EXECUTIONS WITH HANGING AND FIRING SQUAD ONLY. THAT WORKS.

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

The state of Colorado has an execution scheduled for a man that's been on death row for a crime he committed in 1997. In Nevada a man  on  death row for years and who continually requested  that the state to put him to death has drug companies and opponents still delaying  his execution. What a farce.

The appeals process in death penalty cases allows convicted murders to avoid punishment for  20, 23, 25, years and  even more. This should not happen.

The bleeding heart attorneys and courts cry the  blues and say the use of the drug combinations  are cruel and inhumane punishment for the murdering animals. It never ceases to amaze me that some states  who  use the  drug combinations  carry out the death penalty execution successfully. Yet, a state somewhere else in the nation that  uses the "exact" same drug combination has the courts and attorneys screaming to high heaven that the practice is cruel. WOW!

Folks, about seven states and Washington, D.C. actually allow terminally ill patients to obtain a prescription from their doctor and  end their own life, Yet,  when it comes to convicted killers the-courts and attorneys play these games about what is allowed to be used to end someones life.

The state of Tennessee carried out an execution  a week or two ago on a convict who raped and murdered little  7-year-old Paula Dyer, a girl he was babysitting. The weak, feckless, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissenting opinion saying: "In refusing to grant Irick, (the convicted rapist-murder) a stay the Court today turns a blind eye to a proven likelihood that the state of Tennnessee is on the verge of "inflicting several minutes of torturous pain on an inmate in custody."

Can you believe that dumb reasoning. I can't. My question Justice Sotomayor. What about the  excrutiating and long lasting pain little 7-year old Paula endured while she as being raped and then murdered by this animal? My view is the rapist/murderer should feel some of the pain he inflicted on the little girl. Why should the 7-year old feel the pain and torture she experienced while he raped and murdered her, and not him.

People, I believe these lawsuits brought by the drug companies saying their drugs can't be used for executions is just a way to circumvent the death penalty and protect death penalty inmates. My position, if a drug is on the open market and for sale then drug companies have no right to say who can and cannot use it. Hell, if it's for sale and the state legally purchases the drugs, then is is up to the state to say who it is used on.

This false argument of the bleeding hearts saying they object to a drug being used for the first time because they don't know how it will affect the person taking it is way off base. My answer to the drug companies, courts and lawyers who argue that  position is: "Hey, there is always a first time for everything. Every drug combination that has ever been used BEFORE had to be used for the FIRST TIME. And, if we citizens allow these drug companies or attorneys to tell us how  a drug is supposed to be used-- even if a licensed, practicing physician approves its use is going down a slippery slope of eroding our  FIRST AMENDENT.

Folks we can use a drug prescribed by a licensed veterinary doctor who each and every days puts terminally sick animals of all kinds down in a peaceful comfortable way. And, as previously stated we have the  doctors who prescribe a comfortable way for  us terminally sick humans to  be put to death is a comfortable, humane, easy manner. But yet, when it come to carrying out a duly rendered verdict of death to murderers  the courts and lawyers play these silly games. We are supposed to have swift justice in this country but delaying a death penalty by 20 or more years is not carrying out the will or wishes of the  people that rendered  the sentence. That's justice DELAYED.

Further, I say the government is incompetent. We should bring back only two ways of carrying out the death penalty. The first, HANGING, the second, FIRING SQUAD. Period.  Both methods of putting someone to death are  clean and efficient and very fast. By using these two methods there will be no argument of what drug works and which one don't .

 It was in 1977 when Oklahoma and Texas began using the drug combinations by injection. This only gave people who were against the death penalty ammunition to HALT executions. And, because of the  snowflake courts and attorney's looking for a way to stop executions these drug combinations did the job for them.

A couple weeks ago 13 members of the  doomsday cult group  that killed 13 people in Japan using a serin gas attack in the subway system were put to death. They were hanged. As I said, clean, efficient and fast. So, if we want swift justice in the United States we have to limit the  appeals process for death penalty cases. Put a time limit for all appeals to be heard within a year. There is no reason why a person sentenced  the death penalty should sit comfortably on death row being housed and fed for 20, 25, years and longer while the victims family and friends suffer. So carry out the death sentence by one of two ways, hanging and firing squad. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You  decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com