USA MILITARY ACTION IN IRAQ? OBAMA DOESN'T GET IT.
THE KUHNS REPORT
Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
President Obama is sending more "military advisers" to Iraq and he says he may have to use more military options to quell the unrest in Iraq. Another dumb move by Obama in the war that was called the"dumb war."
Folks, Obama is oblivious to what's happening around the world. I think he makes his foreign policy decisions by a hands raised vote from a small group of people advising him. Here's a guy that never even had a lemonade stand, held a legitimate job in his life and did not serve in the military. He was thrown into the presidency because he was articulate and gave a good speech at a convention. Once he was sworn in he didn't keep many of his promises to the country and many people call him a liar, and some polls rate him as the "worst" president since 1945.
I should say, I voted for Obama the first time around. I believed the country needed a change. However, he couldn't stand up to the job. He bombed out as a president and the second time around I voted for Romney and voted against each and every incumbent in office. I wanted to see "new blood in Washington. I wanted a whole new turnover - -but, as luck would have it, the voters put all of the same old incumbents right back into office. They didn't change any of those 10 and 20 term lawmakers. What a disappointment that was to me.
Obama's new military mission in Iraq is a continuation of the Iraq war fiasco which NEVER should have started in the first place. Because of the United States meddling in the Iraqi system of government we are being sucked in, deeper and deeper. Hell, this is about the third go round. But remember, Iraq was attacked at least a dozen times or more over the decades by other countries and it didn't change the culture embedded there.
Obama is throwing money and military might back into Iraq and he doesn't really know who is fighting among themselves in that country. There are so many different faction and religious groups trying to get a foot hold in Iraq there is no "one" group that is recognized. We have the Sunnis , the Shi'ites, the Kurds, the Yazidi and who knows what other groups will show up. It has been that way for centuries in Iraq. The people residing in Iraq know what groups they want to belong too and they themselves know how to segregate themselves into different areas and enclaves that they understand. The Iraqi people have been living "their way" for millenniums.
It is not for us, the United States, to interfere and tell the Iraqi people how to live, what governments to form, what to believe, and what groups should be in power at any given time.
Obama and his ilk never learn from the past. Instead he and his friends are hell bent on forcing different cultural beliefs down the throats of the Iraqi people. I submit Iraq will never, ever be a democratic nation and/or society in any shape or form.
Iraq has never really been conquered by any outside power over the centuries because the Iraqi people know how they want to live - - and just because we built one of the largest, most expensive,luxurious, Embassies in the world on Iraqi soil doesn't mean we have a democratic foothold in that country. On the contrary, I predict many of the Iraqi people resent our embassy being there.
My suggestion: Get out of Iraq. Obama, remove any and all U.S. military personnel from Iraq. Let the Iraqi people fight it out among themselves. Whatever group comes out on top, (after fighting it out on their own -- without our military assistance) is the government we deal with, if they want to deal with the United States.
Right now, Obama is just using military force in Iraq killing people from various groups. not knowing who is who. All he's doing is having the military perform an exercise to sharpen and keep out military in shape. He's playing "whack a mole" with the recent air strikes.
I submit Obama and many in Congress couldn't tell you who is the enemy and who are the good guys in Iraq. Hell, it was Obama who put Al Maliki into power as President in the first place. Now, all of a sudden he's our enemy and Obama is backing another to head Iraq. So, you see --it's the USA's meddling in Iraq politics that brought Iraq to the state it is in today. Remember when Saddam Hussein was OUR FRIEND? We supported him for years too. Then believe it or not MONEY and OIL became the name of the game and our big MONEY OIL corporations wanted a piece of the action and suddenly, Saddam was our enemy, a bad, guy.
I would submit that Iraq was much better off under Hussein that it is now. And I would bet that many Iraq people would agree with my assessment. But GREED, MONEY and OIL caused the demise of Iraq, under the guise of the USA is going to make the country a Democratic nation. I say it will never happen. - And, that's m y opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Saturday, August 16, 2014
Wednesday, August 13, 2014
WAR CRIMES! CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY! THE U.S. DOES IT.
THE KUHNS REPORT
Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Amnesty International recently reported that U.S. Forces who have killed and/or tortured Afghanistan civilians has not been brought to justice because of failures in the U.S. Military Justice system. At least 1800 Afghanistan civilians have been killed and/or tortured by coalition troops from 2009 to 2013.
The U.S. Military most often fails to hold U.S. military people for unlawful killings accountable. There have been cases where U.S. soldiers broke into Afghanistan houses arrested the male adult and shot and killed the wife, children and other relatives. Another case reported where 18 people were tortured and killed when U.S. Special Forces broke into a house, stripped the clothes off everyone in the residence, their legs were stretched out and they were beaten, then killed, and put into black body bags in front of an elderly man who witnessed the acts.
It appears that evidence of "WAR CRIMES" by U.S. soldiers is ignored by the Defense Department, the White House and many in Congress. I have always said that the U.S. and specific soldiers who commit the crimes should be held accountable for "war crimes" just like we hold soldiers and leaders from other countries accountable.
Folks, thousands of Afghans have been killed or injured by U.S. soldiers but the injured cannot receive any recourse. That's wrong. One of the major reasons for not holding Americans accountable for torture and killing is because the administration and our Congress force the invaded countries to sign "agreements" that the U.S. soldiers will not be held accountable for their atrocious acts of torture and killing.
The U.S. basically threatens the country with such things as withholding American foreign aid, military assistance and protection if the invaded country does not sign the agreement. The
administration and Congress want all U.S. soldiers to be exempt from any war crimes. The sad part of this is: Many other alleged allies of the U.S. go along with this policy.
It is disgusting that the U.S. and it's allies fail to agree to be held accountable for "war crimes" and "crimes against humanity" but have no qualms about accusing other foreign countries leaders and soldiers of committing these crimes. Talk about hypocrisy, the U.S. and certain allies are the poster child for it.
The leaders of the world have the court in the Hague to prosecute war crimes and they are more than willing to imprison and execute leaders and soldiers from different countries who are accused of such heinous crimes (with the exception of the United States and a select group of U..S. allies).
Think back on Abu Ghraib and the torture and prisoner abuse that occurred. Was the USA held accountable? Not really. Hell, stripping prisoners, beating them, water boarding - - and other horrific crimes, yet a couple of low ranking soldiers were said to be held accountable. What a joke! Remember, we prosecuted and held the Germans and Japanese accountable for doing what we, the USA did at Abu Ghraib and the world sat on the sidelines like the three little monkeys -- see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil. I suggest the U.S.and some of it's allies like to "rationalize" their evil deeds and condemn others who commit the same atrocities.
Right now, look what's going on between Israel and Gaza. It is clear that "war crimes" and "crimes against humanity" have been committed but do you really think the world, especially the U.S. will hold Israel accountable? If you do, I'll sell you a bridge in Brooklyn. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________)
Dr.Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Amnesty International recently reported that U.S. Forces who have killed and/or tortured Afghanistan civilians has not been brought to justice because of failures in the U.S. Military Justice system. At least 1800 Afghanistan civilians have been killed and/or tortured by coalition troops from 2009 to 2013.
The U.S. Military most often fails to hold U.S. military people for unlawful killings accountable. There have been cases where U.S. soldiers broke into Afghanistan houses arrested the male adult and shot and killed the wife, children and other relatives. Another case reported where 18 people were tortured and killed when U.S. Special Forces broke into a house, stripped the clothes off everyone in the residence, their legs were stretched out and they were beaten, then killed, and put into black body bags in front of an elderly man who witnessed the acts.
It appears that evidence of "WAR CRIMES" by U.S. soldiers is ignored by the Defense Department, the White House and many in Congress. I have always said that the U.S. and specific soldiers who commit the crimes should be held accountable for "war crimes" just like we hold soldiers and leaders from other countries accountable.
Folks, thousands of Afghans have been killed or injured by U.S. soldiers but the injured cannot receive any recourse. That's wrong. One of the major reasons for not holding Americans accountable for torture and killing is because the administration and our Congress force the invaded countries to sign "agreements" that the U.S. soldiers will not be held accountable for their atrocious acts of torture and killing.
The U.S. basically threatens the country with such things as withholding American foreign aid, military assistance and protection if the invaded country does not sign the agreement. The
administration and Congress want all U.S. soldiers to be exempt from any war crimes. The sad part of this is: Many other alleged allies of the U.S. go along with this policy.
It is disgusting that the U.S. and it's allies fail to agree to be held accountable for "war crimes" and "crimes against humanity" but have no qualms about accusing other foreign countries leaders and soldiers of committing these crimes. Talk about hypocrisy, the U.S. and certain allies are the poster child for it.
The leaders of the world have the court in the Hague to prosecute war crimes and they are more than willing to imprison and execute leaders and soldiers from different countries who are accused of such heinous crimes (with the exception of the United States and a select group of U..S. allies).
Think back on Abu Ghraib and the torture and prisoner abuse that occurred. Was the USA held accountable? Not really. Hell, stripping prisoners, beating them, water boarding - - and other horrific crimes, yet a couple of low ranking soldiers were said to be held accountable. What a joke! Remember, we prosecuted and held the Germans and Japanese accountable for doing what we, the USA did at Abu Ghraib and the world sat on the sidelines like the three little monkeys -- see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil. I suggest the U.S.and some of it's allies like to "rationalize" their evil deeds and condemn others who commit the same atrocities.
Right now, look what's going on between Israel and Gaza. It is clear that "war crimes" and "crimes against humanity" have been committed but do you really think the world, especially the U.S. will hold Israel accountable? If you do, I'll sell you a bridge in Brooklyn. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________)
Dr.Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
RIOTS IN MISSOURI. IT'S AN OUTRAGE. IT SHOULDN'T HAVE HAPPENED.
THE KUHNS REPORT
Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Riots in the streets, AGAIN. A shooting in Ferguson, Missouri by a policeman that killed 18-year-old Michael Brown caused the black community to go on a rampage and vandalize, loot and steal from stores and businesses in the city. Why?
Instead of a peaceful protest and waiting to see what results come out of a police and FBI investigation and allow the legal system to handle the matter, the people chose to break into stores and businesses and steal valuables from those establishments and burn at least one building to the ground. So far there had been TWO nights of rioting. That's uncalled for.
The businesses and stores that were vandalized, broken into and had merchandise stolen had nothing whatsoever to do with the shooting but yet it appears the black community just needed an excuse to rob, steal and burn.
The sad part of the rioting is police and law enforcement stood around and watched the damage and thefts that these innocent business owners incurred and did NOTHING. Laws were being broken and law enforcement allowed it to happen. That's WRONG! The police and whatever other law enforcement agencies were present should have stopped the looting. I submit, police are to PROTECT AND SERVE the citizens of their communities. They clearly didn't protect and serve the citizens that had their businesses looted in front of their eyes.
During the second day of the uncalled for riots some in the community called for calm but they shouldn't have had to ask for calm. There shouldn't have been a RIOT in the first place.
I'm disgusted that the police officers and law enforcement in Missouri are playing the political correct card by standing by allowing rioters to loot honest, abiding store owners. Just because blacks choose to loot and riot is no excuse for the police inaction of stopping the looters.
I see a trend occurring over the years. Ever since the WATTS RIOTS in Los Angeles, the black community has been given a pass to go on a rampage when they feel one or more of their community was wronged. I was living in Compton, California during the Watts riots. I saw the building being burned down, the looting, the stealing, the cars set on fire. There was no need for the black community to do such damage, but since then, every time there is a major conflict with police and a black individual in cities across the country the black community responds by looting and burning. I view it as the black community seeing it a "given"- (i.e) Police shooting equals looting and burning. They feel they have that right and/or privilege . It shouldn't be that way.
I suggest that if the police/law enforcement in Ferguson has stopped the vandalism, looting and riots from the get -go those rioters would know that such acts of disobedience and violations of the law would not be tolerated. Arrests should have been and force met with equal force.
I fault the police in the cities that allow the riots to occur. When they just stand by and watch lawbreakers rob and destroy they are enabling the rioters and enforcing the idea in the rioters minds that it's okay to rob, steal and burn an innocent business establishment "because we did it before and nothing happens.. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Riots in the streets, AGAIN. A shooting in Ferguson, Missouri by a policeman that killed 18-year-old Michael Brown caused the black community to go on a rampage and vandalize, loot and steal from stores and businesses in the city. Why?
Instead of a peaceful protest and waiting to see what results come out of a police and FBI investigation and allow the legal system to handle the matter, the people chose to break into stores and businesses and steal valuables from those establishments and burn at least one building to the ground. So far there had been TWO nights of rioting. That's uncalled for.
The businesses and stores that were vandalized, broken into and had merchandise stolen had nothing whatsoever to do with the shooting but yet it appears the black community just needed an excuse to rob, steal and burn.
The sad part of the rioting is police and law enforcement stood around and watched the damage and thefts that these innocent business owners incurred and did NOTHING. Laws were being broken and law enforcement allowed it to happen. That's WRONG! The police and whatever other law enforcement agencies were present should have stopped the looting. I submit, police are to PROTECT AND SERVE the citizens of their communities. They clearly didn't protect and serve the citizens that had their businesses looted in front of their eyes.
During the second day of the uncalled for riots some in the community called for calm but they shouldn't have had to ask for calm. There shouldn't have been a RIOT in the first place.
I'm disgusted that the police officers and law enforcement in Missouri are playing the political correct card by standing by allowing rioters to loot honest, abiding store owners. Just because blacks choose to loot and riot is no excuse for the police inaction of stopping the looters.
I see a trend occurring over the years. Ever since the WATTS RIOTS in Los Angeles, the black community has been given a pass to go on a rampage when they feel one or more of their community was wronged. I was living in Compton, California during the Watts riots. I saw the building being burned down, the looting, the stealing, the cars set on fire. There was no need for the black community to do such damage, but since then, every time there is a major conflict with police and a black individual in cities across the country the black community responds by looting and burning. I view it as the black community seeing it a "given"- (i.e) Police shooting equals looting and burning. They feel they have that right and/or privilege . It shouldn't be that way.
I suggest that if the police/law enforcement in Ferguson has stopped the vandalism, looting and riots from the get -go those rioters would know that such acts of disobedience and violations of the law would not be tolerated. Arrests should have been and force met with equal force.
I fault the police in the cities that allow the riots to occur. When they just stand by and watch lawbreakers rob and destroy they are enabling the rioters and enforcing the idea in the rioters minds that it's okay to rob, steal and burn an innocent business establishment "because we did it before and nothing happens.. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Saturday, August 9, 2014
WAR MONGERING USA: LET THE IRAQI'S FIGHT THEIR OWN BATTLES.
THE KUHNS REPORT
Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Obama and his cohorts are stepping in it again. He decides to use military action in Iraq. The Iraqi military was trained by the USA to defend their own country. We spent well over 25 BILLION DOLLARS training the Iraqi military to fend for themselves, yet when there is conflict between different religious sectarian factions in the country the Iraqi military members throw down their weapons and run telling their President that they cannot defend their country. Wow! Then the Iraqi government cries and boo hoo's to the United States asking us to pull their fat out of the fire and defend their country.They want us to fight their battles for them, AGAIN.
Folks, we withdrew our forces from Iraq in late 2011, after more than EIGHT YEARS of war, which WE should NEVER have started. Now, here we are again, fighting the war that was called "the dumb war" by legislators, lawmakers and well placed people in the United States. Just yesterday our military began shelling factions in Iraq. Obama says he is protecting Americans and civilians. Really? First of all Americans shouldn't be there. The only Americans we should be protecting in Iraq is the personnel who is stationed in the over-the-top , lavish, enormous Embassy the USA built in that country. And to my knowledge no one has attacked the U.S. Embassy in Iraq. As to protecting civilians against the militants -- I say that is the job of the Iraqi military, not ours.
The Obama administration will do anything to provoke, agitate and stir up conflict to drag out wars around the globe. Remember people, this was the guy that ran for President, bad-mouthing the Iraq war. He shouted from the rooftops that the United States should not have went into Iraq and that he would immediately bring all troops home if he became president. Now, he's a war monger who relishes the fact that he can play war with the lives of Americans.
To back his plays he contacts the UK, France and other nations and makes deals with them so they will give him some sort of credibility when he begins a military action. What a joke!
Imagine how much money it is costing the United States to engage in this military action. A BILLION here, a BILLION there means nothing to this administration. If they need more money they go to the printing presses and just print more. What a shameful practice. We have spent more money and acquired more debt under president Obama than other administrations put together.
This military move into Iraq again is nothing more that a distraction from the many problems we have here at home. When Americans have problems in the USA, the administration starts a military action or a war, to take our mind off of the troubles across the nation.
I suggest we stop these looney-tune military strikes and let the Iraqi's fight their own battles. The only assist the USA, or any other country should provide is food and water drops to the Iraqi people. I support that, and only that.
These different factions and groups in Iraq have been fighting among themselves for CENTURIES. That won't change and we, the USA should not choose sides and manipulate the Iraqi people.
It appears that after the USA spent BILLIONS of dollars training a military force to work and defend their own country the Iraqi government wants the United States to come to their rescue forever and be their guardian and caretaker.
I can't understand why our administration start wars and initiates military actions in other countries, gives those governments billions of dollars and then sign on to protect those countries if there is internal conflict. Yes, we are the policemen of the world, folks. No matter how often the Washington lawmakers deny that fact, they can't make it go away. All it takes is a leader of one of these corrupt countries to call the White House and tell the President they need money, and our military might, and without hesitation Washington agrees to provide the help.
Our tax dollars could be better spent right here in the USA. I say we spent enough money and lives in Iraq. The administration said they would pull out of Iraq and let the country solve their own problems. But is looks as though Obama is again going back on his word. Instead of keeping the United States nose out of the internal conflicts occurring in Iraq, allowing the different sides to fight it out among themselves Obama is using U.S. military to incite the feuding sides. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Obama and his cohorts are stepping in it again. He decides to use military action in Iraq. The Iraqi military was trained by the USA to defend their own country. We spent well over 25 BILLION DOLLARS training the Iraqi military to fend for themselves, yet when there is conflict between different religious sectarian factions in the country the Iraqi military members throw down their weapons and run telling their President that they cannot defend their country. Wow! Then the Iraqi government cries and boo hoo's to the United States asking us to pull their fat out of the fire and defend their country.They want us to fight their battles for them, AGAIN.
Folks, we withdrew our forces from Iraq in late 2011, after more than EIGHT YEARS of war, which WE should NEVER have started. Now, here we are again, fighting the war that was called "the dumb war" by legislators, lawmakers and well placed people in the United States. Just yesterday our military began shelling factions in Iraq. Obama says he is protecting Americans and civilians. Really? First of all Americans shouldn't be there. The only Americans we should be protecting in Iraq is the personnel who is stationed in the over-the-top , lavish, enormous Embassy the USA built in that country. And to my knowledge no one has attacked the U.S. Embassy in Iraq. As to protecting civilians against the militants -- I say that is the job of the Iraqi military, not ours.
The Obama administration will do anything to provoke, agitate and stir up conflict to drag out wars around the globe. Remember people, this was the guy that ran for President, bad-mouthing the Iraq war. He shouted from the rooftops that the United States should not have went into Iraq and that he would immediately bring all troops home if he became president. Now, he's a war monger who relishes the fact that he can play war with the lives of Americans.
To back his plays he contacts the UK, France and other nations and makes deals with them so they will give him some sort of credibility when he begins a military action. What a joke!
Imagine how much money it is costing the United States to engage in this military action. A BILLION here, a BILLION there means nothing to this administration. If they need more money they go to the printing presses and just print more. What a shameful practice. We have spent more money and acquired more debt under president Obama than other administrations put together.
This military move into Iraq again is nothing more that a distraction from the many problems we have here at home. When Americans have problems in the USA, the administration starts a military action or a war, to take our mind off of the troubles across the nation.
I suggest we stop these looney-tune military strikes and let the Iraqi's fight their own battles. The only assist the USA, or any other country should provide is food and water drops to the Iraqi people. I support that, and only that.
These different factions and groups in Iraq have been fighting among themselves for CENTURIES. That won't change and we, the USA should not choose sides and manipulate the Iraqi people.
It appears that after the USA spent BILLIONS of dollars training a military force to work and defend their own country the Iraqi government wants the United States to come to their rescue forever and be their guardian and caretaker.
I can't understand why our administration start wars and initiates military actions in other countries, gives those governments billions of dollars and then sign on to protect those countries if there is internal conflict. Yes, we are the policemen of the world, folks. No matter how often the Washington lawmakers deny that fact, they can't make it go away. All it takes is a leader of one of these corrupt countries to call the White House and tell the President they need money, and our military might, and without hesitation Washington agrees to provide the help.
Our tax dollars could be better spent right here in the USA. I say we spent enough money and lives in Iraq. The administration said they would pull out of Iraq and let the country solve their own problems. But is looks as though Obama is again going back on his word. Instead of keeping the United States nose out of the internal conflicts occurring in Iraq, allowing the different sides to fight it out among themselves Obama is using U.S. military to incite the feuding sides. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Saturday, August 2, 2014
THE JURY SYSTEM IN MINNESOTA RUN AMOK.
THE KUHNS REPORT
Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Former Minnesota Gov. Jesse Ventura won a $1.8 MILLION DOLLAR award after a two-year fight with the estate of author Chris Kyle who penned, "American Sniper," who was killed last year in Texas. Kyle was reputed the deadliest sniper in U.S. Military history. Ventura sued for defamation after Kyle mentioned a fight in a bar and said Ventura bad-mouthed the Navy Seals.
My problem is with the verdict and the state of the judicial and jury system in Minnesota. The jury deliberated for five days before telling the judge that they could not reach a verdict, but were told by the judge to keep trying. Now get this: --- the attorneys from both sides agreed to allow a verdict if eight of ten jurors agreed. Can you imagine that, folks? Usually a jury comes back with a verdict for the prosecution or defense or a deadlock.
How the hell could the court allow the jury to make a decision with eight out of 10 jurors. Talk about "justice being blind." What was the judge thinking to allow such an agreement? Did he and/or the attorney's have to attend a ball game, have a date, a family dinner? What?
I submit, that if a FULL paneled jury cannot make up their mind in a case and are deadlocked then, hey--- a mistrial. Then the parties can decide whether they want to go through another trial again.
But 8 out of 10 jurors? Come on! Why didn't the judge and attorneys try cases saying if five (5) of the jurors agree the case will be settled. Or, if only two (2) jurors agree the case will be settled.
John Borger, an attorney for the Kyle estate was questioned about why he agreed to a non unanimous verdict when the jury was close to being hung: "That was a "strategic" call, which seemed appropriate at the time." Really? What's so strategic about not wanting a full jury to decide? Make's one wonder, doesn't it?
The jury was instructed that Ventura had to prove that Kyle either knew or believed what he wrote was untrue, or that he harbored serious doubts about the truth.
Folks, defamation is a hard climb up a hill to prove and why the court and attorneys allowed this jury verdict is beyond me.
I would bet that the Kyle estate has a great, if not excellent, grounds for appeal. Oh well, our justice system at work, people. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions, You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Friday, August 1, 2014
THE LETHAL EBOLA VIRUS IS IN THE USA. IT'S HERE NOW! COURTESY OF OUR GOVT.
THE KUHNS REPORT
Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Do you trust the government and this administration? I don't. Why? Because they do not keep their word or follow through on their promises, and they lie. This brings me to an issue that scares the hell of of me. One word" EBOLA.
The government says there is nothing to worry about. The EBOLA virus will not affect Americans.
The lethal outbreak in West Africa is not under control, far from it. Yet, our incompetent lawmakers are bringing at least TWO people that is infected with the lethal virus into America. The powers to be who allowed this dumb move say that the two EBOLA infected people will be treated at Emory University Hospital, in Atlanta, GA, in a sterile, contained environment. Really? If there is even the slightest chance that this deadly virus (that has no cure) will be mishandled or transferred to another person the two infected people, Dr. Kent Brantly and aid worker Nancy Writebol should have remained in Africa and treated there.
Dr. Bruce Ribner, an infectious disease specialist at Emory said: "The reason we are bringing these patients back to our facility is because they deserve the highest level of care offered for their treatment." Hell, the facility where the patients are to be treated was built a DECADE ago. Outdated? Maybe. Dr. Ribner says the two infected patients will receive "SUPPORTIVE CARE. I submit that care could have been performed in Liberia just like it is already being done there.
Imagine, the patient Dr. Brantly was taken to Emory with helicopters flying over the Hospital; law enforcement surrounding the facility and the ambulance crews had to wear very specialized protective gear while transporting. And the government and consultants say- NOT TO WORRY.
The facility at Emory has only been used to treat SARS patients which turned out the suspected patients did not have the disease.But now this old facility is about to TRY to treat patients with the known death sentence disease EBOLA. If American health care workers are to treat the infected people, that team should be sent to Africa to render aid, not in AMERICA.
I would like to go on record saying that the administration, the State Department and the looney toon doctors and consultants that had the bright idea to bring the EBOLA killer to the U.S. is playing a game of Russian Roulette with the American people. Whatever happened to the oath, protect Americans and the United States? Again it is ignored by lawmakers.
I have no doubt that if the CDC can set up a( Ha! Ha!) safe environment here in the United States, they indeed can do the same in Africa. We should keep this ugly, deadly killing virus isolated from the USA, at all costs.
According to our government-this will be the first time an EBOLA infected person will be treated in the United States. That should not be the case. That's nothing to be proud of. Ebola in any shape or form should NOT be brought into the USA. There is no cure or treatment for this virus -- so, why bring it into the country? The workers that went to Africa to work with the EBOLA knew the risks but apparently, for some reason (i.e) mishandling, came down with the Ebola virus.
Folks, this lethal killer has already spread to other countries. An infected person even boarded a plane and traveled to several countries. What does that tell you about transmission? How many other people may have been infected? In Africa, the health workers have to wear special protective gear and family members of the dead have to be instructed on how to handle the dead bodies.
Our government officials tell us " Americans should not fear that the epidemic will take hold in the USA, because the fatal virus is contagious only when a patient is "sick with symptoms" of the disease. The virus is spread with direct contact with bodily fluids. They tell us the Ebola virus is not airborne, so people would have to come in direct contact with the bodily fluids of an infected person. Well, no poop! It doesn't take much to have any person transfer body fluids to another person. These may include blood, even sweat, vomit, feces, urine, saliva and semen. They go on to say making transmission through "casual contact," in a public setting is UNLIKELY. The key word here is "unlikely." How many people have you seen that doesn't wash their hands in a public place like a restaurant when they leave a urinal or toilet stall after they have a bile movement? Result, feces on their hands. How many times have you seen health care professionals in doctors offices and hospitals NOT wash their hands before treating you? Sweat? People sweat all the time in public. Semen? Sexual intercourse is a given. It's rampant. Again, one word about semen and sexual intercourse - "AIDS."
But the government will have you believe that the deadly EBOLA will not affect the general population in America. They say, "no need to panic." People, that is what the government usually says when there is a threat from any virus, environmental disaster, disease, etc., --. When have you ever heard the government talking heads admit that there is a problem, step up to the plate and take responsibility? I would say, mostly never.
Lets not forget the small pox outbreak that killed off a very large number of our Native American population; lets not forget the flu virus that killed tens of thousands of people; then there was measles, typhoid fever. malaria and cholera that was let loose on the general population, just to name a few.
Folks, the early symptoms of EBOLA is fever, muscle aches and sore throat. It can be difficult to distinguish between Ebola and malaria, typhoid fever an cholera. It's only the later stages of Ebola that people begin bleeding internally and externally, often through the nose and ears and other orifices.
What about the nuclear fall out of the Atomic weapons being tested in Nevada; the agent Orange killer in Vietnam, the insecticides that were sprayed on United States cities killing animals and people. the Syphilis experiments that killed hundreds of Black men, the LSD experiments and yes, don't forget the HIV/Aids virus. We were told that it would not come to America from Africa, telling Americans it was isolated.
So, I ask you, what makes you believe that you can trust the word of the people that are now saying EBOLA being brought to the United States will be contained? Hell, just recently the CDC mishandled small pox and anthrax AND these are the guys that's supposed to have a handle the EBOLA situation?
In most of the incidents mentioned above the government denied their participation and/or told the American people that there was nothing to be afraid of.
Other fiasco's our government and so-called brainy researchers were involved in: Remember the KILLER BEES? We were told that the experiments were safe and being conducted outside of the USA and there was no way the killer bees could escape and/or be released and ever come to America. Guess what? Killer bees were let loose on America killing people and animals and they now have a permanent foothold in America to this day. Don't forget the aggressive and killer species of animal and plant life that was turned loose in the United States killing fish, birds, trees, etc.
Just imagine all of the people that has already came in contact to some degree with these two infected patients. To cite a few lets say: health care workers in Africa, the entire plane crew that transported the infected patients to the United States, the ambulance crew that transports the patients to Emory Hospital; any and all staff at the facility.
Now imagine that this lethal EBOLA virus can be transmitted by means other that "contact by body fluids." The supposed experts "DO NOT" really know. It's an educated guess on their part. However, all of the heath care workers that will work in the facility around the infected patients will leave and go home every day, the crew of the plane and crew of the ambulance that transported the patients to Emory will also go home each day having contact with the general population of America.
One of my suggestions to the government and any team handling and/or being involved with the transportation of the Ebola infected patients is: dispose of the aircraft that transported the patients; dispose of the ambulance that transported the patients; incinerate and dispose of any and all medical equipment, clothing and materials that was used to treat the infected patients. Why? This non-curable, deadly disease may have"latent" aspects that not even the so-called experts are not aware of which may at some later date infect others that comes into contact with the transport, materials, and devices used to care for the two Ebola infected people.
Here are some questions for the government, the President and Congress and all of the alleged experts mouthing that there is no danger to Americans. The questions: What do the doctors and experts treating these two infected people intend to do with them now that they CARRY inside their body one of the most deadly and lethal viruses on this planet? Will they eventually release them? Will they let them go on with their lives and come in physical contact with family and strangers in public setting? Are the treating doctors going to eventually give these two infected Ebola patients a clean bill of health? If by chance the two infected patients do nor survive, what will they do with the bodies? Will the doctors and researchers keep and maintain some or parts of the body organs? If so, for what, and why? Again, these two infected patients should have been put in quarantine and isolated, IN AFRICA, for America's protection.
I say that there is tons of unanswered questions when it comes to understanding this deadly virus and the arrogance of our lawmakers and many in the medical field is shameful.
I predict that once the EBOLA virus is brought into the United States (by these TWO) infected people -- IT WILL BE HERE for good. It will have it's start. Mark my words, folks, the temptation of the idiot researchers of the government to handle it and work with it like kids with their play dough will go awry like all of the fiasco's that went before. It will be too late to re-cork the bottle.You can bet when it is unleashed the government people will use the excuse that they didn't see it coming.
Finally, I don't care if the two EBOLA infected people are Americans or polka dot aliens from another planet, they should not have been brought back to the United States, PERIOD. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Bradley Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)