DON'T FEEL LEFT OUT. FOCUS ON YOUR NEW ATTITUDE & PERSONALITY. BE THAT WINNER.
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Reply to Sandra P., in San Diego, California .--
Your inquiry was : How do I become more accepted in social gatherings? You said you felt left out, alone and unwanted .
Sandra, I'd like to see you build up your self-esteem, confidence, and attitude. That will go a long way. If you have a great personality and attitude you can achieve success in most any task or endeavor you choose to undertake,
You mentioned you just bought my recent book "SUCCEED IN LIFE, BE A SUCCESS. Using Relaxation, Visualization and Imagery" That's a good start. First, thank you for considering my book. It was just released a couple of weeks ago. I hope you enjoy the book. In it, you'll find that if you seek out the positive qualities of all those people around you, and compliment them and point out their positive traits people will gravitate to you more and more. Sandra, when you recognize and comment on the good in others you will find that you will begin to become more interested in those people. And, the plus side is, with that positive attitude it will inspire you to look inside yourself to see how you are growing.
Sandra, in the book, you will find many beneficial affirmations that will help you achieve your desires. You'll learn how to demand the best from yourself. Using the relaxation, visualization, and imagery techniques in the book you will find that it will give you a big step up to build your self-confidence and self-esteem. You will find yourself taking on tasks and pushing limits, allowing you to set new goals in life. All this will allow you to improve your entire life. I venture to say that once you start to acquire and build your new attitude and personality you will not feel left out anymore.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Thursday, December 1, 2016
Wednesday, November 30, 2016
YES, CHINESE MEDICINE CAN OFFER GOUT RELIEF.
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
For Ronnie T, in Tampa, Florida.
Your inquiry said that you are experiencing painful episodes of the gout. You wanted to know if there is some oriental medicine and/or an alternative medicine regimen that might bring some relief.
My first response is "yes." In this particular ailment, Oriental Medicine would suggest you begin with eating more fruit and vegetables. Lay off the smoked meats and stick to lean beef. Rather that eating large portions of meats try to replace the meat with beans and lentils; at least, try to eat fish once a week. And yes, eggs are good for you.Along with the fruits, veggies and fish, they provide good protein. Myself, I'm not a fan of dairy products so I limit them in my diet to a large degree. Possibly you can try limiting your dairy intake also. If you rearrange your eating habits to these mentioned here I am sure you will find some relief regarding your gout situation. And, check in with your doctor once you've begun to frame your diet and food choices to see if he or she can offer even more suggestions in this matter. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
__________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
For Ronnie T, in Tampa, Florida.
Your inquiry said that you are experiencing painful episodes of the gout. You wanted to know if there is some oriental medicine and/or an alternative medicine regimen that might bring some relief.
My first response is "yes." In this particular ailment, Oriental Medicine would suggest you begin with eating more fruit and vegetables. Lay off the smoked meats and stick to lean beef. Rather that eating large portions of meats try to replace the meat with beans and lentils; at least, try to eat fish once a week. And yes, eggs are good for you.Along with the fruits, veggies and fish, they provide good protein. Myself, I'm not a fan of dairy products so I limit them in my diet to a large degree. Possibly you can try limiting your dairy intake also. If you rearrange your eating habits to these mentioned here I am sure you will find some relief regarding your gout situation. And, check in with your doctor once you've begun to frame your diet and food choices to see if he or she can offer even more suggestions in this matter. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
__________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
POSSIBLE BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER.
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
This memo goes out to Marcia B., in Texas.
In regards to your inquiry wherein you describe areas of your sister's life situation. I would suggest that you seek out professional help for her. The sooner she gets into therapy the sooner you will find the stress, anxiety and concern you are experiencing for her will be alleviated to a great extent.
From all the information you provided me, I would say it appears your sister can't accept rejection, of any kind. Basically, no one can reject JB because she will just keep coming back, over and over again. For JB, having people in her life is like oxygen to her. She also has serious trust issues, especially when she told her fiance, in a rage, that "you don't get to leave me"!
From your information, it also appears she has problems on the job and clearly cannot take any constructive criticism. She feels as though people are stabbing her in the back. Chances are, your sister will sabotage everything in her life. With the actions, you describe regarding your sister I would say she has a "Borderline Personality Disorder." Some people with this disorder know they are sick but cannot get a grip on their behavior.
I hope this information will help you make the right decisions. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
.
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
This memo goes out to Marcia B., in Texas.
In regards to your inquiry wherein you describe areas of your sister's life situation. I would suggest that you seek out professional help for her. The sooner she gets into therapy the sooner you will find the stress, anxiety and concern you are experiencing for her will be alleviated to a great extent.
From all the information you provided me, I would say it appears your sister can't accept rejection, of any kind. Basically, no one can reject JB because she will just keep coming back, over and over again. For JB, having people in her life is like oxygen to her. She also has serious trust issues, especially when she told her fiance, in a rage, that "you don't get to leave me"!
From your information, it also appears she has problems on the job and clearly cannot take any constructive criticism. She feels as though people are stabbing her in the back. Chances are, your sister will sabotage everything in her life. With the actions, you describe regarding your sister I would say she has a "Borderline Personality Disorder." Some people with this disorder know they are sick but cannot get a grip on their behavior.
I hope this information will help you make the right decisions. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
.
Sunday, November 6, 2016
HILLARY CLINTON GOES FOR THE MUCK , FILTH AND MUD -AGAIN!
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Wow! The Clinton campaign is really stooping to a new low. In order to pander and court the black vote a few days prior to election day Clinton and her staff hold a rally in Cleveland featuring the vulgar Rap person, Jay Z and Black Lives Matter supporter, Beyonce.
For all the flack that Trump took from Clinton about his language, she stands with, and embraces Jay Z, whose songs are nothing but filthy, dirty uncouth ramblings that pretend to be music. Are you kidding me? My view on Rap music is nothing but someone talking or yelling the words into a microphone to the same old tired cadence in the background. The big difference with Jay Z is he spews out the "F" word, Motherf-----, and the "N" word. He didn't say these filthy words just once. Instead, most every other word out of his mouth was the F, MF or N word.
And, believe it or not, I've heard that this pandering candidate is going to show up in Pennsylvania, and possibly other states with these same "down in the gutter" so called entertainers in the closing days of this campaign. It makes me wonder if Clinton sold her soul long ago. It appears nothing is beneath her in order to get what she wants. That's sad.
Can you imagine what would happen if a white performer used even one of those words in a speech or song? They would be crucified, without a doubt. Yet Clinton is smiling and cozying up to this garbage mouth. I would think this presidential candidate would have more class than to accept the filth pouring out of Jay Z's mouth in support of her. She may say she has class, but to me, it's all "fourth class."
For a person who is accused of being untrustworthy, dishonest and an outright liar she still never ceases to amaze me as to how low she can continue to slide into the muck , manure, and dirt.
I submit that any reasonable, intelligent, competent, rational person would not have allowed a vile, garbage mouth man to stand on a stage representing the democratic party and a presidential candidate to act as an ambassador for them. It's a disgrace. It's disgusting. Clinton has no shame whatsoever.
People may not like either presidential candidate but really, come on! Does America want someone with Clinton's misguided values, attitude, and personality to represent the United States around the globe? It appears this woman and her Clinton machine will do anything to pander to get elected. And believe me, if she is elected she will take all of those perverted actions right back into the White House.
I, as a voter, a vet, an American and a patriot, who loves America sees no contest between the two candidates we have to choose from. Clinton who has been mired and entrenched in sleazy, dirty politics and tricks for over forty years versus a businessman who has never been in politics and says he wants to change the country for the better. Trump says he is beholden to no one or any lobby due to his fortune. To me, that's a game changer right there, a breath of fresh air. Any newcomer is worth a shot. Especially, when they can't be bought. A non-politician can't be any worse that what Clinton and her friends did to this country over the past eight years. And, hey, if Trump doesn't keep his pact with the country, throw him out after his four years in office. But I believe the man deserves a chance to right this ship. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Wow! The Clinton campaign is really stooping to a new low. In order to pander and court the black vote a few days prior to election day Clinton and her staff hold a rally in Cleveland featuring the vulgar Rap person, Jay Z and Black Lives Matter supporter, Beyonce.
For all the flack that Trump took from Clinton about his language, she stands with, and embraces Jay Z, whose songs are nothing but filthy, dirty uncouth ramblings that pretend to be music. Are you kidding me? My view on Rap music is nothing but someone talking or yelling the words into a microphone to the same old tired cadence in the background. The big difference with Jay Z is he spews out the "F" word, Motherf-----, and the "N" word. He didn't say these filthy words just once. Instead, most every other word out of his mouth was the F, MF or N word.
And, believe it or not, I've heard that this pandering candidate is going to show up in Pennsylvania, and possibly other states with these same "down in the gutter" so called entertainers in the closing days of this campaign. It makes me wonder if Clinton sold her soul long ago. It appears nothing is beneath her in order to get what she wants. That's sad.
Can you imagine what would happen if a white performer used even one of those words in a speech or song? They would be crucified, without a doubt. Yet Clinton is smiling and cozying up to this garbage mouth. I would think this presidential candidate would have more class than to accept the filth pouring out of Jay Z's mouth in support of her. She may say she has class, but to me, it's all "fourth class."
For a person who is accused of being untrustworthy, dishonest and an outright liar she still never ceases to amaze me as to how low she can continue to slide into the muck , manure, and dirt.
I submit that any reasonable, intelligent, competent, rational person would not have allowed a vile, garbage mouth man to stand on a stage representing the democratic party and a presidential candidate to act as an ambassador for them. It's a disgrace. It's disgusting. Clinton has no shame whatsoever.
People may not like either presidential candidate but really, come on! Does America want someone with Clinton's misguided values, attitude, and personality to represent the United States around the globe? It appears this woman and her Clinton machine will do anything to pander to get elected. And believe me, if she is elected she will take all of those perverted actions right back into the White House.
I, as a voter, a vet, an American and a patriot, who loves America sees no contest between the two candidates we have to choose from. Clinton who has been mired and entrenched in sleazy, dirty politics and tricks for over forty years versus a businessman who has never been in politics and says he wants to change the country for the better. Trump says he is beholden to no one or any lobby due to his fortune. To me, that's a game changer right there, a breath of fresh air. Any newcomer is worth a shot. Especially, when they can't be bought. A non-politician can't be any worse that what Clinton and her friends did to this country over the past eight years. And, hey, if Trump doesn't keep his pact with the country, throw him out after his four years in office. But I believe the man deserves a chance to right this ship. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Tuesday, October 25, 2016
FOX NEW: KELLY FILE, ALWAYS LOOKING FOR A GOT YA MOMENT. IT'S SAD!
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF: Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Fox News, "The Kelly File" tends to have a large tendency for bias. On October 25, 2016. Megyn Kelly interviewed Mike Pence, V-P running mate of Donald Trump. She quickly brought up the subject of Trump and sex with women. She clearly seemed obsessed with the titillating, salacious, sex conversation. Pence avoided getting down in the muck with her and handled the situation with class. Then, Kelly brought on Newt Gingrich, and again, brought up the Trump sex matter. When Gingrich called her on it and said something like "you're obsessed with sex" Kelly retorted, "I am not obsessed with sex. Then she went on with a rambling dissertation saying something to the effect that she's a woman and is concerned about such things. As Gingrich scolded her about her obvious obsession relating to the sexual conversations, she as host, and in charge of the microphone attempted to cover her tracks by interrupting and accusing Gingrich of having "anger issues." After being called out by Gingrich for her obvious bias she acted like an upset, little child, and the only thing she could say to close the segment was making a comment about Gingrich having anger issues. Wow! When did Kelly get a degree in psychology? What a joke this show is.
It looks to me as though Kelly makes the attempt to pretend that she is an objective host but it appears she is not what she is pretending to be. I have seen earlier shows where she tries to push bad press on Trump into her conversations with her guests. I think she should be right up front and tell the viewers she has a bias for Trump.
It's very clear that the Kelly File and other shows on Fox are all set up ahead of time to coincide with what these teleprompter readers are going to say at any particular or specific time. They act as if they are spontaneous but then they magically bring up a TV clip of whatever they were talking about. I say that's not fair and that's not balanced. That's fixed, set in stone, and prepped.
Fox News tries to sell themselves as fair and balanced but when one looks at some of the Fox hosts and their presentations, a prudent, reasonable person can come to the conclusion that there is nothing fair and balanced on the shows. -And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE ZIKA VIRUS IS RAMPANT.
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF: Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The horrific Zika plague- running rampant in places like Africa, Southeast Asia and Central and South America is now playing havoc in the Unites States. And, my views is, it didn't have to be this way. It appears the U.S. is always a day late and a dollar short.
I submit that if the U.S. would have attacked the Zika virus in cooperation with other countries when it first reared its ugly head and then took specific action against this terrifying threat, our country would have been much better off. Instead, what did we do? Officials said, "don't worry about it," it's nit in the U.S., just don't travel to countries where the virus is. Then, when some people did travel to the infected countries and returned to the United States, carrying this dreaded infection, some government officials told the country that the cases were isolated incidents and there was nothing to worry about.
But,Zika cases broke out in Florida and what did the government people say? It's only in the area of "one block." Tey warned people not to travel to that block. Ir wasn't long until the bureaucrats told the people of Flordia that the Zika virus was only in a one-mile radius zone, so no big deal, don't worry. They told people to stay away from the one-mile area. Hell, the virus kept creeping further and further and finally, the officials became concerned. Can you believe it? Then these same state and government people started pointing fingers of blame using the old worn out phrases: "We could have, or we should have. They played the ol' could-a , should-a game.
Why is it our incompetent government officials nearly always fail to take action at the onset of situations, but instead allow bad things to occur and then after the fact, play arm-chair quarterback trying to explain what should have been done, in the first place? That's when all the so-called experts and talking heads hit television and start spouting gobbly-goop.
How many times have you heard government officials, politicians and groups tell the Amercian people: "We're taking this action so an occurrence like this will "never happen again?" But, guess what people? It always happens again --doesn't it.
I would estimate that at the present time there are about 3,000 cases of this mosquito-borne illness across our country, and growing larger each and every day.
Remember, this mystery illness that shrinks infants brains in-utero actually causes a myriad of defects in the baby. There is no prevention against the virus, The only way to hopefully avoid this scary virus and avoid infection is having our dumb-bunny bureaucrats tell everyone: "Avoid traveling to any infected areas, avoid mosquito bites, and to wear condoms when having sexual intercourse.
Now, I bet the rush is on to find a vaccine. But again, I would say that if, and when, the Zika virus was first discovered and the healthcare researchers were actually on the ball they could have tested monkeys, rodents, and other primates to have possibly had a vaccine in tge bucket well before this horrendous visus hit our shores.
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF: Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The horrific Zika plague- running rampant in places like Africa, Southeast Asia and Central and South America is now playing havoc in the Unites States. And, my views is, it didn't have to be this way. It appears the U.S. is always a day late and a dollar short.
I submit that if the U.S. would have attacked the Zika virus in cooperation with other countries when it first reared its ugly head and then took specific action against this terrifying threat, our country would have been much better off. Instead, what did we do? Officials said, "don't worry about it," it's nit in the U.S., just don't travel to countries where the virus is. Then, when some people did travel to the infected countries and returned to the United States, carrying this dreaded infection, some government officials told the country that the cases were isolated incidents and there was nothing to worry about.
But,Zika cases broke out in Florida and what did the government people say? It's only in the area of "one block." Tey warned people not to travel to that block. Ir wasn't long until the bureaucrats told the people of Flordia that the Zika virus was only in a one-mile radius zone, so no big deal, don't worry. They told people to stay away from the one-mile area. Hell, the virus kept creeping further and further and finally, the officials became concerned. Can you believe it? Then these same state and government people started pointing fingers of blame using the old worn out phrases: "We could have, or we should have. They played the ol' could-a , should-a game.
Why is it our incompetent government officials nearly always fail to take action at the onset of situations, but instead allow bad things to occur and then after the fact, play arm-chair quarterback trying to explain what should have been done, in the first place? That's when all the so-called experts and talking heads hit television and start spouting gobbly-goop.
How many times have you heard government officials, politicians and groups tell the Amercian people: "We're taking this action so an occurrence like this will "never happen again?" But, guess what people? It always happens again --doesn't it.
I would estimate that at the present time there are about 3,000 cases of this mosquito-borne illness across our country, and growing larger each and every day.
Remember, this mystery illness that shrinks infants brains in-utero actually causes a myriad of defects in the baby. There is no prevention against the virus, The only way to hopefully avoid this scary virus and avoid infection is having our dumb-bunny bureaucrats tell everyone: "Avoid traveling to any infected areas, avoid mosquito bites, and to wear condoms when having sexual intercourse.
Now, I bet the rush is on to find a vaccine. But again, I would say that if, and when, the Zika virus was first discovered and the healthcare researchers were actually on the ball they could have tested monkeys, rodents, and other primates to have possibly had a vaccine in tge bucket well before this horrendous visus hit our shores.
THE REPUBLICAN PARTY BETTER WEAR BIG BOY PANTS-GET TRUMP ELECTED.
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF: Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Boy, the corrupt media is something else.According to Donald Trump, Fox News and actual video tape disclosures the media goof-offs are anything but unbiased. They continue to degrade, insult and rip the Trump campaign to shreds. Yet, news items such as the Clinton emails, the Wiki-Leak revelations, the dishonesty and corrupt dealings of the Clinton foundation and the DNC go unreported. It has been reported that the journalists and news people spent 25 minutes hammering Trump but spent only between fifty and sixty seconds reporting on Clinton. Talk about piling on! Wow!
It's been said that 95 percent of donations from the journalists and media people went into the Hillary Clinton campaign pockets. Only 5 percent of donations from these same people went into Republican campaigns. That's got to tell us something folks. It looks like the media is in the tank for the Clinton campaign.
If that's so, how can the average middle-class John and Jane Doe expect to get honest and trustworthy news reports from television, newspapers, etc.? They can't. It appears the news is manipulated to such a degree that it is weighted in favor of the Democratic machine. The media idiots are tilting and skewing an election. Shame on them!
We only have a couple of weeks left in this presidential election and I would offer that the Trump camp saturate the airwaves and television screens with "positive ads" explaining Trump's"Contract with America," laying out what he intends to do in the first 100 days in office. Have Trump make numerous campaign ads outlining key points of his policy and the differences between the Republican and Democratic positions on such things as, immigration, economics, foreign policy and job creation.
I submit that if the Republican party would rally around Mr. Trump and saturate the television with such ads, the ads would speak for themselves and Mr. Trump would not have to be out there on the front lines being torn apart by the media hounds trying to derail his campaign.
I believe if Mr. Trump reads the campaign ad information away from the media dogs, and he clarifies the differences between himself and Hillary Clinton, along with the differences between the Republican and Democrat party, he would move up in the polls over -night.
A good example of a campaign ad would be to tell all of the women across America what he is going to do about such things as child care; maternity leave; equal pay; term limits on politicians and jobs. Tell them how he is going to allow them to put food on their table by better salaries, etc.
If the Republican party would help Mr. Trump do the ads, I would think the Republicans would win the election. The Republicans who are bashing Trump, those Republicans who have sour grapes, who want to retain their Washington power should realize that if Trump wins they will still have their power. If they continue to try to bring Trump down (because they have a personal vendetta) they are going to allow the Democratic party to change the course of this country in the worst way for generations to come.
I predict that if Trump is not elected, millions of voters will take their wrath out on the snooty, snobbish, Republican wnnna-be elites who snubbed their nose at a person that was not, or is not, a greedy politician. I personally think that if Trump fails to get elected a large part of the blame can be laid on the shoulders of the Republican party. These Republican idiots really believe that since Trump is not one of them ( a Washington insider), he's not worthy to be president. Rather than thinking of what is best for the country they are only thinking of themselves.
I would suggest the Republican party get off their lazy duff, pour the money into the ads, stand behind Trump, get him elected and then surround him with the smart, intelligent people that he would need to put all of his policies in motion. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W, KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Monday, October 17, 2016
FOX NEWS HAS GONE DOWN HILL OVER THE YEARS.
THE KUHNS REPORT
Hello America- and how is the world treating you?
Why people still watch the Fox News Channel is very perplexing to me. They steered away from a very good news organization and turned it into the (FNC-Funny News Channel) when they began to run Jesse Watters and Dennis Miller segments on the O'Reilly Factor. To me, those segments are a waste of valuable air time. It appears all Fox News is doing is trying to fill time between excessive commercials and promos. All the programs on FOX basically do the same thing.They follow the same format. It appears Fox has everything scripted out for these teleprompter readers to the exact second for a commercial break.
To illustrate some of the complaints I have heard about Fox: They have film cuts already cued up to insert into their conversation that are supposed to be a spontaneous, natural discussion,with a guest. They also shut down conversations with their guests to run FIVE minutes or more of commercials and promos.
As I mention in earlier blogs FOX is running approximately FIVE minutes of time with the narrator and the guests, THEN they run FIVE minutes of commercials. At times they only spend THREE minutes in discussion before they run FIVE minutes of commercials. I challenge anyone to time the commercials on the FOX NEWS programs like O'Reilly, Kelly, Hannity, etc.----
I believe it's a rip off folks. It's a race for the commercial break. You can hear the moderators say, "We're coming up on a hard break. I gotta go." Folks, it's not about the news or guests. I have an opinion and since every one's entitled to an opinion, mine is: "IT'S ABOUT THE MONEY PEOPLE." I believe what FOX is doing by running FIVE minutes of program and then running FIVE MINUTES of commercials and promos is outrageous. It is total outright GREED.
I stopped watching FOX weeks ago when I caught on to their money grab with the commercials. Come on! Five minutes of supposed show and then FIVE minutes of commercial. They squeeze in at least TEN or more commercials in that five minutes. When is enough, enough?
Basically, out of the hour program we, the consumer, are subjected to at least THIRY MINUTES or MORE of commercials. The teleprompter readers on the O'Reilly Factor, the Kelly file and Hannity and all the others at FOX are making big bucks for THIRTY minutes of info- commercials.Could it be because they may not be able to carry on a conversation without the FOX executives setting up each and every word they spout out? It's like a dog and pony show. "Here's your cue -- read it." And, like a fifth grader they read what's in front of them, like little robot.
How dumb does a person have to be to sit in front of a television set and watch the same old narrators talk to the SAME, old worn out talking heads night after night? You already know what each guest is going to say before they say it. It appears they pay some of these guests by way of saying, "A FOX CONTRIBUTOR."
To my thinking FOX is selling "commercials. When I watched FOX it appeared to me that it was nothing more than an infomercial of commercials. Folks, I do not believe there is anything "fair and balanced" at FOX. That is why I stopped watching the Network. However,if ever the "greedy executives" running the show for these teleprompter readers get back to having them read NEWS and current events WITHOUT pausing every FIVE minutes or less for FIVE minutes or more of commercials I and many of my friends around the world might consider viewing the shows again. Let's see if they (FOX), can once again offer good shows without an over-saturation of COMMERCIALS.- And, that's my opinion. Make up your own minds. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
Hello America- and how is the world treating you?
Why people still watch the Fox News Channel is very perplexing to me. They steered away from a very good news organization and turned it into the (FNC-Funny News Channel) when they began to run Jesse Watters and Dennis Miller segments on the O'Reilly Factor. To me, those segments are a waste of valuable air time. It appears all Fox News is doing is trying to fill time between excessive commercials and promos. All the programs on FOX basically do the same thing.They follow the same format. It appears Fox has everything scripted out for these teleprompter readers to the exact second for a commercial break.
To illustrate some of the complaints I have heard about Fox: They have film cuts already cued up to insert into their conversation that are supposed to be a spontaneous, natural discussion,with a guest. They also shut down conversations with their guests to run FIVE minutes or more of commercials and promos.
As I mention in earlier blogs FOX is running approximately FIVE minutes of time with the narrator and the guests, THEN they run FIVE minutes of commercials. At times they only spend THREE minutes in discussion before they run FIVE minutes of commercials. I challenge anyone to time the commercials on the FOX NEWS programs like O'Reilly, Kelly, Hannity, etc.----
I believe it's a rip off folks. It's a race for the commercial break. You can hear the moderators say, "We're coming up on a hard break. I gotta go." Folks, it's not about the news or guests. I have an opinion and since every one's entitled to an opinion, mine is: "IT'S ABOUT THE MONEY PEOPLE." I believe what FOX is doing by running FIVE minutes of program and then running FIVE MINUTES of commercials and promos is outrageous. It is total outright GREED.
I stopped watching FOX weeks ago when I caught on to their money grab with the commercials. Come on! Five minutes of supposed show and then FIVE minutes of commercial. They squeeze in at least TEN or more commercials in that five minutes. When is enough, enough?
Basically, out of the hour program we, the consumer, are subjected to at least THIRY MINUTES or MORE of commercials. The teleprompter readers on the O'Reilly Factor, the Kelly file and Hannity and all the others at FOX are making big bucks for THIRTY minutes of info- commercials.Could it be because they may not be able to carry on a conversation without the FOX executives setting up each and every word they spout out? It's like a dog and pony show. "Here's your cue -- read it." And, like a fifth grader they read what's in front of them, like little robot.
How dumb does a person have to be to sit in front of a television set and watch the same old narrators talk to the SAME, old worn out talking heads night after night? You already know what each guest is going to say before they say it. It appears they pay some of these guests by way of saying, "A FOX CONTRIBUTOR."
To my thinking FOX is selling "commercials. When I watched FOX it appeared to me that it was nothing more than an infomercial of commercials. Folks, I do not believe there is anything "fair and balanced" at FOX. That is why I stopped watching the Network. However,if ever the "greedy executives" running the show for these teleprompter readers get back to having them read NEWS and current events WITHOUT pausing every FIVE minutes or less for FIVE minutes or more of commercials I and many of my friends around the world might consider viewing the shows again. Let's see if they (FOX), can once again offer good shows without an over-saturation of COMMERCIALS.- And, that's my opinion. Make up your own minds. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Thursday, September 22, 2016
KEEP PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES CLEAN-HONEST. CHECK FOR EARPIECES.
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF: Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Matt Lauer's interview with Hillary Clinton was questionable in regards to "if" Clinton was wearing a covert earpiece during the interview. There are reports from social and certain media organizations that she did wear the hidden earpiece on September 7, 2016. A flesh-colored earpiece can be easily concealed so that Hillary Clinton could receive information, answers, and responses to questions by the moderator.
What's that say about cheating? The opponent, without an earpiece, in any debate, would be at a severe disadvantage. The other person answering questions without the help of someone whispering in their ear versus Clinton being fed stock answers and responses by her campaign staff via a covert earpiece ---WOW!
I would suggest to the sponsors and moderators of the upcoming debate between Clinton and Trump on September 26, 2016, to have each of the candidate's ears checked for earpieces and listening devices before the debate starts and during breaks.
If these candidates cannot speak for themselves, what good is a dog and pony show advertised as a debate? Neither of these presidential candidates should be fed answers and responses to questions in any way, shape or form. Keep the debate clean. And, -- that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Sunday, September 11, 2016
CHECK ALL DEBATE PARTICIPANTS FOR COVERT EARPIECES. KEEP ELECTIONS HONEST.
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF: Hello America,and how is the world treating you?
The other day, a television forum was held featuring Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Each candidate took separate turns before the cameras. However, it was insinuated that candidate Hillary Clinton was wearing an earpiece during her interview. What? The Clinton camp denies the accusation but people on the Internet and social media are buzzing with stories that she did wear a listening device.
If, in fact, that is the case, and she was wearing a listening device throughout her interview. I call it "dirty pool." Can you imagine the uproar there would have been from the Clinton campaign if Trump was seen or alleged to have been wearing a listening device?
If she was wearing a listening device she had an enormous advantage. Wow! Her team and staff could feed her answers to the questions being asked by the moderator. They could also instruct her when to sit or stand to emphasize a point in the interview. Fact is, the interview could be manipulated in her favor.
To be on the safe side, I would suggest to the television networks, the moderators and the sponsors of any political forum, town hall or debate to actually check each person taking part in the debate for earpieces or listening devices immediately before the start of any debate or interview. In addition, following each and every break , prior to returning to the stage, each individual should be checked again so as to prevent any one of the debaters from obtaining a listening device during their breaks.
For those doubters that say a person involved in a debate cannot be equipped with such a device. I say, "grow up." As an example, at the present time most news anchors, moderators, and commentator on television already wear very sophisticated earpieces as they report each and every day. Their production directors are always talking in their ear telling them when to break or what to do or say.
Some devices are so small they are near undetectable. And is not unthinkable that aides, handlers, and managers from both the Democrat and Republican campaigns have access to some of the most sophisticated electronics out there. And, I wouldn't put it past either campaign to try to secure an edge in the presidential debates. Hell, the Democrats have already manipulated electronics by setting up secret private servers off and away from governmental sites, altering and destroying electronic emails and destroying Blackberry's and mobile devices, (with hammers.). So what would make a reasonable person think that some of these same people would not try to find a way to manipulate and covertly use other electronic aids.
If in fact, Clinton was wearing a listening device, all she was doing was parroting what some campaign aide was whispering in her ear and telling her what to say in response to the questions being asked. So all Clinton would have been doing was acting like a puppet, with someone else pulling her strings. If that's the case, that's sad -- and it's cheating.
NO ONE taking part in a debate, especially a political or presidential debate, should be allowed to wear an earpiece of any kind during the event. In any political or presidential debate, the viewing audience should be assured and guaranteed that they are hearing only the words coming out of the mouths of the individuals standing on the stage,without the help or assist of anyone else feeding them material.
It is obvious the advantage a person has who may be wearing an earpiece and/or listening device against a person who is not wearing one. So, let's keep our political and presidential debates HONEST and ABOVE BOARD. The audience has an absolute right to know, who, if anyone, is using an earpiece on stage during debates. -- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF: Hello America,and how is the world treating you?
The other day, a television forum was held featuring Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Each candidate took separate turns before the cameras. However, it was insinuated that candidate Hillary Clinton was wearing an earpiece during her interview. What? The Clinton camp denies the accusation but people on the Internet and social media are buzzing with stories that she did wear a listening device.
If, in fact, that is the case, and she was wearing a listening device throughout her interview. I call it "dirty pool." Can you imagine the uproar there would have been from the Clinton campaign if Trump was seen or alleged to have been wearing a listening device?
If she was wearing a listening device she had an enormous advantage. Wow! Her team and staff could feed her answers to the questions being asked by the moderator. They could also instruct her when to sit or stand to emphasize a point in the interview. Fact is, the interview could be manipulated in her favor.
To be on the safe side, I would suggest to the television networks, the moderators and the sponsors of any political forum, town hall or debate to actually check each person taking part in the debate for earpieces or listening devices immediately before the start of any debate or interview. In addition, following each and every break , prior to returning to the stage, each individual should be checked again so as to prevent any one of the debaters from obtaining a listening device during their breaks.
For those doubters that say a person involved in a debate cannot be equipped with such a device. I say, "grow up." As an example, at the present time most news anchors, moderators, and commentator on television already wear very sophisticated earpieces as they report each and every day. Their production directors are always talking in their ear telling them when to break or what to do or say.
Some devices are so small they are near undetectable. And is not unthinkable that aides, handlers, and managers from both the Democrat and Republican campaigns have access to some of the most sophisticated electronics out there. And, I wouldn't put it past either campaign to try to secure an edge in the presidential debates. Hell, the Democrats have already manipulated electronics by setting up secret private servers off and away from governmental sites, altering and destroying electronic emails and destroying Blackberry's and mobile devices, (with hammers.). So what would make a reasonable person think that some of these same people would not try to find a way to manipulate and covertly use other electronic aids.
If in fact, Clinton was wearing a listening device, all she was doing was parroting what some campaign aide was whispering in her ear and telling her what to say in response to the questions being asked. So all Clinton would have been doing was acting like a puppet, with someone else pulling her strings. If that's the case, that's sad -- and it's cheating.
NO ONE taking part in a debate, especially a political or presidential debate, should be allowed to wear an earpiece of any kind during the event. In any political or presidential debate, the viewing audience should be assured and guaranteed that they are hearing only the words coming out of the mouths of the individuals standing on the stage,without the help or assist of anyone else feeding them material.
It is obvious the advantage a person has who may be wearing an earpiece and/or listening device against a person who is not wearing one. So, let's keep our political and presidential debates HONEST and ABOVE BOARD. The audience has an absolute right to know, who, if anyone, is using an earpiece on stage during debates. -- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Thursday, September 1, 2016
FOX NEWS! A RIP-OFF NETWORK: THEY RUN INFOMERCIALS OF COMMERCIALS.
THEY'RE NOT INTERESTED IN NEWS.
THE KUHNS REPORT
I refuse to watch FOX NEWS NETWORK anymore. Why? Easy! Because the FOX NEWS NETWORK is nothing but an "Infomercial" sales force. When you watch FOX you are watching an infomercial of "Commercials,", that's all. I'm not an expert with a stopwatch but I have been timing the commercial breaks with my trusty Timex wrist watch.
I dare and challenge anyone that is watching FOX to time the commercial breaks versus the supposed news they offer. I have found over and over again, night after night, that FOX shows, O'Reilly, Kelly File, Hannity, and Justice start their hour with FIVE MINUTES of commentary/news, etc. then, FIVE minutes later they say, "We'll be right back." "Stay with us."Guess what? They run FIVE minutes of commercials. In that, five minutes of commercials they run approximately TEN commercials, sometimes more. Then the shows host returns and talks to guests or rattles on themselves for another FIVE minutes. Then again, FIVE minutes worth of commercials. And folks, this goes on like this throughout the entire hour show. "FIVE MINUTES of supposed news or commentary and FIVE minutes of commercials. So, out of the entire hour we viewers only get THIRTY minutes of events, news, etc.
And, if you notice, FIVE minutes before the show ends, at the top of the hour, the host, (for example,) HANNITY always says something like this, "Well be right back, stay with us. We need your help." Then it goes to commercial for four-and- a- half-minutes, or 4-minutes, forty-five seconds . Again approximately TEN commercials are run and he comes back about 15 seconds before the hour and says, "That's all the time we have, thanks for watching. O'Reilly Kelly and the other hosts do the same thing.
When I first caught on to this commercial rip-off, I thought it was a fluke, but after watching for a couple weeks I found it was the norm for FOX news. In fact, you can hear Kelly, O'Reilly, or Eric (his fill-in host), or the Judge, often say to the guest. ":We have to go, we have a hard break coming up. And sometimes the guests and host are automatically cut off mid-sentence for the commercial breaks. Apparently, the network has the commercials set on a computer.
People, I REFUSE to watch "infomercials" of commercials. If FOX or any other network wants to saturate us viewers with commercials, they should PAY us to watch them.
____
I'm old enough to remember when cable shows came on the scene. Back then all TV viewers had to watch was ABC, NBC, and CBS. When the cable companies asked us television viewers to pay for cable, we asked, "WHY, should we pay to watch television?" The cable companies answer, "Because there are no commercials. Cable is commercial free."And, that, folks, is what people paid cable companies for - commercial free television programming. Now look how things have gotten out of hand.
Through the years, the cable companies greased the hands of politicians, special interests, and lobbyists and began running commercials on cable shows.
Even when commercials were being run on the major networks and cable shows the viewer could watch FIFTEEN MINUTES of the show, Example: In a half -hour show when they broke for commercial, the commercial was only three minutes in length, then the show returned to allow us to watch the remainder of the half-hour show. If it were an hour show, the commercials were approximately THREE minutes, every FIFTEEN minutes of the show.
However, through the years, the television networks, in collusion with their sponsors, now have TEN MINUTES of the actual show followed by a full FIVE minutes of commercials. So, in a half-hour show we only see 20 minutes of the show. TEN minutes of commercials. In an hour show, we see only 40 minutes of the show and a LONG, LONG 20 minutes of commercials. That's wrong folks. But it appears that is the norm for television programs now. TEN minutes of show, FIVE minutes of commercials (approximately TEN) commercials.
BUT REMEMBER- The GREEDY FOX NETWORK only wants the viewer to have FIVE minutes of a supposed show and FIVE minutes of commercials (Ten or more commercials in that FIVE minutes.)
So, that is why I am boycotting and refusing to watch FOX NEWS. In the past their shows like O'Reilly and, Hannity were good informative platforms, but now, these hosts just fill in FIVE-minute segments with a bunch of babble, just to get to the FIVE minutes of commercials. RIP OFF! You bet.
I submit, what informative information can you, the viewer get in a FIVE-minute segment, especially when they have three guests at once yelling and talking over one another, offering their party line. And sometimes the host of the FOX show joins in trying to be heard over the other three shouting guests. That leaves the viewer with a bunch of garbage.
I thought moderators and/or the host's job was to have control of the show but instead of telling each guest, "You'll all get equal time and get your turn," these nitwits allow the guests to run amok. And then the hosts have the arrogance to say, "Great debate." Are you kidding me! Debate? What FOX is offering is not a debate. All Fox guests do is offer an "opinion" and give a dissertation on the party line of whatever party they represent. What a joke. And, if you watch carefully, you'll see the same old worn out talking heads most every night and you know in advance what they're going to say before they say it because FOX puts the same ol', same ol' on the show most every day.
If you, the television viewer feels like I do about commercials being rammed down our throats by greedy FOX NEWS, I would suggest you get your news and information from other sources like I am doing now. I have always read newspapers and magazines,(at least in those venues you can skip the ads and only read the important events,) You can read your tablet or phone, like I do. And, you can listen to radio for your news. A side note: Even on my tablet I refuse to click or tap on items that have a video with a commercial attached.
Folks, the TV networks, and cable companies make billions of dollars. The sponsors putting out these commercials make billions. I suggest that what the networks and cable companies should do is charge the sponsors more money to place their ads on the television shows and then, --- give us viewers back out viewing time (FIFTEEN MINUTES OF SHOW and THREE MINUTES of commercial.)
If there is a reason for the people of this country to protest and march on Washington I would say it is this issue. Television is the only entertainment some households can afford. They should not have to be exposed to over-saturation of commercials interrupting their viewing pleasures.
When the average television household is paying well over ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS a month to watch TV , commercials should be at a minimum. Fact is, if these cable companies and networks want the viewers to watch commercials, THEY SHOULD BE PAYING US.
I mention FOX because I have been watching that network throughout the election cycle, But enough is enough. NO MORE! I haven't taken the time to time CNN and other cable channels but I do suspect they too are cheating us television viewers. It's bad enough watching most networks that offer TEN minutes of the television show and then FIVE minutes of commercials (which amount to TEN or more.)
Now that I refuse to watch FOX NEWS I'll look at other shows to see which ones I'll cease to watch. I am also going to contact my Congressman and would suggest those that share my views about these greedy networks, sponsors, and cable companies do the same. It's about time our representatives step up and protect us from this outrageous gouging. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
You can reach doctor Kuhns at bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THEY'RE NOT INTERESTED IN NEWS.
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF: Hello America and how is the world treating you?
I refuse to watch FOX NEWS NETWORK anymore. Why? Easy! Because the FOX NEWS NETWORK is nothing but an "Infomercial" sales force. When you watch FOX you are watching an infomercial of "Commercials,", that's all. I'm not an expert with a stopwatch but I have been timing the commercial breaks with my trusty Timex wrist watch.
I dare and challenge anyone that is watching FOX to time the commercial breaks versus the supposed news they offer. I have found over and over again, night after night, that FOX shows, O'Reilly, Kelly File, Hannity, and Justice start their hour with FIVE MINUTES of commentary/news, etc. then, FIVE minutes later they say, "We'll be right back." "Stay with us."Guess what? They run FIVE minutes of commercials. In that, five minutes of commercials they run approximately TEN commercials, sometimes more. Then the shows host returns and talks to guests or rattles on themselves for another FIVE minutes. Then again, FIVE minutes worth of commercials. And folks, this goes on like this throughout the entire hour show. "FIVE MINUTES of supposed news or commentary and FIVE minutes of commercials. So, out of the entire hour we viewers only get THIRTY minutes of events, news, etc.
And, if you notice, FIVE minutes before the show ends, at the top of the hour, the host, (for example,) HANNITY always says something like this, "Well be right back, stay with us. We need your help." Then it goes to commercial for four-and- a- half-minutes, or 4-minutes, forty-five seconds . Again approximately TEN commercials are run and he comes back about 15 seconds before the hour and says, "That's all the time we have, thanks for watching. O'Reilly Kelly and the other hosts do the same thing.
When I first caught on to this commercial rip-off, I thought it was a fluke, but after watching for a couple weeks I found it was the norm for FOX news. In fact, you can hear Kelly, O'Reilly, or Eric (his fill-in host), or the Judge, often say to the guest. ":We have to go, we have a hard break coming up. And sometimes the guests and host are automatically cut off mid-sentence for the commercial breaks. Apparently, the network has the commercials set on a computer.
People, I REFUSE to watch "infomercials" of commercials. If FOX or any other network wants to saturate us viewers with commercials, they should PAY us to watch them.
____
I'm old enough to remember when cable shows came on the scene. Back then all TV viewers had to watch was ABC, NBC, and CBS. When the cable companies asked us television viewers to pay for cable, we asked, "WHY, should we pay to watch television?" The cable companies answer, "Because there are no commercials. Cable is commercial free."And, that, folks, is what people paid cable companies for - commercial free television programming. Now look how things have gotten out of hand.
Through the years, the cable companies greased the hands of politicians, special interests, and lobbyists and began running commercials on cable shows.
Even when commercials were being run on the major networks and cable shows the viewer could watch FIFTEEN MINUTES of the show, Example: In a half -hour show when they broke for commercial, the commercial was only three minutes in length, then the show returned to allow us to watch the remainder of the half-hour show. If it were an hour show, the commercials were approximately THREE minutes, every FIFTEEN minutes of the show.
However, through the years, the television networks, in collusion with their sponsors, now have TEN MINUTES of the actual show followed by a full FIVE minutes of commercials. So, in a half-hour show we only see 20 minutes of the show. TEN minutes of commercials. In an hour show, we see only 40 minutes of the show and a LONG, LONG 20 minutes of commercials. That's wrong folks. But it appears that is the norm for television programs now. TEN minutes of show, FIVE minutes of commercials (approximately TEN) commercials.
BUT REMEMBER- The GREEDY FOX NETWORK only wants the viewer to have FIVE minutes of a supposed show and FIVE minutes of commercials (Ten or more commercials in that FIVE minutes.)
So, that is why I am boycotting and refusing to watch FOX NEWS. In the past their shows like O'Reilly and, Hannity were good informative platforms, but now, these hosts just fill in FIVE-minute segments with a bunch of babble, just to get to the FIVE minutes of commercials. RIP OFF! You bet.
I submit, what informative information can you, the viewer get in a FIVE-minute segment, especially when they have three guests at once yelling and talking over one another, offering their party line. And sometimes the host of the FOX show joins in trying to be heard over the other three shouting guests. That leaves the viewer with a bunch of garbage.
I thought moderators and/or the host's job was to have control of the show but instead of telling each guest, "You'll all get equal time and get your turn," these nitwits allow the guests to run amok. And then the hosts have the arrogance to say, "Great debate." Are you kidding me! Debate? What FOX is offering is not a debate. All Fox guests do is offer an "opinion" and give a dissertation on the party line of whatever party they represent. What a joke. And, if you watch carefully, you'll see the same old worn out talking heads most every night and you know in advance what they're going to say before they say it because FOX puts the same ol', same ol' on the show most every day.
If you, the television viewer feels like I do about commercials being rammed down our throats by greedy FOX NEWS, I would suggest you get your news and information from other sources like I am doing now. I have always read newspapers and magazines,(at least in those venues you can skip the ads and only read the important events,) You can read your tablet or phone, like I do. And, you can listen to radio for your news. A side note: Even on my tablet I refuse to click or tap on items that have a video with a commercial attached.
Folks, the TV networks, and cable companies make billions of dollars. The sponsors putting out these commercials make billions. I suggest that what the networks and cable companies should do is charge the sponsors more money to place their ads on the television shows and then, --- give us viewers back out viewing time (FIFTEEN MINUTES OF SHOW and THREE MINUTES of commercial.)
If there is a reason for the people of this country to protest and march on Washington I would say it is this issue. Television is the only entertainment some households can afford. They should not have to be exposed to over-saturation of commercials interrupting their viewing pleasures.
When the average television household is paying well over ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS a month to watch TV , commercials should be at a minimum. Fact is, if these cable companies and networks want the viewers to watch commercials, THEY SHOULD BE PAYING US.
I mention FOX because I have been watching that network throughout the election cycle, But enough is enough. NO MORE! I haven't taken the time to time CNN and other cable channels but I do suspect they too are cheating us television viewers. It's bad enough watching most networks that offer TEN minutes of the television show and then FIVE minutes of commercials (which amount to TEN or more.)
Now that I refuse to watch FOX NEWS I'll look at other shows to see which ones I'll cease to watch. I am also going to contact my Congressman and would suggest those that share my views about these greedy networks, sponsors, and cable companies do the same. It's about time our representatives step up and protect us from this outrageous gouging. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
You can reach doctor Kuhns at bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Sunday, May 8, 2016
PAUL RYAN, PRIEBUS AND WASHINGTON ESTABLISHMENT LIE.
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF: Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The Republican party elite has been doing everything in its power to sabotage Donald Trump and his march to the presidency.
The inappropriate remarks from Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan is disgusting. He says he is not ready to support Donald Trump. Really? Where's the unity of the party. This failed vice-presidential clown in his now high ranking position should be the first to support Trump. He has to begin unifying the party, not Trump. Trump unified millions and millions of voters and brought millions into the Republican party. If that's not unity on Trump's part, I don't know what is.
When the election first got under way he said he would support the nominee. So, he lies? Another individual, Reince Priebus, the Republican Party Chairman is waffling also. I suggest that it is up to these high ranking mucky-mucks to get out front and begin the unification by telling all of their colleagues that: "Trump is the nominee and we have to do everything within our power to get him elected."
Both of these men said they would support the nominee but for a number of reasons decided to change their minds and torpedo Trumps chances.
It was no secret that when the race first began,all of the candidates swore to support the Republican nominee, as did Priebus and Ryan and numerous Republican elites in Congress. Fact is, they continued to pressure Trump into the pledge of supporting the Republican nominee and insisted that he not try an Independent run for the office. Trump signed the pledge and kept his word. Now these Washington insiders refuse to keep their word. What does that tell you, folks?
Sarah Palin came out today and said that Paul Ryan is toast. I agree. First, if you can't trust the Speaker of the House and his word, what can you believe from him when he says he will look out for the people of the United States.
I agree partly with Palin's view that this guy is looking to be President in the near future and is pandering to his Washington colleagues. But if you can't trust this guys word, why would anyone want him as president. After his lie, I wouldn't vote for him if he were running for dog catcher. I guess he caught a dose of "Clinton-citis,"and you can't believe anything he says.
I also believe that like many Republican establishment wanna-be's Ryan has another reason to deep-six Trump. Remember, he was running mate with his good ol' buddy, Mitt Romney, and when Romney started to blast Trump with all the negative ads and unwarranted statements, Ryan jumped on board Romney's wagon. These two, along with many in the Republican party seem to have a "Liwinsky" type relationship with each other. These politico idiots, who are ruining the Republican party are so close you couldn't pry them apart with a butter knife.
The current Washington representatives who are supposedly looking out for our best interests has lost touch with the American people. They live in their own crazy little dysfunctional world, in the Washington Beltway, only looking to enrich themselves, family and friends.
The entrenched Republicans who have been running Washington brought this situation on themselves. Why? Because they held the majority in Washington but failed to act. They wouldn't challenge Obama and his policies. They wouldn't say" no" to Obama. These morons gave Obama a free hand and buckled under to Obama's whims at every turn. The Republicans gave the store away for eight years - - and they can't get it though their head why people are angry.
Even though it was them that screwed up, they do not want to lose their status in Washington. They want to carry on the same way they have been. These goof-ups are afraid that" the will of the people,"by putting Trump in Washington, will turn their world up-side-down. And, should Trump become president, he should shake up the system.
Remember, Trump owes these mental cases "nothing." He is a billionaire, money to burn. He doesn't have to take money from special interests, lobbyists, or politicians. He doesn't have to play the Washington game of one-hand-washes the other.
I predict that if Trump gets to the White House he will surround himself with some of the best knowledgeable people around in various areas that need addressed, such as, military, education, economy, foreign affairs etc. - -
Hell, Trump can't do any worse that Obama. Obama, never held a job in his life before becoming president and he was never in the military - -yet, he is commander-in-chief our military forces and he sticks his nose in most every aspect of government, like he's an expert on everything. The only claim to fame of Obama is, he was a "street organizer" in Chicago. So, I say if those credentials qualify him for the highest office in the land, Trump has him beat by a mile.
These fat cat politicians should give Trump a chance. If he fouls it up, we dump Trump after his first term. But I predict that change will come, change will be good, if they get on board the "Trump Train."
Kudo's to Senator John McCain. Apparently he came out today saying he supports Trump as nominee. He, McCain, should take his colleagues to task for lying to the American people by telling us they would support the Republican nominee and then doing an "about face."
All of these old school, over the hill, "has been's" running Washington should be relegated to the trash heap. We the people asked for change, we need change, and Trump is change.
Finally, Trump and his campaign staff should replay statements of Ryan, Priebus, and all of the other candidates and their Washington friends that promised to support the nominee. He should remind them that he signed his pledge to do that but the other people's signed pledge is not worth the paper it's written on.
And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
CALIF: Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The Republican party elite has been doing everything in its power to sabotage Donald Trump and his march to the presidency.
The inappropriate remarks from Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan is disgusting. He says he is not ready to support Donald Trump. Really? Where's the unity of the party. This failed vice-presidential clown in his now high ranking position should be the first to support Trump. He has to begin unifying the party, not Trump. Trump unified millions and millions of voters and brought millions into the Republican party. If that's not unity on Trump's part, I don't know what is.
When the election first got under way he said he would support the nominee. So, he lies? Another individual, Reince Priebus, the Republican Party Chairman is waffling also. I suggest that it is up to these high ranking mucky-mucks to get out front and begin the unification by telling all of their colleagues that: "Trump is the nominee and we have to do everything within our power to get him elected."
Both of these men said they would support the nominee but for a number of reasons decided to change their minds and torpedo Trumps chances.
It was no secret that when the race first began,all of the candidates swore to support the Republican nominee, as did Priebus and Ryan and numerous Republican elites in Congress. Fact is, they continued to pressure Trump into the pledge of supporting the Republican nominee and insisted that he not try an Independent run for the office. Trump signed the pledge and kept his word. Now these Washington insiders refuse to keep their word. What does that tell you, folks?
Sarah Palin came out today and said that Paul Ryan is toast. I agree. First, if you can't trust the Speaker of the House and his word, what can you believe from him when he says he will look out for the people of the United States.
I agree partly with Palin's view that this guy is looking to be President in the near future and is pandering to his Washington colleagues. But if you can't trust this guys word, why would anyone want him as president. After his lie, I wouldn't vote for him if he were running for dog catcher. I guess he caught a dose of "Clinton-citis,"and you can't believe anything he says.
I also believe that like many Republican establishment wanna-be's Ryan has another reason to deep-six Trump. Remember, he was running mate with his good ol' buddy, Mitt Romney, and when Romney started to blast Trump with all the negative ads and unwarranted statements, Ryan jumped on board Romney's wagon. These two, along with many in the Republican party seem to have a "Liwinsky" type relationship with each other. These politico idiots, who are ruining the Republican party are so close you couldn't pry them apart with a butter knife.
The current Washington representatives who are supposedly looking out for our best interests has lost touch with the American people. They live in their own crazy little dysfunctional world, in the Washington Beltway, only looking to enrich themselves, family and friends.
The entrenched Republicans who have been running Washington brought this situation on themselves. Why? Because they held the majority in Washington but failed to act. They wouldn't challenge Obama and his policies. They wouldn't say" no" to Obama. These morons gave Obama a free hand and buckled under to Obama's whims at every turn. The Republicans gave the store away for eight years - - and they can't get it though their head why people are angry.
Even though it was them that screwed up, they do not want to lose their status in Washington. They want to carry on the same way they have been. These goof-ups are afraid that" the will of the people,"by putting Trump in Washington, will turn their world up-side-down. And, should Trump become president, he should shake up the system.
Remember, Trump owes these mental cases "nothing." He is a billionaire, money to burn. He doesn't have to take money from special interests, lobbyists, or politicians. He doesn't have to play the Washington game of one-hand-washes the other.
I predict that if Trump gets to the White House he will surround himself with some of the best knowledgeable people around in various areas that need addressed, such as, military, education, economy, foreign affairs etc. - -
Hell, Trump can't do any worse that Obama. Obama, never held a job in his life before becoming president and he was never in the military - -yet, he is commander-in-chief our military forces and he sticks his nose in most every aspect of government, like he's an expert on everything. The only claim to fame of Obama is, he was a "street organizer" in Chicago. So, I say if those credentials qualify him for the highest office in the land, Trump has him beat by a mile.
These fat cat politicians should give Trump a chance. If he fouls it up, we dump Trump after his first term. But I predict that change will come, change will be good, if they get on board the "Trump Train."
Kudo's to Senator John McCain. Apparently he came out today saying he supports Trump as nominee. He, McCain, should take his colleagues to task for lying to the American people by telling us they would support the Republican nominee and then doing an "about face."
All of these old school, over the hill, "has been's" running Washington should be relegated to the trash heap. We the people asked for change, we need change, and Trump is change.
Finally, Trump and his campaign staff should replay statements of Ryan, Priebus, and all of the other candidates and their Washington friends that promised to support the nominee. He should remind them that he signed his pledge to do that but the other people's signed pledge is not worth the paper it's written on.
And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Sunday, January 10, 2016
THE OREGON STANDOFF SHOULD BE PUT DOWN, NOW! DON'T REPEAT THE 2014 FIASCO. LAWBREAKERS ARE LAWBREAKERS
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The seizure of the Federal Wildlife Preserve in Oregon by ARMED anti-government extremists is unwarranted. These idiots are nothing but a bunch of radicals trying to provoke the federal government into an armed confrontation. All of these malcontents who ILLEGALLY took over the wildlife refuge by brandishing rifles, sidearms and other weapon, who try to act macho implying that they will use the weapons against federal officers and other law enforcement people is ludicrous.
This groups first excuse was that they didn't want the Hammond father and son (TWO ARSONISTS) to go to prison. When the two arsonists reported to prison to serve their sentence this group of anti-government armed radicals then decided to continue to occupy the wildlife refuge saying they're fighting for all of our rights. What a crock!
Once the Hammond clan went to prison the local sheriff asked the Bundy family and their toughies to leave the Oregon county and go back home to Nevada and where ever else they resided. But Ammon Bundy refused to do so and said he and his motley crew is going to stay and occupy the wildlife refuge.
Folks this situation all started when Cliven Bundy from Nevada failed to pay at least a million dollars in fees to the federal government. The government made a move to confiscate the Bundy families cattle in 2014. The move resulted in the Bundy family and others organizing, taking up weapons and threatening to fight off any law enforcement that took their cattle. Because these idiots were armed the federal officers and local law enforcement backed down and refused to confiscate the law breaking Bundy families cattle. What did that do? That emboldened this wannabe soldier group to look for other excuses to act out in other parts of the country. Fact is, many of the same people now in Oregon who are occupying the wildlife refuge were involved in the Cliven Bundy fiasco in 2014.
If these armed militia people really wanted to get their point across they should follow the laws of the land. They can contact their senators, contact congress people, contact local and state lawmakers, use the court system, etc., - - these anti-government people could also start internet petitions, use the social media to gather support and network through media. BUT, they SHOULD NOT arm themselves, invade and occupy government and/or local properties.
These men and women who like to threaten people with guns,who forcefully take over and occupy property that they have no right to do should be taken to task. At the time of the Bundy family stand off in 2014 here in Nevada I predicted that the government should have not backed down against this rag tag group of lawbreakers. I said that if the government DID NOT prosecute some of the Bundy family members and many of the armed radicals who openly threatened to use lethal force against law enforcement this same group would rear their ugly head again some place else in the near future. WELL! Was I right? You bet. People, the feds should have scooped up the Bundy family cattle, sold them at auction and sent Cliven Bundy to prison. That would have put an end to this families urge to confront the federal government and local law enforcement with weapons.
Since the federal government turned tail and ran away from what should have been a lawful, legal arrest of the Bundy family and cohorts in 2014, we now have this INSURRECTION playing out in a small town in Oregon. This shouldn't have happened folks but because these make believe soldiers who claim to be a militia got away with having the feds and local law enforcement back down a couple years ago they think they have the right to pull the same crap again. Thus, Ammon and Ryan Bundy decided to call on their fake army of idiots to occupy the wildlife refuge in Oregon.
Folks, if you or I owed the federal government a MILLION DOLLARS in fees, taxes, etc., how long do you think it would be before they would have us sitting out many years in prison? But this Bundy clan failed to pay the government a million dollars for about TWENTY YEARS. Go figure. Fact is, the father of the Bundy family is still a very free man - -and to date has not paid the money he owes the federal government.
My position is that when the federal government chickened out, backed down and failed to enforce the law at gunpoint, it gave the group of radicals the energy to push their crazy movement.
Do these radical bums really think that they will actually shoot at and try to kill federal agents or local law enforcement? If they do, they are crazier than I think they are.They like to be brag and flash guns around and make implied threats that they will use the guns against law enforcement but when it comes to dying, will they? I doubt it. The feds and local law enforcement should call their bluff. The authorities should give these anti-government idiots a short time frame to pack up and leave ---else, they will be taken into custody and arrested. The authorities should not repeat the same tactics they did in the 2014 Bundy fiasco and back down. - -again, I say - -PROSECUTE. After spending a few years in prison I'm sure some of these pretend soldiers, militia, patriots, (whatever they call themselves) will have an entirely different outlook of using weapons and threats to occupy property.
If, in the event one of these crazy idiots does decide to fire a weapon at federal agents or local law enforcement, the authorities should respond in kind and shoot, maim and kill a few of these lawbreakers. I would predict that the group would then turn tail and scurry back home. However, I tend to believe that the Bundy brothers and their band of misfits in Oregon want to provoke the feds and local law enforcement into a confrontation. I say - -,so be it. The authorities should take these clowns on. First thing is to arrest the people who are occupying the wildlife refuge -- see if they resist. If they do and it comes to armed force the authorities shouldn't hesitate. Do the job.
Another concern of mine is why the local sheriff is coddling this bunch of losers. He asked them to leave, they should have left, but didn't. I'm also sure there's many laws on the books in Oregon that the sheriff could use to place these occupiers in custody. Come on! Trespass; Civil Disobedience; Disturbing the Peace . Hey, even spitting on the ground. My point--there is a law somewhere on the books to take action against these people. Use it.
Final though folks, do you think for one moment that if this group of WHITE agitators, who seem to hate the government with a passion were a group of ARMED BLACKS, HISPANICS, ASIANS, or even MUSLIMS, who illegally took over and occupied a government facility they would still be allowed to occupy the premises for days at a time. If you believe that I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn. I say that if it were anybody but this WHITE group of so-called patriots in Oregon, there would be armed federal agents and armed local law enforcement surrounding the compound, helicopters buzzing the area, armored vehicles in position and snipers at the ready. People, if these occupiers =ere anybody but WHITE (so-called patriots) it would be a situation like Ruby Ridge or Waco, Texas. The situation would be treated like a fire fight in Chicago streets.
My suggestion to the federal and local government authorities: Order the group to leave; if they don't -- arrest the entire group and prosecute this time around. If worse comes to worse and these crazies decide to take up arms against law enforcement - -take them out, period. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)