HILLARY CLINTON DOESN'T GET MY VOTE.

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating  you?

Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton tells Americans her email fiasco was not or is not a National Security risk. Come on, folks! Her emails were hacked. Despite the hack of her emails two years ago, the State Department failed to take any action to protect and secure Clinton's private computer server.

The hacked emails, which included frequent correspondence with Sidney  Blumenthal while Clinton, was still in office in 2012, were sent by a  "Romanian":  hacker to numerous news outlets, which were later posted online by the news organizations. The State Department  failed to take"immediate" action by implementing security precautions such as updating software and securing passwords. So far, at least FIVE emails have been deemed classified and two were said to be "Top Secret." But Clinton and her posse along with the State Department is parsing the situation saying "the classifications were not marked "classified" at the time.

The State Department has  displayed a total disregard for National Security because they turned a blind eye to Clinton's private server from the get-go. I submit that once the Clinton/Blumenthal hack  was initiated the actual domain name for Clinton's host server was completely laid bare. Also keep in mind, after the email hack incident, in 2013 she went ahead and even  hired a  Colorado firm to manage her PRIVATE email sever.

People, here's a lady that is a top notch lawyer who has worked in government service for  a large portion of her adult life yet she tries to play the dumb  card. She certainly knew the rules of  the federal government when she went rogue with the emails. I believe as many others in America do that Clinton knew that if she used a State Department account, her 60,000-plus emails would clearly become part of the official record, as they should be. However, she didn't want any of that. I would suspect that Hillary Clinton is a "control freak obsessed with privacy and secrecy issues. It appears that someone who may display such tendencies does not want to be transparent in any way, shape or form.

The lack of transparency is  shown in the acts that she did. She obtained the  private server which to my knowledge none of the previous Secretaries went to the trouble and great expense to set up a private email server for themselves.

At this point in time I see Clinton in political and "legal" trouble. And all of her denials and excuses she spouts doesn't change the fact that she brought all of this trouble down on herself.

As to any transparency, I will say this. The only thing transparent about  Hillary Clinton is that she "flip-flops" on most all positions she chooses to take. Foe example, while campaigning  in one section of the country she is "for" an issue or policy but in another city, town or state she FLIPS and takes the other side, "against" it. It appear Clinton tries to cover all of her bases to pander to whatever group she's campaigning in front of, no matter which issue or policy comes up. She's for it today, against it tomorrow. Clinton strikes me a  a person that will do and say "anything", to be elected. She promises any group, such as unions, the Latino, etc., anything, as long as that group is useful to her for that particular moment in time. No matter what the problem or question by groups and individuals are her response seems to be: ""I'll solve it."

Clinton's shifts on issues and policies should be evident to any person in the country. Just listen to her claims and statements on any issue/policy.  In 2008, she was all for the "Defense of the Marriage Act", but now: She's for "Pro-Gay Marriage." In the late 1990's she was for more incarcerations of criminals, now she's against  incarcerations.Clinton was for the Pacific Trade deal. She said it was the "gold standard." Now, she's against it.  It's  laughable, people. Her middle name should be  "waffle,", better yet "Pinocchio", since  a majority of people polled in the U.S. believe she is "untrustworthy", a "liar."

What we really need serving in the office of President of the United States is a person with conviction, someone who is consistent on issues and policies, and clearly a person of principle. Does Hillary possess these qualities? Personally, I don't think she does. Her past actions speak for themselves. Things like past scandals (not counting the current email or the 2012 Benghazi scandal), questionable stock deals, contributions from foreign donors and her flip-flops on issues and policies are just the tip of the iceberg as to why I could not support Clinton's campaign.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.