OBAMA'S WAR MONGERING SHOULD NOT INVOLVE THE USA IN THE SYRIAN CONFLICT- AMERICA SHOULD COME FIRST
THE KUHNS REPORT


LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?


Arms to Syria? Obama was looking for an excuse to arm rebels in Syria and after pressure from clowns like Senator John McCain and others he buckeled and now says he is "certain" the Syrian government has used chemical weapons against rebels. What a joke. No one knows for sure if  chemical weapons were used and if  they were "WHO" used them. Possibly the rebels? Maybe.

Here we go again. Obama who  run for  President on anti-war platforms is one of the worst war mongers today. Here's a guy that has never been in the military but now thinks that sending  troops around the world to fight is okay.  He thinks that troops and war in Iraq is okay, troops and war in Afghanistan is okay, war in Pakistan is okay and now - - WOW! Syria.

All that money that will be spent on assisting the rebels in Syria could be spent right here at home on our own border security, infrastructure and  feeding our own poor and creating jobs for the vets he already committted to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Obama and a number of his colleagues in Congress really like to play "policemen of the world" The reason for that is to take Americans mind away from our own troubles here at home. He and his ilk believe that when there is problems in our own country like high gasoline costs, food price hikes, poverty, education problems and immigration upheavel the thing to do is to start a war or conflict and try to convince the American people that we have to intercede in other countries internal problems.

Folks, I submit that we should not have  started a war in Iraq, should not have gone into Afghanistan nor held a covert unadvertised war in Pakistan and we should not be provinding military weapons to  one side or the other in Syria. The Syrian people chose to rise up and fight their government on their own, If they win the  struggle ON THEIR OWN, fine. If they are beat down and lose, that's fine also. Then we, America,  deal and conduct business with the one left standing. Their civil war is not our problem. Hell, we had our own civil war and fought it and handled it on our own. Tens of thousands of Union and Confederate troops died in our civil war. But Americans  came out of our own civil war and moved on. The same should apply to all of these other countries that rise up against their government. They know going in that they want a change and if they  actually make that change on thier own (without any outside help) then they will have the country they fought for.

Remember, first there was the Arab Spring uprising with Egypt, then Syria thought they could do what Egypt did and rose up and have been fighting for more than two years. Now, there is Turkey rising up agaist the government. Are we, the United states going to stick our nose in each and everyone of these foreign countries business for political gain? mIt seems so.

I speculate and believe that  the reason Obama and Congress is now saying they will back the Syrian rebels is because  the Assad government is winning the conflict so far and if that happens the Syrian government will be much stronger and a favorite of Iran. Iran is a bristling point for Obama and some war hawks in the administration and Congress. Obama and these war hawks have the idea that if they  help the rebels overthrow Assad it will be a black-eye for Iran. To me, this is just petty politics. The USA wants to have the upperhand on anything involving Iran but they are not cognizant of the consequences of playing these silly  war games. It could back fire turn the Middle East into a firestorm.

What happens if Assad believes that he is being blamed for using chemical weapons? Chances are he might really  turn them loose.

The United States should refrain from any assistance to the rebel cause in Syria. We certainly do not need another military conflict. Just today, the news reported that the Obama 's White House says that  our CIA personnel in Syria has never been stronger. That tells me that the administration has been aiding and helping the rebels for months, if not years.

So, to summarize:- - Who knows how long Obama had the CIA working inside Syria to destablize  the Assad regime; he then began helping the rebels cause; he now says chemical weapons were used and he now has the right to send military weapons to the rebels.  Sound familiar? The same thing occurred in the  mark up to the Iraq war. First, there was - - we need to have the leader of a country gone;  then- there is the excuses as to why the United States should become militarily involved;  then-  there is the step to send arms and use covert (CIA) operations in the country of Syria; then -provide weapons to one side against the othe; then- there will be training of the rebels by the USA both inside and outside Syria. Final step, the United States taking military action against Syria, maybe no-fly zones - - maybe boots on the ground (under the guise of the USA) just training the rebels. Then, outright, full blown involvement to overthrow another foreign government. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.