypocrisy in its highest form.
EXAMPLE-CITE: House Republican Leader, John Boehner who recently had occasion to fly was permitted to bypass both the "body Scan and the aggressive pat down." The TSA employees walked him around both security measures. Fair? No Way! But it is happening everyday. Politicians,lawmakers and alleged movers and shakers in this country fail to abide by the laws they impose on everyone else.
Here's a story to consider: Lets look at one recent case of TSA patting down a flying traveler. Let's call the lady LOIS. At the airport Lois went through the body scanner and the TSA agent saw something he/she could not understand so Lois was told to submit to a pat down. She was taken to a secluded area and was patted down with the "aggressive techniques." The agent ran her hands up the woman's legs, between her crotch and around her private areas. The agent then ran their hands around Lois's breasts and felt something. Lois told the TSA agent that she had breast surgery and that she wore a prosthetic. The agent told her to take off her blouse, Lois complied and removed the blouse. Again, Lois said that she was wearing a prosthetic because of the breast surgery. The TSA agent still was not satisfied and told Lois to remove the prosthetic. Lois was surprised at the request but was also frightened following the very intrusive pat down and again, complied with the TSA agents instructions.
My thoughts regarding Lois - - this TSA federal employee clearly over stepped his/her bounds. This agents need to exert what little power they possess to show they can do what they want is ridiculous. No one was there to supervise the agent or tell that agent not to do what they did. There was no video monitoring anywhere in the room so that what I would describe as -(assault, both physical and mental)could be documented for Lois's protection.
Here's one thought: The government has dogs that can sniff out, drugs, weapons, chemicals and liquids, etc. - - There are also dogs that are trained and being used here in the United States to sniff out various diseases that a person may have. Dogs have been used to detect such things as diabetes, kidney disease, cancer(s) (i.e.) prostate. There is a dog that can sniff anyone or anything for most items,products and chemicals on the market today. Using the dogs and the present technology to scan for explosives, weapons and chemicals there should be no reason to institute these high risk body scans or aggressive pat downs on people. I submit that with the metal detector walk through by travelers, the scans of the carry on baggage and checked luggage,and use of dogs for the various liquids, chemicals, powders, etc., that should suffice. Naturally, if a person looks suspicious or fits a profile they should be asked to go to another area and be interviewed more thoroughly.
Suggestion: If these invasive, aggressive body pat downs continue they should only be made by: a medical doctor or physicians assistant. The only other persons that should be able to touch another persons body or feel and touch in and around an individuals private parts is a health professional in the privacy of an examination room. That is how it has been since the beginning of time and that relationship should still be held inviolate. I would say that any reasonable person only trusts themselves and a doctor to feel, touch, probe, their body parts and/or their family members body.
SECOND:- Lets talk about the intrusive Body Scans: Are they radiation driven? Yes, they are. Should people be exposed to radiation? My opinion, No! Folks, one CAT scan, only ONE,is equivalent to THIRTY (30) dental x-rays. Radiation builds up in one's body.Radiation causes cancer just to mention one disease let alone all the other possible side effects radiation may incur on one's body. Again, my opinion is that radiation "kills!" People, there have been controversial studies that even the slight radiation from one's cell phone may be very detrimental to a person's body and health. It has even been suggested that the small amounts of radiation from that cell phone use may even cause cancer of the brain to some extent.
The Director of Home Land Security and the government lapdogs that have an agenda tell us citizens that the amount of radiation given off by these super body scanners is very low dose and does not harm the body of the traveler. Do you trust governments reports and believe everything the government tells you?
In the past the government told us there was no dangerous arsenic, mercury, pesticides and other chemical levels in the water we drink.Guess what, the pollutants in the water are changing male fish and frogs into the female gender even changing their genitalia They have told us that certain medications were not harmful to us yet look at the medications constantly being pulled off of the market on a daily basis for killing people.
Reports,promises and assurances put out by the government in most every area of life often have proven to be false, misleading and outright lies. So, my question: If the government has been predisposed to put out false and misleading or inaccurate information in the past what makes you believe that any new reports or pronouncements by government officials will be reliable and honest?
There have been instances where the government have had their experts change official reports to fit their political agenda (i.e)for one, climate change. There are numerous other examples where government reports have been skewed or altered, especially in the scientific field of study.
Do I trust what the Director of Homeland Security tells me about the radiation scanners? Personally, No! Can you image a business man or woman who has to fly each and every day because of their employment and these people going through these super body scanners at least twice a day, too and from work, five or six days a week? What will be the long term effects of that radiation exposure on those business travelers? Can the government tell you with "medical certainty" that long exposure to the radiation from the body scans will not harm you? I doubt it!
While you're thinking about that I want you to remember that no airline pilot will have to be concerned about those health risks and our lawmakers in Washington, D.C. also exempted themselves from any health dangers.
Obama says that he understands the furor over the screenings and said he relies on the advice of his counter terrorism team to advise him as to when he can alter or change the intrusive procedures. That's nice. He doesn't have to expose himself or his daughters or spouse to these humiliating and intimidating security checks so he really has no understanding of the situation. I would suggest that his counter terrorism team and his advisor' s want to look good in his eyes so they feed him misinformation to justify their position and employment.
Fact is, at what point do these rubber gloved strangers stop harassing the disabled in wheelchairs, the elderly and the young fresh-faced high school and college kids and use common sense and competent judgment when it come to choosing who might be a clear and present danger and whom to search. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to make a reasonable evaluation that an 80 year old senior citizen in a wheelchair or a high school or college student wearing flip flops and shorts is not a mass murderer or bomber. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Here Is Your Tip For Overeating: Hope It Helps
THE DOCTOR IS IN
_________________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
To Kayleen: You asked me how you can avoid over eating in an attempt to shed a few pounds. here is one tip related to your inquiry.Give it a try.
If you are going to eat a full meal within and hour-eat one apple. If your meal is two hours away, eat an apple with a spoon of peanut butter. You can spread the peanut butter on the apple if you wish. If your full meal is scheduled three hours away, eat the apple and peanut butter and add two whole grain crackers.
Kayleen, this will help you to eat less when you sit for the full meal.This pre-meal hint has protein and a multitude of vitamins and it will satisfy your cravings and will in all likelihood allow you to eat less during the full meal. Benefit: - you may even begin to drop a few of those extra pounds you were worried about. Good luck. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
_________________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
To Kayleen: You asked me how you can avoid over eating in an attempt to shed a few pounds. here is one tip related to your inquiry.Give it a try.
If you are going to eat a full meal within and hour-eat one apple. If your meal is two hours away, eat an apple with a spoon of peanut butter. You can spread the peanut butter on the apple if you wish. If your full meal is scheduled three hours away, eat the apple and peanut butter and add two whole grain crackers.
Kayleen, this will help you to eat less when you sit for the full meal.This pre-meal hint has protein and a multitude of vitamins and it will satisfy your cravings and will in all likelihood allow you to eat less during the full meal. Benefit: - you may even begin to drop a few of those extra pounds you were worried about. Good luck. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Saturday, November 20, 2010
Charles Rangel:Avoids Prison-Wesley Snipes Goes To Prison: Justice Isn't Served
THE DOCTOR IS IN
________________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Lawmaker Charles Rangel,D-NY apologizes and pleads for mercy.The Ethics Committee only censured him. Wow! That's it?
Here's a man that skipped out on his taxes and failed to pay them for 17 YEARS. And this guy worked the tax Ways and Means committees in Washington D.C. for years yet he claims ignorance of the tax laws.
Rangel blubbers before the committee and pleads for mercy telling them he is not a corrupt politician but I submit that anyone that fails to pay their taxes for 17 years is a corrupt person. He shortchanged the IRS on rental income from a villa in the Dominican Republic and he also solicited donors for the Charles B. Rangel Center at City College, New York. Corrupt! You bet.
A 20 term politician like Rangel makes a good case for "term limits." These lawmakers go to Washington and most all fall into the deep, dark hole of corruption. If the lawmakers only had two terms that wouldn't allow them to become entrenched in the slime and sleaze that is prevalent in Washington.Changing politicians after two terms would bring new blood into the mix and allow Congress to move forward instead of constant gridlock.
My feeling is that when these Washington lawmakers commit a crime they should be punished and Rangel should have been expelled and sent to prison.
If you or I, or any person other than a member of Congress failed to pay our taxes for even ONE year the IRS would be all over us.They would seize and freeze bank accounts, salaries, and any assets until they got their money. It happens everyday across this country. BUT, a Washington lawmaker, a member of Congress - - guess what? A free pass.
A related case: Just reported by the (Associated Press) - Movie actor Wesley Snipes is ordered to surrender in his tax case. A federal judge said "time has come for the judgment to be enforced." Snipes was sentenced to spend (three years) in prison. The actor remained out of prison while appealing his conviction. Now he has to do the time. The 48 year old star was convicted in 2008 on three misdemeanor counts of willful failure to file his income tax returns. He was acquitted of two more serious felony charges.
So,let's recap: Snipes gets 3 years in prison for three misdemeanor counts of failure to file his income taxes and Rangle, a pampered politician, who failed be honest on his tax forms and lied to the IRS to evade taxes for SEVENTEEN YEARS skates away clean.
Snipes deserves to go to jail for his crimes. Rightly so. But, this corrupt lawmaker Rangle should have to abide by the same laws as the rest of us in the United States and he should have to spend time in prison also. And, if justice was fair, he would be sentenced to many more years in prison than Snipes.
It makes one wonder: If this guy has been failing to pay his taxes for SEVENTEEN YEARS and using monies to promote his own image and stature with his name on buildings, what else has he done that was possibly illegal while being a lawmaker for over 50 years?
The Washington establishment protects it's own and always will. The Ethics Committee proved that point once again. What illegal act does it take to give these guys or gals their walking papers or prison time? - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
________________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Lawmaker Charles Rangel,D-NY apologizes and pleads for mercy.The Ethics Committee only censured him. Wow! That's it?
Here's a man that skipped out on his taxes and failed to pay them for 17 YEARS. And this guy worked the tax Ways and Means committees in Washington D.C. for years yet he claims ignorance of the tax laws.
Rangel blubbers before the committee and pleads for mercy telling them he is not a corrupt politician but I submit that anyone that fails to pay their taxes for 17 years is a corrupt person. He shortchanged the IRS on rental income from a villa in the Dominican Republic and he also solicited donors for the Charles B. Rangel Center at City College, New York. Corrupt! You bet.
A 20 term politician like Rangel makes a good case for "term limits." These lawmakers go to Washington and most all fall into the deep, dark hole of corruption. If the lawmakers only had two terms that wouldn't allow them to become entrenched in the slime and sleaze that is prevalent in Washington.Changing politicians after two terms would bring new blood into the mix and allow Congress to move forward instead of constant gridlock.
My feeling is that when these Washington lawmakers commit a crime they should be punished and Rangel should have been expelled and sent to prison.
If you or I, or any person other than a member of Congress failed to pay our taxes for even ONE year the IRS would be all over us.They would seize and freeze bank accounts, salaries, and any assets until they got their money. It happens everyday across this country. BUT, a Washington lawmaker, a member of Congress - - guess what? A free pass.
A related case: Just reported by the (Associated Press) - Movie actor Wesley Snipes is ordered to surrender in his tax case. A federal judge said "time has come for the judgment to be enforced." Snipes was sentenced to spend (three years) in prison. The actor remained out of prison while appealing his conviction. Now he has to do the time. The 48 year old star was convicted in 2008 on three misdemeanor counts of willful failure to file his income tax returns. He was acquitted of two more serious felony charges.
So,let's recap: Snipes gets 3 years in prison for three misdemeanor counts of failure to file his income taxes and Rangle, a pampered politician, who failed be honest on his tax forms and lied to the IRS to evade taxes for SEVENTEEN YEARS skates away clean.
Snipes deserves to go to jail for his crimes. Rightly so. But, this corrupt lawmaker Rangle should have to abide by the same laws as the rest of us in the United States and he should have to spend time in prison also. And, if justice was fair, he would be sentenced to many more years in prison than Snipes.
It makes one wonder: If this guy has been failing to pay his taxes for SEVENTEEN YEARS and using monies to promote his own image and stature with his name on buildings, what else has he done that was possibly illegal while being a lawmaker for over 50 years?
The Washington establishment protects it's own and always will. The Ethics Committee proved that point once again. What illegal act does it take to give these guys or gals their walking papers or prison time? - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Legalize Marijuana- Make Billions In Tax Revenue-Stop Drug Cartels
THE DOCTOR IS IN
________________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Recently federal investigators seized 20 tons of marijuana in San Diego, California. This is nothing new. This same scenario is being played out across this country each and every day. We taxpayers are subsidizing law enforcement, ICE, DEA, and the judicial system to the tune of billions of dollars a year fighting "illegal drugs." We have been and are losing the drug war. People, we are throwing goods money after bad. Those billions of dollars we are spending each year to fight this losing war should and could be used to bolster this economy and create job opportunities for the middle class workers. The battle cry should be "LEGALIZE MARIJUANA", and I mean for everyday use like alcohol and cigarettes. It should not be limited to only medical use.
Legalization of marijuana has been on a number of ballot measures over the years and a number of states have passed the laws allowing marijuana use for "medical purposes", the most recent state was Arizona. Arizona was the 15th. state to allow the "medical marijuana" law on their books.
A very good hard scientific study just released said that "legal alcohol" is the most harmful drug available world-wide. In fact, the study said that alcohol is more dangerous that heroin and cocaine. Marijuana has been declared to be so "innocuous and relatively safe" it hardly registered in the clinical, scientific studies.
When the voters vote down these legalize marijuana ballot measures they are giving the drug cartels a win.
Folks,seventy-three (73%)percent of all illegal drugs coming into the United States is marijuana. I would suggest that all marijuana use become legal. It could be taxed and the states and Feds could see billions of dollars in tax revenues each year in their coffers.
The states and Feds are spending our tax dollars locking up prisoners everyday relating to marijuana charges costing us millions of dollars a year. We taxpayers could save the billions of dollars which are being spent on law enforcement in an attempt to stop marijuana drug distribution.
I maintain that if marijuana use was legalized and regulated it would provide much needed revenue for the government and states. It would stop the billions of dollars currently being spent to interdict marijuana shipments and use. Law enforcement could then concentrate its resources on the heroin, cocaine and all of the other illegal drugs that are killing our people.
The legalizing and taxing of marijuana would immediately stop the majority of these drug cartels using murder and kidnapping as an excuse to make money. With marijuana being legalized there would be no profit or incentive for the drug cartels to make money from it. The act of legalizing marijuana would be a big hit in the pocket of all the drug cartels operating in and outside the United States.
I would suggest-let the states set the tax on the marijuana sales, not the local government. Let the Feds regulate marijuana and get a big piece of the tax action.
With 70% of all of the illegal drugs being brought into the USA being marijuana and that marijuana is being legalized and taxed it doesn't take much of a math genius to see the advantages of the legalization of marijuana. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
________________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Recently federal investigators seized 20 tons of marijuana in San Diego, California. This is nothing new. This same scenario is being played out across this country each and every day. We taxpayers are subsidizing law enforcement, ICE, DEA, and the judicial system to the tune of billions of dollars a year fighting "illegal drugs." We have been and are losing the drug war. People, we are throwing goods money after bad. Those billions of dollars we are spending each year to fight this losing war should and could be used to bolster this economy and create job opportunities for the middle class workers. The battle cry should be "LEGALIZE MARIJUANA", and I mean for everyday use like alcohol and cigarettes. It should not be limited to only medical use.
Legalization of marijuana has been on a number of ballot measures over the years and a number of states have passed the laws allowing marijuana use for "medical purposes", the most recent state was Arizona. Arizona was the 15th. state to allow the "medical marijuana" law on their books.
A very good hard scientific study just released said that "legal alcohol" is the most harmful drug available world-wide. In fact, the study said that alcohol is more dangerous that heroin and cocaine. Marijuana has been declared to be so "innocuous and relatively safe" it hardly registered in the clinical, scientific studies.
When the voters vote down these legalize marijuana ballot measures they are giving the drug cartels a win.
Folks,seventy-three (73%)percent of all illegal drugs coming into the United States is marijuana. I would suggest that all marijuana use become legal. It could be taxed and the states and Feds could see billions of dollars in tax revenues each year in their coffers.
The states and Feds are spending our tax dollars locking up prisoners everyday relating to marijuana charges costing us millions of dollars a year. We taxpayers could save the billions of dollars which are being spent on law enforcement in an attempt to stop marijuana drug distribution.
I maintain that if marijuana use was legalized and regulated it would provide much needed revenue for the government and states. It would stop the billions of dollars currently being spent to interdict marijuana shipments and use. Law enforcement could then concentrate its resources on the heroin, cocaine and all of the other illegal drugs that are killing our people.
The legalizing and taxing of marijuana would immediately stop the majority of these drug cartels using murder and kidnapping as an excuse to make money. With marijuana being legalized there would be no profit or incentive for the drug cartels to make money from it. The act of legalizing marijuana would be a big hit in the pocket of all the drug cartels operating in and outside the United States.
I would suggest-let the states set the tax on the marijuana sales, not the local government. Let the Feds regulate marijuana and get a big piece of the tax action.
With 70% of all of the illegal drugs being brought into the USA being marijuana and that marijuana is being legalized and taxed it doesn't take much of a math genius to see the advantages of the legalization of marijuana. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Israel Will Only Negotiate Talks If They Get Paid Off-That's Sad
THE DOCTOR IS IN
________________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
United States diplomats brokered a deal with Israel to suspend settlements so peace talks can continue with the Palestinians. In other word bribe and buy Israel. The USA offered an incentive package to reinstate a moratorium on West Bank settlement building.
The deal is said to have Israel stop settlement construction for (90) days. Whoopee! Ninety days? That's nothing. What a joke. However the moratorium would not apply to East Jerusalem and the United States would not request that Israel extend the moratorium when it expires.
This bribe and give-a-way package includes the United States commitment to fight any international resolutions "critical" of Israel. The bribe and payoff doesn't stop there. Also included in the package is 20 stealth fighter jets to Israel.
Israel drew criticism from both the United States and the European Union after new construction plans for apartments.
So, let's recap: (a) Israel will not stop construction"unless" they get paid off. (b) Israel will only stop construction for only ninety (90) days after which they can resume. (c) Israel wants the United States to "fight" any and all international resolutions critical of Israel. What? They do not want anyone or any country to criticize their country? Boo Hoo! Cry, cry!
The USA and Europe have already shown their anger over Israels tactics of delay, instigation,excuses and stalling to move any peace talks forward in an honest, forthright manner. Netanyahu and his colleagues have been finding ways to put a damper on any Mideast peace agreement for years.No wonder Israel wants the United States to "fight" any criticism of their country or tactics.
The sad part of these Mideast negotiations is that the USA has to "pay off" Israel, and for that matter, any country to have them negotiate diplomatically.What we have here in this case is not diplomacy but instead, extortion and bribery.
These peace talks have been ongoing for decade after decade. If the United States and the world really wanted to resolve this matter the answer is UN troops. Set the property line and borders for each of these countries to exist and enforce it. The world had no problem of intervening and using UN troops in other countries around the world to stop the warring factions and ethnic and occupation conflicts. Why should Israel be any different? My answer, it shouldn't.
The world should stop walking on eggs when dealing with Israel and put their foot down and insist that a two state solution is viable and tell Israel in no uncertain terms that a two state solution will be a mandate of the world community and will be enforced by UN troops and military force, if necessary.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
________________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
United States diplomats brokered a deal with Israel to suspend settlements so peace talks can continue with the Palestinians. In other word bribe and buy Israel. The USA offered an incentive package to reinstate a moratorium on West Bank settlement building.
The deal is said to have Israel stop settlement construction for (90) days. Whoopee! Ninety days? That's nothing. What a joke. However the moratorium would not apply to East Jerusalem and the United States would not request that Israel extend the moratorium when it expires.
This bribe and give-a-way package includes the United States commitment to fight any international resolutions "critical" of Israel. The bribe and payoff doesn't stop there. Also included in the package is 20 stealth fighter jets to Israel.
Israel drew criticism from both the United States and the European Union after new construction plans for apartments.
So, let's recap: (a) Israel will not stop construction"unless" they get paid off. (b) Israel will only stop construction for only ninety (90) days after which they can resume. (c) Israel wants the United States to "fight" any and all international resolutions critical of Israel. What? They do not want anyone or any country to criticize their country? Boo Hoo! Cry, cry!
The USA and Europe have already shown their anger over Israels tactics of delay, instigation,excuses and stalling to move any peace talks forward in an honest, forthright manner. Netanyahu and his colleagues have been finding ways to put a damper on any Mideast peace agreement for years.No wonder Israel wants the United States to "fight" any criticism of their country or tactics.
The sad part of these Mideast negotiations is that the USA has to "pay off" Israel, and for that matter, any country to have them negotiate diplomatically.What we have here in this case is not diplomacy but instead, extortion and bribery.
These peace talks have been ongoing for decade after decade. If the United States and the world really wanted to resolve this matter the answer is UN troops. Set the property line and borders for each of these countries to exist and enforce it. The world had no problem of intervening and using UN troops in other countries around the world to stop the warring factions and ethnic and occupation conflicts. Why should Israel be any different? My answer, it shouldn't.
The world should stop walking on eggs when dealing with Israel and put their foot down and insist that a two state solution is viable and tell Israel in no uncertain terms that a two state solution will be a mandate of the world community and will be enforced by UN troops and military force, if necessary.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Gasoline Prices At Pump: Up, Up and Away-Again
THE DOCTOR IS IN
__________________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Here we go again! Gas prices exploding out of sight. It's pushing $3.00 a gallon. Our government officials must have promised big oil something when they were discussing the Gulf Oil spill. Secret negotiations occur quite frequently among lawmakers and the financial titans running this country.
I would think that with the Mid-Term elections going on and all of the negative political ads and this "Great Recession" both the government and Big Oil actually believed that no one would be watching as the price per gallon inched up.
It has always been a ploy of the government and Big Oil to raise the price of a gallon of gas but when complaints arose they would drop the price of a gallon by a penny or two but that would leave the price per gallon at a new high as its new "low" base.
The oil companies and government have been playing this game for years. Cost of a gallon years ago, (i.e.), $1.50, they raise it to $2.00 a gallon, people complain, they drop the price one or two cents, now the gas base line is hovering at $2.00, and they pull the same thing six months down the road. Now gas is a base of $2.50 a gallon, etc., etc., etc.--.
This game goes on and on until the oil companies and big government have us paying a base price of $3.00 per gallon. We are there now . . . and I predict that a gallon of gas will continue to go up because the collusion of government and big oil want us taxpayers to pay $5.00+ a gallon, as a starting point.
How many times do we have to have the "dog and pony" show of our Congress questioning Big Oil and playing to the cameras? Those question and answer sessions never hold Big Oil accountable. Why? Money from Big Oil goes into the pockets of those same Congress people pretending to hold Big Oil accountable.
Lets hold these lawmakers responsible for allowing gasoline prices to rise and rise again, over and over. We have to get on the politicians case and demand lower gasoline prices at the pump. One of my views is that: We taxpayers here in America should not be paying more than $2.00 a gallon for gasoline.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley Kuhns, Ph.D.,O.M.D.
___________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
__________________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Here we go again! Gas prices exploding out of sight. It's pushing $3.00 a gallon. Our government officials must have promised big oil something when they were discussing the Gulf Oil spill. Secret negotiations occur quite frequently among lawmakers and the financial titans running this country.
I would think that with the Mid-Term elections going on and all of the negative political ads and this "Great Recession" both the government and Big Oil actually believed that no one would be watching as the price per gallon inched up.
It has always been a ploy of the government and Big Oil to raise the price of a gallon of gas but when complaints arose they would drop the price of a gallon by a penny or two but that would leave the price per gallon at a new high as its new "low" base.
The oil companies and government have been playing this game for years. Cost of a gallon years ago, (i.e.), $1.50, they raise it to $2.00 a gallon, people complain, they drop the price one or two cents, now the gas base line is hovering at $2.00, and they pull the same thing six months down the road. Now gas is a base of $2.50 a gallon, etc., etc., etc.--.
This game goes on and on until the oil companies and big government have us paying a base price of $3.00 per gallon. We are there now . . . and I predict that a gallon of gas will continue to go up because the collusion of government and big oil want us taxpayers to pay $5.00+ a gallon, as a starting point.
How many times do we have to have the "dog and pony" show of our Congress questioning Big Oil and playing to the cameras? Those question and answer sessions never hold Big Oil accountable. Why? Money from Big Oil goes into the pockets of those same Congress people pretending to hold Big Oil accountable.
Lets hold these lawmakers responsible for allowing gasoline prices to rise and rise again, over and over. We have to get on the politicians case and demand lower gasoline prices at the pump. One of my views is that: We taxpayers here in America should not be paying more than $2.00 a gallon for gasoline.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley Kuhns, Ph.D.,O.M.D.
___________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Pigford vs. Glickman: Obama, Sherrod $1.25 Billion Fraud:
THE DOCTOR IS IN
________________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The following legal case was researched by a number of individuals and portions of it was released on the web off and on. Here is my views on this matter.
Case: "Pigford vs. Glickman": In 1999 a small group of black farmers (400) won the case. Basically, in 1997, this small group of black farmers sued the United States Department of Agriculture. They alleged that they were treated unfairly and were denied USDA loans because of racial discrimination during the periods of 1983 and 1997.
These 400 black farmers won their case and the government agreed to pay each black farmer as much as $50,000.00 to settle their claims.
BUT, something sneaky and covertly happened regarding the "original" judgment and award. On February 23, 2010, under a cloak of darkness and cone of silence, the USDA agreed to release more funds to "Pigford". How much more? Are you ready? A whopping . . . $1.25 billion.
You may ask, why so much. Here's why people. The initial 400 black farmer claimants group had mushroomed into a class action suit to include a total of, get this. . . (86,000) black farmers throughout this country.
Folks, we have a problem: The United States "does not" have, or ever had, 86,000 black farmers.
If any dumb government lawmaker. or anyone would read the very accurate "Official USDA 2007 Census materials that data would show that the total number of black farmers throughout this nation is only (39,697. And get this - - according to the "Official USDA 1992 Census data America only had (18,816) black farmers. Something smells like a kettle of bad fish, right?
What incompetent lawmaker(s) failed to ask: How did (39,697) black farmers morph into the blatant and outright fraudulent claims of (86,000) black farmers? Even more, why didn't even one politician or lawmaker question how an original judgment of $50,000.00 explode into the obscene sum of $1.25 "billion"?
Here's a clue people. One person is mostly responsible. Her name is SHIRLEY SHERROD. She was point person on this case only due to her position in 1997 while at the "Rural Development Leadership Network" and her family received the highest single payout. How much? Approximately $13 million) from those monies.
This woman allegedly exposed herself as the instigator of one of the largest fraud cases in the USA - - -a fraud allowed to occur only because she shouted and yelled racism at anyone and everyone she could in government and as usual, our governments political correct nanny lawmakers bowed and buckled to these outrageous demands by SHERROD.
And the tale gets even more weird. Ms. Sherrod let slip the name of the person who aid and abetted her in this racial discrimination fraud.
This fraud carried out against the American people originally had a judgment relating to "Pigford vs Glickman", in 1999, applied to only (16,000) black farmers.
However in 2008, there was a junior United States Senator who got a law passed to reopen the case and allow many more black farmers to sue the government for monies. Who was that Senator? The Senator was Barack Hussein Obama.
Remember, this law was passed in "secret" and because the woman responsible for pushing and acting as point person was an obscure USDA official (hardly anyone knew), all of us American taxpayers took another big hit and had no idea that we had been forced to pay out more than $1.25 billion to settle a questionable racial discrimination claim.
Currently Ms. Sherrod basically disappeared from the public eye.It's like she fell off of the planet. It appears she chose to go underground and remain silent - - -about this corruption. But with millions of dollars I would think anyone could buy a lot of privacy. Obama, the man who passed the law - - - he's now the nations leader. Wow!
I would say that even if a small part of the information relating to this case is found to be accurate the American people should demand explanations from Obama and the White House and insist that those involved in this massive fraud be held accountable for their actions.-And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuns@gmail.com
________________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The following legal case was researched by a number of individuals and portions of it was released on the web off and on. Here is my views on this matter.
Case: "Pigford vs. Glickman": In 1999 a small group of black farmers (400) won the case. Basically, in 1997, this small group of black farmers sued the United States Department of Agriculture. They alleged that they were treated unfairly and were denied USDA loans because of racial discrimination during the periods of 1983 and 1997.
These 400 black farmers won their case and the government agreed to pay each black farmer as much as $50,000.00 to settle their claims.
BUT, something sneaky and covertly happened regarding the "original" judgment and award. On February 23, 2010, under a cloak of darkness and cone of silence, the USDA agreed to release more funds to "Pigford". How much more? Are you ready? A whopping . . . $1.25 billion.
You may ask, why so much. Here's why people. The initial 400 black farmer claimants group had mushroomed into a class action suit to include a total of, get this. . . (86,000) black farmers throughout this country.
Folks, we have a problem: The United States "does not" have, or ever had, 86,000 black farmers.
If any dumb government lawmaker. or anyone would read the very accurate "Official USDA 2007 Census materials that data would show that the total number of black farmers throughout this nation is only (39,697. And get this - - according to the "Official USDA 1992 Census data America only had (18,816) black farmers. Something smells like a kettle of bad fish, right?
What incompetent lawmaker(s) failed to ask: How did (39,697) black farmers morph into the blatant and outright fraudulent claims of (86,000) black farmers? Even more, why didn't even one politician or lawmaker question how an original judgment of $50,000.00 explode into the obscene sum of $1.25 "billion"?
Here's a clue people. One person is mostly responsible. Her name is SHIRLEY SHERROD. She was point person on this case only due to her position in 1997 while at the "Rural Development Leadership Network" and her family received the highest single payout. How much? Approximately $13 million) from those monies.
This woman allegedly exposed herself as the instigator of one of the largest fraud cases in the USA - - -a fraud allowed to occur only because she shouted and yelled racism at anyone and everyone she could in government and as usual, our governments political correct nanny lawmakers bowed and buckled to these outrageous demands by SHERROD.
And the tale gets even more weird. Ms. Sherrod let slip the name of the person who aid and abetted her in this racial discrimination fraud.
This fraud carried out against the American people originally had a judgment relating to "Pigford vs Glickman", in 1999, applied to only (16,000) black farmers.
However in 2008, there was a junior United States Senator who got a law passed to reopen the case and allow many more black farmers to sue the government for monies. Who was that Senator? The Senator was Barack Hussein Obama.
Remember, this law was passed in "secret" and because the woman responsible for pushing and acting as point person was an obscure USDA official (hardly anyone knew), all of us American taxpayers took another big hit and had no idea that we had been forced to pay out more than $1.25 billion to settle a questionable racial discrimination claim.
Currently Ms. Sherrod basically disappeared from the public eye.It's like she fell off of the planet. It appears she chose to go underground and remain silent - - -about this corruption. But with millions of dollars I would think anyone could buy a lot of privacy. Obama, the man who passed the law - - - he's now the nations leader. Wow!
I would say that even if a small part of the information relating to this case is found to be accurate the American people should demand explanations from Obama and the White House and insist that those involved in this massive fraud be held accountable for their actions.-And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuns@gmail.com
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
CNN and Eliot Spitzer: Who Can Believe CNN Coverage Now ?
THE DOCTOR IS IN
________________
LAS VEGAS-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Can you believe it! Eliot Spitzer, a disgraced politician and lawyer gets a job on CNN television network. What's the world coming too?
An investigation into Spitzer's wrongful behavior began on or about March 10, 2008. Spitzer was lying and covering up his illegal activity, while holding public office for a long, long time. Here's a guy that secretly went to places in and out of the state to engage in illegal sex. He hired prostitutes at the Emperor's Club and paid thousands of dollars an hour for their services. He also used false identities to cover up his crimes.
His reward: land a job with his own show on CNN for big bucks.. My problem is understanding why a recognized network like CNN would even consider hiring someone, or for that fact "anyone" that has proved to the nation and the world that they clearly lied to colleagues, friends, family and law enforcement in the attempt to cover up their crimes.
When anyone uses a false identity and knowingly plans in advance to deceive and lie while committing a crime or any type of illegal activity, while holding public office is a person that cannot be trusted. Mr. Spitizer's credibility was "zero" the minute he got caught committing his crimes. He gives people still another reason why they should not trust lawyers, or the media.
How can anyone in this nation trust this man's analysis on anything, let alone, issues and topics relating to world news and political and/or legal opinions and general news of the day? If Spitzer was predisposed to plan out his illegal activities and knowingly lie and cover up his wrongdoing then, the odds are he will lie, deceive and utter false information when talking to the general public now.
How can television viewers believe this person? CNN just lost all credibility with me by hiring someone of Spitzer's character and reputation. I would submit that CNN should have let this man fade away and possibly seek employment in a profession far away from media exposure.If CNN wanted to hire another employee I would think that there are many honest, competent and qualified journalists and media people in this country that could do what Spitzer was hired to do. It makes one wonder what deals were made to have Spitzer represent CNN, and why.
Spitzer's employment on CNN is telling . . . the moral fabric of this nation has come undone and proves that the media will put themselves in the gutter for ratings or money, or both.
If I cannot get honest news, opinions and commentary from someone I can trust that particular network is clearly not worth watching.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
________________
LAS VEGAS-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Can you believe it! Eliot Spitzer, a disgraced politician and lawyer gets a job on CNN television network. What's the world coming too?
An investigation into Spitzer's wrongful behavior began on or about March 10, 2008. Spitzer was lying and covering up his illegal activity, while holding public office for a long, long time. Here's a guy that secretly went to places in and out of the state to engage in illegal sex. He hired prostitutes at the Emperor's Club and paid thousands of dollars an hour for their services. He also used false identities to cover up his crimes.
His reward: land a job with his own show on CNN for big bucks.. My problem is understanding why a recognized network like CNN would even consider hiring someone, or for that fact "anyone" that has proved to the nation and the world that they clearly lied to colleagues, friends, family and law enforcement in the attempt to cover up their crimes.
When anyone uses a false identity and knowingly plans in advance to deceive and lie while committing a crime or any type of illegal activity, while holding public office is a person that cannot be trusted. Mr. Spitizer's credibility was "zero" the minute he got caught committing his crimes. He gives people still another reason why they should not trust lawyers, or the media.
How can anyone in this nation trust this man's analysis on anything, let alone, issues and topics relating to world news and political and/or legal opinions and general news of the day? If Spitzer was predisposed to plan out his illegal activities and knowingly lie and cover up his wrongdoing then, the odds are he will lie, deceive and utter false information when talking to the general public now.
How can television viewers believe this person? CNN just lost all credibility with me by hiring someone of Spitzer's character and reputation. I would submit that CNN should have let this man fade away and possibly seek employment in a profession far away from media exposure.If CNN wanted to hire another employee I would think that there are many honest, competent and qualified journalists and media people in this country that could do what Spitzer was hired to do. It makes one wonder what deals were made to have Spitzer represent CNN, and why.
Spitzer's employment on CNN is telling . . . the moral fabric of this nation has come undone and proves that the media will put themselves in the gutter for ratings or money, or both.
If I cannot get honest news, opinions and commentary from someone I can trust that particular network is clearly not worth watching.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Sunday, November 7, 2010
The Obama's and Congress Just Don't Get It
THE DOCTOR IS IN
________________
LAS VEGAS
Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Congress gone mad! They approve President Obama's wishes for his party time antics around the world.
Some of this particular information was gathered by searching the web and from receiving e-mails from around the country. I would like to acknowledge and credit all of those persons for their input regarding this issue.
OBAMA and FAMILY TRIP TO INDIA: Included, Obama family and 2000 or more of their friends and staff.
WHEN: Immediately following the Mid-Term elections.
COST OF TRIP: Nearly half a billion dollars. LENGTH OF TRIP: 2-3 days.
INDIA and ASIA TRIP: Was unscheduled.---
PERSONAL NOTE REGARDING THE INDIA/ASIA TRIP: I submit Obama didn't want to face the enormous losses the Democratic party experienced in the Mid-Term election.
INDIA TRIP INFO: The Obama family booked 600 rooms at the elegant/lavish Five (5) Star TAJ MAHAL HOTEL. Note: This hotel is the most expensive hotel in all of India. The Obama's have reserved "all" of the banquet rooms and "all" of the restaurants for their traveling party people's needs.
INDIA TRIP INFO-#2: Besides taking over the entire TAJ MAHAL HOTEL, they also secured 125 rooms at the very prestigious TAJ PRESIDENTE HOTEL, and 200 rooms at the OBEROI HOTEL and the GRAND HYATT for many in the Obama team.
TRANSPORTATION FOR INDIA TRIP: Both Air Force One planes will be used, PLUS, two (2) jumbo jets and 24 military aircraft, PLUS, a number of U.S. fighter planes to fly escort for Obama's "circus" entourage.
OBAMA NEEDS:
1. President Obama is very, very, dependent on teleprompters to deliver his words of wisdom He is known to use these teleprompters for all of his public comments and speeches no matter how small. So, there will be approximately ten (10) teleprompters traveling with the Prezz, while visiting India. It's said that India does not have teleprompters. Who knows?
2. 48 cars are being transported to India for the Obama's and his flying circus team mates. PLUS, all presidential limos will be sent to India also.
3. The Obama's choice of hotels are by the seashore so the U.S. Navy will dispatch a number of vessels to patrol the India coastline for 200 miles each way.
4. Obama and his administration has booked the entire "INDIA NATIONAL CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS so that they can entertain their party guests that came along for the ride and so they can host their guests representing the Indian government.
5.Obama's got their own personal chef's and the chef's staff to go on the trip to India so as to ensure their food is "safe."
6. Mrs. Obama commanded that a full hair and make-up staff continually be available for her at her beckoned call.
6. Security? The security detail is so voluminous the estimate of the cost cannot be determined at this writing. NOTE: The trip was put together so quickly that the security costs will be at a premium with thousands working this Obama party get-a-way.NOTE: Mrs. Obama said she wanted to meet with prostitutes and other sex workers in the most sleazy and dangerous parts of Mumbai. Result, the security costs just for this part of Obama protection will be out of this world.
While the Obama caravan travels in Mumbai, which has the worst traffic jams in the world you can bet that the Obama vehicles will cause havoc and disruption while causing inconvenience to the working people, who by the way, are some of the poorest people in the world. Basically the entire city of Mumbai will be locked and shut down for President and Mrs. Obama.
India, of all places to run away to, especially when the voters in the United States are concerned about jobs and the unemployment numbers. Hell, India is the "outsource" capitol of the world. American jobs are being outsourced to them on a daily basis. It is the worlds answering service "ground zero." India,the country that takes away more jobs from the USA work force than most any other country in the world.. Yet, Obama chooses to promote more jobs for India? Where is this guys mindset? The guy must have "brain fatigue." Obama seems to be tone deal. He didn't hear a word the voters have said.
I would predict that this election dodging trip, a TWO DAY, maybe THREE DAY trip, will go down in history as one of the most expensive ever taken. I would also predict that this Obama visit to India will surpass President Bill Clinton's trip to Africa in 1998. That trip was estimated at $450 million dollars, or more. No official figured have ever been released.
Talking about the Clinton's, Mrs Clinton and daughter Chelsea took a tour of India in 1996 and the Secret Service said that it was a logistical nightmare. I have to say that the Clinton's set records for their travel both inside and outside the United States by any president.Regardless, even with all of that and the Obama's knowing what the Clinton's spent on their travels they still chose to take a Mid-Term vacation and run away from the voters.
OBAMA TRIVIA: The Obama's have taken more vacations in approximately 22 months than "any" presidential family in history.It is rumored and floated around Washington, D.C. that the Obama's actually hate Camp David. It is a rustic, relaxing compound outside of Washington, D.C. and even though most each and every president has written how much they enjoyed Camp David, a special private retreat, the Obama family choose to travel outside Washington, D.C., and globe hop around the world, spending our taxpayer monies in a willy-nilly manner. That to me, is outrageous. These Obama trips and spending sprees are beyond the pale and yet, CONGRESS continues to fund these party packs.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
________________
LAS VEGAS
Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Congress gone mad! They approve President Obama's wishes for his party time antics around the world.
Some of this particular information was gathered by searching the web and from receiving e-mails from around the country. I would like to acknowledge and credit all of those persons for their input regarding this issue.
OBAMA and FAMILY TRIP TO INDIA: Included, Obama family and 2000 or more of their friends and staff.
WHEN: Immediately following the Mid-Term elections.
COST OF TRIP: Nearly half a billion dollars. LENGTH OF TRIP: 2-3 days.
INDIA and ASIA TRIP: Was unscheduled.---
PERSONAL NOTE REGARDING THE INDIA/ASIA TRIP: I submit Obama didn't want to face the enormous losses the Democratic party experienced in the Mid-Term election.
INDIA TRIP INFO: The Obama family booked 600 rooms at the elegant/lavish Five (5) Star TAJ MAHAL HOTEL. Note: This hotel is the most expensive hotel in all of India. The Obama's have reserved "all" of the banquet rooms and "all" of the restaurants for their traveling party people's needs.
INDIA TRIP INFO-#2: Besides taking over the entire TAJ MAHAL HOTEL, they also secured 125 rooms at the very prestigious TAJ PRESIDENTE HOTEL, and 200 rooms at the OBEROI HOTEL and the GRAND HYATT for many in the Obama team.
TRANSPORTATION FOR INDIA TRIP: Both Air Force One planes will be used, PLUS, two (2) jumbo jets and 24 military aircraft, PLUS, a number of U.S. fighter planes to fly escort for Obama's "circus" entourage.
OBAMA NEEDS:
1. President Obama is very, very, dependent on teleprompters to deliver his words of wisdom He is known to use these teleprompters for all of his public comments and speeches no matter how small. So, there will be approximately ten (10) teleprompters traveling with the Prezz, while visiting India. It's said that India does not have teleprompters. Who knows?
2. 48 cars are being transported to India for the Obama's and his flying circus team mates. PLUS, all presidential limos will be sent to India also.
3. The Obama's choice of hotels are by the seashore so the U.S. Navy will dispatch a number of vessels to patrol the India coastline for 200 miles each way.
4. Obama and his administration has booked the entire "INDIA NATIONAL CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS so that they can entertain their party guests that came along for the ride and so they can host their guests representing the Indian government.
5.Obama's got their own personal chef's and the chef's staff to go on the trip to India so as to ensure their food is "safe."
6. Mrs. Obama commanded that a full hair and make-up staff continually be available for her at her beckoned call.
6. Security? The security detail is so voluminous the estimate of the cost cannot be determined at this writing. NOTE: The trip was put together so quickly that the security costs will be at a premium with thousands working this Obama party get-a-way.NOTE: Mrs. Obama said she wanted to meet with prostitutes and other sex workers in the most sleazy and dangerous parts of Mumbai. Result, the security costs just for this part of Obama protection will be out of this world.
While the Obama caravan travels in Mumbai, which has the worst traffic jams in the world you can bet that the Obama vehicles will cause havoc and disruption while causing inconvenience to the working people, who by the way, are some of the poorest people in the world. Basically the entire city of Mumbai will be locked and shut down for President and Mrs. Obama.
India, of all places to run away to, especially when the voters in the United States are concerned about jobs and the unemployment numbers. Hell, India is the "outsource" capitol of the world. American jobs are being outsourced to them on a daily basis. It is the worlds answering service "ground zero." India,the country that takes away more jobs from the USA work force than most any other country in the world.. Yet, Obama chooses to promote more jobs for India? Where is this guys mindset? The guy must have "brain fatigue." Obama seems to be tone deal. He didn't hear a word the voters have said.
I would predict that this election dodging trip, a TWO DAY, maybe THREE DAY trip, will go down in history as one of the most expensive ever taken. I would also predict that this Obama visit to India will surpass President Bill Clinton's trip to Africa in 1998. That trip was estimated at $450 million dollars, or more. No official figured have ever been released.
Talking about the Clinton's, Mrs Clinton and daughter Chelsea took a tour of India in 1996 and the Secret Service said that it was a logistical nightmare. I have to say that the Clinton's set records for their travel both inside and outside the United States by any president.Regardless, even with all of that and the Obama's knowing what the Clinton's spent on their travels they still chose to take a Mid-Term vacation and run away from the voters.
OBAMA TRIVIA: The Obama's have taken more vacations in approximately 22 months than "any" presidential family in history.It is rumored and floated around Washington, D.C. that the Obama's actually hate Camp David. It is a rustic, relaxing compound outside of Washington, D.C. and even though most each and every president has written how much they enjoyed Camp David, a special private retreat, the Obama family choose to travel outside Washington, D.C., and globe hop around the world, spending our taxpayer monies in a willy-nilly manner. That to me, is outrageous. These Obama trips and spending sprees are beyond the pale and yet, CONGRESS continues to fund these party packs.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)