JUSTIN BIEBER IS JUST ANOTHER LIP-SYNCING CLOWN
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Justin Bieber stood in front of a microphone at the MGM Grand to receive a Milestone Award at the Billboard Music Awards a few days ago. Milestone Award? The kids only 19 years old. Come on! He gave two performances but people, - - - THEY were LIP- SYNCED.
The crowd booed this young so-called talent because he showed up late for his performance. He was so caught by surprise he looked as though he was a deer caught in the headlights. He couldn't respond to the crowd for nearly a minute. When the crowd booed Bieber he said " I'm 19 years old. I think I'm doing a pretty good job." He thinks so, in his own mind but I'm sure there are many like me that think he is doing a rotten job.
My question to all of these fans that say they like Bieber: Why the hell do you want to be a fan of someone that pretends to sing? Why pay good money and stand in line for hours to see some one "FAKE IT. Lately a number of well known artists have been LIP-SYNCING rather than stand in front of an audience and sing "for real." That's sad.
Lip-Syncing is a no talent performance. Moving your lips like a ventriloquist dummy is not performing. It's singing under false pretense, fooling the public, pretending to be something you're not. The only thing this guy and all the other lip-syncing crazies do is prance and dance around the stage. That is all the people and fans are paying for - -to watch some choreography, dance moves. That's it. And the surprising thing is most any of the kid fans in the audience could do those same moves with very little practice.
Bieber, like a lot of the other talents that profess to be a star never had the experience of earning their bones. Previous stars like Elvis, Johnny Cash, Ella Fitzgerald, Frank Sinatra and other greats earned their bones. They appeared in sleazy, crummy nightclubs, taverns, and dingy country bars before they reached the type of fame and fortune Bieber currently enjoys. Plus, they actually used their vocal talents by singing for "REAL" Not one of them ever lip-synced. They made their fame on pure talent and sang every word of the song as they performed. One writer once wrote: The reason Garth Brooks show at the Wynn Hotel/Casino in Las Vegas was so great is because Brooks reached back to his days of struggling and playing for boozed up, staggering revelers at Willie's Saloon in Stillwater, Okla.
That writer was correct. Brooks and all the others mentioned here paid their dues and made it on sheer talent. But Bieber, only 19 years old who was put in a music studio with a music mixer and high-tech computer equipment to make up for mistakes in his actual voice quality and possibly cover his vocal failing never had to prove his real talent by touring the saloons, taverns and grimy, gritty, nightclubs.
I really can't understand why anyone would pay to see someone lip-sync (where's the talent) in that? Personally, I wouldn't pay to see anyone pretend to sing. The lip-syncing idiots couldn't pay me to go see them perform. If I wanted to see someone pretend I could go to any karaoke bar in the country and watch pretenders - -at least the karaoke singers are using their real voice "trying" to sing along with the music. Bieber and those other lip-syncing singer wanna-be's don't even do that.
People, lip-syncing is a fraud on the audience and public. It is this type of fake entertainers that is dumbing down the entertainment industry. Bieber and the rest of the lip-syncing clowns (both men and women) are laughing all the way to the bank. What a rip off! - - And, that's my opinion. You decide. Make youre own decisions.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Saturday, May 25, 2013
JODI ARIAS JURY WAS AFRAID TO MAKE DECISION OF DEATH ACCORDING TO THE FOREMAN - -WHAT A JOKE THIS JURY WAS.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The jury foreman in the Jodi Arias trial says the panel could not decide whether the killing of her boyfriend was enough to merit a death sentence. What? She admitted to "murdering him." Foreman William Zervakos goes on to say Arias was not a Jeffrey Dahmer or Charles Manson. Really?
This scorned, hateful, obsessive woman stabbed her boyfriend repeatedly, then she took time to coldly shoot him in the head and then, - - hold his head up with one hand and slash his throat from ear to ear. If that doesn't merit a death penalty, What does? The jury was assigned the task to determine Arias fate on the facts of the case, not compare murders to Dahmer and Manson. The foreman also said this: " It was unfair that 12 average Americans who aren't lawyers had to make such a crucial decision." What a bunch of dummies. With an attitude like that it is a wonder how this jury was chosen for jury duty. People, that is what 12 average people are tasked to do - - make the decision as to life or death like other juries all over the country. And then this foreman tells the world he would like to talk to Jodi Arias. What a jerk. Could it be he's star struck? He wants his 15 minutes of fame. I would suspect he is one of the jurors that would not vote the death sentence for Arias.
Hopefully, the next jury will have the courage to look at the facts of the case and forgo the comparison of Dahmer and Manson to Arias. Murder is murder. Arias confessed to the crime and the bizarre, ugly details of the murder. Just because Arias didn't cannibalize her boyfriend after shooting him and slicing and dicing him up - - she gets a pass? What a lousy bunch of misfits this Arias jury was. If they really believed that they should not be making such a decision they should have refused to serve on the jury. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The jury foreman in the Jodi Arias trial says the panel could not decide whether the killing of her boyfriend was enough to merit a death sentence. What? She admitted to "murdering him." Foreman William Zervakos goes on to say Arias was not a Jeffrey Dahmer or Charles Manson. Really?
This scorned, hateful, obsessive woman stabbed her boyfriend repeatedly, then she took time to coldly shoot him in the head and then, - - hold his head up with one hand and slash his throat from ear to ear. If that doesn't merit a death penalty, What does? The jury was assigned the task to determine Arias fate on the facts of the case, not compare murders to Dahmer and Manson. The foreman also said this: " It was unfair that 12 average Americans who aren't lawyers had to make such a crucial decision." What a bunch of dummies. With an attitude like that it is a wonder how this jury was chosen for jury duty. People, that is what 12 average people are tasked to do - - make the decision as to life or death like other juries all over the country. And then this foreman tells the world he would like to talk to Jodi Arias. What a jerk. Could it be he's star struck? He wants his 15 minutes of fame. I would suspect he is one of the jurors that would not vote the death sentence for Arias.
Hopefully, the next jury will have the courage to look at the facts of the case and forgo the comparison of Dahmer and Manson to Arias. Murder is murder. Arias confessed to the crime and the bizarre, ugly details of the murder. Just because Arias didn't cannibalize her boyfriend after shooting him and slicing and dicing him up - - she gets a pass? What a lousy bunch of misfits this Arias jury was. If they really believed that they should not be making such a decision they should have refused to serve on the jury. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Friday, May 24, 2013
SECURE THE BORDER FIRST- BEFORE ANY IMMIGRATION BILL IS PASSED
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The immigration bill should be considered very carefully. Right now, as the bill stands it does nothing to prevent millions more of illegal aliens flooding across our borders. If the bill goes forward as it is currently written we Americans will have a repeat of the 1986 Amnesty fiasco. Back then, Congress was considering the idea of deporting 3 million illegal aliens. My personal belief was that should have been done. Deporting the 3 million illegal aliens would have been a message to the entire world that we will not tolerate illegals sneaking into the United States. But instead, President Ronald Reagan and Congress made the decision to give all of those illegal aliens amnesty promising us citizens that the borders would be secured to stop all illegal entries and there would be no other amnesty given in future.
The secure the border idea clearly did not work. Now we have estimates of 11 million illegal aliens in the country. I believe we have much more than that. I would estimate 13 to 22 million illegal aliens expecting another amnesty program.
I say no more freebies, gifts, give-a-ways, (no matter what you want to call them) until the borders are SECURE. Period! We, the people, cannot let 1986 repeat itself with empty promises by President Obama and Congress. Obama wants to grant amnesty which includes a path to citizen ship (to illegals) without first making the borders secure. He violated his oath of office by not enforcing all of the immigration laws on the books to date. To prove that point, Obama has been running ads in Mexico telling the Mexican population that food stamps are available here for them and Obama's henchmen in the Senate blocked a Republican effort to stop Obama advertisements in Mexico. I personally believe that no illegal alien or anyone expecting to receive citizenship should be entitled to welfare, food stamps, free health care, education or any other benefit that a United States citizen is entitled to.
Supporters of "Secure the Border" crowd should look at this bill with a jaundiced eye because there are some politicians and lawmakers that believe that increasing the size of the Hispanics in this country will help their political ambitions.
Right now we have a "Gang of 8" making the decisions as to how immigration will be handled here in the USA. Hell if all we need is eight(8) people deciding the fate of our country why do e need all the rest of those lawmakers on Capitol Hill? This gang of 8 crap happens on all types of earth shattering legislation. We let our lawmakers put 8 people together to make decisions that affect the entire country. The rest of the Congress sits on their butts and vote along party lines instead of voting their own conscious in mass. What a way to run a country, right? And, it's usually the same old tired talking heads assigned to these "gang of 8" groups."
If we don't want to see a repeat of the 1986 amnesty program we have to stop the executive branch from holding the power to say when the border is secure.
I say to have the border secure we need that border fence that was promised years ago. The fence should be the double fence running the full length of the Southern United States. The double fence should have a clean path between the two fences for Immigration vehicles and personnel to patrol. The fence should be well lit backed up by cameras and drones. There should be specific entrances for foot and vehicle traffic only. Those entrances should have Immigration Patrol stationed where each entrant or vehicle coming and going is checked through a government database verifying said entries.
Folks, we have excellent data bases currently operational in our government. Our government can track and pay millions of people a year social security benefits on time each month, our states can track and pay tens of thousands of retirees state, county and city benefits each month, same with our veterans. We can track and keep current on payments to people all over the world so what is the problem about tracking who comes and goes across our border entry stations? I say, it's lack of will by our White House and Congress. We should know who is in our country at any given time.
To help insure the security of our borders we need to have the E-Verify system to make certain we know who is actually working on any job in the United States. Many large Agra companies and corporations have been against checking the immigration status of their employees.(They enjoy the cheap labor). I say it is time for the government to mandate that every employer, (no matter how large or small) has to verify their employees citizenship and working status through the E-Verify system. No employee should be exempt. If every employee is checked through the E-Verify system there is no cause for anyone to say that a certain group or person is being singled out. If you are a legal and lawful resident working a job there should be no issue with having your identification checked out.
So, before this immigration bill is passed we should insist that our Southern border be double fenced, with back up of electronics, lighting, additional immigration agents, cameras and drones and each and every person applying and/or working a job in the United States be checked through the E-Verify System prior to employment and every year or so after that. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The immigration bill should be considered very carefully. Right now, as the bill stands it does nothing to prevent millions more of illegal aliens flooding across our borders. If the bill goes forward as it is currently written we Americans will have a repeat of the 1986 Amnesty fiasco. Back then, Congress was considering the idea of deporting 3 million illegal aliens. My personal belief was that should have been done. Deporting the 3 million illegal aliens would have been a message to the entire world that we will not tolerate illegals sneaking into the United States. But instead, President Ronald Reagan and Congress made the decision to give all of those illegal aliens amnesty promising us citizens that the borders would be secured to stop all illegal entries and there would be no other amnesty given in future.
The secure the border idea clearly did not work. Now we have estimates of 11 million illegal aliens in the country. I believe we have much more than that. I would estimate 13 to 22 million illegal aliens expecting another amnesty program.
I say no more freebies, gifts, give-a-ways, (no matter what you want to call them) until the borders are SECURE. Period! We, the people, cannot let 1986 repeat itself with empty promises by President Obama and Congress. Obama wants to grant amnesty which includes a path to citizen ship (to illegals) without first making the borders secure. He violated his oath of office by not enforcing all of the immigration laws on the books to date. To prove that point, Obama has been running ads in Mexico telling the Mexican population that food stamps are available here for them and Obama's henchmen in the Senate blocked a Republican effort to stop Obama advertisements in Mexico. I personally believe that no illegal alien or anyone expecting to receive citizenship should be entitled to welfare, food stamps, free health care, education or any other benefit that a United States citizen is entitled to.
Supporters of "Secure the Border" crowd should look at this bill with a jaundiced eye because there are some politicians and lawmakers that believe that increasing the size of the Hispanics in this country will help their political ambitions.
Right now we have a "Gang of 8" making the decisions as to how immigration will be handled here in the USA. Hell if all we need is eight(8) people deciding the fate of our country why do e need all the rest of those lawmakers on Capitol Hill? This gang of 8 crap happens on all types of earth shattering legislation. We let our lawmakers put 8 people together to make decisions that affect the entire country. The rest of the Congress sits on their butts and vote along party lines instead of voting their own conscious in mass. What a way to run a country, right? And, it's usually the same old tired talking heads assigned to these "gang of 8" groups."
If we don't want to see a repeat of the 1986 amnesty program we have to stop the executive branch from holding the power to say when the border is secure.
I say to have the border secure we need that border fence that was promised years ago. The fence should be the double fence running the full length of the Southern United States. The double fence should have a clean path between the two fences for Immigration vehicles and personnel to patrol. The fence should be well lit backed up by cameras and drones. There should be specific entrances for foot and vehicle traffic only. Those entrances should have Immigration Patrol stationed where each entrant or vehicle coming and going is checked through a government database verifying said entries.
Folks, we have excellent data bases currently operational in our government. Our government can track and pay millions of people a year social security benefits on time each month, our states can track and pay tens of thousands of retirees state, county and city benefits each month, same with our veterans. We can track and keep current on payments to people all over the world so what is the problem about tracking who comes and goes across our border entry stations? I say, it's lack of will by our White House and Congress. We should know who is in our country at any given time.
To help insure the security of our borders we need to have the E-Verify system to make certain we know who is actually working on any job in the United States. Many large Agra companies and corporations have been against checking the immigration status of their employees.(They enjoy the cheap labor). I say it is time for the government to mandate that every employer, (no matter how large or small) has to verify their employees citizenship and working status through the E-Verify system. No employee should be exempt. If every employee is checked through the E-Verify system there is no cause for anyone to say that a certain group or person is being singled out. If you are a legal and lawful resident working a job there should be no issue with having your identification checked out.
So, before this immigration bill is passed we should insist that our Southern border be double fenced, with back up of electronics, lighting, additional immigration agents, cameras and drones and each and every person applying and/or working a job in the United States be checked through the E-Verify System prior to employment and every year or so after that. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Cleveland Police Department Bungles It Again.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Again, the Cleveland, Ohio police foul up big time.
It appears that Cleveland cops are more interested in their coffee and donut breaks than following up on reports by citizens.
Three women, missing for ten years were just discovered to be alive, No thanks to Cleveland Police Department. Only after an alert resident of Cleveland helped break down a door to free victim Amanda Berry, were the ladies set free.
After the fact, the Cleveland police respond to the residence at 2207 Seymour Street , go inside and then radio - -"We got the women." Really? The person that got the women out of that house was one, brave, alert, helpful citizen who lived in the area where the women were being held. He helped kick in the door. That people is who got the women free. Not Cleveland cops.
They would never have gotten the women without that brave neighbors help. In fact the Cleveland Police 911 operator that received a call from that hero and Berry herself was lax in sending help. Come on! The 911 dispatcher stating- "We'll send a car when one is available," even when victim Berry is shouting to her," Not later, Now!" " Before he comes back", meaning the kidnapper.
It's not like someone didn't give a heads up to the Cleveland Police Department on prior occasions. One lady called police and reported that she saw a naked woman in the back yard. Cops come by, knock on the door and leave. Wow! Another time the Cleveland Police Department was called when a neighbor reported hearing screams coming from inside the terror/torture house. Again, the police respond and knock on the door and leave. The lady that reported the naked lady said the police told her that they didn't believe her. Great police work guys, -- If you are a Keystone cop.
What would a competent, trained, and alert police officer do? Here's some suggestions for the Cleveland cops. Beside knocking on the door, walk around the outside of the house, checking the perimeters for something unusual. Leave a card and have the owner or any residents living there call the officer so that the officer could follow up and ask permission to go into the house. Note: A search warrant if necessary.
Clue(s) 1. : Report of a woman screaming 2. The windows were blacked out with black garbage bags. What does it take to have an officer sense that something doesn't smell right and there may be a woman hurt inside the house. Possibly being abused, assaulted or even murdered. God! Cop training 101 should have led any of the responding officers to the conclusion that something is amiss when legitimate citizen reports of screams emanating from a house that is blackened out with garbage bags covering all the windows is right there before their eyes. The cops attitude might as well have been: Whoops, no time to search neighbor, I have to go on coffee break and I'm running late.
This is not the first time Cleveland Police Department failed its residents throughout the city. Only a few years ago, 2009, a horrid smell permeated an entire Cleveland neighborhood. The cause of the smell was determined to be the result of eleven(11) dead bodies and one (1) head found on the property courtesy of serial killer Anthony Sowell's murder rampage.
Again, how did the Cleveland comic cops fail to discover this horrific body stash? Any homicide cop would tell you that the smell of a dead body in quite obvious and unique. There is no smell like it. Yet, not one police officer had the nose to sniff out Sowell.
What about the cops patrolling the neighborhood graveyard? Where were they? Was there even one cop that walked a beat in the neighborhood to smell what the Cleveland residents were complaining about for months? I bet not. The Officers today choose to stay in their patrol car and wait until their called. When I was growing up there was cops "walking" beats. The cops on the beat knew the residents and shopkeepers and the shopkeepers and residents knew the cops, by name.
It's no secret then that the Cleveland Police Officers missed the chance to nab a serial killer many years before the body count grew. I submit, what harm would it be to have these overweight, overpaid cops park their vehicle on a corner and walk a couple blocks, first down one side of the street then return to their car by walking the other side of the street. If there are two cops to a car. One can stay with the vehicle while the other walks the beat and they can alternate staying with the vehicle.
If officers were "required"to WALK a beat they could be in tune with the residents they claim to protect. If in fact officers were actually walking a beat they might have smelled the same foul odor that the neighborhood was complaining about and bumbled and stumbled upon all those bodies stacked up like cord wood. If they were WALKING the beat they may have been more alert to the goings on at the HORROR HOUSE on Seymour Street.
I have always maintained that in cities like Cleveland, New York, Chicago, Portland, Oregon and others, the Chief of Police should mandate that the officers "WALK" a beat, instead of sitting in a car waiting for a call. Walking a beat by any police officer makes any neighborhood safer.Residents are happy to see them on the block, the criminals wouldn't know when a police officer may come around a corner. Crime would diminish. Things like graffiti, armed robbery, burglary, assault and even murder would fall dramatically.
But, it looks as though all the modern day police departments are interested in is their over the top salaries, lucrative pensions and health plans that their public employees unions negotiate for them at our expense. Everything else is secondary.
Now, Cleveland cops are trying to take credit for these three ladies freedom. What a joke. From Cleveland Police Departments past performance skills in solving crimes I would say they can't find their butt with both hands. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
___________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Again, the Cleveland, Ohio police foul up big time.
It appears that Cleveland cops are more interested in their coffee and donut breaks than following up on reports by citizens.
Three women, missing for ten years were just discovered to be alive, No thanks to Cleveland Police Department. Only after an alert resident of Cleveland helped break down a door to free victim Amanda Berry, were the ladies set free.
After the fact, the Cleveland police respond to the residence at 2207 Seymour Street , go inside and then radio - -"We got the women." Really? The person that got the women out of that house was one, brave, alert, helpful citizen who lived in the area where the women were being held. He helped kick in the door. That people is who got the women free. Not Cleveland cops.
They would never have gotten the women without that brave neighbors help. In fact the Cleveland Police 911 operator that received a call from that hero and Berry herself was lax in sending help. Come on! The 911 dispatcher stating- "We'll send a car when one is available," even when victim Berry is shouting to her," Not later, Now!" " Before he comes back", meaning the kidnapper.
It's not like someone didn't give a heads up to the Cleveland Police Department on prior occasions. One lady called police and reported that she saw a naked woman in the back yard. Cops come by, knock on the door and leave. Wow! Another time the Cleveland Police Department was called when a neighbor reported hearing screams coming from inside the terror/torture house. Again, the police respond and knock on the door and leave. The lady that reported the naked lady said the police told her that they didn't believe her. Great police work guys, -- If you are a Keystone cop.
What would a competent, trained, and alert police officer do? Here's some suggestions for the Cleveland cops. Beside knocking on the door, walk around the outside of the house, checking the perimeters for something unusual. Leave a card and have the owner or any residents living there call the officer so that the officer could follow up and ask permission to go into the house. Note: A search warrant if necessary.
Clue(s) 1. : Report of a woman screaming 2. The windows were blacked out with black garbage bags. What does it take to have an officer sense that something doesn't smell right and there may be a woman hurt inside the house. Possibly being abused, assaulted or even murdered. God! Cop training 101 should have led any of the responding officers to the conclusion that something is amiss when legitimate citizen reports of screams emanating from a house that is blackened out with garbage bags covering all the windows is right there before their eyes. The cops attitude might as well have been: Whoops, no time to search neighbor, I have to go on coffee break and I'm running late.
This is not the first time Cleveland Police Department failed its residents throughout the city. Only a few years ago, 2009, a horrid smell permeated an entire Cleveland neighborhood. The cause of the smell was determined to be the result of eleven(11) dead bodies and one (1) head found on the property courtesy of serial killer Anthony Sowell's murder rampage.
Again, how did the Cleveland comic cops fail to discover this horrific body stash? Any homicide cop would tell you that the smell of a dead body in quite obvious and unique. There is no smell like it. Yet, not one police officer had the nose to sniff out Sowell.
What about the cops patrolling the neighborhood graveyard? Where were they? Was there even one cop that walked a beat in the neighborhood to smell what the Cleveland residents were complaining about for months? I bet not. The Officers today choose to stay in their patrol car and wait until their called. When I was growing up there was cops "walking" beats. The cops on the beat knew the residents and shopkeepers and the shopkeepers and residents knew the cops, by name.
It's no secret then that the Cleveland Police Officers missed the chance to nab a serial killer many years before the body count grew. I submit, what harm would it be to have these overweight, overpaid cops park their vehicle on a corner and walk a couple blocks, first down one side of the street then return to their car by walking the other side of the street. If there are two cops to a car. One can stay with the vehicle while the other walks the beat and they can alternate staying with the vehicle.
If officers were "required"to WALK a beat they could be in tune with the residents they claim to protect. If in fact officers were actually walking a beat they might have smelled the same foul odor that the neighborhood was complaining about and bumbled and stumbled upon all those bodies stacked up like cord wood. If they were WALKING the beat they may have been more alert to the goings on at the HORROR HOUSE on Seymour Street.
I have always maintained that in cities like Cleveland, New York, Chicago, Portland, Oregon and others, the Chief of Police should mandate that the officers "WALK" a beat, instead of sitting in a car waiting for a call. Walking a beat by any police officer makes any neighborhood safer.Residents are happy to see them on the block, the criminals wouldn't know when a police officer may come around a corner. Crime would diminish. Things like graffiti, armed robbery, burglary, assault and even murder would fall dramatically.
But, it looks as though all the modern day police departments are interested in is their over the top salaries, lucrative pensions and health plans that their public employees unions negotiate for them at our expense. Everything else is secondary.
Now, Cleveland cops are trying to take credit for these three ladies freedom. What a joke. From Cleveland Police Departments past performance skills in solving crimes I would say they can't find their butt with both hands. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
___________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Sunday, May 5, 2013
The Israelis Want War and Want To Drag the United States Into It.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Israel again is interjecting itself into Syria's civil war. Israeli missiles destroyed Syrian property by initiating a military strike which would be the second attack within three days. Israel was not attacked by Syria yet Israel chose to preempt a military strike against another sovereign nation. Two previous military air strikes by Israel, one in January and one on Friday allegedly targeted weapons shipments. Really?
Israel is hell bent on starting another war in the Middle East. They always cry that they have to defend themselves against missile attacks from the Palestinians. I agree that if they are attacked, yes, defend yourself. But, to initiate a military attack against another country without being attacked by that country is unwarranted.
Preemptive strikes against another country was brought about by our Bush administration when Bush decided to militarily attack Iraq (under the guise and excuse that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction). The USA attacked Iraq under false pretenses just so a war could be justified and rationalized to take the people's mind off of our own domestic problems here at home. Now, Israel states they can use a preempted attack on other countries because the United States did it. Israel told us this on at least two occasions now. You (meaning the United States) did it first so we can do it too.
Israel has been instigating a war and military conflict in the Middle East for years. They tried to pressure the United States to use military action against Iran and now they want to suck the United States into another war involving Syria.
We shouldn't be involved in a military operation in Syria in any way whatsoever and we shouldn't have attacked Iraq nor should we be involved in Afghanistan .
The warring parties in Syria is an internal civil war between the Syrian rebels and the Syrian government troops.
This idea of preemptive military strikes against another country without being attacked is uncalled for. Israel and the United States should keep their nose out of another countries civil war. I say let the two factions fight it out between themselves and whichever group comes out the winner that is the regime we deal with.
Israel will continue to attack Syria (for no reason) other than excuses that possibly missiles may fall into wrong hands (in another country). They also state that chemical weapons may have been used by the Syrian government. Again, really? Who knows which side used them if indeed they were used? That is just another excuse to get the United States and other countries involved in another military conflict. Side note: - - Haven't we learned anything from past experiences like Iraq and Afghanistan ?
Until missiles or chemical weapons are used directly against Israel itself, Israel and every other country should let Syria handle their own conflicts among themselves. Israel nor any other country should choose sides during another countries civil war. Israel has been stirring the pot to agitate and provoke a Middle East war with expectations that no matter what they do the United States is obligated to help them.
I say Israel can defend itself. We, the United States give Israel billions of dollars each year plus billions more in military equipment (Where do you thing the Iron Domes technology came from?) Yep, the good ol' USA. Over the years we (the United States) gave Israel the most modern and up-to-date military technology for land, sea and air defenses. We all know Israel harbors nukes and maintains their military arsenal courtesy of the United States yet Israel continues to provoke and agitate Mid-East neighbors, just itching for a war.
Now that Israel has attacked Syria in first strikes they now fear that Syria might choose to retaliate so they now moved two iron domes into position to thwart any retaliatory attack by Syria. Folks, could you blame Syria if they did retaliate? No! My question? What does Israel expect when they attack another country FIRST. I would think that the country that was attacked would want to retaliate and seek revenge. We did it, Israel does it when the country is actually attacked. But, come on! Picking a fight and attacking another country before you are attacked is just being a big bully. I submit that when you are attacked (like we were on 2011) by another nation, you should retaliate and wipe the attacking country off the face of the earth with our military might - -BUT, don't attack another country first using petty excuses and rationalizations to justify the preemptive strike.
For the record, that is what Israel does all the time. If a rocket is fired into Israel by the Palestinians, Israel immediately retaliate(saying they were attacked and they are defending themselves). So do you think Syria wants to retaliate against an unwarranted attack. I would think so.
But, mark my words, if and when Syria decides to retaliate for being attacked by Israel the Israeli government will shout to high heaven -"We have been attacked", "we have a right to defend ourselves). What a joke.
And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Israel again is interjecting itself into Syria's civil war. Israeli missiles destroyed Syrian property by initiating a military strike which would be the second attack within three days. Israel was not attacked by Syria yet Israel chose to preempt a military strike against another sovereign nation. Two previous military air strikes by Israel, one in January and one on Friday allegedly targeted weapons shipments. Really?
Israel is hell bent on starting another war in the Middle East. They always cry that they have to defend themselves against missile attacks from the Palestinians. I agree that if they are attacked, yes, defend yourself. But, to initiate a military attack against another country without being attacked by that country is unwarranted.
Preemptive strikes against another country was brought about by our Bush administration when Bush decided to militarily attack Iraq (under the guise and excuse that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction). The USA attacked Iraq under false pretenses just so a war could be justified and rationalized to take the people's mind off of our own domestic problems here at home. Now, Israel states they can use a preempted attack on other countries because the United States did it. Israel told us this on at least two occasions now. You (meaning the United States) did it first so we can do it too.
Israel has been instigating a war and military conflict in the Middle East for years. They tried to pressure the United States to use military action against Iran and now they want to suck the United States into another war involving Syria.
We shouldn't be involved in a military operation in Syria in any way whatsoever and we shouldn't have attacked Iraq nor should we be involved in Afghanistan .
The warring parties in Syria is an internal civil war between the Syrian rebels and the Syrian government troops.
This idea of preemptive military strikes against another country without being attacked is uncalled for. Israel and the United States should keep their nose out of another countries civil war. I say let the two factions fight it out between themselves and whichever group comes out the winner that is the regime we deal with.
Israel will continue to attack Syria (for no reason) other than excuses that possibly missiles may fall into wrong hands (in another country). They also state that chemical weapons may have been used by the Syrian government. Again, really? Who knows which side used them if indeed they were used? That is just another excuse to get the United States and other countries involved in another military conflict. Side note: - - Haven't we learned anything from past experiences like Iraq and Afghanistan ?
Until missiles or chemical weapons are used directly against Israel itself, Israel and every other country should let Syria handle their own conflicts among themselves. Israel nor any other country should choose sides during another countries civil war. Israel has been stirring the pot to agitate and provoke a Middle East war with expectations that no matter what they do the United States is obligated to help them.
I say Israel can defend itself. We, the United States give Israel billions of dollars each year plus billions more in military equipment (Where do you thing the Iron Domes technology came from?) Yep, the good ol' USA. Over the years we (the United States) gave Israel the most modern and up-to-date military technology for land, sea and air defenses. We all know Israel harbors nukes and maintains their military arsenal courtesy of the United States yet Israel continues to provoke and agitate Mid-East neighbors, just itching for a war.
Now that Israel has attacked Syria in first strikes they now fear that Syria might choose to retaliate so they now moved two iron domes into position to thwart any retaliatory attack by Syria. Folks, could you blame Syria if they did retaliate? No! My question? What does Israel expect when they attack another country FIRST. I would think that the country that was attacked would want to retaliate and seek revenge. We did it, Israel does it when the country is actually attacked. But, come on! Picking a fight and attacking another country before you are attacked is just being a big bully. I submit that when you are attacked (like we were on 2011) by another nation, you should retaliate and wipe the attacking country off the face of the earth with our military might - -BUT, don't attack another country first using petty excuses and rationalizations to justify the preemptive strike.
For the record, that is what Israel does all the time. If a rocket is fired into Israel by the Palestinians, Israel immediately retaliate(saying they were attacked and they are defending themselves). So do you think Syria wants to retaliate against an unwarranted attack. I would think so.
But, mark my words, if and when Syria decides to retaliate for being attacked by Israel the Israeli government will shout to high heaven -"We have been attacked", "we have a right to defend ourselves). What a joke.
And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)