MY DOUBTS ABOUT CARLY FIORINA.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Carly Fiorina -- before the voters decide to vote this lady in because of all the buzz that she did good in the debates lets look at her record. First thing to know is that she is not an outsider like Donald Trump or Dr. Carson. She has been in politics before and was defeated.The New York Times reported that in 2008, she was an economic adviser to John McCain, the career politician that ran for president. Her title was: "Chairwoman of the Republican National Committee's "Victory 08 committee. McCain lost his bid for president. Further, this over ambitious lady had a large, large desire to be vice-president if McCain got elected. She was salivating for the job like a dog eyeing a steak. I can only suspect that Fiorina was very disappointed when McCain selected Alaska Governor, Sarah Palin as his vice-presidential running mate. Fact is, Dana Milbank from the Washington Post said that "Fiorina, for her part couldn't be any more plain about her vice-president ambitions without taking out an ad." WOW! Fiorina an outsider? No way.
In 2010, she ran in the political arena to defeat California Sen. Barbara Boxer. While running she made fun of and mocked Boxers hair. This is the same woman that now in 2015 felt offended about Trump making a remark about her appearance. Is she a hypocrite? Maybe, possibly. She was indignant about Trump's remarks about her appearance but had no qualms about playing the insult card regarding Senator Boxer. Fiorina lost the election to Senator Boxer. However, she did spend 22 MILLION DOLLARS on the Boxer/Fiorina race, which included $5.5 MILLION of her own money. Boy, this woman wants in politics bad, doesn't she?
It appears Fiorina will say and do anything to secure a spot in the political arena. During the September, 2015 debate she presented a savage attack on Planned Parenthood saying she wanted to defund the program. She dared Hillary Clinton and Obama to watch the tapes, She described a fully formed fetus laying out on a table with heart beating, limbs moving while a person says: " We have to keep it alive to harvest its brain." According to organizations that check facts of these political wannabe's, one in particular, "POLITIFACT" reported that Fiorina's remarks were untrue. They reported that the footage of the fetus was just "stock footage" and was added to the video to enhance the drama to the videos content. It should be noted that another fact check service, FactCheck.org reported "We are aware of "no" video showing such a scene."
Another media reporter, Josh Marshall said: "Fiorina has a habit of simply making things up." Also, when Fiorina became CEO of Hewlett-Packard in 1999, she made the stupid claim that "there is no glass ceiling for women." I would suggest the reader ask most women in the work force if they agree with Fiorina's assessment and statement about "no glass ceiling for women."
In 2005, Fiorina was booted out of HP. She tried to tell anyone who would listen that it was an ol' Boy's Network that cost her, her job. Really? After she was appointed CEO Hewlett-Packard began to show signs of deteriorating and the companies performance began to drop like a rock. She literally ran Hewlett-Packard into the ground. HP's performance dropped like a asteroid crashing into earth. Lay offs of company employee's were in the tens of thousands. But believe it or not, as CEO of HP, Fiorina walked away with MILLIONS and MILLIONS of dollars in her pocket.
Carly Fiorina claims to be a competent business woman but her business smarts and how she performed with various companies clearly shows ineptness, incompetence and bad decision making. When some of the employee's that worked under and with Fiorina was interviewed they paint a very bad picture of her performance skills. Some reported that she wanted "yes" people around her. If her circle of employee's didn't agree with her, they were history. Other reports in the media said that she frequently became angry with her employees and some said "it was her way or the highway." Others described her a a mean person and said she wanted things her way, and only her way. So much for Compaq and Hewlett-Packard. Right?
I don't know who I am going to vote for at this early stage of the game. I have always been an Independent voter. But at this point in time if I had to compare the two supposed business outsiders running for President on the Republican side - -Fiorina vs Trump, it would be no contest.
1. Trump has a proven track record of success as a business person, doing business deals all over the world Fiorina, trashed and burned most every company she was involved in or with.
2. Fiorina is NO true outsider (as she claims). She was clearly involved in politics and had an in with old school politicians like Sen. John McCain, in fact working for him. She ran and lost for a Senate seat against Barbara Boxer. However, Trump never held political office, He never was employed by Washington lawmakers nor was he hired as adviser to either the Republican or Democratic party. Plus, TRUMP states he is paying for his presidential run from his own pocket. and even stated that he will not accept the salary paid to the president, if elected. His presidential salary would go to charity, according to TRUMP. Can Fiorina say that?
I may vote for anyone of the current 15 or so Republican candidates (depending who drops out along the way) or one of the four Democratic candidates because I try to vote for the person that I believe will do the best job for the country. But I certainly will narrow my choices by eliminating persons that I see as hypocrites, liars and those who embellish and play lose with the facts and truth. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions., You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Wednesday, September 30, 2015
Tuesday, September 29, 2015
PRESIDENT PUTIN MAKES SENSE. THE U.S. KEEPS FOULING UP
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
I watched Russian President, Vladimir Putin's interview on television 60 minutes last night and heard some of his message to the United Nations. I have to say Putin did very well during the 60 minutes interview. It appears this man is intelligent, well versed in world affairs and foreign policy matters. He's tactful in his responses to the interviewer, he is blunt and he came across very well. It's obvious he has a great love for his motherland and explained in clear fashion about losing approximately 25 million Russians when the USSR broke apart. He also was cautious not to try to explain situations that President Obama is involved in.
I agree with a lot of what Putin says, especially when it comes to the Syrian war. He does not want to overthrow the Syrian government and get rid of President Basher-al-Assad. Currently Assad is attempting to put down a rebellion within his borders and Putin's view is to allow the Syrian military fight their own war. I agree with that position. The only Syrian soldiers fighting ISIS terrorists is Assad's elite guard unit. Like Putin, I say let the entire Syrian military fight the terrorists. So far the U.S. has spent 500 MILLION dollars to train and equip 5,000 moderate rebels to fight ISIS. But that effort has turned out to be a complete failure . The result of that training and support was only a few Syrian fighters (you could count them on one hand) stayed to fight. The others we trained threw down their weapons, ran away, turned over their weapons to ISIS and now are fighting on the ISIS side using our weapons.
In collusion with the Saudi Arab nations Obama allows them to provide arms and equipment to Sunni rebel groups fighting the Assad. regime, which is dominated by a small minority Shiite sect
I disagree with Obama and his administrations plan to provide money, training, weapons, etc., to certain groups in Syria to fight so-called terrorists. Fact is,Obama and his minions really doesn't know who represents these groups or what agenda they have in the long run. All Obama knows is that he wants Assad to go. He's said that over and over again. My view is the United States should not arm people they don't know enough about. Further, the U.S.should join Russia and other nations to fight and wipe out ALL of these different groups. I believe they all should be treated like terrorists. Obama should let Assad take back his country and stay in power. Then if the people of Syria want to change leaders let them do it on their own. You can bet that if another nation said that Obama should go, should be replaced, he would do the same as Assad is doing. He would fight tooth and nail to stay in power.
Look what happens every time we, the United States goes into a foreign country and decides to overthrow the leaders of those countries. We turn those countries into shambles. We cause the citizens of those countries to divide into different factions and fight each other. Look what we did starting with Iraq. The United States used a preemptive strike against Iraq using the excuse that Iraq had "weapons of mass destruction." But all the information supplied by the Washington warmongers was proved to be false. The Washington crowd wanted to start a war and they did. The U.S. spent billions on the Iraq war and today we are still fighting the battle. Then came Afghanistan, (billions of dollars more), then Libya, now Syria and Africa. The U.S. has spent and is still spending BILLIONS of dollars on these wars, wars we should have not gotten involved in. BILLIONS of dollars, THOUSANDS of American lives wasted in the name of trying to spread American democracy to countries that have their own customs and.culture. People, these countries do not want our way of life, the never did. They want to live their lives in their own countries as they have been doing for centuries.
I submit that if it wasn't for the U.S. sticking their nose into Iraq and starting a war there would be no Taliban terrorists threatening the world, no ISIS Muslim radicals threatening the world. Those people in those countries would have still been living under their chosen leaders doing what comes natural to them, living their way of life. I suggest that after the Iraq invasion, the U.S. lead the effort to DISBAND the Iraq army and that in turn led to the creation of ISIS. Why do I say that? Because former Iraq army officers now compile the extremist groups top ranks. Then there's Libya. The US. again stuck there nose in another countries internal affairs and formed a so-called coalition of European partners to overthrow Libya's leader, Moammar Gadhafi, which again led to the creation of ISIS and terrorists there. As a side note: Just today the media reported that Obama said he admits that he made mistakes in Libya. Wow! Mistakes he says? I say BIG TIME MISTAKES.
Now, Europe has a mass influx of Syrian refugee's that want sheltered, fed and taken care of by other nations. Is it the the fault of the Unites States that this refugee situation is what it is? I would suggest that a big part of the blame falls on the United States. It appears that the lawmakers in Washington fail to learn by past experience and mistakes. The Washington establishment starts one war, causes havoc and turmoil and then moves on to another country trying to depose the leaders while rationalizing their involvement.Washington keeps playing the same ol' song over and over again.
The billions of dollars spent on all of these never ending misguided wars could have been used here at home in the good ol' USA, feeding our poor, our hungry, rebuilding our infrastructure, securing our own borders BUT instead Washington takes our tax money and feeds, clothes and supports other people in these warring countries. Washington uses our tax money to build schools, roads fences, infrastructure and borders in the ravaged countries while caring less for our own kids, citizens and way of life here in America.
Finally, my solution to the mass refugee problem that was caused by the U.S.and its allies . I've written in earlier blogs and articles that the European Union and the United States should:
" Keep all of the Syrian refugee's in Syria. The European countries and the U.S. can build a buffer zone of PROTECTION in a swath of Syria where all the refugee's can migrate. The the U.S. and the world communities (i.e., Germany, Austria, Hungry, Croatia Greece, Russia, etc. can provide food, clothing, heath care and all humanitarian aid as needed to all refugee's."
Folks, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that a proposal such as the one I suggest will work. All of the refugee's would be under the complete protection of all the world powers. Any terrorists group who would even consider invading the protection zone would be insane. The situation now is that European countries are setting up camps and zones in their individual countries to accommodate the refugee's. They can hardly handle the masses. But keeping the refugee's in their own country (Syria) would be the answer. They will be provided for by the world's humanitarian aid to them and the Syrian refugee's would be able to resume their lives after the Syrian conflict is resolved.
European countries and the United States are currently allowing hundreds of thousands of Syrian refugee's in their borders. That is a crazy act. An act that was not though out clearly.The refugee's influx will turn each countries ethnicity upside down, jobs will be lost to actual citizens of those countries who accept them and in all likelihood there will be some terrorist radicals that will lie their way into these countries, establish a base and carry out terrorist acts. Again, it would be easier to contain and accommodate the Syrians on their own soil. It clearly is easier to disburse aid and comfort to the Syrians in their own country rather that trying to resettle them throughout the world.
My idea and solution would also prevent any Syrian radial and/or ISIS person from infiltrating the refugee masses and relocating to a country where they can carry out a terrorist act on that particular country. Speaking as an American I would say that we, the United States SHOULD NOT allow even ONE Syrian refugee into the country. Once one radical terrorist gets a foothold, the next move is an entire cell of radials being organized and then -- we here in this country will be having the same problem with ISIS as the countries now fighting them. Mark my words: If Obama and/or the administration allows Syrian refugee's into America it is not a question of IF, but WHEN our country comes under attack by terrorists.. To me, ONE Syrian radical in America is too much. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Friday, September 25, 2015
OBAMA, DO NOT ALLOW EVEN "ONE" SYRIAN, MUSLIM REFUGEE INTO THE USA.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The Obama administration is doing a number on America again. He and his cohort, Secretary of State, KERRY said the United States will allow about 70,000 refugee's from Syria and other warring Muslim countries into the United States this year. Next year Obama and Kerry plan to allow 100,000 more Muslim migrant refugee's into America. IS HE CRAZY? Imagine, Obama has let at least 500,000 refugee's into the United States since he took office. Question? How many more refugee's and immigrants can the United States handle before the tipping point disrupts the American way of life on a permanent basis?
My view is that we SHOULD NOT allow even"ONE" Muslim, Syrian refugee into America. Folks it will be just a matter of time before some, or even one of these Muslim refugee's will commit a terrorist act on American soil. I say it is not a question of if, but when. I suggest to you that "it is a clear CERTAINTY" this will happen. Mark my words: If Obamba and the do-gooder lawmakers in Washington go through with this half-baked refugee plan I predict that there will be an attack on U.S. soil by at least ONE of the refugees that the administration had allowed into the United States. And you can bet that once one or more Syrian refugees who are intent on doing harm to America get a foothold in our country it will be a constant battle to rid the country of the radicals.It will be too late, then.
There are 60 MILLION people currently displaced around the world and dollars to donuts more and more of these displaced people will be more than willing to. board small boats,trains vehicles and even planes to run rampant through Europe's OPEN BORDERS and many will LIE, CHEAT and STEAL to gain entry into some European cities and the United States. It is evident that once these displaced persons see that these refugee's are going to be taken in by the West and housed, fed and paid money to live on they are going to mob rush the borders and stampede like a bunch of cattle. The problem will grow like a cancer-- worldwide.
People, if you see one ant, cockroach or pest on the kitchen counter, in all probability there are hundreds more in and under the kitchen cabinets. I also maintain that after the first attack by one of the refugee Muslim radicals here in the USA the lawmakers and administration will pass the buck trying to rationalize their errors and mistakes, not owning up to any of them.
Is it easy to get past Homeland Security to gain entry into this country? You bet. Just look at the immigration problem we are experiencing in America today. There are MILLIONS of "illegal aliens" in out country now and they are coming in by the thousands EVERY day.
Right now, as Homeland Security personnel screen people coming into this country they only give approximately 3 to 5 minutes of attention to each person. In fact, every screening currently being done on entry into the USA is a very cursory one. So how the devil can Homeland Security actually tell if the Muslim, Syrian refugee is really what he or she says they are? Answer: THEY CAN'T.
I predict, right now that some ISIS terrorists and Muslim radicals will infiltrate the refugee masses and pretend to be fleeing from a war torn country. These covert terrorists will be prepped, before hand, as to what to say and how to answer and respond to the very brief inquiry by Homeland Security people. Christ, just look how the screening process got out of hand in Europe as the millions of refugee's entered Austria, Germany, Hungry, Croatia etc. At this time those countries DO NOT know who's who. Europe is letting these migrants into their countries willy-nilly because they are overwhelmed by the massive influx.
I submit that the European Union should not have wanted a ONE WORLD ORDER.In fact, they shouldn't have created it. No borders? WOW! European leaders thought it would be a great idea to allow people to go from country to country without a passport while using basically ONE currency, THE EURO. Look what that fiasco got them folks? Greece asked for TWO separate world loans to bail their country out of bankruptcy. Then what happened. They broke their promise to pay back the money. They defaulted and refused to pay off the TWO previous loans worth billions. It appears Greece's promises are not worth the paper they are written on. Now Greece again made a promise to repay billions back if the European Union and world powers let them have their THIRD bailout loan amounting to BILLIONS of dollars. And the dummy world banks and European Union gave Greece their money.WOW! Remember, now that Greece pulled this" promise -fail to repay" game on the world you can bet other countries that are on the brink like Spain, Portugal and Italy will want the same treatment and action for their countries. Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy have it set up so their citizens can live on "over- the- top" pensions and welfare payments, take months worth of vacations and receive lucrative, generous heath care benefits. The citizens in these countries do not want to work. They literally want to be taken care of by their government. SO MUCH for a "ONE WORLD ORDER" and one currency. Right?
Now this so-called ONE WORLD order who didn't want borders and who wanted the use of one currency is flooded with Muslim refugee's and this migration of the Muslims will turn such countries as Germany, Austria, Hungry, etc., into nation where they will lose their heritage and ethnicity.
Here's my solution to this current refugee fiasco. I would suggest that the world powers implement my plan - -with some tweaking:
"Take all of the Syrian refugee's and keep them in their own country. Hell, there can be a very, very, large protected zone in Syria where all of the refugee's could be safe and protected.. The world powers to be can encircle this protected zone (in Syria) and keep the refugee's safe while providing food, housing clothes health care and all required humanitarian aid. The refugee's would be in their own country. They would be comfortable there living in their own cultural comfort zone. Keeping the Syrians in their own country would immediately solve the mass migration that is occurring at this moment. I submit these immigrants/refugee's would be comfortable living in their own country, especially when they are being protected, fed and housed.
People of the world, it doesn't take a FIFTH GRADER to figure a solution like the one I'm proposing here to see that it will curtail the mass exodus. So, DO NOT LET the Syrians and refugee's from other war torn countries migrate to countries on the European continent. Keep them in their own countries, under protection by world powers and troops until such time that the military conflicts in the ravaged countries are resolved. Once the conflicts are resolved the refugee's can resume their life in their country of origin."
Here's a side note people. Many of these Syrian refugee's (are mostly MALE) The majority of the men fleeing is of military age. They are fleeing because they DO NOT want to be inducted into the military in their country and they DO NOT want to fight for their own freedom on their own sovereign soil. They would rather run away and have other countries take care of them by feeding, clothing and housing and provide generous welfare, health care and money benefits . If these so-called refugee's are afraid to do their military duty to salvage their own country, what does that tell you?
Also, look at many of these refugee's landing in Greece, Austria, Germany, etc.,-- they have great looking name brand clothes, name brand sneakers , jewelry and yes, cell phones. They even coordinate their trip by using the social media on their cell phones. What's the matter with this picture? They can pay cell phone bills and dress in brand name clothes yet they claim poverty? How long will it take some of these refugee's to coordinate a terrorist attack on United Sates soil?
It was noted also that some of the young male refugee's that were interviewed by news people in Greece and Hungry spoke English and many said they hadn't been to any school for any education in six, seven years or more and had not worked or held a job during that same amount of time. Uneducated out of work Syrians and Muslims? These are exactly the type of young people that are ripe for the picking for ISIS and radical Muslims to recruit.
Remember, we here in the United States fought our own civil war. Tens of thousands of men were killed during that conflict and the war was eventually resolved and we Americans, both from the North and South moved on to make this country great. Why is it these other countries want us to fight their wars for them while they "RUN and HIDE"and want to be taken care of while sitting on the sidelines?
So lets go full circle. Back to my original though. Does the United States need to allow hundreds of thousands of Syrian refugee's into our country? I say, "NO"! Oh, by the way -- the very RICH Muslim countries such as the Saudi's and other Arab and Muslim nations REFUSE to take these Muslim refugee's into their countries. Do they know something we don't? -- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D
_________________________________.
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The Obama administration is doing a number on America again. He and his cohort, Secretary of State, KERRY said the United States will allow about 70,000 refugee's from Syria and other warring Muslim countries into the United States this year. Next year Obama and Kerry plan to allow 100,000 more Muslim migrant refugee's into America. IS HE CRAZY? Imagine, Obama has let at least 500,000 refugee's into the United States since he took office. Question? How many more refugee's and immigrants can the United States handle before the tipping point disrupts the American way of life on a permanent basis?
My view is that we SHOULD NOT allow even"ONE" Muslim, Syrian refugee into America. Folks it will be just a matter of time before some, or even one of these Muslim refugee's will commit a terrorist act on American soil. I say it is not a question of if, but when. I suggest to you that "it is a clear CERTAINTY" this will happen. Mark my words: If Obamba and the do-gooder lawmakers in Washington go through with this half-baked refugee plan I predict that there will be an attack on U.S. soil by at least ONE of the refugees that the administration had allowed into the United States. And you can bet that once one or more Syrian refugees who are intent on doing harm to America get a foothold in our country it will be a constant battle to rid the country of the radicals.It will be too late, then.
There are 60 MILLION people currently displaced around the world and dollars to donuts more and more of these displaced people will be more than willing to. board small boats,trains vehicles and even planes to run rampant through Europe's OPEN BORDERS and many will LIE, CHEAT and STEAL to gain entry into some European cities and the United States. It is evident that once these displaced persons see that these refugee's are going to be taken in by the West and housed, fed and paid money to live on they are going to mob rush the borders and stampede like a bunch of cattle. The problem will grow like a cancer-- worldwide.
People, if you see one ant, cockroach or pest on the kitchen counter, in all probability there are hundreds more in and under the kitchen cabinets. I also maintain that after the first attack by one of the refugee Muslim radicals here in the USA the lawmakers and administration will pass the buck trying to rationalize their errors and mistakes, not owning up to any of them.
Is it easy to get past Homeland Security to gain entry into this country? You bet. Just look at the immigration problem we are experiencing in America today. There are MILLIONS of "illegal aliens" in out country now and they are coming in by the thousands EVERY day.
Right now, as Homeland Security personnel screen people coming into this country they only give approximately 3 to 5 minutes of attention to each person. In fact, every screening currently being done on entry into the USA is a very cursory one. So how the devil can Homeland Security actually tell if the Muslim, Syrian refugee is really what he or she says they are? Answer: THEY CAN'T.
I predict, right now that some ISIS terrorists and Muslim radicals will infiltrate the refugee masses and pretend to be fleeing from a war torn country. These covert terrorists will be prepped, before hand, as to what to say and how to answer and respond to the very brief inquiry by Homeland Security people. Christ, just look how the screening process got out of hand in Europe as the millions of refugee's entered Austria, Germany, Hungry, Croatia etc. At this time those countries DO NOT know who's who. Europe is letting these migrants into their countries willy-nilly because they are overwhelmed by the massive influx.
I submit that the European Union should not have wanted a ONE WORLD ORDER.In fact, they shouldn't have created it. No borders? WOW! European leaders thought it would be a great idea to allow people to go from country to country without a passport while using basically ONE currency, THE EURO. Look what that fiasco got them folks? Greece asked for TWO separate world loans to bail their country out of bankruptcy. Then what happened. They broke their promise to pay back the money. They defaulted and refused to pay off the TWO previous loans worth billions. It appears Greece's promises are not worth the paper they are written on. Now Greece again made a promise to repay billions back if the European Union and world powers let them have their THIRD bailout loan amounting to BILLIONS of dollars. And the dummy world banks and European Union gave Greece their money.WOW! Remember, now that Greece pulled this" promise -fail to repay" game on the world you can bet other countries that are on the brink like Spain, Portugal and Italy will want the same treatment and action for their countries. Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy have it set up so their citizens can live on "over- the- top" pensions and welfare payments, take months worth of vacations and receive lucrative, generous heath care benefits. The citizens in these countries do not want to work. They literally want to be taken care of by their government. SO MUCH for a "ONE WORLD ORDER" and one currency. Right?
Now this so-called ONE WORLD order who didn't want borders and who wanted the use of one currency is flooded with Muslim refugee's and this migration of the Muslims will turn such countries as Germany, Austria, Hungry, etc., into nation where they will lose their heritage and ethnicity.
Here's my solution to this current refugee fiasco. I would suggest that the world powers implement my plan - -with some tweaking:
"Take all of the Syrian refugee's and keep them in their own country. Hell, there can be a very, very, large protected zone in Syria where all of the refugee's could be safe and protected.. The world powers to be can encircle this protected zone (in Syria) and keep the refugee's safe while providing food, housing clothes health care and all required humanitarian aid. The refugee's would be in their own country. They would be comfortable there living in their own cultural comfort zone. Keeping the Syrians in their own country would immediately solve the mass migration that is occurring at this moment. I submit these immigrants/refugee's would be comfortable living in their own country, especially when they are being protected, fed and housed.
People of the world, it doesn't take a FIFTH GRADER to figure a solution like the one I'm proposing here to see that it will curtail the mass exodus. So, DO NOT LET the Syrians and refugee's from other war torn countries migrate to countries on the European continent. Keep them in their own countries, under protection by world powers and troops until such time that the military conflicts in the ravaged countries are resolved. Once the conflicts are resolved the refugee's can resume their life in their country of origin."
Here's a side note people. Many of these Syrian refugee's (are mostly MALE) The majority of the men fleeing is of military age. They are fleeing because they DO NOT want to be inducted into the military in their country and they DO NOT want to fight for their own freedom on their own sovereign soil. They would rather run away and have other countries take care of them by feeding, clothing and housing and provide generous welfare, health care and money benefits . If these so-called refugee's are afraid to do their military duty to salvage their own country, what does that tell you?
Also, look at many of these refugee's landing in Greece, Austria, Germany, etc.,-- they have great looking name brand clothes, name brand sneakers , jewelry and yes, cell phones. They even coordinate their trip by using the social media on their cell phones. What's the matter with this picture? They can pay cell phone bills and dress in brand name clothes yet they claim poverty? How long will it take some of these refugee's to coordinate a terrorist attack on United Sates soil?
It was noted also that some of the young male refugee's that were interviewed by news people in Greece and Hungry spoke English and many said they hadn't been to any school for any education in six, seven years or more and had not worked or held a job during that same amount of time. Uneducated out of work Syrians and Muslims? These are exactly the type of young people that are ripe for the picking for ISIS and radical Muslims to recruit.
Remember, we here in the United States fought our own civil war. Tens of thousands of men were killed during that conflict and the war was eventually resolved and we Americans, both from the North and South moved on to make this country great. Why is it these other countries want us to fight their wars for them while they "RUN and HIDE"and want to be taken care of while sitting on the sidelines?
So lets go full circle. Back to my original though. Does the United States need to allow hundreds of thousands of Syrian refugee's into our country? I say, "NO"! Oh, by the way -- the very RICH Muslim countries such as the Saudi's and other Arab and Muslim nations REFUSE to take these Muslim refugee's into their countries. Do they know something we don't? -- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D
_________________________________.
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Monday, September 21, 2015
CNN:I DUB THEE "CIRCUS NEWS NETWORK"-DEBATES WERE A FARCE.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The presidential debate put on by television CNN was a THREE RING CIRCUS. I now dub CNN as the CIRCUS NETWORK NEWS-(CNN). What is it with these moderators who question the presidential candidates? Instead of actual relevant questions, with substance, regarding the candidates views and opinions on such things as: foreign policy, economics, domestic issues here at home these TV moderators only wanted to polish their image by asking dopey, silly and stupid "got you" questions. I can only say these moderators handling presidential debates are a bunch of CLOWNS in the CIRCUS NEWS NETWORK line up.
The CIRCUS NEWS NETWORK (CNN) did a disservice to both the viewing public and the presidential candidates by turning what should have been an actual debate into this comical, pretend make believe debate by having their circus clown moderators present the candidates with stupid, childish questions far afield of any political interest.
The moderators must have set in a room constructing the meaningless questions using their network bosses wishes as a bid for ratings. Folks, it wouldn't take much to ask questions that 24 million viewers wanted to be addressed. FIFTH GRADERS could have come up with better questions that this IDIOT panel of so called NEWS people.
All the debate was was the moderators asking such things as: "Mr. Trump. Jeb Bush said this about you?" Then the irrelevant, silly question. And, Carly, Mr Trump said this about you? What do you have to say to Mr. Trump? Then, the silly, irrelevant question. This went on and on for THREE HOURS folks. And all these CIRCUS CLOWN moderators say is they wanted to have the presidential candidates interact. WOW! I submit that all of the candidates could have interacted by responding to the views and opinions of their opponents on substantial questions.
I say the moderators at CIRCUS NETWORK NEWS (CNN) could have asked questions of the candidates such as (i.e) Mr. Trump, or Mr. Paul, Mr. Christie or Ms. Fiorina: " If elected President, what actions will you take to raise the incomes of people in this country? Or, "How will you reverse all of the jobs being outsourced overseas? Or, what is your economic plan for this country if you are elected President? How will you secure and protect our borders? Explain your plan to save Social Security? And, on and on. There are many, many important issues that the people of this country want to see how these presidential candidates are going to approach them and present THEIR plan and address these needs.
Also, to be fair to all of the candidates on the stage --instead of hopping from one presidential candidate and giving one or more specific candidates more time than others the moderators should have EACH and EVERY candidate address and answer the same question and/or issue at hand, right down the line. That way each candidate will have the opportunity to present their case on a specific issue. Naturally each candidate will be limited to the same amount of time to respond the question put forth AND all of the viewers at home and in the audience can actually see how each candidate would handle the situation presented. That approach would allow the viewers to make an informed decision on which candidate has the better grasp on the question asked. In that way the voters can make up their mind as to who is lacking in knowledge, who falls short in addressing the question/issue, who can clearly articulate and explain the issue. But these phony (supposed to be FUNNY) questions like: "Who would you like to see on the $10.00 bill? It's laughable.
These candidates should be DEBATING about the most important issues facing this nation and all of them on that stage should have a chance (even if it is only minutes per question ) to address the same question/issue so WE, the PEOPLE can hear each candidates response.
Seriously, if I wanted to see a staged, moderated mix-up (like these CIRCUS NETWORK CLOWNS-(CNN) put on by bashing each candidate and expecting the candidates to respond to the negatives I would watch a JERRY SPRINGER show. This circus was below any NEWS NETWORK quality and content.
Keep in mind there is enough time for these presidential candidates to bad mouth or trash their opponents while on the stump, in town hall meeting and rally''s, etc. We the people can see that occur on our own to help us make u our own minds as to who we favor. We don't need an international news network (who is supposed to construct questions for a national debate) to stir the pot and present a THREE RING CIRCUS, instead of seriously presenting a debate between different candidates. NEWS NETWORKS, we Americans do not need silly jokes or puffy fluffy questions directed to the presidential candidates. Forget the so-called jokes and softball silly questions and get to the meat of the reason we are all here. DEBATE among the candidates on the issues of the world and domestic problems. WE want to hear the candidates response to GROWN UP, ADULT questions that pertain to world and domestic problems plaguing us here in America.
Finally, I am and was very disappointed to see a prominent news media source put on this DOG and PONY show for the benefit of rating and the image of these third rate moderators. I submit that THREE regular, everyday citizens from across the country could have constructed and presented a list of questions for a presidential debate much more relevant that these IDIOT moderators.
In fact, if nothing else, these moderators could have and should have went out into the country and accepted a question from different individuals until they had enough questions on the various issues of concern to fill this THREE HOUR THREE RING CIRCUS. Real, heartfelt, serous questions on issues people across the country are worried about and want addressed would have been a GOD send.-- And, that's my opinion. Make up your own mind. Make your own decisions.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
___________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradlkeykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The presidential debate put on by television CNN was a THREE RING CIRCUS. I now dub CNN as the CIRCUS NETWORK NEWS-(CNN). What is it with these moderators who question the presidential candidates? Instead of actual relevant questions, with substance, regarding the candidates views and opinions on such things as: foreign policy, economics, domestic issues here at home these TV moderators only wanted to polish their image by asking dopey, silly and stupid "got you" questions. I can only say these moderators handling presidential debates are a bunch of CLOWNS in the CIRCUS NEWS NETWORK line up.
The CIRCUS NEWS NETWORK (CNN) did a disservice to both the viewing public and the presidential candidates by turning what should have been an actual debate into this comical, pretend make believe debate by having their circus clown moderators present the candidates with stupid, childish questions far afield of any political interest.
The moderators must have set in a room constructing the meaningless questions using their network bosses wishes as a bid for ratings. Folks, it wouldn't take much to ask questions that 24 million viewers wanted to be addressed. FIFTH GRADERS could have come up with better questions that this IDIOT panel of so called NEWS people.
All the debate was was the moderators asking such things as: "Mr. Trump. Jeb Bush said this about you?" Then the irrelevant, silly question. And, Carly, Mr Trump said this about you? What do you have to say to Mr. Trump? Then, the silly, irrelevant question. This went on and on for THREE HOURS folks. And all these CIRCUS CLOWN moderators say is they wanted to have the presidential candidates interact. WOW! I submit that all of the candidates could have interacted by responding to the views and opinions of their opponents on substantial questions.
I say the moderators at CIRCUS NETWORK NEWS (CNN) could have asked questions of the candidates such as (i.e) Mr. Trump, or Mr. Paul, Mr. Christie or Ms. Fiorina: " If elected President, what actions will you take to raise the incomes of people in this country? Or, "How will you reverse all of the jobs being outsourced overseas? Or, what is your economic plan for this country if you are elected President? How will you secure and protect our borders? Explain your plan to save Social Security? And, on and on. There are many, many important issues that the people of this country want to see how these presidential candidates are going to approach them and present THEIR plan and address these needs.
Also, to be fair to all of the candidates on the stage --instead of hopping from one presidential candidate and giving one or more specific candidates more time than others the moderators should have EACH and EVERY candidate address and answer the same question and/or issue at hand, right down the line. That way each candidate will have the opportunity to present their case on a specific issue. Naturally each candidate will be limited to the same amount of time to respond the question put forth AND all of the viewers at home and in the audience can actually see how each candidate would handle the situation presented. That approach would allow the viewers to make an informed decision on which candidate has the better grasp on the question asked. In that way the voters can make up their mind as to who is lacking in knowledge, who falls short in addressing the question/issue, who can clearly articulate and explain the issue. But these phony (supposed to be FUNNY) questions like: "Who would you like to see on the $10.00 bill? It's laughable.
These candidates should be DEBATING about the most important issues facing this nation and all of them on that stage should have a chance (even if it is only minutes per question ) to address the same question/issue so WE, the PEOPLE can hear each candidates response.
Seriously, if I wanted to see a staged, moderated mix-up (like these CIRCUS NETWORK CLOWNS-(CNN) put on by bashing each candidate and expecting the candidates to respond to the negatives I would watch a JERRY SPRINGER show. This circus was below any NEWS NETWORK quality and content.
Keep in mind there is enough time for these presidential candidates to bad mouth or trash their opponents while on the stump, in town hall meeting and rally''s, etc. We the people can see that occur on our own to help us make u our own minds as to who we favor. We don't need an international news network (who is supposed to construct questions for a national debate) to stir the pot and present a THREE RING CIRCUS, instead of seriously presenting a debate between different candidates. NEWS NETWORKS, we Americans do not need silly jokes or puffy fluffy questions directed to the presidential candidates. Forget the so-called jokes and softball silly questions and get to the meat of the reason we are all here. DEBATE among the candidates on the issues of the world and domestic problems. WE want to hear the candidates response to GROWN UP, ADULT questions that pertain to world and domestic problems plaguing us here in America.
Finally, I am and was very disappointed to see a prominent news media source put on this DOG and PONY show for the benefit of rating and the image of these third rate moderators. I submit that THREE regular, everyday citizens from across the country could have constructed and presented a list of questions for a presidential debate much more relevant that these IDIOT moderators.
In fact, if nothing else, these moderators could have and should have went out into the country and accepted a question from different individuals until they had enough questions on the various issues of concern to fill this THREE HOUR THREE RING CIRCUS. Real, heartfelt, serous questions on issues people across the country are worried about and want addressed would have been a GOD send.-- And, that's my opinion. Make up your own mind. Make your own decisions.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
___________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradlkeykuhns@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)