The Body Is A Fantastic Machine

Whatever the mind can imagine, the mind can accomplish.

Monday, August 19, 2013

TELEVISION SHOW -"CROSSING LINES" IS A LOSER

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

This response goes out to  E.C. who asked me to give an opinion on the television program "CROSSING LINES." Well, here's my opinion E.C.

I think the show is a loser. It is fragmented and disjointed. The actors, with the exception of Donald Sutherland are poor excuses for actors. Plus, Sutherland doesn't have much of a part in each episode.

Most episodes have these actors running around with a glum, gloomy attitude by people that can't relate to their part in the series.

The show also leans to heavy on the inter-personal relatuionships of the so called team, especially the leader of the team. He and his wife are having problems but if a person didn't see the show from the start they really don't know what's happening.There is a disconnect for the viewers. The show also seems to drag and it lacks real interest.  I see nothing real exciting about this show and predict that it wil not last too long.
And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

Bradley W Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
__________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by emai at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com



Monday, August 12, 2013

THE OPRAH DOG & PONY SHOW-AN APOLOGY TO OPRAH? FOR WHAT?

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

Looks like Oprah Winfrey is stirring the pot again - - claiming "racism. What a joke".

I would imagine that there are numerous and varied opinions on why Oprah Winfrey did what she did in playing the "race card" against an entire country. I was asked to weigh in so here is my take and opinion on the situation

According to Oprah's story she walked into a store in Zurich and asked to see a purse. Cost of the purse -$38,000.00. The clerk said: "You can't afford this one." " Let me show you something else" (or words of that nature.) Oprah then gets her nose out of joint and screams out to the world that Zurich is "RACIST because of the clerks comment.." What?

It appears Oprah's tantrum was because she wasn't recognized as a famous person or celebrity. Poor Oprah felt "dissed" (disrespected) for lack of recognition so she  yells racism and plays the  "race card." Shame on her.

It may interest Oprah to know that not everybody on this planet knows actually what Oprah Winfrey looks like in real life, especially a store clerk half-way around the world. I guess Oprah  relishes the idea that where ever she walks all the people in the area should recognize her. Come on!

Oprah is a lady whose weight fluctuates  from big to small on any given day. Remember all of the diets she went through on her television show and professed to the viewers that "this diet works", then another. Her weight  bounces up and down like a yo-yo. Oprah also changes her hair  style often and like any other woman her make-up might change from day to day. So, I ask you - -how can a store clerk half way around the world be expected to know Oprah out of the  thousands, if not millions of black tourists that visit Zurich every year? Answer: The clerk can't.

I would suspect Oprah expects  people around the world to recognize her as the Grand Poo-bah and  curtsy or bow in her presence and because this store  clerk had no idea who Oprah was-it has to be a case of "racist" and "racism" according to Winfrey's world.

The same thing that was said to Oprah was also said to me as I was growing up. I heard it as a adolescent, a teenager and as a young adult and I have no doubt that thousands of other people across the United States has  been told: "You can't  afford this one." "Let me show you something else" at one time or another. But like me, I am sure they did not take it  to mean it was an act of disrespect.

Oprah's actions and comments make me think she may have a  lot of internal, latent feeling bubbling up inside her entire being for  one reason or another . Maybe some of those feeling, resentments and whatever other demons she is  fighting with known only to her is a big part of this fiasco and  rather than make a mountain out of an ant hill like she did in Zurich I would suggest she  turn inward and search and seek out her own failing instead of yelling "racist" blaming other people and an entire country.

Zurich and/Switzerland is anything but racist. The country hosts tens of millions of visitors each and every year and many of the tourists are black like Oprah and truly enjoy the courtesy of that country.

Because of the complaint by Oprah the Swiss officials of the country apologized. I believe that's taking political correctness to extremes. If I were the Swiss official I would not have  offered any sort of an apology. All that does is give Winfrey what she wanted - - recognition and maybe - - to publicize her part in the recent movie "The Butler."

A final note: - - Just this evening on the television program "INDIDE EDITION" Oprah was seen saying something like: "The purse was too expensive. I wouldn't have bought it anyway." Can you believe that? I guess Oprah had her moment by making a big, big deal of her shopping trip.  And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
___________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com


Sunday, August 4, 2013

OUR FOOD SAFETY BEING IGNORED-STILL ANOTHER OUTBREAK

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

Our government is clearly not protecting us consumers when it come to food safety. Just recently another outbreak of  "CYCLOSPORA" courtesy of  bad salad from MEXICO.  Folks,  this outbreak affected 16 states and made at least 400 people ill, some left in critical condition.

How many times do hundreds and thousands of people have to fall ill or even die because of bad food being shipped into this country from Mexico. Our FDA and politicians ignore the tainted food on a regular basis.  The U.S.  gives tens of billions of dollars to other countries in "foreign aid', and we build up their borders, their schools and infrastructure with even more money but when it come to protecting citizens of the United States they do not want to spend the money. Go Figure!

Just a side note:  Our administration gives Egypt 1.5 BILLION dollars a year in foreign aid and even when there is a coup  in that country Obama and his people still want to send Egypt the 1.5 BILLION dollars. And, it is clearly unlawful to do that since that country was taken over by a coup. Can you imagine what that 1.5 billion dollars could do right here in this country  building up our food safety program and building up our own roads, bridges and infrastructure? Wow!

This  most recent cyclospora outbreak is just one of many that has occurred in the U.S. and people are getting sick . Some people  die.

The government, especially Congress has to assure  us U.S. citizens that the food being imported into this country is safe to eat. They are not doing that.  They have fallen down on the job for decades.

Food from Mexico is bad, very bad. I know because my mother (God bless her soul) traveled to Mexico, and ate salads while there and became deathly ill. When she returned to the United States she sought out medical help and was told by a renown physician that she had to lose a Kidney because she had eaten tainted salad in Mexico. Yep, mom lost one of  her Kidney's to salad from Mexico. The doctor told mom that food grown in fields in Mexico were not attended to properly. He explained that the crops grown in Mexico were always exposed to urine and feces from the workers and that the water  used to irrigate the crops was dirty and filthy and contained all types of disease.

This  current outbreak of Cyclospora was traced to a company named: Taylor Farms of Mexico, (Aka) Taylor Farms de Mexico S de R.L. de C.V.. It is supposedly owned and operated by an American firm but it is reported that  an inspection of the  farm has not been done in years. AND, you wonder why we Americans  get sick from bad food. The American companies that have an interest in  these farms care less about food safety (It's  all about MONEY ).

This bad food was shipped to "Red Lobster" and "Olive Garden Restaurtants" just to mention a couple of places. These are popular spots for people eating out but little did the customers know when munching down the salads that it was  a possible death sentence for their family.

People, personally, I will  not eat produce or any food that I know is shipped into the states from MEXICO. YEA!!! for labeling. I check the labels on the tomatoes and other produce when I go to the market. If it states "Product of Mexico" I pass it up. In restaurants I do not have the luxury of finding out where the produce came from. That's SCARY.

I know I miss out on certain produce in season because many super markets and places like Wal-Mart sell produce from Mexico. I refuse to buy it. I look for produce from places like California and Florida. If it is stamped  ("Product of the U.S.) I will buy it.

This practice of our government having such open borders and importing food and produce from other countries frightens me. It has been reported that only five (5) percent, [if that] is truly inspected as it arrives here in this country. That is BAD.

I  know we have the ability to inspect ALL of our food as it comes into the U.S. and we also have the money but it is being diverted to other countries in the form of  foreign aid , grants, and other packages - -that's sad. Our tax money that should be spent here in the United States for  Americans safety and well-being is being squandered by our government officials for their own benefits and agendas. - And that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

Saturday, July 27, 2013


SAN DIEGO- DUMP BOB FILNER FROM OFFICE - WHAT's The MATTER WITH A RECALL?

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS  VEGAS -  Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

Perverts to the right of us, perverts to the left of us, perverts all around us. Let's see - -we have Eliot Spitzer, running for office in New York and then the wennie wagger Anthony Weiner running for Mayor of New York City and we have his females accomplice 23-year-old  Sydney Leathers from Indiana who gladly and willingly had phone sex with Weiner dominating the news in recent days. Now- another pervert named Bob Filner, the current Mayor of San Diego, California comes on the scene. Filner is a  former Congressman who served at least TEN TERMS in that institution.

Filner is accused of groping, kissing and making foul comments to women on and off his staff - -one comment something like: "when you come to  work tomorrow, don't wear any panties under your dress." Oh boy! This is the guy that's running San Diego?  Seventy (70) percent of the residents of San Diego want Filner to resign but he refuses to do so. Instead, he says he will undergo - - get this, - (TWO WEEKS ) of therapy to handle his problem. Really? Two weeks of therapy. If he were my patient I would have him in an "intensive therapy' program and it would certainly be much longer than TWO WEEKS.

My question is: Why doesn't the people of San Diego "recall' this  guy. He just started in office and has four years to go --Hell, get him out of office now.  BUT, on the other hand I would have to say: "People. get the representation they deserve." They voted him into office and now they're crying about it.

Remember this guy was a congressman for at least two decades and his bad behavior was supposedly known by his colleagues but as usual this"private club of congress people" ignored his  vulgar, filthy   behavior and swept it under the congressional rug. As always congress always and will always protect their own - - until THEY ARE CAUGHT- then Congress people say "I had no idea."

Folks, I submit that people like Filner should not be holding public office. Instead, they should be a private citizen receiving the long-term health care treatment they require. How can anyone run a city from the confines of a mental health facility, even for two weeks? My answer, they CAN'T.

However, the people across the country that keeps electing the same old talking heads into office  year after year are at fault. Whether Democrat or Republican, or Independent people should  vet their candidates carefully and check them out and after two terms in office vote them out and put new blood in there.  If voters did that there would be no time for the politician to become corrupt or develop  strange, bizarre, bad behavior like Filner has but if they did they would be out in two terms in any case.  People, WISE UP. Don't be partisan, be  a brave, knowledgeable voter. Change is good. Since there are no term limits on many elective offices it's  up to us voters to change the politicians on a regular basis. No matter who we vote in for a change it couldn't be worse than the person currently holding office. Give any new man or woman a chance for two terms.

If, in fact, the people of San Diego had vetted this sicko Filner prior to voting for him the city would not be experiencing all of the bad news, publicity and heartache that is occurring right now.

My message and suggestion to San Diego : Recall, recall, recall Filner NOW.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
"INSIDE EDITION" FLUNKED The INTERVIEW TEST. SYDNEY LEATHER'S SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRILLED AS TO HER PARTICIPATION - -

THE KUHNS REPORT


LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?


What a silly. lousy interview "INSIDE EDITION" had with Sydney Leathers, the young lady  that was involved in the Anthony D. Weiner scandal. Talk about softball questions - - the interviewer might have well as used a powder-puff on Leathers.

Come on! Here's a 23-year-old woman who knowingly participated in filthy email exchanges and phone sex with Weiner (at least two to three times a week) according to Leathers.  Her email responses to Weiner were  as gross and vulgar as Weiners to her. During the interview Leathers  called Weiner disgusting and a "dirty old man" (and, rightly so), I agree totally with that. But throughout the interview she sat there smiling and laughing in front of the cameras like a 10 year child opening Christmas presents and  placed the situation squarely on Weiners shoulders and the person conducting the interview allowded her to just that.

Leathers started sexting with Weiner in 2012 and continued the relationship through November 2012 and she even communicated with Weiner as late as April, this year. And she says she was disgusted? I doubt that.  She went into  this sexting and phone sex  romp willingly, with eyes wide open and  from her email responses she enjoyed it to no end.

What the "Inside Edition" interview should have done was asked questions relating to her behavior in this matter. A few questions  that should have been asked could have been something like this:

Why did you begin conducting filthy emails with Weiner? Did you like it? If not, why didn't you stop after the first raunchy contact?

Why did you begin having phone sex with Weiner two or three days a week? Did you enjoy that too?

From your responses in the emails to Weiner it appears you gladly indulged in the sexting.

You originally said you contacted Weiner to complain about his bad behavior when he resigned from Congress so why in the world would you accept his sexually explicit emails, text and participate in phone sex with him and carry on this sick relationship for  such a long time?

According to your emails to Weiner you clearly said you would like to participate in the sex acts with Weiner as he described what he wanted to do to you. Why would you do that?

You said that Weiner is a dirty old man? Do you believe that your responses to him are just as dirty? Would that make you a "dirty young woman?"

You also  said you loved him? Correct? Please explain that to me?

Folks, there is a ton of questions I would have asked this probable  female sex deviant Leathers. She  has the same tendencies that Weiner displays yet the interviewer didn't pursue the rhyme or reason why she did what she did. That old saying: "It takes two to Tango" fits perfectly in this case. Both had dirty minds and the two of them  used their dirty talk over a long period of time.

If  Leathers was so disgusted with this "Dirty Old Man" why then did she not put a halt to his sexual advances from the get-go? Did  this lady have an agenda for herself? I would suspect - -"yes."

Now believe it or not Leathers acquired a talent agent. Wow! Here's a woman who indulges in vulgar, filthy, gross, sexual communications with a man at least 20-years her senior and admittedly tells him she "loves" him and now based on her sexual emails and phone sex exploits she wants to be recognized as a talent. There used to be a phase that fits this woman to a tee- -It was; " We know what you are, we just have to determine the price."

And the public will probably allow this possible sex-crazed , foul mouth 23-year-old make a bundle of money just because she was involved with Weiner. The talk show circuit will  in all likelihood give Sydney Leathers a platform for her sad, pathetic story - - that's a shame. That only shows you how low the media will go to  grind out a story.

Personally, I think both Weiner and Leathers should be put out to pasture. They both look to have the  same gutter type mindset , they both participated in the filthy, vulgar talk promising each other sexual satisfaction via the phone sex (and Leathers sat there during the interview laughing about it as she said she had phone sex) and it appears both have mental issues that clearly need resolved. So, both should share the disgust in this scandal. They are both disgusting. Anthony Weiner and Sydney Leathers should be in intensive therapy for their problems and both should be ostracized and both should not be allowed to make any money whatsoever from their sicko-sex tryst

I would like to think that if any other news outlet interviews Leathers they do a better job than "Inside Edition. "  I would hope to see her questioned just as hard as sleaze ball Anthony Weiner for her part in this story. " Inside Edition" fell down o the job. But I guess the media will do "anything" for a story. Don't give this foul-mouthed wanna- be- a- star a pass in  this case. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. Youi decide.

Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
___________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleytkuhns@gmail.com
.

Thursday, July 25, 2013

ANTHONY WEINER SHOULD BE HISTORY, NOT MAYOR-IF NY VOTER'S PUT THIS CRAZY IN OFFICE, THEY'RE NUTS.

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

 Weenie wagging Anthony Weiner should drop out of the race for Mayor of New York City. People like Congressional colleague, Rep  Jerrold Nadler,D-NY and all the other candidates for the office advised Weiner to leave the race but because his wife,  Huma Abedin, a longtime advisor and  good friend of  former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton agreed to stand by her husband he is using politicos and their friends in an attempt to gain office as Mayor.

Weiner's wife Huma said she hoped the voters would give him another chance. Really? How many chances does this guy expect to get from the public? He was caught previously showing his private parts and sending raunchy emails to young ladies. He then asked the voters for forgiveness and said he would rehabilitate, but guess what? He decided to continue his bad behavior after his alleged rehab stint by sending photos of his junk to other young women accompanied by the disgusting emails.

If this guy was my patient/client in therapy I would advise him to drop out of the race and undergo extensive therapy. Some talking heads on TV said Weiner is a sex addict. I disagree, he is a sex deviant. Folks people that expose themselves are spending time in jail as a sex offender. Yet his wife Huma who wants to be first lady of NYC says it is a private or personal matter between them and he is a good man. Again, I disagree. It is not a private matter. His exploits are out there on the Web, the worldwide Internet. That is not a private matter anymore. It is clearly a public matter. And, how can he be a good man when he displays this obscene, filthy behavior?

Weiner and wife say his sexcapades are something in his past but Weiner himself says other reports of emails and videos may surface. It sounds to me  that Weiner's bad behavior is not something out of his past but instead is in the present and pssible could be in the future if he does not get  professional help.

Again, Anthony Weiner is not a client or patient of mine but I would suspect that this sex behavior just didn't start a couple years ago while he was holding public office. I have suspicions that Weiner began this deviant behavior in his teen years if not before and continued through his college years. Folks, a person just doesn't wake up one morning when they are 46-years-old and decide to  take pictures of their private package and send them around the world on the Internet.

Now at 48-years-old Weiner is still performing the same acts he did two years earlier. People, I see Weiner as being predisposed to commit these acts and unless he gets into an intense therapy program he will continue those acts. Let me explain it this way: "If  a car thief steals 25 "RED" Corvettes in a row chance are the 26th car he steals will be a "Red" Corvette too.  In this example the thief is predisposed to do that. He has a thing for "Red Corvettes." I would predict that Anthony Weiner will continue to take photos of his private parts and email them to any young woman that shows an interest in his sexual perversions. He has an inclination to repeat this same behavior over and over. He loves it.

About here I should comment on the woman that participated in his dirty, disgusting sex activities. What's her motive? Here's my take and opinion. She wants to have her fifteen of fame in the spotlight and possibly make money from the the experience with Weiner.

Let's look at the situation:  It has been reported that Sydney Leathers, a 23-years-old contacted Weiner and criticized him for his sexting during the first scandal. But then she began having a sex texting phone sex relationship with the same guy she complained about. Why? The relationship supposedly started in 2012 through November, 2012, but she said she  communicated with Weiner as late as April, this year.

This 23-year-old has fled her home in Indiana for digs elsewhere reportedly asking for $100,000 for her story regarding Weiner. It appears this young  sex texting thing had a plan because she  told a friend on Facebook that: "I could ruin someone's life right now." And, Wow! Her story is all over the news, worldwide. Will she make the $100,000 she wants? Who Knows?  You would wonder what goes on in this girls zany, loopy head by sex-texting and participating in raunchy, dirty, disgusting emails. I suggest that the reader read some of the emails between these two people that have been reported in major newspapers - - they are filthy exchanges. I would suspect she is as bad as he is by her participation in these sex communication exchanges. Talk about class - - in my eyes this girl has none and if she does have even an ounce of class it's all "fourth class" at that.  Now that Leathers has come forward I predict that there will other young ladies will come out of the woodwork jumping on the bandwagon too- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com


Sunday, July 21, 2013

OBAMA & FRIENDS INTRODUCED "RACE" TO TRAYVON MARTIN TRIAL. TALK ABOUT TAKING SIDES-HE DID. WOW!

\
THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, an dhow is the world treating you?

Where precisely  was the race issue in the Trayvon Martin/Zimmerman trial? THERE WAS NONE. However President Obama, with his inappropriate comments and speech made it one. Obama, pressured by the Congressional Black Caucus and  the radical Al Sharpton believe it is alright to polarize the nation by injecting "race" into a trial verdict.

A week after the  "legal verdict" of "not guilty" was handed down in a court of law Al Sharpton and his organization rallied the black community to protest in cities across the country. Even before the trial President Obama came out and said: "If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon."  By doing that he made "skin color" a big, fat, glaring issue. Then a week after the verdict he again interjects himself into  the trial giving a speech related to the Martin/Zimmerman case saying: " Trayvon Martin could have been me." With the mention of race by ignorant politicians, the media, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson it is a disgrace to the country.

This President puts on a face of respectability by attempting to take a position on unity between the races. but in reality it appears he sets his sights on other ideals.  For example, let me cite the Fort Hood massacre of 13 military men by a Muslim shooter shouting " Allah Akbar.' .Now, that crime was a clear "racist, hate crime."  After that shooting Obama said: "we should not jump to ethnic and/or religious conclusions.  But now, look at his remarks and comments . Even before the Trayvon Martin trial  was heard - -he drags in  black versus white by inflaming the country using color as a tool.

There was never a hint that Zimmerman was a racist or had any racial motives in the Trayvon shooting. The investigation was conducted by members from various law enforcement agencies including the FBI and at least 30 of Zimmerman's aquaintances were interviewed and there was not one iota of proof that  Zimmerman was a racist in any way, shape or form. The race card was only brought forth by irresponsible politicians, special groups and the media.

Even the Attorney general Eric Holder speaking before the NAACP told the group he will continue to investigate the possibility of bringing Civil Rights violations against Zimmerman. Certain people just cannot accept the fact that "THE JURY HAS SPOKEN."

According to Zimmerman, Trayvon Martin looked suspicious as he walked around in a Hoodie. Personally, I think if anyone saw a person walking in the dark of night around an apartment complex wearing a Hoodie it would make one suspicious and wonder if the person belongs and/or lives there.

Talk about suspicion lets remember what  Jesse Jackson once said about members of his own race. To refresh memories, he said:  "there is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery, then look around and see somebody "WHITE" and feel relieved."

Folks, black youths are being killed everyday at the hands of black youths in cities around this country. Take Chicago,  Obama's stomping grounds,  more than 530 people under the age of 21 have  been murdered since 2008 and many more have been wounded or otherwise experienced violence - -more often than not by the hands of their peers and especially in the  city's African-American communities.

I would like to pose the question: How many WHITE youths in cities across America  are killed by African-American's every year? Yet, there is no call from the President or Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson or the Congressional Black Caucus to organize protest marches in those cities screaming for racial justice  or a review of  the firearms laws and legislation because of the murder and there certainly never is a call for Civil Rights investigations by the Feds when a white youth has been murdered.

I said it before and I say it again - -the Trayvon Martin killing was just another tragic shooting like all of the others that occur each and every day in cities across the country  The Trayvon Martin case should have been treated like all of those others.

Finally, I should make note that the instigators yelling and screaming that this is nothing but a race issue case should also consider how Trayvon Martin has been portrayed. Each photo of Trayvon  has been as a young  teen at the age of 12-years old through possibly 14- years old  instead of  the 17-year old he was. Remember, in many courts of law a teenager can be tried as an adult so to make out that Trayvon is a chubby cheek 12 to 14-year old teenager clearly distorts the picture. I urge and challenge the media to actually publish  different photos of Trayvon Martin as he actually appears at 17-years old at the time of the shooting. OR, the media should have  published photos of Zimmerman at ages between 12-years old and 14- years old. Talk about manipulation - - the media, politicians and special interest groups clearly manipulated to sway opinion and stir up emotion.

 People,  the verdict has been rendered in the Trayvon/Zimmerman trial. The case was heard in a court of law; it was prosecuted; evidence and testimony was heard; the defense was heard; the case went before the jury; the jury deliberated and rendered their verdict. Get a life! Live with it! Justice has been done. Stop all of these crazy protests- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com