WALL NOT FULLY FUNDED THIS BUDGET. SHUT DOWN GOVERNMENT NEXT BUDGET.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The President just signed the spending bill. Again, the WALL came in underfunded.
The $854 billion spending bill is to keep the government open through December 7th.
Trump only received $1.6 billion for his wall. That is a far cry from what is needed. However, Senators McConnell and Speaker Ryan supposedly told Trump that after the midterms they will fully fund his wall. I suspect the leadership in the Republican party are once again patronizing the President. Based on their past action regarding the wall construction I feel it is very difficult to trust what they say. The leadership in the Republican party has taken a page from the Democratic party and continually obstructed and delayed Trump's wall. The lawmakers keep moving the wall goal post for the President. First, they say, next time. Next time comes and goes and no wall. Next they say "please Mr. President, do not shut down the government. The midterms are coming up and if you demand the wall or shut down the government that will hurt us in the midterm election." So again the President caved to their demands.
But, I suggest that the President STOP giving in to this weak, feckless Republican leadership next time. If they do not fully fund the WALL--SHUT down the government. Period. He should stop buckling under the whims and wishes of these lawmakers and act on his own good instincts. Following the midterms he should hold fast and tell these weak acting lawmakers: "it's the money for the Wall or nothing.
But I believe even after the midterms these same entrenched, established Republicans will tell Trump, "We have the 2020 presidential election coming up and it will hurt the party. Wait until after your reelected." That seems to be their game plan. They will flatter and patronize the President to get him to keep postponing and delaying the wall project.
Mr. President, shut down the government and refuse to sign the next budget bill if full funding for the wall is not in it. Stop conceding to your leadership. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Saturday, September 29, 2018
CALL FOR A VOTE. GET THESE SPINELESS LAWMAKERS ON THE RECORD BEFORE THE MIDTERMS.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Well, the RINO (Republicans In Name Only) Republicans again snookered President Trump to obstruct and delay. These people are Democrats. always pretending to be Republicans so they can reap the benefits of Congress and the power of the title. What a shame.
Yesterday, September 28th., Jeff Flake (R), the flake from Arizona decided to side with his friends in the Democratic party to scuttle a nominee for the United States Supreme Court. Following his announcement three or four other RINO's jumped on his bandwagon. That guaranteed there was no way to move to a vote to confirm Judge Kavanaugh.
Keep in mind that FLAKE is not running for office again so he has nothing to lose by sinking President Trump's agenda and policies. He has made it clear over the past couple years that he has a very large hate on for President Trump a has has been opposing and throwing up roadblocks against Trump over and over again.
Thus guy promised to vote to confirm judge Kavanaugh only a few hours earlier but at the last minute, like his buddy, the late John McCain he chose to obstruct.
If there were more Republicans in Congress that actually supported the President's policies the party would not have to have depended on his vote. Since there were not enough Republicans he knew he had the power to get what he wanted from Congress, I suspect this flaky character is auditioning for a job when he leaves Congress. I imagine he has a lucrative job offer and it was contingent on him deep- sixing the nomination.
Very few, if any, in Washington, especially in the Republican party like flaky FLAKE and the voters in his home state of Arizona let him know they would vote him out of office this time around and that is why he decided not to rum again. He couldn't win reelection. His constituents hated him. So, this last minute move was his swan song from Congress. Although he did say and promise if the Judiciary Committtee would allow the "one week" extension for an FBI investigation of the proposed nomination he WOULD vote to confirm judge Kavanaugh. Let's see if he follows through. He changed his mind the last minute yesterday, so can you "trust" this guys thinking and scheming? We will see.
My suggestion to the Judiciary Committee and Congress: STOP these constant delays. and pandering to outside attorneys. I submit that if Senator Grassley and the weak Republican party would have insisted and held a straight up and down VOTE two weeks ago, the judge would have been already been confirmed and we would not be where we are today..The Judiciary Committee and the CIRCUS clowns on the Committee giving way to demands of outsiders is ridiculous.
I would further suggest that whether it takes the FBI 3, 5 days, or one week to wrap up their interviews the nomination should be brought immediately for a VOTE. I say, call for a vote, win or lose, and get all these milk toast lawmakers, one by one, ON THE RECORD with their VOTE--yea or nay so the people across this country can see who is for or against this nominee and the Trump agenda. AND do this well before the midterm elections.- And. that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Well, the RINO (Republicans In Name Only) Republicans again snookered President Trump to obstruct and delay. These people are Democrats. always pretending to be Republicans so they can reap the benefits of Congress and the power of the title. What a shame.
Yesterday, September 28th., Jeff Flake (R), the flake from Arizona decided to side with his friends in the Democratic party to scuttle a nominee for the United States Supreme Court. Following his announcement three or four other RINO's jumped on his bandwagon. That guaranteed there was no way to move to a vote to confirm Judge Kavanaugh.
Keep in mind that FLAKE is not running for office again so he has nothing to lose by sinking President Trump's agenda and policies. He has made it clear over the past couple years that he has a very large hate on for President Trump a has has been opposing and throwing up roadblocks against Trump over and over again.
Thus guy promised to vote to confirm judge Kavanaugh only a few hours earlier but at the last minute, like his buddy, the late John McCain he chose to obstruct.
If there were more Republicans in Congress that actually supported the President's policies the party would not have to have depended on his vote. Since there were not enough Republicans he knew he had the power to get what he wanted from Congress, I suspect this flaky character is auditioning for a job when he leaves Congress. I imagine he has a lucrative job offer and it was contingent on him deep- sixing the nomination.
Very few, if any, in Washington, especially in the Republican party like flaky FLAKE and the voters in his home state of Arizona let him know they would vote him out of office this time around and that is why he decided not to rum again. He couldn't win reelection. His constituents hated him. So, this last minute move was his swan song from Congress. Although he did say and promise if the Judiciary Committtee would allow the "one week" extension for an FBI investigation of the proposed nomination he WOULD vote to confirm judge Kavanaugh. Let's see if he follows through. He changed his mind the last minute yesterday, so can you "trust" this guys thinking and scheming? We will see.
My suggestion to the Judiciary Committee and Congress: STOP these constant delays. and pandering to outside attorneys. I submit that if Senator Grassley and the weak Republican party would have insisted and held a straight up and down VOTE two weeks ago, the judge would have been already been confirmed and we would not be where we are today..The Judiciary Committee and the CIRCUS clowns on the Committee giving way to demands of outsiders is ridiculous.
I would further suggest that whether it takes the FBI 3, 5 days, or one week to wrap up their interviews the nomination should be brought immediately for a VOTE. I say, call for a vote, win or lose, and get all these milk toast lawmakers, one by one, ON THE RECORD with their VOTE--yea or nay so the people across this country can see who is for or against this nominee and the Trump agenda. AND do this well before the midterm elections.- And. that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Tuesday, September 25, 2018
PRESIDENT SHOULD IMMEDIATELY "DECLASSIFY" FBI-JUSTICE DOCUMENTS. DON'T COUNT ON THE INSPECTOR GENERAL.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
President Trump should "declassify" any and all documents relating to the "Russian" investigation immediately. Former Justice Department employees, media hosts and their guests and members of Congress have repeatedly said the documents should be released and that President Trump can have that done with a stroke of his pen. These requests have been ongoing for approximately a year now.
Recently President Trump told the nation that he would declassify the documents from the FBI and the Justice Department without any redaction's so there would be complete transparency but it appears some of his White House staff and lawmakers once again played the President and convinced him to delay the declassification. Now the Inspector General has access to the documents to determine declassification. What a Joke!
President Trump has been buckling and giving in to some of these people around him. Example, The border wall money, the president caved. We have no wall because entrenched career Republicans and Democrats , (Ryan and McConnell), and others want to keep things as they were in Washington and dislike and resent President Trump. They do not want the wall built. Period. During the last budget deal: the President caved and signed the legislation (without the wall).
President Trump said he would shut down the government this time if he did not get the total amount of funds for the wall this time. However, he caved again. during this current budget deal. The President caved again and bought Ryan and McConnell's excuse that if he shut down the government it would hurt the mid-term election. What a crock!
Now, it's the declassification of documents that the nation is waiting to see and trusted the President when he said he "would" declassify the documents in unredacted form but----he caved again..
I voted for Trump thinking his being no lawmaker or a politician and his strong businessman qualities would change things in Washington. But folks, I'm sad to say I am becoming disappointed with the President's "indecisive" tendencies. He is allowing the Washington establishment to roll over him again and again. That's sad.
I would like to see this president do what he says he is going to do and DO IT. If he says he is going to shut down the government. DO IT. If he says he is not going to sign a budget. DON'T' IT, don't sign it. If he says he is going to declassify FBI and Justice documents. DO IT.
I suspect the President has good instincts. He should use them and ignore these established Washington insiders that want to hurt his presidency. These spoilers in Congress and the White House are leading him around by the nose. I submit if he stuck to his guns and followed through with his statements-- we would have the wall paid for in this next budget. We would have a clear understanding of the content of the FBI documents in question. And a number of his campaign promises would have been met, and kept by now.
Finally, he should immediately get rid of Deputy Attorney Rosenstein. He should not listen to his White House and Congressional advisers. Fire the bad guy. Rosenstein's like a bad infected tooth. He has to be yanked to get rid of the infection. Do it in one decisive move. Quick and easy. Then let the chips fall where they may. People, the world's not going to stop over the firing of this sleazy, lying character. Same goes for Attorney General Sessions. The President promised to drain the swamp. Well, these swamp creatures have to go and then government can get back to taking care of business, And, that my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
President Trump should "declassify" any and all documents relating to the "Russian" investigation immediately. Former Justice Department employees, media hosts and their guests and members of Congress have repeatedly said the documents should be released and that President Trump can have that done with a stroke of his pen. These requests have been ongoing for approximately a year now.
Recently President Trump told the nation that he would declassify the documents from the FBI and the Justice Department without any redaction's so there would be complete transparency but it appears some of his White House staff and lawmakers once again played the President and convinced him to delay the declassification. Now the Inspector General has access to the documents to determine declassification. What a Joke!
President Trump has been buckling and giving in to some of these people around him. Example, The border wall money, the president caved. We have no wall because entrenched career Republicans and Democrats , (Ryan and McConnell), and others want to keep things as they were in Washington and dislike and resent President Trump. They do not want the wall built. Period. During the last budget deal: the President caved and signed the legislation (without the wall).
President Trump said he would shut down the government this time if he did not get the total amount of funds for the wall this time. However, he caved again. during this current budget deal. The President caved again and bought Ryan and McConnell's excuse that if he shut down the government it would hurt the mid-term election. What a crock!
Now, it's the declassification of documents that the nation is waiting to see and trusted the President when he said he "would" declassify the documents in unredacted form but----he caved again..
I voted for Trump thinking his being no lawmaker or a politician and his strong businessman qualities would change things in Washington. But folks, I'm sad to say I am becoming disappointed with the President's "indecisive" tendencies. He is allowing the Washington establishment to roll over him again and again. That's sad.
I would like to see this president do what he says he is going to do and DO IT. If he says he is going to shut down the government. DO IT. If he says he is not going to sign a budget. DON'T' IT, don't sign it. If he says he is going to declassify FBI and Justice documents. DO IT.
I suspect the President has good instincts. He should use them and ignore these established Washington insiders that want to hurt his presidency. These spoilers in Congress and the White House are leading him around by the nose. I submit if he stuck to his guns and followed through with his statements-- we would have the wall paid for in this next budget. We would have a clear understanding of the content of the FBI documents in question. And a number of his campaign promises would have been met, and kept by now.
Finally, he should immediately get rid of Deputy Attorney Rosenstein. He should not listen to his White House and Congressional advisers. Fire the bad guy. Rosenstein's like a bad infected tooth. He has to be yanked to get rid of the infection. Do it in one decisive move. Quick and easy. Then let the chips fall where they may. People, the world's not going to stop over the firing of this sleazy, lying character. Same goes for Attorney General Sessions. The President promised to drain the swamp. Well, these swamp creatures have to go and then government can get back to taking care of business, And, that my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Saturday, September 22, 2018
CHUCK GRASSLEY'S PUSSY FOOTING HAS GOT TO STOP. VOTE SEPT. 24TH.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
GOP Chuck Grassley should stop jumping through hoops for the attorney's of Dr. Ford. He has been more that accommodating. It's now Saturday afternoon and he and the Judiciary Committee is still be "jerked around". Christ, this is Congress. Congress asked doctor Ford to appear and offered a number of different options for the doctor to be comfortable in giving testimony. Congress sets the rules for someone to appear before their committee. But Grassley has been moving the goal post and pooping around pushing back date after date that he said were dates certain at the time he issued them..
Grassley is being led around by his nose. That goes to show the people in the country that Congress cannot even keep their word on most "anything". Grassley is so "indecisive" that he looks like a clown.
He should tell the American people that this deadline of Saturday, September 22, 2018 was not met. Why? Because he told us that doctor Ford's Saturday deadline was the final dateto say if she would appear and testify. She wasn't offered the opportunity by Grassley to continue to negotiate . He was specific about Dr. Ford appearing and testifying. Instead, the recent letter to Grassley and the Committee today was a bumch of mumble-jumble,--- AGAIN! The doctors attorney's still are demanding negotiating. They did not meet the demands of Grassley.
I submit that doctor Ford and her attorney's had ample time to meet the demands of the Committee and it time for Grassley to finally stick to his word and put an end to the pandering of this good doctor Ford and her attorney's, give a public statement that Dr. Ford failed to comply accordingly and tell the public that he is going to hold a vote on Judge Kavanaugh Monday, September 24,th. -- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
GOP Chuck Grassley should stop jumping through hoops for the attorney's of Dr. Ford. He has been more that accommodating. It's now Saturday afternoon and he and the Judiciary Committee is still be "jerked around". Christ, this is Congress. Congress asked doctor Ford to appear and offered a number of different options for the doctor to be comfortable in giving testimony. Congress sets the rules for someone to appear before their committee. But Grassley has been moving the goal post and pooping around pushing back date after date that he said were dates certain at the time he issued them..
Grassley is being led around by his nose. That goes to show the people in the country that Congress cannot even keep their word on most "anything". Grassley is so "indecisive" that he looks like a clown.
He should tell the American people that this deadline of Saturday, September 22, 2018 was not met. Why? Because he told us that doctor Ford's Saturday deadline was the final dateto say if she would appear and testify. She wasn't offered the opportunity by Grassley to continue to negotiate . He was specific about Dr. Ford appearing and testifying. Instead, the recent letter to Grassley and the Committee today was a bumch of mumble-jumble,--- AGAIN! The doctors attorney's still are demanding negotiating. They did not meet the demands of Grassley.
I submit that doctor Ford and her attorney's had ample time to meet the demands of the Committee and it time for Grassley to finally stick to his word and put an end to the pandering of this good doctor Ford and her attorney's, give a public statement that Dr. Ford failed to comply accordingly and tell the public that he is going to hold a vote on Judge Kavanaugh Monday, September 24,th. -- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL ROSENSTEIN HAS TO GO. MR. PRESIDENT, FIRE HIM.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein has to go. Why? After the allegations of him discussing secretly recording the President to undermine the administration is outrageous. Rosenstein denies the allegations but I submit that Rosenstein's discussing such a matter as secretly recording the President in an attempt to damage the Presidency is grounds for immediate dismissal. Come On! What person in their right mind working in the Administration would even consider covertly recording the Commander-in-Chief? We clearly do nit need these types of people working in government service.
Folks we already know that at least one person has already secretly recorded White House officials for apparent personal and financial gain. I say, we certainly do not need others doing the same thing, especially law enforcement people like the Deputy Attorney General.
There were approximately seven (7) people in that room when Rosenstein said he would secretly record meetings(s) with President Trump. I would suggest that the White House have all seven people testify " under oath"as to what was actually said and discussed in that meeting which was reported by the New York Times. Then, President Trump should interview each and every person that was present during the meeting and make a decision as to their veracity and truthfulness.
President Trump should also consider the damage that is now being done to him and the Administration by law enforcement Justice Department officials even discussing such a matter.
One individual that was present in the room said that Rosenstein made the comments but it was Rosenstein being sarcastic. My opinion about this persons evaluation of Rosenstein's comments is that: This person really does not know what Rosenstein was thinking or meant. Hey, the Deputy Attorney General said it. Let Rosenstein explain, in his own words, to President Trump why he said such a thing and allow the President to decide the context of this unwarranted discussion.
My view is that the President should immediately fire Rosentstein. He should make it clear to Rosenstein that subject matter such as secretly recording him throws a cloud over the entire Justice system and leaves people across the country and in Congress always wondering if conversations and discussions like this are used against the public and lawmakers on a regular basis. The President should also tell Rosenstein that in order to clear the air it would be best if he would resign immediately--- or, be fired.
Further I suggest that President Trump fire all of the remaining seven people who are still employed by the government who were present in the room discussing the idea of taking such action against the him. A clean sweep and a clean house of these individuals is the only disinfectant that will settle this matter. -- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein has to go. Why? After the allegations of him discussing secretly recording the President to undermine the administration is outrageous. Rosenstein denies the allegations but I submit that Rosenstein's discussing such a matter as secretly recording the President in an attempt to damage the Presidency is grounds for immediate dismissal. Come On! What person in their right mind working in the Administration would even consider covertly recording the Commander-in-Chief? We clearly do nit need these types of people working in government service.
Folks we already know that at least one person has already secretly recorded White House officials for apparent personal and financial gain. I say, we certainly do not need others doing the same thing, especially law enforcement people like the Deputy Attorney General.
There were approximately seven (7) people in that room when Rosenstein said he would secretly record meetings(s) with President Trump. I would suggest that the White House have all seven people testify " under oath"as to what was actually said and discussed in that meeting which was reported by the New York Times. Then, President Trump should interview each and every person that was present during the meeting and make a decision as to their veracity and truthfulness.
President Trump should also consider the damage that is now being done to him and the Administration by law enforcement Justice Department officials even discussing such a matter.
One individual that was present in the room said that Rosenstein made the comments but it was Rosenstein being sarcastic. My opinion about this persons evaluation of Rosenstein's comments is that: This person really does not know what Rosenstein was thinking or meant. Hey, the Deputy Attorney General said it. Let Rosenstein explain, in his own words, to President Trump why he said such a thing and allow the President to decide the context of this unwarranted discussion.
My view is that the President should immediately fire Rosentstein. He should make it clear to Rosenstein that subject matter such as secretly recording him throws a cloud over the entire Justice system and leaves people across the country and in Congress always wondering if conversations and discussions like this are used against the public and lawmakers on a regular basis. The President should also tell Rosenstein that in order to clear the air it would be best if he would resign immediately--- or, be fired.
Further I suggest that President Trump fire all of the remaining seven people who are still employed by the government who were present in the room discussing the idea of taking such action against the him. A clean sweep and a clean house of these individuals is the only disinfectant that will settle this matter. -- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Monday, September 10, 2018
THE VICE-PRESIDENT SHOULD SPEAK FOR HIMSELF. THE ANONYMOUS OP-ED AUTHOR & THEIR GROUP's COUP d' ETAT HAS TO BE UNMASKED.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Wow! Vice-President Pence went on nationwide television yesterday and told the interview host that he is"100%" confident that NONE of his staff is the NY Times Op-Ed author. When asked he said he knows his staff and their character and they are not the author of the Op-Ed. He was asked if he had asked members of his staff if they were the author of the Op-Ed in the NYT He relied, "No.. I know their character." When asked if he would take a lie detector test, (polygraph) He replied, "in a heartbeat." That's great. Speaking for himself is the correct response. But to speak for his entire staff is a big mistake.
There is no one on this planet that knows (for certain) what is going on in the mind of another individual, no matter how long you have known a person or how close they are to you. How many times have you heard people say such things as: "I would never have suspected he would kill a person, he was my neighbor for years." Or, " my husband cheated on me with another woman for years. The affair lasted 10 years. I had no idea ." Or, " I was married to the man for over 20 years, and had no idea he was someone else leading a double life."
And, what is the first thing lawmakers in Washington say when one of their own private club commit a crime? " That;s not the man/woman I knew. I would never have suspected the person was capable of such a crime." Then, the head of the office or agency that had the person on staff begin making excuses to distance themselves from the offender.
I would suggest that Vice-President Pence ONLY speak for himself. Not present a blanket clearance for his entire staff, especially when he did not sit down with each one and ask them directly if they were in fact, the author of the piece. I would say, that's no way to run an office. But, what boss would not say "my people's okay". They want to believe that individuals they hired, vouched for and employed are squeaky clean people. That;s nice , but not realistic, especially in today's world.. But really, does anyone really know what a person is capable of?
Good example, look what is currently occurring in the FBI, the Justice Department, State Department and our FISA courts. No one would have suspected the people that were found to be liars, corrupt individuals thus far would do such a thing. BUT they DID. They were caught in their own web they built for themselves. So again, let each person speak for themselves Mr. Vice-President. Let the person defend their own position.
Let me say, I have administered polygraph (lie-detector) examinations for federal, state, county and municipal agencies for many years. I have taught the technique to federal investigators. And, as any law enforcement or criminal investigator knows "EVERYONE IS SUSPECT during an investigation. This approach specifically applies in regards to a polygraph examiner. Until all of the alleged suspects are administered the lie detector test to determine the actual involvement in the issue at hand everyone is suspect. I would suggest that Vice-President Pence let each and every member on his staff SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.
If it comes to administering lie detector tests in this Op-ED mess I would also suggest that no one be exempt. Each department/agency or office in the administration should send each and every employee in, one by one, office by office, from the Vice-President on down. I would think that under the umbrella of National Security concerns every employee working in the administration would be subject and mandated to undergo the lie detector (polygraph) examination.
Final thought, if the courts would step in and get involved they could have the New York Times reveal the author of the Op-Ed. That certainly would save a lot of stress and strain on the administration, regarding any lie detector examination and clearly would end the speculation as to WHO wrote the Op-ED. I believe this route would be best for the entire country and the person unmasked could be prosecuted for any crime(s) determined to be committed by penning such accusations against the President of the United States or subverting the constitution for their and their groups agenda of a secret "coup d' etat". - - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Wow! Vice-President Pence went on nationwide television yesterday and told the interview host that he is"100%" confident that NONE of his staff is the NY Times Op-Ed author. When asked he said he knows his staff and their character and they are not the author of the Op-Ed. He was asked if he had asked members of his staff if they were the author of the Op-Ed in the NYT He relied, "No.. I know their character." When asked if he would take a lie detector test, (polygraph) He replied, "in a heartbeat." That's great. Speaking for himself is the correct response. But to speak for his entire staff is a big mistake.
There is no one on this planet that knows (for certain) what is going on in the mind of another individual, no matter how long you have known a person or how close they are to you. How many times have you heard people say such things as: "I would never have suspected he would kill a person, he was my neighbor for years." Or, " my husband cheated on me with another woman for years. The affair lasted 10 years. I had no idea ." Or, " I was married to the man for over 20 years, and had no idea he was someone else leading a double life."
And, what is the first thing lawmakers in Washington say when one of their own private club commit a crime? " That;s not the man/woman I knew. I would never have suspected the person was capable of such a crime." Then, the head of the office or agency that had the person on staff begin making excuses to distance themselves from the offender.
I would suggest that Vice-President Pence ONLY speak for himself. Not present a blanket clearance for his entire staff, especially when he did not sit down with each one and ask them directly if they were in fact, the author of the piece. I would say, that's no way to run an office. But, what boss would not say "my people's okay". They want to believe that individuals they hired, vouched for and employed are squeaky clean people. That;s nice , but not realistic, especially in today's world.. But really, does anyone really know what a person is capable of?
Good example, look what is currently occurring in the FBI, the Justice Department, State Department and our FISA courts. No one would have suspected the people that were found to be liars, corrupt individuals thus far would do such a thing. BUT they DID. They were caught in their own web they built for themselves. So again, let each person speak for themselves Mr. Vice-President. Let the person defend their own position.
Let me say, I have administered polygraph (lie-detector) examinations for federal, state, county and municipal agencies for many years. I have taught the technique to federal investigators. And, as any law enforcement or criminal investigator knows "EVERYONE IS SUSPECT during an investigation. This approach specifically applies in regards to a polygraph examiner. Until all of the alleged suspects are administered the lie detector test to determine the actual involvement in the issue at hand everyone is suspect. I would suggest that Vice-President Pence let each and every member on his staff SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.
If it comes to administering lie detector tests in this Op-ED mess I would also suggest that no one be exempt. Each department/agency or office in the administration should send each and every employee in, one by one, office by office, from the Vice-President on down. I would think that under the umbrella of National Security concerns every employee working in the administration would be subject and mandated to undergo the lie detector (polygraph) examination.
Final thought, if the courts would step in and get involved they could have the New York Times reveal the author of the Op-Ed. That certainly would save a lot of stress and strain on the administration, regarding any lie detector examination and clearly would end the speculation as to WHO wrote the Op-ED. I believe this route would be best for the entire country and the person unmasked could be prosecuted for any crime(s) determined to be committed by penning such accusations against the President of the United States or subverting the constitution for their and their groups agenda of a secret "coup d' etat". - - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Sunday, September 9, 2018
AIRLINES ARE GOUGING US AGAIN. WHERE'S CONGRESS & NEW REGULATIONS.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Well, here we go again. The airlines are at it again. Jet Blue, Delta, American and other airline are raising fees again,. Th cost of the first bag will be $35.00, instead of the previous $30.00. The second bag will increase also. Another increase is if you wish to change your flight plans or cancel. That fee goes from $200.00 to $250.00.
People, when is enough, enough? Remember when these airlines started dinging us for bag fees. They told us they would keep the cost down and the fees might only be temporary. Since the inception of charging us traveler's the additional bag fees, those fees continued to increase. The airlines found that charging for the bags increased their bottom line by millions and they continued to get greedy.
The airlines cut all amenities when and where ever they could. The meals, the beverages and even the small pack of peanuts are a thing of the past.They reduced the amount of seating space allowed for the flying customer just to allow them to pack in even more passengers on the plane. One airline years ago mulled over the idea of having people stand instead of sit so they could carry more passengers on each flight. I really believe the airlines could, and would make a passenger stand during a flight if it meant cramming more people on the plane.
The airlines were deregulated decades ago with our lawmakers saying it would allow for cheaper airline fares. And they suggested mote people would be able to afford to fly. However, since the airlines were deregulated they gamed the system and now, look where the flying public is.? We have only high prices, lost amenities, cramped seating space, flight delays, passengers stranded on runways for hours on end without food, water, and restrooms. And that's just some of the problems we now have with a deregulated airline industry.
I would suggest that the Congress and government step up and formulate brand new regulations. The airline industry should be mandated to follow new, strict regulations. Hold the airlines accountable and stop the gouging. The FAA has been falling down on the job for years when it comes to holding any airline accountable for their gross abuses to the flying public.
I remember the time (40's ,50's, 60's and 70's) when flying used to be a fun experience. The employees were courteous, there was ample seating space for everyone on board, food was served to the passengers, snacks and drinks were always available. Now, to squeeze every penny out of the customer the airlines eliminated most ,if not all of the amenities,. They began charging for the little extras that used to be part of the flight and when they found they could get away with applying a fee for extra bags, the airlines went wild.. It turned out to be a real moneymaker for them. They made millions more a year. At every opportunity they raise those fees. The airlines now are looking to find each and every thing they can attach a fee to.
Folks, once the greed starts and sets in, it only escalates. And the airlines have been on this greed trip for years, taking advantage of the flying public. And, unless we scream to high heaven and insist our milk toast lawmakers in Washington set new rules and regulation AND insist they stop taking money for the airline industry LOBBYISTS, our flying on an airline will only get worse..-- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decision. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Well, here we go again. The airlines are at it again. Jet Blue, Delta, American and other airline are raising fees again,. Th cost of the first bag will be $35.00, instead of the previous $30.00. The second bag will increase also. Another increase is if you wish to change your flight plans or cancel. That fee goes from $200.00 to $250.00.
People, when is enough, enough? Remember when these airlines started dinging us for bag fees. They told us they would keep the cost down and the fees might only be temporary. Since the inception of charging us traveler's the additional bag fees, those fees continued to increase. The airlines found that charging for the bags increased their bottom line by millions and they continued to get greedy.
The airlines cut all amenities when and where ever they could. The meals, the beverages and even the small pack of peanuts are a thing of the past.They reduced the amount of seating space allowed for the flying customer just to allow them to pack in even more passengers on the plane. One airline years ago mulled over the idea of having people stand instead of sit so they could carry more passengers on each flight. I really believe the airlines could, and would make a passenger stand during a flight if it meant cramming more people on the plane.
The airlines were deregulated decades ago with our lawmakers saying it would allow for cheaper airline fares. And they suggested mote people would be able to afford to fly. However, since the airlines were deregulated they gamed the system and now, look where the flying public is.? We have only high prices, lost amenities, cramped seating space, flight delays, passengers stranded on runways for hours on end without food, water, and restrooms. And that's just some of the problems we now have with a deregulated airline industry.
I would suggest that the Congress and government step up and formulate brand new regulations. The airline industry should be mandated to follow new, strict regulations. Hold the airlines accountable and stop the gouging. The FAA has been falling down on the job for years when it comes to holding any airline accountable for their gross abuses to the flying public.
I remember the time (40's ,50's, 60's and 70's) when flying used to be a fun experience. The employees were courteous, there was ample seating space for everyone on board, food was served to the passengers, snacks and drinks were always available. Now, to squeeze every penny out of the customer the airlines eliminated most ,if not all of the amenities,. They began charging for the little extras that used to be part of the flight and when they found they could get away with applying a fee for extra bags, the airlines went wild.. It turned out to be a real moneymaker for them. They made millions more a year. At every opportunity they raise those fees. The airlines now are looking to find each and every thing they can attach a fee to.
Folks, once the greed starts and sets in, it only escalates. And the airlines have been on this greed trip for years, taking advantage of the flying public. And, unless we scream to high heaven and insist our milk toast lawmakers in Washington set new rules and regulation AND insist they stop taking money for the airline industry LOBBYISTS, our flying on an airline will only get worse..-- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decision. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Saturday, September 8, 2018
THE ANONYMOUS LETTER WRITER BURROWED IN THE WHITE HOUSE: CALL IN SECRET SERVICE, JUSTICE DEPT, AND COURTS.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
A recent op-ed published in the NYT stated that there was a high level administration official, and a group described as a sleeper cell working in the the White House to resist, obstruct, cause turmoil and thwart President Trump and his policies and agenda.
Some in Congress said the the ethics committee should investigate the matter and hold the person responsible. ARE YOU KIDDING. Once a matter is turned over to the ethics committee, it gets lost in a maze and dark hole. Any investigation by this lame, ineffectual committee is done in SECRET and no resolution is ever reported to the taxpayer. IT's a JOKE. The only purpose of the ethics committee is to "protect all members of congress. Nothing more.
As an example, look what happened when we, the taxpayer demanded action to know about the payments made to men and women who were sexually assaulted by these lawmakers in congress. This slush fund to pay off the victims was kept secret for decades. We were paying off these claims against the congress people with our hard earned money. All the while they were laughing at us while they continued to sexually assault, knowing that it wasn't their money that was paying the bill.
That matter is still lost somewhere in the belly of the beast, the ETHICS COMMITTEE. Again, this committee is only there to protect the entire congress and hide and cover up for each of these over paid, lazy lawmakers. The public still doesn't have any real answer as to how the congress is going to STOP using our money to pay-off their wrongdoing. I would bet dollars to donuts that these lawmakers in congress are still using our money to pay for their misdeeds.
So, to have the congress people say that the "ethics committee" should handle any investigation into this unknown person that penned the article is ludicrous. They will immediately bury it and cover it up.
My opinion: This op-ed from " Mr. or Ms. ANONYMOUS "is an act of sedition against the government, the White House and the president of the United States. If in fact, this person and a group of colleagues in the government are working against the administration to change and overturn the results of a legitimate election , it is clearly a National Security risk. Where's the Secret Service, the Justice Department, and the courts.? They should be all over this. I believe the courts could compel the New York Times to name the anonymous source. Folks, we DO NOT need a shadow government from within working to tear down the government. Forget the ETHICS COMMITTEE for any answers.. Federal law enforcement and our courts should step in and uncover this traitor and their entire group and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
A recent op-ed published in the NYT stated that there was a high level administration official, and a group described as a sleeper cell working in the the White House to resist, obstruct, cause turmoil and thwart President Trump and his policies and agenda.
Some in Congress said the the ethics committee should investigate the matter and hold the person responsible. ARE YOU KIDDING. Once a matter is turned over to the ethics committee, it gets lost in a maze and dark hole. Any investigation by this lame, ineffectual committee is done in SECRET and no resolution is ever reported to the taxpayer. IT's a JOKE. The only purpose of the ethics committee is to "protect all members of congress. Nothing more.
As an example, look what happened when we, the taxpayer demanded action to know about the payments made to men and women who were sexually assaulted by these lawmakers in congress. This slush fund to pay off the victims was kept secret for decades. We were paying off these claims against the congress people with our hard earned money. All the while they were laughing at us while they continued to sexually assault, knowing that it wasn't their money that was paying the bill.
That matter is still lost somewhere in the belly of the beast, the ETHICS COMMITTEE. Again, this committee is only there to protect the entire congress and hide and cover up for each of these over paid, lazy lawmakers. The public still doesn't have any real answer as to how the congress is going to STOP using our money to pay-off their wrongdoing. I would bet dollars to donuts that these lawmakers in congress are still using our money to pay for their misdeeds.
So, to have the congress people say that the "ethics committee" should handle any investigation into this unknown person that penned the article is ludicrous. They will immediately bury it and cover it up.
My opinion: This op-ed from " Mr. or Ms. ANONYMOUS "is an act of sedition against the government, the White House and the president of the United States. If in fact, this person and a group of colleagues in the government are working against the administration to change and overturn the results of a legitimate election , it is clearly a National Security risk. Where's the Secret Service, the Justice Department, and the courts.? They should be all over this. I believe the courts could compel the New York Times to name the anonymous source. Folks, we DO NOT need a shadow government from within working to tear down the government. Forget the ETHICS COMMITTEE for any answers.. Federal law enforcement and our courts should step in and uncover this traitor and their entire group and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Friday, September 7, 2018
SAFEGUARD ELECTIONS? KEEP IT SIMPLE. RETURN TO PAPER BALLOTS.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
A so-called expert panel from the National Academy of Sciences was formed to weigh-in on reforming the election system. I fear this panel will piddle around, take forever to reach a good consensus and come up with a flimsy, hollow report.
While they are doing this we get closer to the Midterms and the 2020 presidential election.
My two cents in this matter is a very simple solution in order to guarantee an election of safety, free from hacking and computer voter fraud.
First, I would suggest that the nation go back to the PAPER BALLOT that was used decades ago. Use a human and readable ballot. If this is done the voter ballot can be verified and used in any recounts. A computer, electronically record of the vote cannot be verified like the paper ballot can.
People, technology is fine for many things, in many situations, but using it for voting, casting ballots is not the place. It is a red flag to criminals that manipulation and fraud is the name of the game. The threat from all of these hostile foreign nations is not worth computer elections.
Electronic/computer technology clearly is not the future of of the ballot box and the voting public.
Second, have the voter show identification at the polling place prior to entering the voting booth. This move will verify their registration as a voter and a citizen of the United States. As an additional measure the government could authorize and mandate a thumb print be put on the paper ballot. This move would guarantee that the person casting the vote on the ballot was indeed the person voting.
Why wait for some "expert" panel to come up with reams and reams of suggestions to improve elections? My idea is simple and logical. It was a proven method of voting since the early 1900s. It worked. And, like the people say. "If it ain't broken, don't fix it.. Folks, I'm all in to the return of paper ballots that can be tracked and verified.--And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
A so-called expert panel from the National Academy of Sciences was formed to weigh-in on reforming the election system. I fear this panel will piddle around, take forever to reach a good consensus and come up with a flimsy, hollow report.
While they are doing this we get closer to the Midterms and the 2020 presidential election.
My two cents in this matter is a very simple solution in order to guarantee an election of safety, free from hacking and computer voter fraud.
First, I would suggest that the nation go back to the PAPER BALLOT that was used decades ago. Use a human and readable ballot. If this is done the voter ballot can be verified and used in any recounts. A computer, electronically record of the vote cannot be verified like the paper ballot can.
People, technology is fine for many things, in many situations, but using it for voting, casting ballots is not the place. It is a red flag to criminals that manipulation and fraud is the name of the game. The threat from all of these hostile foreign nations is not worth computer elections.
Electronic/computer technology clearly is not the future of of the ballot box and the voting public.
Second, have the voter show identification at the polling place prior to entering the voting booth. This move will verify their registration as a voter and a citizen of the United States. As an additional measure the government could authorize and mandate a thumb print be put on the paper ballot. This move would guarantee that the person casting the vote on the ballot was indeed the person voting.
Why wait for some "expert" panel to come up with reams and reams of suggestions to improve elections? My idea is simple and logical. It was a proven method of voting since the early 1900s. It worked. And, like the people say. "If it ain't broken, don't fix it.. Folks, I'm all in to the return of paper ballots that can be tracked and verified.--And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
MY TAKE ON THE NFL FIASCO.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
I had a few people ask me to give my opinion on the NFL controversy. So, here goes.
I would suggest that the owners of the teams step up and grow a backbone, put on their big boy pants and tell the players something like:
"I am the owner of this team. I am paying each of you millions of dollars in salary.Sure, you have a right to protest and you can do it anytime and anywhere you wish except during a game, on the field. Men, I'm here to make money and when your protests cost me customers and ticket sales, and that move is affecting my business, my bottom line, it is my business. So, I am instructing all of your players to stand during the national anthem, and our flag. Any player that refuses or chooses not to do abide by my rules will be benched immediately and will be traded to the worst team I can find at the earliest date."
I feel that if these wimpy owners would have set the rules and have the players abide by those rules this whole fiasco would not have gotten a foothold. Folks, these players are paid millions and millions of dollars and if you hit them in their pocketbook and they realize they will lose money and possibly lose their job, they will play the game and leave politics out of the game experience. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
I had a few people ask me to give my opinion on the NFL controversy. So, here goes.
I would suggest that the owners of the teams step up and grow a backbone, put on their big boy pants and tell the players something like:
"I am the owner of this team. I am paying each of you millions of dollars in salary.Sure, you have a right to protest and you can do it anytime and anywhere you wish except during a game, on the field. Men, I'm here to make money and when your protests cost me customers and ticket sales, and that move is affecting my business, my bottom line, it is my business. So, I am instructing all of your players to stand during the national anthem, and our flag. Any player that refuses or chooses not to do abide by my rules will be benched immediately and will be traded to the worst team I can find at the earliest date."
I feel that if these wimpy owners would have set the rules and have the players abide by those rules this whole fiasco would not have gotten a foothold. Folks, these players are paid millions and millions of dollars and if you hit them in their pocketbook and they realize they will lose money and possibly lose their job, they will play the game and leave politics out of the game experience. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Thursday, September 6, 2018
PRESIDENT TRUMP SHOULD SHUT DOWN THE GOVERNMENT IF CONGRESS DOES NOT GIVE HIM THE WALL.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
President Trump said that he is considering shutting down the government if he doesn't get his border wall money. Hooray! But his Republican cohorts in Congress, like Senate Majority leader McConnell and Speaker Paul Ryan are already going to the media and saying there will be no shutdown. What a joke. These two Republicans are clearly not a friend of the president and have been blocking president Trumps agenda from the get-go.
The two lame brains are using the excuse "wait until after the midterm election." Just another tactic to keep the old entrenched Republicans way of life continuing. They hate Trump's change and don't want him to succeed in anything he does. They promised him the wall last year and then pushed a spending bill on the sly that didn't give the president his wall.. They keep telling the president, "next time." Or, it's not a right time. Now, they're using the midterm election as an excuse and you can bet then they will tell the president that's it too close to the 2020 election. And they will push to have him wait until his second term begins. They, Ryan and McConnell, are part of the swamp people that want to keep Washington as it was and they, their friends and friendly lobbyists are making tons of money for not building the wall on the southern border.
My suggestion to president Trump --SHUT THE GOVERNMENT DOWN until you get the funding you want and need for the wall. First, if the government shuts down it always seems to run better. The world is not going to stop. On all previous shutdowns the feds always keep the essential personnel they need to run the government and it has always run just fine without serious interruptions.
The government always calls back their employees, and guess what? They pay them back pay for the time the government was shutdown. Side note: I have a problem with that part of a shutdown. I say if and employee is off the job, not working, THEY SHOULD NOT be paid. Period.
The people working outside the government who gets laid off when their company lays them off temporarily or when and if the company shuts down the employee is on their own. They usually file for unemployment or take another job until they are hired back. The pampered government workers should not be entitled to anymore that the average worker across the country. But that is another story I will cover in another blog.
In summary, President Trump should go for the government shutdown even if it is before the midterm elections. Why? Because no matter what he does he's going to take heat for it. The RINO Republicans and the Democrats want him out of office so bad that if he came up with a cure for cancer, they would find fault with that.
I hope the president does not allow these spoiler Republicans and Democrats who continually work against him win out again. He promised the wall and if he does shut down the government until he gets the money for it the voters will reward him with their votes and continue to back his agenda. It's time he told these spoilers where to get off the Trump train. -- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)