Saturday, June 29, 2013
THE WHITEY BULGER TRIAL STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN-FEDS SCREW UP AGAIN
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The Feds are prosecuting "Whitey Bulger" for allegedly committing NINETEEN (19) murders. Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian Kelly wants Bulger to go away for life. Yet, get this- the government is trying to make their case by using John Martorano, ex-Winter-Hill gang "HITMAN."
Now keep in mind this guy, Martorano, has murdered not ONE, NOT TWO, NOT THREE but TWENTY (20) people that the Feds know of. How many more do they not know about? Yet, they only sentenced this murdering scumbag to a very small sentence of fourteen years. "For killing 20 people?" What a deal. Other murders that kill only one person generally get a death sentences or life in prison but the U.S. Attorney sees fit to let Martorano skate free with only 14- years just to nail Bulger. What's the matter with this picture?
This case stinks to high heaven. It centers around dirty, corrupt ex- FBI agents like John Morris and his supervisor John Connolly who took money and bribes from the bad guys and did other bad, bad, things for the mob. The entire Boston FBI office was a sleazy, corrupt organization and now the government is trying to cover their ass and rehab their reputation of: Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity. What a joke. The Boston office of the FBI had none of that.
The government used another mob hit man,Stephen "The Rifleman" Flemmi. Unlike Martorano, he is serving a life sentence for his murders that exceeds twenty kills. Martorano is living the high life in the sun and sand, courtesy of the Feds. And to top it off the Feds had Martorano on the payroll paying him tens of thousands of dollars for living expenses, housing and what not. Christ, with the money paid by the Feds to this hit man and his family to live a plush life he is probably making more than he ever did while working as hit man in the mob. And all of this protection and money being paid to support a serial killer was so the government could obtain the testimony of Martorano so they could drive another nail in Bulger's coffin.
Hell, the Feds are too lazy to actually build a stand alone case on the bad stuff Bulger did so they can send him to prison. I submit they could if they wanted to. Instead, they would rather use our tax money and support proven hit men and their families. The government knew Martorano and Flemmi were multiple killers ten times over but they chose to deal with Martorano rather than give him death or life without parole.If the Feds cannot make a case against a person that has murdered 20 people or more - -they REALLY are stupid. A fifth-grader could figure this one out: You have 20 dead bodies and you have the admission of the person that killed all of those people . CASE CLOSED- Death sentence or life without parole. Who needs to deal? I know who- THE FEDS, who else.
What is this? One hit man commits 20 murders and is free and Bulger who committed 19 murders is said to be a dangerous person that should spend his life in prison. Martorano is lavished with money and protection and he and his family is living the life of the Ozzie & Harriet family - - AGAIN courtesy of the Feds.
My thoughts are: All of these mob guys should be in the joint either on death row or life without parole. Bulger, Flemmi and Martorano are all very bad guys. At least Flemmi is doing his time(life).
Come On! When a person kills nineteen and twenty people, (maybe more)- - - and the Feds allow that monster to roam the countryside just to secure a conviction of another mass murderer - - that's wrong. Talk about justice being blind? The Feds can sure manipulate the justice system. There is no reason in the world to let someone who killed 20 people loose. What the hell are they thinking. Each case should have been tried on its own merits and each murderer should have been found guilty. How can a person that kills 20 people or more talk the government lawyers out of money and a sentence of only14 years. What a joke. How would they explain that to any person sitting on death row or spending life in prison for ONLY one murder? They can't and won't.
Finally, how is the Feds going to rationalize Bulger killing 19 people, while Martorano and the "Rifleman" Flemmi each killed 20 people or more while sending Bulger to death row or life while Martorano is out on the street. Talk about a corrupt system, this is it.- And, that's my opinion. You decide. Make your own decisions.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
IT'S OKAY FOR A BLACK TO USE A RACIAL SLUR-BUT NOT OKAY FOR A WHITE?
WHAT ELSE IS NEW?
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The George Zimmerman trial in Florida sure brings out some idiots . On the stand. The black 19-year old Rachel Jeantel who said she was on the phone with Trayvon Martin at the time of the altercation testified that she thought race was an issue because "Trayvon put race in this." She said Trayvon Martin told her that " a creepy-ass CRACKER" was following him.
Guess what? Daryl Parks, the Martin family attorney said; "Some young people loosely use language they probably shouldn't use. IT'S JUST SLANG they use, " he said.
Whoa!!!!! A young black can call someone with light skin or a caucasian a "CRACKER" but a young woman (at the time), years ago, named Paula Deen cannot use the "N" word? Come On! One person in a particular race , in this case "black" can make a derogatory remark against a person but when a person from another race , White" uses a derogatory word against a black, that person is called a RACIST, a BIGOT. Where's the parity, the equality? Where's the justice? Hey, both used the words when they were under threat of death. What's the difference? People say a lot of things when they are under stress.
Folks, I have always maintained that way back in the 40's 50's 60's and 70's and even the 80's the "N" word was just a SLANG word for "Negro."It was a common reference, nothing more. What is good for one race is good for another. Each race had their words referencing one another. So I say, why persecute one person for using a SLANG word and make excuses for another race using a SLANG word. Boy, I guess it is in the eye of the beholder. Right?
Get a life people. What's in the past is in the past. Get over it. Don't try to rewrite history, AGAIN. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns @gmail.com
WHAT ELSE IS NEW?
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The George Zimmerman trial in Florida sure brings out some idiots . On the stand. The black 19-year old Rachel Jeantel who said she was on the phone with Trayvon Martin at the time of the altercation testified that she thought race was an issue because "Trayvon put race in this." She said Trayvon Martin told her that " a creepy-ass CRACKER" was following him.
Guess what? Daryl Parks, the Martin family attorney said; "Some young people loosely use language they probably shouldn't use. IT'S JUST SLANG they use, " he said.
Whoa!!!!! A young black can call someone with light skin or a caucasian a "CRACKER" but a young woman (at the time), years ago, named Paula Deen cannot use the "N" word? Come On! One person in a particular race , in this case "black" can make a derogatory remark against a person but when a person from another race , White" uses a derogatory word against a black, that person is called a RACIST, a BIGOT. Where's the parity, the equality? Where's the justice? Hey, both used the words when they were under threat of death. What's the difference? People say a lot of things when they are under stress.
Folks, I have always maintained that way back in the 40's 50's 60's and 70's and even the 80's the "N" word was just a SLANG word for "Negro."It was a common reference, nothing more. What is good for one race is good for another. Each race had their words referencing one another. So I say, why persecute one person for using a SLANG word and make excuses for another race using a SLANG word. Boy, I guess it is in the eye of the beholder. Right?
Get a life people. What's in the past is in the past. Get over it. Don't try to rewrite history, AGAIN. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns @gmail.com
Sunday, June 23, 2013
SENATOR JEFF SESSIONS & Governor of Arizona Are Right:
Before Any Immigration Deal- SECURE the SOUTHERN BORDER
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
I agree with Senator Jeff Sessions and the Governor of Arizona. Before any immigration deal allowing a pathway to citizenship to millionsof "illegal aliens" the southern border of the United States has to be SECURED, SECURED, SECURED. Not just 700 miles of fence as the "Gang of Eight" in Washington propose. Instead, 2000 miles of fence from the East Coast to the West Coast should be constructed. We have the money to do the job. What we need is these lawmakers who are pandering to the Hispanic community to bite the bullet. Why give billions of dollars to Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries to secure their borders when ours leaks like a seive. Take some of that money and use it here where it is needed for our SECURE borders.
The fence should be double-layered and double tiered, nothing less.
Folks, until the southern border of the United States is proven to be secure we will have "illegal aliens" making border crossing just as they have been for the past 30 years.
Words by the Congress people are not sufficient. They lied before. What we need now is ACTION. Show me the double- layered, double tiered fence running the full length of our southern border then, and only then, I will believe these lawmakers.-And, that's my opinion. You decide. Make your own decisions.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
___________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Before Any Immigration Deal- SECURE the SOUTHERN BORDER
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
I agree with Senator Jeff Sessions and the Governor of Arizona. Before any immigration deal allowing a pathway to citizenship to millionsof "illegal aliens" the southern border of the United States has to be SECURED, SECURED, SECURED. Not just 700 miles of fence as the "Gang of Eight" in Washington propose. Instead, 2000 miles of fence from the East Coast to the West Coast should be constructed. We have the money to do the job. What we need is these lawmakers who are pandering to the Hispanic community to bite the bullet. Why give billions of dollars to Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries to secure their borders when ours leaks like a seive. Take some of that money and use it here where it is needed for our SECURE borders.
The fence should be double-layered and double tiered, nothing less.
Folks, until the southern border of the United States is proven to be secure we will have "illegal aliens" making border crossing just as they have been for the past 30 years.
Words by the Congress people are not sufficient. They lied before. What we need now is ACTION. Show me the double- layered, double tiered fence running the full length of our southern border then, and only then, I will believe these lawmakers.-And, that's my opinion. You decide. Make your own decisions.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
___________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Saturday, June 22, 2013
PAULA DEEN SHOULDN'T LOSE HER JOB- IT'S A BUM WRAP
SOMETHING SMELLS AT FOOD NETWORK AND IT'S NOT GOOD COOKING
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Well here we go again. What people say is no longer free speech. Words that were in the dictionary and books for centuries are now used to ruin a person's career just because the United States wants to be POLITICALLY correct. Paula Deen is just the recent person that certain groups want to do harm to.
Let me get this out there right off the bat. I am not a cook or chef or anything that resembles one. I do not watch the Food Network on a regular basis (only occasionally) that Mrs. Deen was affiliated with. I now know that there are millions of people that watch Deen's cooking shows but my concern over the uproar of Paula Deen using the "N" word is that "FREE SPEECH" and "FREE EXPRESSION" has been thrown out the window and has been dumbed down for decades. The United States was founded on freedom(s) and one of the most cherished is the right for anyone to say what they want as long as they do not yell "fire" in a theater.
As to the "N" word, - - lets get it out there. It is the word Nigger, short for "Negro". It's a word, no more, no less, that's all it is unless one uses it in hateful context. Folks, that particular word has been written in books, journals newspapers, magazines for centuries referring to black ethnicity. Even today, the black people have been prone to use the word in everyday conversation. I have had them use it in my presence. Rappers, singers, comedians and actors in movies within the last couple years have used the word.
Deen was asked in a deposition : "Have you EVER used the "N: word. She answered honestly and responded "absolutely". She didn't want to lie in a sworn deposition but most any person over the age of 50 has in all likelihood at one time or another used that word as they were growing up. I am in my 70's and I can remember using the word before I was 17 years old. For anyone living in the 1940's, 50's and 60's the "N" word was a common word being used by most everyone in the country. After the civil rights movement in the 60's the word "Black" came to replace the word "Negro" and the "N" word. In those days the "N" word wasn't used as a hateful thing . It was a slang version of the word "Negro" It just describes a race of people, no more.
Hell, my race is white but I am from a German and Hungarian background. My great-grandparents came to the USA aboard a ship in 1902 and became US citizens five years later and me, my family and ancestors were called "Squarehead, "Kraut", and yes, even "Nazi" which I was not. I had friends that were Italian and they were called "Guinea's and Whop's, my grand-dad was called a "Hunky". Let's not mention what people called Arabs, Gypsies and Chinese people. There was a word for most every type ethnic backgrond. Even our American Indian was called things like Redskin, dog eaters, scalpers and what not - -So, What's new? It did happen back then, on a regular basis but is does not happen that much now because of the political correct climate that is forced fed down our throats by the government and groups that have an agenda. What happened years ago does not even relate to the current climate of 2013.
Just because people used those words decades ago doesn't mean that they should lose their job, their livelihood, or reputation. Hardly anyone uses the "N" word anymore, just like the words are no longer used to describer the Italians, Germans, etc.
Deen answered truthfully but the attorney's should have only directed their questions to what the restaurant employee 's issues were at the restaurant she was working at, --- not something that may have happened decades ago. The question, "Did you EVER use the "N" word?" is just a "gotcha" question. It's like - "Did you ever beat your wife?" It appears the attorney asking the question of Deen wanted to be like the attorney in the O.J. Simpsoin trial asking Mark Fuhrman about the "N" word.
I would submit that if any of the attorneys are over 50 years old they themselves have used the "N" word as they grew up. Hypocrites , you bet!
As to the Food Network not renewing Deen's contract. They are a bunch of hypocrites themselves. You can't tell me that of all those people employed at Food Network not one of them has never, EVER, used the "N" word at sometime in their life. I submit that the Food Network should renew Deen's contract and not go along with pretended outrage that somewhere at sometime in her life Deen used the "N" word.
Christ, get a life people and get away from this political correct nonsense. Like me, I have no doubts that Paula Deen has worked with and associated herself with many black people in her life. So, what's the fuss. The media sees Deen as a wounded, bleeding fish in the water and these shark's are circling to destroy someone that has been doing good for people for years and years. In fact, just this evening a black commentor told the interviewer that since Paula Deen used the "N" word, she is now a racist. What a crock!
Wanna bet that the media and all the television networks will put their black correspondents and anchors front and center to babble about Paula Deen being a monster - - AND, that's totally wrong. - And, that's my opinion. You decide. Make your own decisions.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
And
Monday, June 17, 2013
SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM IS WRONG-HISPANICS WILL NOT VOTE FOR REPUBLICANS-NO MATTER WHAT THEY DO TO PACIFY
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Senator Lindsey Graham from South Carolina says that the GOP will fail in 2016 if they do not fold their hand and pass immigration reform. I said it before and I will say it again - - "No matter what the Republicans do they will not have the Hispanic vote for at least a couple of generations from now. A poll out of the University of Nevada found what most politicians already know, that being, most Hispanics will not vote for Republicans in any way, shape or form. The poll showed Hispanics do not trust Republicans. Forty-Six (46%) percent of Hispanics have never, ever voted for even ONE Republican
In my opinion it is going to be very difficult for the Republicans to win the under 30 Hispanic for at least two generations. So, why should the Republicans pander to the Hispanics by giving in to all of their wants and wishes. It won't do the Republicans a bit of good. I would suggest that the Republicans hold their ground and insist on a Southern border security guarantee before any" illegal alien" is legalized on a path to citizenship; the double fence(that was promised years ago) running the full length of the border from California to Florida; an e-verify system for all employers to check ALL of their employees (working in the United States) citizenship status; and enforcement of all the immigration laws we already have on the books.
If the Republicans do these things it will build confidence and trust with the American people that they mean business and will stop any future influx of "illegal aliens" crossing into our country.
I submit that if our government can keep tabs on any person living in the USA to verify that persons, birth, death, social security payments, pension payments, veteran payments and employment and clearly handle a persons banking, insurance and driver license activities this country can with accuracy determine if a person is in this country legally. And, if they are not- - DEPORT them. No second or third chances. Illegal is illegal. In addition the idea of a baby being born on American soil by "ILLEGAL's should be stopped. The baby should not be granted automatic citizenship. That baby should retain the citizenship of the parents home country.
Folks, this is a country of immigrants as many lawmakers like to point out BUT it is a country of LEGAL immigrants and NOT "illegal" immigrants. It is time for our congress to stop playing politics and enforce our current immigration law and take serious the idea of deportation of people being in this country illegally.- And, that is my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D/
________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Senator Lindsey Graham from South Carolina says that the GOP will fail in 2016 if they do not fold their hand and pass immigration reform. I said it before and I will say it again - - "No matter what the Republicans do they will not have the Hispanic vote for at least a couple of generations from now. A poll out of the University of Nevada found what most politicians already know, that being, most Hispanics will not vote for Republicans in any way, shape or form. The poll showed Hispanics do not trust Republicans. Forty-Six (46%) percent of Hispanics have never, ever voted for even ONE Republican
In my opinion it is going to be very difficult for the Republicans to win the under 30 Hispanic for at least two generations. So, why should the Republicans pander to the Hispanics by giving in to all of their wants and wishes. It won't do the Republicans a bit of good. I would suggest that the Republicans hold their ground and insist on a Southern border security guarantee before any" illegal alien" is legalized on a path to citizenship; the double fence(that was promised years ago) running the full length of the border from California to Florida; an e-verify system for all employers to check ALL of their employees (working in the United States) citizenship status; and enforcement of all the immigration laws we already have on the books.
If the Republicans do these things it will build confidence and trust with the American people that they mean business and will stop any future influx of "illegal aliens" crossing into our country.
I submit that if our government can keep tabs on any person living in the USA to verify that persons, birth, death, social security payments, pension payments, veteran payments and employment and clearly handle a persons banking, insurance and driver license activities this country can with accuracy determine if a person is in this country legally. And, if they are not- - DEPORT them. No second or third chances. Illegal is illegal. In addition the idea of a baby being born on American soil by "ILLEGAL's should be stopped. The baby should not be granted automatic citizenship. That baby should retain the citizenship of the parents home country.
Folks, this is a country of immigrants as many lawmakers like to point out BUT it is a country of LEGAL immigrants and NOT "illegal" immigrants. It is time for our congress to stop playing politics and enforce our current immigration law and take serious the idea of deportation of people being in this country illegally.- And, that is my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D/
________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Sunday, June 16, 2013
LOCK DOWN THE SOUTHERN BORDER BEFORE ANY IMMIGRATION REFORM-SECURE BORDERS FIRST!
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
This gang of eight working on the immigration bill are trying to rush passage through by July 4th.,. to coincide with our July 4th. celebration. I think it is a bad move. It's politics as usual. Before any sweeping immigration reform bill is passed there has to be a guarantee that the border is clearly secured.
If we Americans are being asked to accept over 11 million "illegal aliens" into this country we have to have more than promises by our Congress people and the President that the border ("will be, or possibly be") secure.
Once the Southern border of the United States is shown to be secure then and only then should these "illegal aliens" be allowed to move toward any type of legalization.
Folks, Congress already PROMISED the American people back in 1986 that if we gave millions of "illegal aliens" amnesty they would permanently SEAL the Southern border of the USA. "THEY LIED." Instead, they allowed over 11 million more "illegal aliens" entry into our country without enforcing our immigration laws. Another LIE by our government- During election time Congress and the President said they would build a double fence along the full length of the Southern border. They told us Americans that they had the money and would have the fence built in a short time. LIE, LIE, LIE! The Feds only built about 3 to 6 miles of fence on our Southern border and it was a pitiful fence at that. No double fence as was promised.
So, I say, why believe this crazy gang of eight or the government? They will promise the moon to get what they want and then renege. Personally I would want to see any promises in writing, with guarantees before I would let 11 million "illegal aliens" a path to USA citizenship.
What I would like to see and suggest that Congress do before they put any kind of reform in our immigration laws is this:
1. Build the "double fence "(AS THEY PROMISED) from the Atlantic to the Pacific on our Southern border. Remember, these same lawmakers said they were going to do that and told us they had the funds to do that. Where's the fence? The double fence should have a swath of dirt road between the two fences so that Immigration, Border Patrol Agents can continually drive up and down the road patrolling the fence against intruders.
2. At specific points the fence should have a guard station and entry where Immigration Agents can check the coming and going of each and every person.
3. Each person entering and/or leaving the country through the Southern fenced area should be photographed, fingerprinted and visas and papers checked.
I would say that Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and others is on the right track when they say: "The border has to be secure before any "illegal alien " is allowed to move forward on a path to becoming a citizen.
As everyone knows, I am an Independent. I have voted for Democrats and Republicans, as well as Independents. I have no axe to grind one way or the other. I have always voted for the lawmakers that I thought would do the best for the United States. But as I currently see it the Democrats want to give 11 million "illegal aliens" a pathway to citizenship with the attitude of "Damn the border security", we Democrats have Hispanics in or pocket and a border that is not secured will allow millions more to invade our country - - that means votes.
I see the Republicans only asking for the Southern border to be completely secure before any "illegal alien "can move toward citizenship."That is not asking a lot.
I would say to the lawmakers on the hill-- PROVE IT! DO WHAT YOU SAID YOU WOULD DO YEARS AGO. The FIRST move: Build that fence immediately- I predict that if the lawmakers build the fence without delay that will go a long way in gaining Americans trust again that our border will become secure.
If the Republicans think that folding and giving the okay for Immigration reform will help them in the eyes of the Hispanic community thereby garnering votes - -they have another think coming. Just today, two studies were reported on and printed in the Las Vegas Review Journal showing that : "No matter what the Republicans do it will change NOT change the mind of the Hispanic population.". Hispanics will not vote for them. Hispanics are 80% for Democrats, NO MATTER WHAT the Republicans do, or will do.
I would think that there would be more respect for the Republican party if they insist that before any immigration reform is enacted the fence has to be completed and the Southern border locked down against any further "illegal alien" entries. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
___________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
This gang of eight working on the immigration bill are trying to rush passage through by July 4th.,. to coincide with our July 4th. celebration. I think it is a bad move. It's politics as usual. Before any sweeping immigration reform bill is passed there has to be a guarantee that the border is clearly secured.
If we Americans are being asked to accept over 11 million "illegal aliens" into this country we have to have more than promises by our Congress people and the President that the border ("will be, or possibly be") secure.
Once the Southern border of the United States is shown to be secure then and only then should these "illegal aliens" be allowed to move toward any type of legalization.
Folks, Congress already PROMISED the American people back in 1986 that if we gave millions of "illegal aliens" amnesty they would permanently SEAL the Southern border of the USA. "THEY LIED." Instead, they allowed over 11 million more "illegal aliens" entry into our country without enforcing our immigration laws. Another LIE by our government- During election time Congress and the President said they would build a double fence along the full length of the Southern border. They told us Americans that they had the money and would have the fence built in a short time. LIE, LIE, LIE! The Feds only built about 3 to 6 miles of fence on our Southern border and it was a pitiful fence at that. No double fence as was promised.
So, I say, why believe this crazy gang of eight or the government? They will promise the moon to get what they want and then renege. Personally I would want to see any promises in writing, with guarantees before I would let 11 million "illegal aliens" a path to USA citizenship.
What I would like to see and suggest that Congress do before they put any kind of reform in our immigration laws is this:
1. Build the "double fence "(AS THEY PROMISED) from the Atlantic to the Pacific on our Southern border. Remember, these same lawmakers said they were going to do that and told us they had the funds to do that. Where's the fence? The double fence should have a swath of dirt road between the two fences so that Immigration, Border Patrol Agents can continually drive up and down the road patrolling the fence against intruders.
2. At specific points the fence should have a guard station and entry where Immigration Agents can check the coming and going of each and every person.
3. Each person entering and/or leaving the country through the Southern fenced area should be photographed, fingerprinted and visas and papers checked.
I would say that Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and others is on the right track when they say: "The border has to be secure before any "illegal alien " is allowed to move forward on a path to becoming a citizen.
As everyone knows, I am an Independent. I have voted for Democrats and Republicans, as well as Independents. I have no axe to grind one way or the other. I have always voted for the lawmakers that I thought would do the best for the United States. But as I currently see it the Democrats want to give 11 million "illegal aliens" a pathway to citizenship with the attitude of "Damn the border security", we Democrats have Hispanics in or pocket and a border that is not secured will allow millions more to invade our country - - that means votes.
I see the Republicans only asking for the Southern border to be completely secure before any "illegal alien "can move toward citizenship."That is not asking a lot.
I would say to the lawmakers on the hill-- PROVE IT! DO WHAT YOU SAID YOU WOULD DO YEARS AGO. The FIRST move: Build that fence immediately- I predict that if the lawmakers build the fence without delay that will go a long way in gaining Americans trust again that our border will become secure.
If the Republicans think that folding and giving the okay for Immigration reform will help them in the eyes of the Hispanic community thereby garnering votes - -they have another think coming. Just today, two studies were reported on and printed in the Las Vegas Review Journal showing that : "No matter what the Republicans do it will change NOT change the mind of the Hispanic population.". Hispanics will not vote for them. Hispanics are 80% for Democrats, NO MATTER WHAT the Republicans do, or will do.
I would think that there would be more respect for the Republican party if they insist that before any immigration reform is enacted the fence has to be completed and the Southern border locked down against any further "illegal alien" entries. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
___________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Friday, June 14, 2013
OBAMA'S WAR MONGERING SHOULD NOT INVOLVE THE USA IN THE SYRIAN CONFLICT- AMERICA SHOULD COME FIRST
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Arms to Syria? Obama was looking for an excuse to arm rebels in Syria and after pressure from clowns like Senator John McCain and others he buckeled and now says he is "certain" the Syrian government has used chemical weapons against rebels. What a joke. No one knows for sure if chemical weapons were used and if they were "WHO" used them. Possibly the rebels? Maybe.
Here we go again. Obama who run for President on anti-war platforms is one of the worst war mongers today. Here's a guy that has never been in the military but now thinks that sending troops around the world to fight is okay. He thinks that troops and war in Iraq is okay, troops and war in Afghanistan is okay, war in Pakistan is okay and now - - WOW! Syria.
All that money that will be spent on assisting the rebels in Syria could be spent right here at home on our own border security, infrastructure and feeding our own poor and creating jobs for the vets he already committted to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Obama and a number of his colleagues in Congress really like to play "policemen of the world" The reason for that is to take Americans mind away from our own troubles here at home. He and his ilk believe that when there is problems in our own country like high gasoline costs, food price hikes, poverty, education problems and immigration upheavel the thing to do is to start a war or conflict and try to convince the American people that we have to intercede in other countries internal problems.
Folks, I submit that we should not have started a war in Iraq, should not have gone into Afghanistan nor held a covert unadvertised war in Pakistan and we should not be provinding military weapons to one side or the other in Syria. The Syrian people chose to rise up and fight their government on their own, If they win the struggle ON THEIR OWN, fine. If they are beat down and lose, that's fine also. Then we, America, deal and conduct business with the one left standing. Their civil war is not our problem. Hell, we had our own civil war and fought it and handled it on our own. Tens of thousands of Union and Confederate troops died in our civil war. But Americans came out of our own civil war and moved on. The same should apply to all of these other countries that rise up against their government. They know going in that they want a change and if they actually make that change on thier own (without any outside help) then they will have the country they fought for.
Remember, first there was the Arab Spring uprising with Egypt, then Syria thought they could do what Egypt did and rose up and have been fighting for more than two years. Now, there is Turkey rising up agaist the government. Are we, the United states going to stick our nose in each and everyone of these foreign countries business for political gain? mIt seems so.
I speculate and believe that the reason Obama and Congress is now saying they will back the Syrian rebels is because the Assad government is winning the conflict so far and if that happens the Syrian government will be much stronger and a favorite of Iran. Iran is a bristling point for Obama and some war hawks in the administration and Congress. Obama and these war hawks have the idea that if they help the rebels overthrow Assad it will be a black-eye for Iran. To me, this is just petty politics. The USA wants to have the upperhand on anything involving Iran but they are not cognizant of the consequences of playing these silly war games. It could back fire turn the Middle East into a firestorm.
What happens if Assad believes that he is being blamed for using chemical weapons? Chances are he might really turn them loose.
The United States should refrain from any assistance to the rebel cause in Syria. We certainly do not need another military conflict. Just today, the news reported that the Obama 's White House says that our CIA personnel in Syria has never been stronger. That tells me that the administration has been aiding and helping the rebels for months, if not years.
So, to summarize:- - Who knows how long Obama had the CIA working inside Syria to destablize the Assad regime; he then began helping the rebels cause; he now says chemical weapons were used and he now has the right to send military weapons to the rebels. Sound familiar? The same thing occurred in the mark up to the Iraq war. First, there was - - we need to have the leader of a country gone; then- there is the excuses as to why the United States should become militarily involved; then- there is the step to send arms and use covert (CIA) operations in the country of Syria; then -provide weapons to one side against the othe; then- there will be training of the rebels by the USA both inside and outside Syria. Final step, the United States taking military action against Syria, maybe no-fly zones - - maybe boots on the ground (under the guise of the USA) just training the rebels. Then, outright, full blown involvement to overthrow another foreign government. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Arms to Syria? Obama was looking for an excuse to arm rebels in Syria and after pressure from clowns like Senator John McCain and others he buckeled and now says he is "certain" the Syrian government has used chemical weapons against rebels. What a joke. No one knows for sure if chemical weapons were used and if they were "WHO" used them. Possibly the rebels? Maybe.
Here we go again. Obama who run for President on anti-war platforms is one of the worst war mongers today. Here's a guy that has never been in the military but now thinks that sending troops around the world to fight is okay. He thinks that troops and war in Iraq is okay, troops and war in Afghanistan is okay, war in Pakistan is okay and now - - WOW! Syria.
All that money that will be spent on assisting the rebels in Syria could be spent right here at home on our own border security, infrastructure and feeding our own poor and creating jobs for the vets he already committted to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Obama and a number of his colleagues in Congress really like to play "policemen of the world" The reason for that is to take Americans mind away from our own troubles here at home. He and his ilk believe that when there is problems in our own country like high gasoline costs, food price hikes, poverty, education problems and immigration upheavel the thing to do is to start a war or conflict and try to convince the American people that we have to intercede in other countries internal problems.
Folks, I submit that we should not have started a war in Iraq, should not have gone into Afghanistan nor held a covert unadvertised war in Pakistan and we should not be provinding military weapons to one side or the other in Syria. The Syrian people chose to rise up and fight their government on their own, If they win the struggle ON THEIR OWN, fine. If they are beat down and lose, that's fine also. Then we, America, deal and conduct business with the one left standing. Their civil war is not our problem. Hell, we had our own civil war and fought it and handled it on our own. Tens of thousands of Union and Confederate troops died in our civil war. But Americans came out of our own civil war and moved on. The same should apply to all of these other countries that rise up against their government. They know going in that they want a change and if they actually make that change on thier own (without any outside help) then they will have the country they fought for.
Remember, first there was the Arab Spring uprising with Egypt, then Syria thought they could do what Egypt did and rose up and have been fighting for more than two years. Now, there is Turkey rising up agaist the government. Are we, the United states going to stick our nose in each and everyone of these foreign countries business for political gain? mIt seems so.
I speculate and believe that the reason Obama and Congress is now saying they will back the Syrian rebels is because the Assad government is winning the conflict so far and if that happens the Syrian government will be much stronger and a favorite of Iran. Iran is a bristling point for Obama and some war hawks in the administration and Congress. Obama and these war hawks have the idea that if they help the rebels overthrow Assad it will be a black-eye for Iran. To me, this is just petty politics. The USA wants to have the upperhand on anything involving Iran but they are not cognizant of the consequences of playing these silly war games. It could back fire turn the Middle East into a firestorm.
What happens if Assad believes that he is being blamed for using chemical weapons? Chances are he might really turn them loose.
The United States should refrain from any assistance to the rebel cause in Syria. We certainly do not need another military conflict. Just today, the news reported that the Obama 's White House says that our CIA personnel in Syria has never been stronger. That tells me that the administration has been aiding and helping the rebels for months, if not years.
So, to summarize:- - Who knows how long Obama had the CIA working inside Syria to destablize the Assad regime; he then began helping the rebels cause; he now says chemical weapons were used and he now has the right to send military weapons to the rebels. Sound familiar? The same thing occurred in the mark up to the Iraq war. First, there was - - we need to have the leader of a country gone; then- there is the excuses as to why the United States should become militarily involved; then- there is the step to send arms and use covert (CIA) operations in the country of Syria; then -provide weapons to one side against the othe; then- there will be training of the rebels by the USA both inside and outside Syria. Final step, the United States taking military action against Syria, maybe no-fly zones - - maybe boots on the ground (under the guise of the USA) just training the rebels. Then, outright, full blown involvement to overthrow another foreign government. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Thursday, June 6, 2013
STAFF SGT. BALES SLAUGHTERED 16 WOMEN AND CHILDREN. NO DEATH PENALTY? WHY?
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - And, how is the world treating you?
Guilty plea- so jury will not consider a death sentence. It appears Staff Sgt. Robert Bales plea guarantees that he will not face the death penalty. Here's a guy that said " There's no good reason in this world for why I did the horrible thing I did." but Bales also told investigators and prosecutors " he made the decision to kill each victim when he raised his gun and pointed it. He also admitted that he struggled with a woman before killing her and, after the tussle," decided to "murder anyone that he saw."
Sgt Bales slaughtered 16 people, mostly women and children that were sleeping in their small Afghan village. They were sleeping! It wasn't an ordered attack by the U.S. military. These were civilians. This guy stole out into the night from his bunk, went to the village and murdered 16 helpless women and children for no reason other than wanting a taste of blood. He also carried matches in his pocket and once he killed the innocents, he set fire to the bodies using kerosene from a lantern. After his horrific slaughter he returned to his remote base, Camp Belambay.
Prior to his murder rampage, he drank excessive amounts of alcohol and snorted drugs. His massacre of these 16 villagers led him to boast about his murderous actions to his comrades back at base.
I say, if the killing of 16 innocent women and children does not warrant death, What Does?
Now in his trial Sgt. Bales claims to have PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) and made a plea so he would not be executed. What a rip off. The guy can stand before the court and be very articulate in speech and demeanor, assist his defense attorneys and yet with a bare face tell everybody that he is a sick puppy. Just because he was a military man and served in Afghanistan that should not give him a pass to avoid death by saying "The devil made me do it." "Feel sorry for me." " I experienced PTSD." " I shouldn't be put to death." And the milk toast judge agreed to this plea deal. Wow!
If a foreigner committed a massacre and murdered 16 innocent women and children here in the U.S.A., you can bet the only recourse would be to put the rabid animal down and seek revenge on the culprit. There would be nothing short of the death penalty. But when one of our citizens goes abroad and slaughters 16 women and children in another country where those poor unsuspecting villagers do not have the means to get justice (the death penalty), it's okay with our court system to give the murderer a pass.
SAID JAN, an Afghan whose wife and three other relatives were murdered in this alcohol, drug induced killing spree made the statement " A prison sentence doesn't mean anything. I know we have no power now. But I will become stronger; and if he does not hang, I will have my revenge."
Can you blame Mr. Jan? Put yourself in his place. You and your wife, family and relatives are sleeping in the safety of your own home when a monster bursts in and shoots everyone there, even physically attacking one of your female relatives and then coldly shooting her dead along with everyone else and then the monster sets the bodies on fire. What would you want? I would suggest that you would want that person to receive the death penalty - - nothing less.
In any event I predict that Mr. JAN will get his revenge (that is their way of life in that part of the world.) An eye for an eye is a very specific part of the Afghan culture. Other than in a war, on the battlefield, they believe that if you kill one of their family they have the right to kill one of yours and I would suspect Mr. JAN along with his friends and relatives will indeed get his due and revenge. In all likelihood JAN and other Afghans will take it out on other U.S. military members serving in Afghanistan. There will probably be many deaths to make up for Sgt. Bales murderous rampage and his avoiding the sentence of death.
\
Talk about the ugly American syndrome - - people around the world hate Americans for many reasons. They accuse Americans for being arrogant, imperialistic and entitled along with many other reasons to hate. Sgt. Bales not receiving the death penalty is just another reason for the Afghan people to buy into the "ugly American."
I believe that Sgt. Bales should have received the death penalty for the murders of 16 women and children. The guy loves his booze and drugs. He used them to commit this massacre and now uses that as an excuse to convince the courts and lawmakers here in the USA that he shouldn't die. And apparently the courts bought it but I predict that Mr. SAID JAN, his friends, relatives and residents far and wide will exact their pound of flesh from other Americans due to the actions of Staff Sgt. Robert Bales.
The death of Sgt. Bales would have settled the matter for Mr. SAID JAN and the Afghans. Justice would have been done. But now? The courts decision to take the death penalty off the table for Bales will result with vengeful Afghans getting even for decades. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - And, how is the world treating you?
Guilty plea- so jury will not consider a death sentence. It appears Staff Sgt. Robert Bales plea guarantees that he will not face the death penalty. Here's a guy that said " There's no good reason in this world for why I did the horrible thing I did." but Bales also told investigators and prosecutors " he made the decision to kill each victim when he raised his gun and pointed it. He also admitted that he struggled with a woman before killing her and, after the tussle," decided to "murder anyone that he saw."
Sgt Bales slaughtered 16 people, mostly women and children that were sleeping in their small Afghan village. They were sleeping! It wasn't an ordered attack by the U.S. military. These were civilians. This guy stole out into the night from his bunk, went to the village and murdered 16 helpless women and children for no reason other than wanting a taste of blood. He also carried matches in his pocket and once he killed the innocents, he set fire to the bodies using kerosene from a lantern. After his horrific slaughter he returned to his remote base, Camp Belambay.
Prior to his murder rampage, he drank excessive amounts of alcohol and snorted drugs. His massacre of these 16 villagers led him to boast about his murderous actions to his comrades back at base.
I say, if the killing of 16 innocent women and children does not warrant death, What Does?
Now in his trial Sgt. Bales claims to have PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) and made a plea so he would not be executed. What a rip off. The guy can stand before the court and be very articulate in speech and demeanor, assist his defense attorneys and yet with a bare face tell everybody that he is a sick puppy. Just because he was a military man and served in Afghanistan that should not give him a pass to avoid death by saying "The devil made me do it." "Feel sorry for me." " I experienced PTSD." " I shouldn't be put to death." And the milk toast judge agreed to this plea deal. Wow!
If a foreigner committed a massacre and murdered 16 innocent women and children here in the U.S.A., you can bet the only recourse would be to put the rabid animal down and seek revenge on the culprit. There would be nothing short of the death penalty. But when one of our citizens goes abroad and slaughters 16 women and children in another country where those poor unsuspecting villagers do not have the means to get justice (the death penalty), it's okay with our court system to give the murderer a pass.
SAID JAN, an Afghan whose wife and three other relatives were murdered in this alcohol, drug induced killing spree made the statement " A prison sentence doesn't mean anything. I know we have no power now. But I will become stronger; and if he does not hang, I will have my revenge."
Can you blame Mr. Jan? Put yourself in his place. You and your wife, family and relatives are sleeping in the safety of your own home when a monster bursts in and shoots everyone there, even physically attacking one of your female relatives and then coldly shooting her dead along with everyone else and then the monster sets the bodies on fire. What would you want? I would suggest that you would want that person to receive the death penalty - - nothing less.
In any event I predict that Mr. JAN will get his revenge (that is their way of life in that part of the world.) An eye for an eye is a very specific part of the Afghan culture. Other than in a war, on the battlefield, they believe that if you kill one of their family they have the right to kill one of yours and I would suspect Mr. JAN along with his friends and relatives will indeed get his due and revenge. In all likelihood JAN and other Afghans will take it out on other U.S. military members serving in Afghanistan. There will probably be many deaths to make up for Sgt. Bales murderous rampage and his avoiding the sentence of death.
\
Talk about the ugly American syndrome - - people around the world hate Americans for many reasons. They accuse Americans for being arrogant, imperialistic and entitled along with many other reasons to hate. Sgt. Bales not receiving the death penalty is just another reason for the Afghan people to buy into the "ugly American."
I believe that Sgt. Bales should have received the death penalty for the murders of 16 women and children. The guy loves his booze and drugs. He used them to commit this massacre and now uses that as an excuse to convince the courts and lawmakers here in the USA that he shouldn't die. And apparently the courts bought it but I predict that Mr. SAID JAN, his friends, relatives and residents far and wide will exact their pound of flesh from other Americans due to the actions of Staff Sgt. Robert Bales.
The death of Sgt. Bales would have settled the matter for Mr. SAID JAN and the Afghans. Justice would have been done. But now? The courts decision to take the death penalty off the table for Bales will result with vengeful Afghans getting even for decades. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)