THE BLACKLIST TELEVISON SHOW-REVIEW
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you.?
Marilyn: from San Diego, CA asked me to watch and review the television show "BLACKLIST." I did just that. Marilyn, here is my take on the show - -
The pilot starring James Spader who plays Raymond "Red" Reddington" really carried the pilot show. As always he excelled in his part. The man has always performed well in most anything he takes on.
Megan Boone who plays Elizabeth Keene, a rookie FBI profiler did an adequate job but tends to over act. I think she trys to hard to come across.
The show has a great plot. Spader intends to assist the FBI in bringing down a list of super criminals so it appears there will be some interesting stories to come.
Bad news about the show? Yes, there is some bad news. The pilot was written by Joe Bokenkamp and directed by Joe Carnahan. Here's where I think the show falls down. There was one scene where Keene blasts into the room with Reddington and stabs him in the neck with a pen, pulling it out with blood on it and shouting she could kill him. Come on ! The reality ff that happening in real life with ANY suspect in an interrogation room by the FBI is about "zero."
Also, if Boone's character of Keene is going to be a half-crazed FBI person, loosing it at every turn - - that will get old fast. If Boone's character keeps coming off half-cocked with a hair trigger temper I think it will hurt the show.
The show needs better direction. From the git-go Keene takes charge , even though she is on the first day of her job (a rookie) and she is telling seasoned agents to put their guns away so she can jump in and handle the situation? The FBI is a team effort organization and it's ludicrous to have a new, rookie, first day on job runningb the show. I think there should have been more thought by th writers and directors to be more common sense and realistic.
We will have to see how future episodes unfold. Marilyn. But all in all the scenario of the show is a good one and Bader is excellent in the part. It really has the makings of becoming a good series. Writers and directors have to get real though and think it out before they put together some of the scenes. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W, Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Monday, September 30, 2013
Saturday, September 28, 2013
OBSCENE SALARIES IN THE ENTERTAINMENT BIZ? YOU BET.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Over blown salaries. It not only happens in the sports field but also in the entertainment field. Let me just refer to some. There are literally thousands of examples that could be cited but here are just a few to mull over. For example, This year Ashton Kutcher starring in TV's "Two and a Half Men" is currently being paid $750,000 an episode. Some actors and actresses appearing in the Law and Order television series, "Special Victims Unit are making $400,000 an episode. And lets not forget Judge Judy and her TV show. It is reported that she is earning an over the top salary of $14 Million dollars a year. WOW! Over paid people. I think so.
Just recently Britney Spears , the over the hill teeny-bopper, who lip syncs her songs and pretends to sing rather than display any real, raw vocal talent just signed on for a $30 MILLION two year stint at the Planet Hollywood Resort Casino earning a whopping $380,000 per show. Can you believe it? Just to have her walk and strut the stage with a group of back up dancers and the hotel/casino execs pay her over $300 grand a show. What the devil is the entertainment business coming to folks? I wonder how long it will take the casino people to realize that Spears show will in all likelihood "bomb" and self destruct.
These same casino/hotel executives are paying DJ's $500,000 for an appearance. What? These clowns show up with a flash drive full of music, plug it into a sound system inside the room and click the on switch and get paid $500,000. What a rip off. Christ, any teen age kid can do that with his or her iPod. Where is the DJ's talent? Nowhere. They have none. What does it take to use someone else's music and replay it from a flash drive?
As a side note - - What about all of these judges on the various talent shows like the "Voice", "America's Got Talent", "American Idol," etc. Come on people. Do you really think some of those so-called entertainers, or has been entertainers are worth the millions of dollars they are being paid?
Like the little lady in the TV commercial used to ask: Where's the beef? My question wold be - - Where's the TALENT? Lip syncing, pretend singers and people that play a flash drive full of music doesn't cut it with me.
In any event - -like many individuals in the sports industry who I think are grossly OVERPAID (for playing a game) people in the entertainment biz are OVER PAID.
Many of the suffering men and women across this nation who clock in and punch a time clock for a hard eight (8) hour day job , try to support a family and who try to make ends meet on $30,000 $50,000 a year, sometimes much less, see this gorging at the trough by these people and can't understand why there is such inequity and disparity. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Over blown salaries. It not only happens in the sports field but also in the entertainment field. Let me just refer to some. There are literally thousands of examples that could be cited but here are just a few to mull over. For example, This year Ashton Kutcher starring in TV's "Two and a Half Men" is currently being paid $750,000 an episode. Some actors and actresses appearing in the Law and Order television series, "Special Victims Unit are making $400,000 an episode. And lets not forget Judge Judy and her TV show. It is reported that she is earning an over the top salary of $14 Million dollars a year. WOW! Over paid people. I think so.
Just recently Britney Spears , the over the hill teeny-bopper, who lip syncs her songs and pretends to sing rather than display any real, raw vocal talent just signed on for a $30 MILLION two year stint at the Planet Hollywood Resort Casino earning a whopping $380,000 per show. Can you believe it? Just to have her walk and strut the stage with a group of back up dancers and the hotel/casino execs pay her over $300 grand a show. What the devil is the entertainment business coming to folks? I wonder how long it will take the casino people to realize that Spears show will in all likelihood "bomb" and self destruct.
These same casino/hotel executives are paying DJ's $500,000 for an appearance. What? These clowns show up with a flash drive full of music, plug it into a sound system inside the room and click the on switch and get paid $500,000. What a rip off. Christ, any teen age kid can do that with his or her iPod. Where is the DJ's talent? Nowhere. They have none. What does it take to use someone else's music and replay it from a flash drive?
As a side note - - What about all of these judges on the various talent shows like the "Voice", "America's Got Talent", "American Idol," etc. Come on people. Do you really think some of those so-called entertainers, or has been entertainers are worth the millions of dollars they are being paid?
Like the little lady in the TV commercial used to ask: Where's the beef? My question wold be - - Where's the TALENT? Lip syncing, pretend singers and people that play a flash drive full of music doesn't cut it with me.
In any event - -like many individuals in the sports industry who I think are grossly OVERPAID (for playing a game) people in the entertainment biz are OVER PAID.
Many of the suffering men and women across this nation who clock in and punch a time clock for a hard eight (8) hour day job , try to support a family and who try to make ends meet on $30,000 $50,000 a year, sometimes much less, see this gorging at the trough by these people and can't understand why there is such inequity and disparity. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Monday, September 23, 2013
DISNEYLAND HAS TO INITIATE A "PROOF OF DISABILITY" POLICY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS CARDS. DISREGARD ALL THE SOB STORIES TO GET AT FRONT OF LINE.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Disneyland is trying to curb the abuse of waiting times for disabled people. They are doing the right thing, the right way. As they revamp their policy to have disabled people go straight to the front of the lines there are those people that are complaining about Disneyland's attempt to change the policy. There was one woman who said she takes her sons, ages 4 and 6 to Disneyland once a week. She said her sons have autism and can't stand in long lines longer than a "few minutes" before they start pushing other people. WOW! Now the advocacy group Autism Speaks consulted with Disney and they are clearly trying to sway opinion for autistic individuals. What about all the other disabled people that does not have autism?
First, let me say that the reason Disney is forced to re-evaluate their front of the line policy is because it has been USED and ABUSED by persons that are clearly not DISABLED. Disney's entire system trying to accommodate the disabled has been taken advantage of and torn apart.
Fact, there were so-called "disabled tour guides" taking people into the parks who charged money, sometimes hundreds of dollars, to accompany ABLE- BODIED (NON-DISABLED) people and allowed them to avoid waiting times. Other guests go to Disneyland and feign a disability Others who DO NOT have a disability have been able to get an assistance card. Why? because Disneyland had no PROOF OF DISABILITY requirement.
It's disgusting that when a lying, cheating, person sees a disabled person with a cane, in a wheelchair or another severe disability go to the front of the line and falsely lie and cheat and say they too have a disability in order to go to the front of the line.
Folks, it's because of these liars and cheats who abused the policy for years that caused Disneyland to re-evaluate it's policy and stop the people that pretend to be disabled from receiving a special access card to their attractions.
For those parents and families of children with epilepsy and autism who criticize Disneyland's decision to change the disabled access policy I say: Don't criticize and bad mount Disneyland - -blame the sleaze balls that are, and have been abusing the Disneyland system for years. I would say that just the massive volume of requests for special access passes has increased more and more each year, all because of FALSE, MADE UP DISABILITIES.
My suggestion to Disneyland and their officials. - - You will find every parent or family with a child that has epilepsy, autism or some other disability giving the park a sympathy story that THEIR child deserves a special access pass over every other child who is standing in line. Disneyland, you will hear heart wrenching stories and excuses why a particular child should have an access pass over others. Some parents cannot stand to see others go to the front of the line ahead of their child. They think that if one child can access to the front of the line their child should too.
Disneyland - - why don't you adopt a policy that requires the alleged disabled person to have a"disabled placard" which has to obtained from the state (like the disabled placard) similar to what licensed drivers) have? It takes a physcian to certify that a person is truly disabled before the person can acquire those disabled placards. Disneyland, you have to demand proof of disability before special access cards are issued to anyone.
People, fair is fair. Someone has to stand in line. Not everyone can jump to the front of the line. If the individual or child is truly disabled they should be happy to show proof of disability. Until Disneyland demands proof of disability there will always be those low-lifes that have been lying and cheating at Disneyland to do the same ol' thing. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D.. O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Disneyland is trying to curb the abuse of waiting times for disabled people. They are doing the right thing, the right way. As they revamp their policy to have disabled people go straight to the front of the lines there are those people that are complaining about Disneyland's attempt to change the policy. There was one woman who said she takes her sons, ages 4 and 6 to Disneyland once a week. She said her sons have autism and can't stand in long lines longer than a "few minutes" before they start pushing other people. WOW! Now the advocacy group Autism Speaks consulted with Disney and they are clearly trying to sway opinion for autistic individuals. What about all the other disabled people that does not have autism?
First, let me say that the reason Disney is forced to re-evaluate their front of the line policy is because it has been USED and ABUSED by persons that are clearly not DISABLED. Disney's entire system trying to accommodate the disabled has been taken advantage of and torn apart.
Fact, there were so-called "disabled tour guides" taking people into the parks who charged money, sometimes hundreds of dollars, to accompany ABLE- BODIED (NON-DISABLED) people and allowed them to avoid waiting times. Other guests go to Disneyland and feign a disability Others who DO NOT have a disability have been able to get an assistance card. Why? because Disneyland had no PROOF OF DISABILITY requirement.
It's disgusting that when a lying, cheating, person sees a disabled person with a cane, in a wheelchair or another severe disability go to the front of the line and falsely lie and cheat and say they too have a disability in order to go to the front of the line.
Folks, it's because of these liars and cheats who abused the policy for years that caused Disneyland to re-evaluate it's policy and stop the people that pretend to be disabled from receiving a special access card to their attractions.
For those parents and families of children with epilepsy and autism who criticize Disneyland's decision to change the disabled access policy I say: Don't criticize and bad mount Disneyland - -blame the sleaze balls that are, and have been abusing the Disneyland system for years. I would say that just the massive volume of requests for special access passes has increased more and more each year, all because of FALSE, MADE UP DISABILITIES.
My suggestion to Disneyland and their officials. - - You will find every parent or family with a child that has epilepsy, autism or some other disability giving the park a sympathy story that THEIR child deserves a special access pass over every other child who is standing in line. Disneyland, you will hear heart wrenching stories and excuses why a particular child should have an access pass over others. Some parents cannot stand to see others go to the front of the line ahead of their child. They think that if one child can access to the front of the line their child should too.
Disneyland - - why don't you adopt a policy that requires the alleged disabled person to have a"disabled placard" which has to obtained from the state (like the disabled placard) similar to what licensed drivers) have? It takes a physcian to certify that a person is truly disabled before the person can acquire those disabled placards. Disneyland, you have to demand proof of disability before special access cards are issued to anyone.
People, fair is fair. Someone has to stand in line. Not everyone can jump to the front of the line. If the individual or child is truly disabled they should be happy to show proof of disability. Until Disneyland demands proof of disability there will always be those low-lifes that have been lying and cheating at Disneyland to do the same ol' thing. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D.. O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Sunday, September 22, 2013
104 YEAR OLD HEIRESS HUGUETTE CLARK's $300 MILLION ESTATE RIPPED OFF BY DOCTORS, NURSE, HOSPITAL. LAWYERS & ACCOUNTANT
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The raiding, draining and marauding of an estate by health care professionals and attorneys is obscene. Case in point - - the estate of of multi-millionaire heiress Huguette Clark. Her estate is estimated to be $300 MILLION dollars.She was 104 years old when she passed in 2011. This case is a poster-child example raising questions about aging, care giving and the fine line between involving possible gratitude and extracting gifts from an elderly, feeble, frail person.
I look at this case and see hospital executives, lawyers, an accountant, a nurse and others who formed a small circle of instigators who cut off Huguette Clark from most everyone in her life. They made this wealthy woman very dependent on their coven of greed. It looks to me that this group induced Clark, a very fragile, frail 104 year old to give them MILLIONS of dollars throughout her stay at the hospital where she decided to reside paying the Beth Israel Hospital in Manhattan approximately $400, 000 a year. This group of greedy people argued that Clark was a clear-headed, sharp-minded woman who knew what she was doing when she made decisions that were unusual in her will.
Clark was surrounded by an expensive doll collection worth more than ONE MILLION dollars and photos from her childhood. This wealthy lady living in the hospital appeared to be a great arrangement for the hospital and her caregivers.
Clark, a single woman had no children and had left most of her estate to charities - -nothing to her distant relatives. I see a big issue here as to whether there is a glaring ethical and reasonable limit of what caregivers , health professionals and advisers can ask for - - AND accept. I think that professionals and institutions such as hospitals should be held accountable for their greedy actions.
Huguette Clark owned the largest apartment on New York's Fifth Avenue. a mansion in Santa Barbara, California and a 52 acre estate in New Canaan, Connecticut. According to court records during Clark's stay at Beth Israel Hospital her main nurse, Hadassah Peri received over 30 MILLION dollars in gifts and presents which I would suspect was by "hook or crook." Some of these extravagant gifts and presents over the years included but was not limited to multiple Manhattan apartments, a $1.2 MILLION dollar Stradivarius violin and a doll collection worth over $1 MILLION dollars. Her primary physician Dr. Henry Singman received more than $500,000 or more IN CASH as Christmas presents, she even covered some of her primary doctors medical expenses and paid part of his granddaughter's college tuition. The will also leaves him $100,000 (which he says he will relinquish) before testifying at trial..
Folks, this money grab by these health care people, such as doctors,nurses, hospitals, lawyers and an accountant doesn't stop there . The Beth Israel Hospital apparently conned, made misrepresentations and slick talked this 104 year old little old lady out of HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of dollars in cash and gifts., a multi-million dollar painting by Edouard Manet worth $3.5 MILLION and a MILLION dollar bequest to the hospital. And believe it or not hospital records, emails and memos from hospital administrators and leaders disclosed that they were trying to find ways to get even more from poor Ms. Clark.
Within a few months of Ms. Cark's arrival at the hospital in 1991, a fundraiser person visited her room once a week. By the next year Clark had given the hospital $145,000, but that was not good enough for the hospital staff. According to a memo from a hospital staffer "Here's hoping we end up with even bigger bucks." Can you imagine! The hospital's then-president. and even his mother urged Ms. Clark to prepare a will, though he told her he wasn't trying to suggest a bequest? REALLY? The hospital told Clark it was preparing to sell the building that Clark was residing in and was going to move her to another building in 2004 BUT hospital executives told her that she could STOP the sale by giving the hospital $125 Million dollars. Conned again? You bet. These low lifes did a number on Clark.
Personally, in my opinion I believe that the hospital, doctors, nurses, Clark's lawyers and accountant milked Clark, an ill, sick, little old ladyout of everything they could so they could stuff their own pockets .
NEWS UPDATE: - - - Now, just a day or two ago jury selection started over the validity of the April 2005 will. This wealthy, elderly lady had very minimal contact with any of her distant relatives over the years thanks to the isolation plan put into action by this group of money-grubbing idiots. It looks to me as if this group of health care professionals, in collusion with her lawyers and accountant kept her isolated from any and all contact with the outside world so they could use her for their own piggy bank to satisfy their own financial needs. That's sad.
Well, it appears now that before the case goes to court both sides came to an agreement and made a deal: According to the deal Clark's chief nurse, Hadassah Peri, would get nothing from Clark's will and would have to return $5 MILLION dollars and the expensive doll collection worth more than $1 MILLION dollars. Again, personally, I think this nurse still made out like a bandit- -What about the $30 MILLION in real estate, gifts and presents she already received. A $5 MILLION payback is nothing,. Clark's lawyer would also get nothing. WOW! But what about all the other millions he received allegedly representing Clark and her best interests before her death? Remember Clark was taken to Beth Israel Medical Center way back in 1991. This group of vultures had Clark secreted away at their medical center at their mercy for at least 20 years.
I should mention that this group of individuals which I can best describe as conniving, scheming sleaze was receiving all of the gifts, presents, etc., worth millions , ON TOP of their fees.
People if a deal wasn't made nurse Peri would stand to receive $30 MILLION dollars in the disputed will and Clark's accountant and lawyers who had already received cash, gifts and presents in addition to their fees over the years stood to make millions more in substantial fees as executors of Clark's estate. Now to my knowledge they get nothing from the will.
Clark's relatives said that hospital executives, medical professionals and Clark's lawyers and accountant took advantage of their access to the heiress and further did manipulate their way into the millions of dollars that Clark had. I tend to agree with them.
SLEAZE, SLEAZE, SLEAZE - - I should mention that this type of action by ripping off affluent, rich elderly people that are hospitalized, sick and possibly near deaths door is not uncommon. In fact, over the past couple of years there have been numerous cases cited on television , in print and on electronic media showing doctors, nurses, lawyers and accountants doing the same thing as what was done to Ms. Clark. These ripoff artists isolate and detach the victim from relatives, friends and associates, then they proceed to give and take away proper health care to manipulating the sick, ill person letting them know that they are the only ones that can care for them and that they, these caregivers , attorneys, and accountants know what is best for them. Thus, they intimidate the victim to give up their cash, assets, etc., and on occasions have the person draft a will bequeathing them substantial assets.
I think there should be a law preventing doctors, nurses, health care people, accountants and lawyers from receiving such gifts from the sick, ill and dying in their charge. There seems to be no transparency as to what is happening behind closed doors of hospital rooms, curtained hospital beds or in the seclusion of the victims own home.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Thursday, September 19, 2013
$174,000 A YEAR IS NOT ENOUGH SALARY FOR CONGRESSMAN,PHIL GINGREY OF GEORGIA? I SAY GEORGIA RESIDENTS SHOULD DUMP THIS GREEDY GUY.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
NEWS FLASH Folks!
To show you how arrogant, uninformed and incompetent some of our Congressman are I am SHOUTING OUT the name of "Congressman, Phil Gingrey of Georgia. This guy clearly does not deserve to be a Congressman and he clearly DOES NOT like his job. It appears the only reason he is in Washington is because he is a greedy, manipulative, uncaring person. He does not have his states constituents interests at heart. Apparently, his only interest is a self-serving one and his gluttoney for MONEY.
Here's the situation people - -
While in a closed meeting Congressman Phil Gingrey blabbered and complained saying "Man, this is a dead-end job (meaning being a Congressman representing the state of Georgia.) In this closed-door meeting Wednesday. this idiot made the statements an comments that he is not paid enough. WOW! This looney-tune Congressman is already making $174,000 a year. But he says, for him, that is not enough.
He went on to say that Congressional aides have a future on K-Street- the well known street in Washinton D.C. that is known for the many, many lobbying organizations that are headquartered there. He complains that aides 33 years old can go to K-Street and make $500,000 a year. - - further complaining and bitching he says: "Meanwhile I'm stuck here making $172,000 a year." I guess he forgot that Congress people had been making $174,000 a year since 2009. He's griping about making ONLY $172,000 when he is actually being paid $174,000 a year.
My question: with a guy like this representing the people in Georgia- What good is he? The only one he is representing is himself. The National Review and other publications picked up on this dolts comments but many downplayed or ignored them.
Hell, the people in greedy Gingrey's district has a median income of ONLY $49,736.00 a year and this ego tripping, arrogant lawmaker is crying that he wants to make at least $500,000 a year like some Congressional aide.
My suggestion and message to the people of Georgia, - - FIRE this guy - -dump him - - get him out of Washington. The sooner the better. He is not representing the people of Georgia, that's for sure. It looks as though his only interest is to suck up all the MONEY he can using his seat in Congress while pretending to act as a peoples representative for the state of Georgia. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
NEWS FLASH Folks!
To show you how arrogant, uninformed and incompetent some of our Congressman are I am SHOUTING OUT the name of "Congressman, Phil Gingrey of Georgia. This guy clearly does not deserve to be a Congressman and he clearly DOES NOT like his job. It appears the only reason he is in Washington is because he is a greedy, manipulative, uncaring person. He does not have his states constituents interests at heart. Apparently, his only interest is a self-serving one and his gluttoney for MONEY.
Here's the situation people - -
While in a closed meeting Congressman Phil Gingrey blabbered and complained saying "Man, this is a dead-end job (meaning being a Congressman representing the state of Georgia.) In this closed-door meeting Wednesday. this idiot made the statements an comments that he is not paid enough. WOW! This looney-tune Congressman is already making $174,000 a year. But he says, for him, that is not enough.
He went on to say that Congressional aides have a future on K-Street- the well known street in Washinton D.C. that is known for the many, many lobbying organizations that are headquartered there. He complains that aides 33 years old can go to K-Street and make $500,000 a year. - - further complaining and bitching he says: "Meanwhile I'm stuck here making $172,000 a year." I guess he forgot that Congress people had been making $174,000 a year since 2009. He's griping about making ONLY $172,000 when he is actually being paid $174,000 a year.
My question: with a guy like this representing the people in Georgia- What good is he? The only one he is representing is himself. The National Review and other publications picked up on this dolts comments but many downplayed or ignored them.
Hell, the people in greedy Gingrey's district has a median income of ONLY $49,736.00 a year and this ego tripping, arrogant lawmaker is crying that he wants to make at least $500,000 a year like some Congressional aide.
My suggestion and message to the people of Georgia, - - FIRE this guy - -dump him - - get him out of Washington. The sooner the better. He is not representing the people of Georgia, that's for sure. It looks as though his only interest is to suck up all the MONEY he can using his seat in Congress while pretending to act as a peoples representative for the state of Georgia. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Monday, September 16, 2013
OBAMA FEIGNS INDIGNATION OVER A GAS ATTACK: BUT OUR GOVT DID JUST AS BAD, IF NOT WORSE, ON OUR OWN PEOPLE
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
On September 15, 2013 I watched the 60 minutes program ad saw president Obama being interviewed regarding the Syrian situation. In addition they had a former CIA analyst on the same show and both men were still pushing the war scenario.
Obama still is crying over the chemical gas attack saying that if we, the American people saw the photographs that he saw we would support his idea of a military strike on Syria. When asked about evidence of the gas attack he danced around the question.
As to the CIA analyst he did everything in his power to support a strike on Syria trying to lay out a case to convince the American people. He and Obama were singing from the same hymn book and the moderator/interviewer played along taking it in stride only asking soft ball questions to make the entire dog and pony show resemble some sort of news program. Folks, all this 60 minute interview was was a promo for the White House to rationalize a military strike in another country.
Did you ever wonder how come the president never mentions the atrocities that our own government perpetrate on our own people? The government and CIA have continually carried out experiments on our American population, (in secret) using chemicals, drugs, gas and toxins, among other things. Yet Obama squeals to high heaven that we are above all that. WRONG!
As per copyrighted information published by Health News Network I will cite a few tidbits of information for your consideration: Four hundred prisoners in Chicago are infected with Malaria in order to study the effects of new and experimental drugs to combat the disease. It was reported that the Nazi's during the Nuremberg trials cited this USA experiment to defend their own actions during the holocaust. Lets flash forward to 1955 when a CIA experiment tested the ability to infect human populations with biological agents released a bacteria withdrawn from the Army's Biological warfare arsenal over Tampa Bay, Florida. Then we had the case in 1956 where the U.S. military released mosquitoes that were infected with Yellow Fever over Savannah, Georgia and Avon Park, Florida. Following each test, Army special agents posing as public health officials tested the victims for effects.
The United States government also subjected prisoners at Holmesburg State prison in Philadelphia, in 1965, to dioxin, a highly toxic chemical component of "Agent Orange" used in Viet Nam. The men were later studied for development of cancer, which indicates that Agent Orange had long been suspected to be a carcinogen.
Lets not forget what happened in 1975 when the virus section of Fort Detrick's Center for Biological Warfare Research is renamed The Fredrick Cancer Research Facilities and placed under the supervision of the National Cancer Institute (NCI). It was here that a special virus program is initiated by the U.S. Navy, purportedly to develop "cancer-causing" viruses. It is also here that retrovirologists isolate a virus to which no immunity exists. that virus is later named HTLV (Human-T cell Leukemia Virus).
So I ask you America - -why is president Obama and his colleagues pushing a war agenda against a chemical gas attack in Syria that killed only 1400 people when these same lawmakers on the Hill know exactly what our government is doing infecting our own American population with gas, chemicals, viruses and disease? And they have no qualms about that. Folks, I suspect that these experiments on us, the American people, are still being carried out today across America. There are numerous other covert acts that have been perpetrated on the American people over the years (without their knowledge) which I hope to mention from time to time in my blog so as to show America the two faces of this administration. Stay tuned. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
___________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Saturday, September 14, 2013
PRESIDENT PUTIN SAVES THE DAY AND THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IS JEALOUS
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
President Obama's foreign policy is useless. Always has been , always will be. Obama goes with the flow of which ever way the wind is blowing for his benefit and standing with his friends by playing whack-a-mole foreign policy. If his friends suggest a line to take he will go with it and then when another friend offers another suggestion Obama jumps at that life-line.
President Vladimir Putin who clearly has a more reasonable cooler head brought about a solution for the Syria situation. Now that the world is praising Putin for his insight lawmakers here at home are crying the blues and going on television saying that Putin interjected himself into the Syrian conflict and that the United States should be in the forefront instead of Putin. Talk about sore losers - - our lawmakers can't stand anyone else in the world coming up with good sensible ideas other than "going to war."
And even now, Secretary of State John Kerry and Lindsey Graham is still blabbering about taking a military strike against Syria. Hasn't Obama, Kerry and lawmakers on the Hill learned anything from Iraq, Afghanistan, even Pakistan?
This administration is bent on destabilizing the entire Mid East region and causing havoc in the stock markets, turmoil on Wall Street , gasoline price increases and food prices going out of sight. The irrational thinking and actions of Obama and Kerry regarding Syria borders on craziness.
I suggest that the United States take a page from president Putin's play book - -hold down the rhetoric, stop the saber rattling and get on with living in peace.
Obama, Graham, Kerry and other in Washington are clearly jealous that president Putin came up with a plan. Now they are screaming that Putin has to much power in these negotiations involving Syria. What a joke. Our lawmakers continually fight among themselves and cannot compromise on the simplest things to run this country but they have the arrogance and bluster to want credit for something president Putin did. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuihns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
President Obama's foreign policy is useless. Always has been , always will be. Obama goes with the flow of which ever way the wind is blowing for his benefit and standing with his friends by playing whack-a-mole foreign policy. If his friends suggest a line to take he will go with it and then when another friend offers another suggestion Obama jumps at that life-line.
President Vladimir Putin who clearly has a more reasonable cooler head brought about a solution for the Syria situation. Now that the world is praising Putin for his insight lawmakers here at home are crying the blues and going on television saying that Putin interjected himself into the Syrian conflict and that the United States should be in the forefront instead of Putin. Talk about sore losers - - our lawmakers can't stand anyone else in the world coming up with good sensible ideas other than "going to war."
And even now, Secretary of State John Kerry and Lindsey Graham is still blabbering about taking a military strike against Syria. Hasn't Obama, Kerry and lawmakers on the Hill learned anything from Iraq, Afghanistan, even Pakistan?
This administration is bent on destabilizing the entire Mid East region and causing havoc in the stock markets, turmoil on Wall Street , gasoline price increases and food prices going out of sight. The irrational thinking and actions of Obama and Kerry regarding Syria borders on craziness.
I suggest that the United States take a page from president Putin's play book - -hold down the rhetoric, stop the saber rattling and get on with living in peace.
Obama, Graham, Kerry and other in Washington are clearly jealous that president Putin came up with a plan. Now they are screaming that Putin has to much power in these negotiations involving Syria. What a joke. Our lawmakers continually fight among themselves and cannot compromise on the simplest things to run this country but they have the arrogance and bluster to want credit for something president Putin did. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuihns@gmail.com
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
OBAMA'S SPEECH RANG HOLLOW. OUR GOVERNMENT & THE UK USED CHEMICAL WEAPONS ON THEIR CITIZENS BUT NOTHING IS EVER SAID ABOUT THAT. WHY?
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
President Obama's speech last night, September 10, 2013 was a bunch of mish-mosh and mumbo-jumbo.. The only reason he said he would give diplomacy a chance was because he KNEW that he did not have the votes in Congress for military action. Plus, he wanted an extension of time so he can attempt to convince the lawmakers on the Hill to vote for military action. Hell, as CBS news reported before and after Obama's speech over sixty(60) percent of the American people are against any military action in Syria. CBS also reported that the calls coming into the White House are 4000 to one against the USA using force in Syria.
Obama said in his speech that we should take a stand against any country using chemical weapons. He also said the 1400 adults and children that were killed by chemical weapons is the reason that the USA should respond with a military strike. But not once in that gobbly-goop did you hear president Obama say that the United States condoned chemical weapons use by allowing Saddam Hussein to gas thousands of Iraqi's and Iranians. In fact the U.S. actually gave Hussein financial support and intelligence reports as we and the rest of the world turned a blind eye to those thousands of Iraq citizens being gassed. Hypocrite? Do you think?
To say Syria's brief chemical attack killing 1400 people is a reason for the United States to attack Syria is ludicrous. Firstly, we really don't know for a fact if the Syrian government or the rebels used gas attacks. It might have been each side using the gas to blame one another. Second, people have been dying in this Syrian civil war for over a year now. Whether the deaths are caused by a gas attack or bullets people are dead. How the people of Syria choose to wage their civil war is their business.It is not our obligation to settle their disputes.
In Obama's speech he said that his military strike would allow certain rebel groups to succeed with his support and his military attack. Yet, out of the other side of his mouth Obama tells the American people that he will not take sides in the civil war conflict. What? He is going to support rebels and diminish the Syrian government's capability to fight the rebels. We all know that many of these rebel groups are actually Al Queda. So now the administration is going to partner with Al-Queda? Doesn't make sense to me folks. How about you? I thought we were in the Mid East to rid the region of Al-Queda.
I submit that the only person offering any level-headed, sensible solution to the Syrian fiasco is Russia's president Putin. His plan to have Syria surrender the chemical weapons under the watchful eye of the U.N. and other country monitors is a good one.
To show how jaundiced Obama and his Democratic party is about Syria's conflict let me cite a news conference that Senator Harry Reid gave on CBS. Even as Russia's Putin put a logical plan on the table Reid opens his big mouth and shouts to the world that Syria can't be trusted - - this even before Putin gave all the details of his plan. I suspect that Obama, Senator Reid, Secretary of State John Kerry and others in the Democratic party are scheming to start a military action against Syria no matter what other countries say or do. That's sad people. No matter what may occur through peaceful talks these idiots already have their minds made up that there will be military action against Syria.
In his speech to the nation Obama basically said that the United States has to take a stand against chemical weapons and that we are the country that should step up to the plate. He also said that we are not the worlds policeman - -What? This non-military president had our troops fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan, and a covert war in Pakistan, all at one time. We were and are policing in all of those countries. Christ, we still have troops in Germany sixty (68) years after world War II . And, lets not forget Korea. We still have military troops in Korea sixty (60) years after the Korean war. AND, WE ARE NOT policeman of the world? Who is Obama kidding?
Now, as to use of chemical weapon by other countries I should mention the UK (United Kingdom), according to a post by Brian Andrews on January 9, 2011 - - The Brit's admits spraying deadly chemical weapons on their citizens. The UK Ministry of Defense admits to spraying much of the UK with dangerous chemicals during secret biological trials from 1940 to 1979. When asked if such experiments were once again being perpetuated against an unsuspecting population, Sue Ellison, spokesperson for a government laboratory replied: 'It is not our policy to discuss ongoing research."
U.S. Government Used Chemicals on American Cities and People
I acknowledge the Wall Street Journal and author Jim Carlton and the article titled:
"Of Microbes and Mock Attacks-51 Years Ago, The Military Sprayed germs on U.S. Cities."
Relating to chemical weapons used by the United States let me cite the above mentioned article by Jim Carlton and the Wall Street Journal: In this writing I will mention particular sections of the 2001 copyrighted article by the Wall Street Journal and give them credit for the coverage.
Fifty-One years ago, Edward J. Nevin checked into a San Francisco hospital, complaining of chills, fever and a generalized feeling of fatigue and malaise. Three weeks later this pipe-fitter was dead, the victim of what doctors said was an infection of the bacterium Serratia marcescens. It was only learned decades later that Nevins and ten (10) other patients who were hospitalized at the same time were sprayed with deadly bacterium. This according to the Senate subcommittee hearing in 1977. It came out that the U. S. Army had staged a mock biological attack on San Francisco, secretly spraying the city with Serratia and other agents. The Army's excuse - - they thought the chemical agents were harmless. Wow!
Their goal was to determine what might happen if a real germ warfare attack was launched upon the city. The dumb experiment authorized and condoned by administration officials and the military involved blasting a bacterial fog over the entire 49-square-mile city from a Navy vessel offshore and recorded with clinical nonchalance: "It was noted that a successful BW (biological warfare) attack on this area can be launched from the sea, and that effective dosages can be produced over relatively large areas," the Army wrote in its 1951 classified report on the experiment.
Secret biological warfare tests were conducted by the government on San Francisco and other American cities from the 1940's through the 1960's, experts say.
"We learned a lot about how vulnerable we are to biological attack from those tests, says Leonard Cole, an adjunct professor of political science at Rutgers University in New Jersey and author of several books on bio terrorism." I'm sure that's at least one reason why crop dusters were grounded after the September 11th attack The military knows how easy it is to disperse organisms that can affect people over large areas."
In other tests in the 1950's, Army researchers dispersed Serratia on Panama City, Florida and Key West, Florida. they also released fluorescent compounds over Minnesota and other Midwestern states to see how far they would spread in the atmosphere. The particles of zinc-cadmium-sulfide (now a known cancer-causing agent) were detected 1,000 miles away in New York state.
During the 1977 hearings the Army fessed up to releasing other bacterium such as Bacillus globigii on unwitting residents in San Francisco, New York and Washington, D.C.
In New York, military researchers in 1966 spread Bacillus subtilis variant Niger in the subway system by dropping light bulbs filled with the bacteria onto the tracks in stations in midtown Manhattan. The bacteria was carried for miles throughout the subway system, leading Army officials to conclude in a January 1968 report: "Similar covert attacks with a pathogenic (disease-causing) agent during peak traffic periods could be expected to expose large numbers of people to infection and subsequent illness and death."
Army officials also found widespread dispersal of bacteria in a May 1965 secret release of Bacillus globigii at Washington's National Airport and its Greyhound bus terminal according to reports released a few years after the Senate hearings. More than 130 passengers who had been exposed to the bacteria traveled to 39 cities in seven states in the two weeks following the mock attack.
The Army kept the biological-warfare tests secret until word of them leaked to the press in the 1970's. According to the Army's testimony in 1977 before the Senate 's subcommittee on health. In 80 of the 239 times biological agents were conducted 80 of those experiments used live bacteria that (at the time) supposedly, were thought to be harmless, such as the Serratia that was showered on San Francisco. In the other experiments it used inert chemicals to simulate bacteria.
Several medical experts have since claimed that an untold number of people have gotten sick as a result of the germ testing..
"The possibility cannot be ruled out that peculiarities in wind conditions or ventilation systems in building might concentrate organisms, exposing people to high doses of bacteria," testified Stephen Weitzman of the state University of New York, in the 1977 Senate hearings..
Justification by the Army was that the tests were a response to evaluate how microbes released on a populated city would disperse.
In the case of the San Francisco experiment between September 20 and September 27, 1950 a navy mine -laying vessel cruised the San Francisco coast, spraying an aerosol cocktail of Serratia and bacillus microbes over the city from giant hoses on deck, according to declassified Army reports. According to lawyers who have reviewed the reports, researchers added fluorescent particles of zinc-cadmium-sulfide to better measure the impact. Based on results from monitoring equipment at 43 locations around the city, the Army determined that San Francisco had received enough of a dose for nearly all of the city's 800,000 residents to inhale at least 5,000 of the particles.
Two weeks after the spraying, on October 11, 1950, Mr. Nevin checked in to Stanford Hospital in San Francisco with fever and other symptoms. Ten other men and women checked in to the same hospital - -which has since been relocated to Stanford University in Palo Alto, California - -with similar complaints. Doctors noticed that all 11 had the same malady: a pneumonia caused by exposure to bacteria believed to be Serratia marcescens. Mr Nevin died three weeks later. The others recovered. the doctors were so surprised by the outbreak that they reported it in a medical journal, oblivious at the time to the secret germ test.
The Nevins family sued the United States government. The attorney who filed the suit was Nevins grandson, Edward J. Nevins III, a San Francisco attorney. The Nevins family appealed the suit all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to overturn lower court judgments upholding the government's immunity from lawsuits.
Today, the U.S. Military is again patrolling San Francisco's coastline. guarding against someone who might try to copy the Army's tests of half century ago.
A question to be asked: How do we protect our citizens against covert chemical attacks by our own government?
This blog piece is to show the American people that all of the bluster and statements made by president Obama during his September 10, 2013 speech about a military attack on Syria doesn't track, at least with me. In the coming weeks I will try to elaborate on other incidents of chemical gas attacks, germ warfare and human experimentation on the American people by our government. My point being - -there are quite a number of countries whose hands are dirty, including ours. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
President Obama's speech last night, September 10, 2013 was a bunch of mish-mosh and mumbo-jumbo.. The only reason he said he would give diplomacy a chance was because he KNEW that he did not have the votes in Congress for military action. Plus, he wanted an extension of time so he can attempt to convince the lawmakers on the Hill to vote for military action. Hell, as CBS news reported before and after Obama's speech over sixty(60) percent of the American people are against any military action in Syria. CBS also reported that the calls coming into the White House are 4000 to one against the USA using force in Syria.
Obama said in his speech that we should take a stand against any country using chemical weapons. He also said the 1400 adults and children that were killed by chemical weapons is the reason that the USA should respond with a military strike. But not once in that gobbly-goop did you hear president Obama say that the United States condoned chemical weapons use by allowing Saddam Hussein to gas thousands of Iraqi's and Iranians. In fact the U.S. actually gave Hussein financial support and intelligence reports as we and the rest of the world turned a blind eye to those thousands of Iraq citizens being gassed. Hypocrite? Do you think?
To say Syria's brief chemical attack killing 1400 people is a reason for the United States to attack Syria is ludicrous. Firstly, we really don't know for a fact if the Syrian government or the rebels used gas attacks. It might have been each side using the gas to blame one another. Second, people have been dying in this Syrian civil war for over a year now. Whether the deaths are caused by a gas attack or bullets people are dead. How the people of Syria choose to wage their civil war is their business.It is not our obligation to settle their disputes.
In Obama's speech he said that his military strike would allow certain rebel groups to succeed with his support and his military attack. Yet, out of the other side of his mouth Obama tells the American people that he will not take sides in the civil war conflict. What? He is going to support rebels and diminish the Syrian government's capability to fight the rebels. We all know that many of these rebel groups are actually Al Queda. So now the administration is going to partner with Al-Queda? Doesn't make sense to me folks. How about you? I thought we were in the Mid East to rid the region of Al-Queda.
I submit that the only person offering any level-headed, sensible solution to the Syrian fiasco is Russia's president Putin. His plan to have Syria surrender the chemical weapons under the watchful eye of the U.N. and other country monitors is a good one.
To show how jaundiced Obama and his Democratic party is about Syria's conflict let me cite a news conference that Senator Harry Reid gave on CBS. Even as Russia's Putin put a logical plan on the table Reid opens his big mouth and shouts to the world that Syria can't be trusted - - this even before Putin gave all the details of his plan. I suspect that Obama, Senator Reid, Secretary of State John Kerry and others in the Democratic party are scheming to start a military action against Syria no matter what other countries say or do. That's sad people. No matter what may occur through peaceful talks these idiots already have their minds made up that there will be military action against Syria.
In his speech to the nation Obama basically said that the United States has to take a stand against chemical weapons and that we are the country that should step up to the plate. He also said that we are not the worlds policeman - -What? This non-military president had our troops fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan, and a covert war in Pakistan, all at one time. We were and are policing in all of those countries. Christ, we still have troops in Germany sixty (68) years after world War II . And, lets not forget Korea. We still have military troops in Korea sixty (60) years after the Korean war. AND, WE ARE NOT policeman of the world? Who is Obama kidding?
Now, as to use of chemical weapon by other countries I should mention the UK (United Kingdom), according to a post by Brian Andrews on January 9, 2011 - - The Brit's admits spraying deadly chemical weapons on their citizens. The UK Ministry of Defense admits to spraying much of the UK with dangerous chemicals during secret biological trials from 1940 to 1979. When asked if such experiments were once again being perpetuated against an unsuspecting population, Sue Ellison, spokesperson for a government laboratory replied: 'It is not our policy to discuss ongoing research."
U.S. Government Used Chemicals on American Cities and People
I acknowledge the Wall Street Journal and author Jim Carlton and the article titled:
"Of Microbes and Mock Attacks-51 Years Ago, The Military Sprayed germs on U.S. Cities."
Relating to chemical weapons used by the United States let me cite the above mentioned article by Jim Carlton and the Wall Street Journal: In this writing I will mention particular sections of the 2001 copyrighted article by the Wall Street Journal and give them credit for the coverage.
Fifty-One years ago, Edward J. Nevin checked into a San Francisco hospital, complaining of chills, fever and a generalized feeling of fatigue and malaise. Three weeks later this pipe-fitter was dead, the victim of what doctors said was an infection of the bacterium Serratia marcescens. It was only learned decades later that Nevins and ten (10) other patients who were hospitalized at the same time were sprayed with deadly bacterium. This according to the Senate subcommittee hearing in 1977. It came out that the U. S. Army had staged a mock biological attack on San Francisco, secretly spraying the city with Serratia and other agents. The Army's excuse - - they thought the chemical agents were harmless. Wow!
Their goal was to determine what might happen if a real germ warfare attack was launched upon the city. The dumb experiment authorized and condoned by administration officials and the military involved blasting a bacterial fog over the entire 49-square-mile city from a Navy vessel offshore and recorded with clinical nonchalance: "It was noted that a successful BW (biological warfare) attack on this area can be launched from the sea, and that effective dosages can be produced over relatively large areas," the Army wrote in its 1951 classified report on the experiment.
Secret biological warfare tests were conducted by the government on San Francisco and other American cities from the 1940's through the 1960's, experts say.
"We learned a lot about how vulnerable we are to biological attack from those tests, says Leonard Cole, an adjunct professor of political science at Rutgers University in New Jersey and author of several books on bio terrorism." I'm sure that's at least one reason why crop dusters were grounded after the September 11th attack The military knows how easy it is to disperse organisms that can affect people over large areas."
In other tests in the 1950's, Army researchers dispersed Serratia on Panama City, Florida and Key West, Florida. they also released fluorescent compounds over Minnesota and other Midwestern states to see how far they would spread in the atmosphere. The particles of zinc-cadmium-sulfide (now a known cancer-causing agent) were detected 1,000 miles away in New York state.
During the 1977 hearings the Army fessed up to releasing other bacterium such as Bacillus globigii on unwitting residents in San Francisco, New York and Washington, D.C.
In New York, military researchers in 1966 spread Bacillus subtilis variant Niger in the subway system by dropping light bulbs filled with the bacteria onto the tracks in stations in midtown Manhattan. The bacteria was carried for miles throughout the subway system, leading Army officials to conclude in a January 1968 report: "Similar covert attacks with a pathogenic (disease-causing) agent during peak traffic periods could be expected to expose large numbers of people to infection and subsequent illness and death."
Army officials also found widespread dispersal of bacteria in a May 1965 secret release of Bacillus globigii at Washington's National Airport and its Greyhound bus terminal according to reports released a few years after the Senate hearings. More than 130 passengers who had been exposed to the bacteria traveled to 39 cities in seven states in the two weeks following the mock attack.
The Army kept the biological-warfare tests secret until word of them leaked to the press in the 1970's. According to the Army's testimony in 1977 before the Senate 's subcommittee on health. In 80 of the 239 times biological agents were conducted 80 of those experiments used live bacteria that (at the time) supposedly, were thought to be harmless, such as the Serratia that was showered on San Francisco. In the other experiments it used inert chemicals to simulate bacteria.
Several medical experts have since claimed that an untold number of people have gotten sick as a result of the germ testing..
"The possibility cannot be ruled out that peculiarities in wind conditions or ventilation systems in building might concentrate organisms, exposing people to high doses of bacteria," testified Stephen Weitzman of the state University of New York, in the 1977 Senate hearings..
Justification by the Army was that the tests were a response to evaluate how microbes released on a populated city would disperse.
In the case of the San Francisco experiment between September 20 and September 27, 1950 a navy mine -laying vessel cruised the San Francisco coast, spraying an aerosol cocktail of Serratia and bacillus microbes over the city from giant hoses on deck, according to declassified Army reports. According to lawyers who have reviewed the reports, researchers added fluorescent particles of zinc-cadmium-sulfide to better measure the impact. Based on results from monitoring equipment at 43 locations around the city, the Army determined that San Francisco had received enough of a dose for nearly all of the city's 800,000 residents to inhale at least 5,000 of the particles.
Two weeks after the spraying, on October 11, 1950, Mr. Nevin checked in to Stanford Hospital in San Francisco with fever and other symptoms. Ten other men and women checked in to the same hospital - -which has since been relocated to Stanford University in Palo Alto, California - -with similar complaints. Doctors noticed that all 11 had the same malady: a pneumonia caused by exposure to bacteria believed to be Serratia marcescens. Mr Nevin died three weeks later. The others recovered. the doctors were so surprised by the outbreak that they reported it in a medical journal, oblivious at the time to the secret germ test.
The Nevins family sued the United States government. The attorney who filed the suit was Nevins grandson, Edward J. Nevins III, a San Francisco attorney. The Nevins family appealed the suit all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to overturn lower court judgments upholding the government's immunity from lawsuits.
Today, the U.S. Military is again patrolling San Francisco's coastline. guarding against someone who might try to copy the Army's tests of half century ago.
A question to be asked: How do we protect our citizens against covert chemical attacks by our own government?
This blog piece is to show the American people that all of the bluster and statements made by president Obama during his September 10, 2013 speech about a military attack on Syria doesn't track, at least with me. In the coming weeks I will try to elaborate on other incidents of chemical gas attacks, germ warfare and human experimentation on the American people by our government. My point being - -there are quite a number of countries whose hands are dirty, including ours. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Sunday, September 8, 2013
THE USA GAVE MONEY & INTELLIGENCE TO SADDAM WHEN HE GASSED HIS PEOPLE. NOW IT'S AN EXCUSE FOR A MILITARY STRIKE? OBAMA IS A HYPOCRITE.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Right off the bat I would like to say FIRE the lawmakers that vote to use a military strike against Syria. I don't care if the Washington lawmakers are, Democrats, Republicans or Independents and i don't care if they have been in Washington for one term or 12 terms. Folks, if they (lawmakers) vote with Obama to use any type of military might against Syria - -GET RID OF THEM, Vote them out of office. A yes vote to act against Syria DEMANDS that these idiots with such a small mentality who refuse to listen to the American people for their own benefit should be history. Watch the vote people and dump all of the Washington fat cats that vote "yes" on any military action. I certainly intend to do just that and I intend to try to convince any friends, relatives, associates and any other person I talk to to vote against any person in Washington that issues a "yes" vote on this matter.
Obama is still rattling the sabers and beating the war drums trying to gather support for a military strike on Syria even though the majority of the American people do not want the United States involved in the Syrian civil war in any way. Where is the policy of working for the American people and doing their business? This looney tune idea of President Obama's is ignoring the wishes of the American people.
I think that Obama's ego is over the top. It looks as though his reason for missiles and possible air strikes on Syria is to make up for his failure in handling the domestic problems here at home and his failure as a statesman and politico on the world stage. His feeling is hurt and he wants to strike out with support from people like Secretary for Defense, John Kerry, Speaker of the House John Boehner and Senator John McCain. This entrenched group of "play- and- go- along outdated politicians are screaming that the USA should make a point by using a military strike because if we don't strike the rest of the world will believe the USA is weak. I say it takes a greater person to back away from a fight rather than mix it up. Acting Macho is no good reason to duke it out, in any arena.
Hell the American people, Russia and a number of other world powers are agaist any military strike on Syria by Obama. Even the Pope came out against this proposed strike but Obama, Kerry, McCain, Boehner and other war mongers doesn't want to lose face. Can you imagine that? A war over losing face? If it were up to me I would tell Obama (" Hey, turn the other cheek.")
Here's my reminder to the American people, Pol Pot killed close to TWO MILLION of his countryman and we stood by and the world went on with their lives. Remember Rwanda? The Tutsi/Hunta massacres? We didn't intervene in that mess either. Then there was Idi Amin who slaughtered over HALF MILLION of his people. We didn't intervene there either. And rightly so. It was none of our business. The world got along just fine and the situations were resolved in their own way and time WITHOUT our bombs or missles. Also, - -lets not forget Saddam Hussein. He used chemical weapons and gassed Kurds and Iranians, wiping out entire villages and small towns. Here's a fact folks, We, the United States actually helped Saddam with millions of dollars in financial aid and targeting intelligence while he gassed his people. So, tell me - - we did nothing on previous gas attacks and slaughter in other countries and even supported Iraq in gassing their citizens and now - - we got religion? Come On.!
Now all of a sudden Obama and his addled Senators on the hill want to play policeman of the world by feigning outrage saying there needs to be military action when 1400 people die. You have to suspect the reasons behind this call for war. There was out right lies and faked intelligence to get us into Iraq. What is the Administrations motives here? How much more stupid can these people in Washington become? They only want to look out for their reelection and will say and do anything to accomplish that task. It is a dog and pony show folks. If each politician is offered something for their support (behind cloed doors) they would sell out their own Momma.
We were right in staying out of all of the previous civil war conflicts and uprising that occurred throughout the world and we should stay out of this centuries old religious civil war and demand that Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Arab nations themselves take care of their own wars without our assist.
You can take this to the bank people - -if OBAMA takes military action against the Syrian government he will be supporting the Al-Qaeda linked rebels. Keep in mind this is the same president that has been spouting "We are at war with Al-Qaeda" for over eleven (11) years. He is also the president that said he would NOT take sides in the Syrian civil war. Talk about lies-WOW! Obama's nose, like Pinocchio's, is growing longer by the minute. Obama's middle name should be Pinocchio.
Finally, I believe that Obama's mind set is to actually over throw the Syrian government using our military might with the excuse that the strike is a very limited military exercise.No one can explain to me that U.S. missles and (2000) pound bunker busting bombs will not devestate Syrian goverment building, infrastructure and its capabilities to fight Al-Qaeda rebel forces, not to mention the death of civilians as collateral damage. The United States has no legitimate interest to interfere and support a rebel uprising agaist the government of Syria.- And, that is my opinion. Make your own decision. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
___________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Right off the bat I would like to say FIRE the lawmakers that vote to use a military strike against Syria. I don't care if the Washington lawmakers are, Democrats, Republicans or Independents and i don't care if they have been in Washington for one term or 12 terms. Folks, if they (lawmakers) vote with Obama to use any type of military might against Syria - -GET RID OF THEM, Vote them out of office. A yes vote to act against Syria DEMANDS that these idiots with such a small mentality who refuse to listen to the American people for their own benefit should be history. Watch the vote people and dump all of the Washington fat cats that vote "yes" on any military action. I certainly intend to do just that and I intend to try to convince any friends, relatives, associates and any other person I talk to to vote against any person in Washington that issues a "yes" vote on this matter.
Obama is still rattling the sabers and beating the war drums trying to gather support for a military strike on Syria even though the majority of the American people do not want the United States involved in the Syrian civil war in any way. Where is the policy of working for the American people and doing their business? This looney tune idea of President Obama's is ignoring the wishes of the American people.
I think that Obama's ego is over the top. It looks as though his reason for missiles and possible air strikes on Syria is to make up for his failure in handling the domestic problems here at home and his failure as a statesman and politico on the world stage. His feeling is hurt and he wants to strike out with support from people like Secretary for Defense, John Kerry, Speaker of the House John Boehner and Senator John McCain. This entrenched group of "play- and- go- along outdated politicians are screaming that the USA should make a point by using a military strike because if we don't strike the rest of the world will believe the USA is weak. I say it takes a greater person to back away from a fight rather than mix it up. Acting Macho is no good reason to duke it out, in any arena.
Hell the American people, Russia and a number of other world powers are agaist any military strike on Syria by Obama. Even the Pope came out against this proposed strike but Obama, Kerry, McCain, Boehner and other war mongers doesn't want to lose face. Can you imagine that? A war over losing face? If it were up to me I would tell Obama (" Hey, turn the other cheek.")
Here's my reminder to the American people, Pol Pot killed close to TWO MILLION of his countryman and we stood by and the world went on with their lives. Remember Rwanda? The Tutsi/Hunta massacres? We didn't intervene in that mess either. Then there was Idi Amin who slaughtered over HALF MILLION of his people. We didn't intervene there either. And rightly so. It was none of our business. The world got along just fine and the situations were resolved in their own way and time WITHOUT our bombs or missles. Also, - -lets not forget Saddam Hussein. He used chemical weapons and gassed Kurds and Iranians, wiping out entire villages and small towns. Here's a fact folks, We, the United States actually helped Saddam with millions of dollars in financial aid and targeting intelligence while he gassed his people. So, tell me - - we did nothing on previous gas attacks and slaughter in other countries and even supported Iraq in gassing their citizens and now - - we got religion? Come On.!
Now all of a sudden Obama and his addled Senators on the hill want to play policeman of the world by feigning outrage saying there needs to be military action when 1400 people die. You have to suspect the reasons behind this call for war. There was out right lies and faked intelligence to get us into Iraq. What is the Administrations motives here? How much more stupid can these people in Washington become? They only want to look out for their reelection and will say and do anything to accomplish that task. It is a dog and pony show folks. If each politician is offered something for their support (behind cloed doors) they would sell out their own Momma.
We were right in staying out of all of the previous civil war conflicts and uprising that occurred throughout the world and we should stay out of this centuries old religious civil war and demand that Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Arab nations themselves take care of their own wars without our assist.
You can take this to the bank people - -if OBAMA takes military action against the Syrian government he will be supporting the Al-Qaeda linked rebels. Keep in mind this is the same president that has been spouting "We are at war with Al-Qaeda" for over eleven (11) years. He is also the president that said he would NOT take sides in the Syrian civil war. Talk about lies-WOW! Obama's nose, like Pinocchio's, is growing longer by the minute. Obama's middle name should be Pinocchio.
Finally, I believe that Obama's mind set is to actually over throw the Syrian government using our military might with the excuse that the strike is a very limited military exercise.No one can explain to me that U.S. missles and (2000) pound bunker busting bombs will not devestate Syrian goverment building, infrastructure and its capabilities to fight Al-Qaeda rebel forces, not to mention the death of civilians as collateral damage. The United States has no legitimate interest to interfere and support a rebel uprising agaist the government of Syria.- And, that is my opinion. Make your own decision. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
___________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Wednesday, September 4, 2013
OBAMA'S MILITARY STRIKE WILL CAUSE WORLD TURMOIL and CHAOS.
OVER 60% OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DO NOT WANT US IN SYRIA
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The administration is still dead set on conducting a military action against Syria.Five naval ships are in the waters near Syria awaiting orders from president Obama to initiate missile strikes. A few days ago a high ranking official in the Syrian administration again said that if the United States takes military action against their country they will "indeed' retaliate. When the official was asked when Syria would retaliate he said that it will be at a time and place of their choosing. I have no reason to doubt those statements because the Mid East culture is such that a grudge can be he held for a long, long time and then vengeance is exacted, sometimes months and years later. When the official was asked if Syria would attack Israel he would not comment except to say the entire Middle East would be set ablaze.
Folks, close to sixty (60 %) percent of the American people polled said that there "should not" be an attack on Syria yet Obama refuses to listen to the will of the American people.
Obama scares me when it come to some of his decision making. He at times reminds me of some of my patients that had a bipolar condition. Many would waffle and be up and down over issues and carry some of their actions out "without" considering the consequences of their acts. I would suspect that some of these Washington partisan wanna-be know-it-alls lack intellectual integrity and clear thinking.
The Brits recently pulled away from participation in a military attack on Syria and Putin, of Russia is adamant that he does not want to see a military strike on Syria. In this case I side with Putin. He is thinking with a level head knowing that the consequences of a military strike could be devastating.
You can be assured that if America, on orders from president Obama does strike Syria with military might the first thing that will happen is you will see our stock market take a plunge like never before, dropping hundreds of points. The economic stability of Wall Street will be hurt for years. In addition, you will see gasoline prices sky rocket and those prices will be sustained for a lengthily time and you can expect to see food prices soar over the top. The turmoil and world disruption Obama will cause with his childish radical decisions regarding Syria will take a toll on America and the consequences will be grave for years to come. However, he continues to fabricate support by Congress and other countries and even threatens to take action against Syria on his own. Question? How can the American people stand by and watch Obama's ignorance of the Constition prevail?
I should mention that just yesterday Obama met in "private" with House Speaker John Boehner(R) and guess what? Boehner came away from that "private" meet saying he supports Obama in conducting a military strike on Syria - -WOW! I would sure have liked to have been a fly on the wall to hear the deal that Obama made with Boehner for his support - - promises, bribes, - -who knows what?. These closed door, private meetings stink to high heaven people.
It is expected to see Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi's support of Obama's war-mongering but John Boehner must have made a sweetheart deal with Obama.
Personally I don't trust any so-called evidence as to who, and if, the Syrian government released chemical gas on it's population. There are statements out there that say the rebels actually released the gas attack to involve America in their civil war to crush the Syrian government Any evidence offered by the White House and Secretary of State, John Kerry to support their reasoning for a military strike is suspect in my eyes. Our government and officials in power have been proven to be liars who manufactured false evidence and statements in the past in order to go to war.
My suggestion: If Obama, John Kerry and their supporters actually have evidence that the Syrian leader and his government did in fact release a chemical gas attack on its citizens then the right and proper thing to do is present that evidence in a court of law (the World court(s)) and allow the other side to present what evidence they have to refute the claims.
Let the court(s) that bear claims of genocide, crimes against humanity and such take the case on and take action against the person(s) who committed the crime(s) and send them to prison.
For decades the world courts have been holding despots responsible for their alleged crimes and that is the way it should be. Evidence presented in a court of law instead of a country (like America) taking it on themselves to act as Judge, Jury and Executioner. Look at the Nuremberg Trials, Also look at the Bosnian conflict. Legal recourse works and when the case is concluded hold the responsible parties accountable. Thus, there is no need to start a war and penalize and/or murder the people of an entire country. All of these fat cats in Washington keep telling the American people that the United States is built on the rule of law. Well, that's great and I say USE IT--Prove your case in court so the world can see justice is done THE RIGHT WAY.
My suggestion to Obama is: Let Syria fight its own civil war. It is none of our business. We Americans fought our own civil war which resulted in tens of thousands of American lives being lost. No one interfered with our civil war so why should we butt our nose into another countries civil wars, revolutions, uprisings, etc. - - Let these people who have been fighting for CENTURIES among themselves settle their own disputes. When the dust settles as to who comes out on top that should be the government we deal with. Further, president Obama - - -PLEASE sit down in a quiet place by yourself and REALLY consider the result of your stupid, unwarranted actions on this country as you continue down this path of death and destruction.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)