Pigford vs. Glickman: Obama, Sherrod $1.25 Billion Fraud:

THE DOCTOR IS IN
________________

LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

The following legal case was researched by a number of individuals and portions of it was released on the web off and on. Here is my views on this matter.

Case: "Pigford vs. Glickman": In 1999 a small group of black farmers (400) won the case. Basically, in 1997, this small group of black farmers sued the United States Department of Agriculture. They alleged that they were treated unfairly and were denied USDA loans because of racial discrimination during the periods of 1983 and 1997.

These 400 black farmers won their case and the government agreed to pay each black farmer as much as $50,000.00 to settle their claims.

BUT, something sneaky and covertly happened regarding the "original" judgment and award. On February 23, 2010, under a cloak of darkness and cone of silence, the USDA agreed to release more funds to "Pigford". How much more? Are you ready? A whopping . . . $1.25 billion.

You may ask, why so much. Here's why people. The initial 400 black farmer claimants group had mushroomed into a class action suit to include a total of, get this. . . (86,000) black farmers throughout this country.

Folks, we have a problem: The United States "does not" have, or ever had, 86,000 black farmers.

If any dumb government lawmaker. or anyone would read the very accurate "Official USDA 2007 Census materials that data would show that the total number of black farmers throughout this nation is only (39,697. And get this - - according to the "Official USDA 1992 Census data America only had (18,816) black farmers. Something smells like a kettle of bad fish, right?

What incompetent lawmaker(s) failed to ask: How did (39,697) black farmers morph into the blatant and outright fraudulent claims of (86,000) black farmers? Even more, why didn't even one politician or lawmaker question how an original judgment of $50,000.00 explode into the obscene sum of $1.25 "billion"?

Here's a clue people. One person is mostly responsible. Her name is SHIRLEY SHERROD. She was point person on this case only due to her position in 1997 while at the "Rural Development Leadership Network" and her family received the highest single payout. How much? Approximately $13 million) from those monies.

This woman allegedly exposed herself as the instigator of one of the largest fraud cases in the USA - - -a fraud allowed to occur only because she shouted and yelled racism at anyone and everyone she could in government and as usual, our governments political correct nanny lawmakers bowed and buckled to these outrageous demands by SHERROD.

And the tale gets even more weird. Ms. Sherrod let slip the name of the person who aid and abetted her in this racial discrimination fraud.

This fraud carried out against the American people originally had a judgment relating to "Pigford vs Glickman", in 1999, applied to only (16,000) black farmers.

However in 2008, there was a junior United States Senator who got a law passed to reopen the case and allow many more black farmers to sue the government for monies. Who was that Senator? The Senator was Barack Hussein Obama.

Remember, this law was passed in "secret" and because the woman responsible for pushing and acting as point person was an obscure USDA official (hardly anyone knew), all of us American taxpayers took another big hit and had no idea that we had been forced to pay out more than $1.25 billion to settle a questionable racial discrimination claim.

Currently Ms. Sherrod basically disappeared from the public eye.It's like she fell off of the planet. It appears she chose to go underground and remain silent - - -about this corruption. But with millions of dollars I would think anyone could buy a lot of privacy. Obama, the man who passed the law - - - he's now the nations leader. Wow!

I would say that even if a small part of the information relating to this case is found to be accurate the American people should demand explanations from Obama and the White House and insist that those involved in this massive fraud be held accountable for their actions.-And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuns@gmail.com