Hillary Clinton's Testimony  Before the Senate Committee Was a Joke

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS

Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

 The Benghazi fiasco was addressed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee  regarding the U.S. mission there.

All she did with her testimony was try to  confuse and distract the committee by arguing in an angry confrontational  tone that she  "knew nothing" on her part about seeing any requests regarding security issues in Libya made by Stevens and others.

This dog and pony show was only to  support the  Obama administrations position on this matter. Clinton really didn't address and sufficiently answer questions that required specific answers. Only a couple of the committee members took issue with her responses. The rest laid back and  let her bob and weave in a vague convoluted manner.

I suggest that all she did in this committee hearing was begin to lay a groundwork for her run at the presidency in 2016.

After the administration and people from her department made numerous excuses for the attack all she could say was: : What difference, at this point, does it make?" "It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we  can to prevent it from ever happening again." What difference does it make? I say, it makes a big difference. If the requests by Stevens were met, he and others would still be alive today.

I suspect that many emails, memos, and communications were indeed sent in relation to  requests for security and seen by the State Department higher-ups, which may have included Clinton.However it is so easy to distance yourself from the incident by making blanket statements like, ". I never saw anything." " I was unaware.  Hell, Clinton is the head of the State Department and we are expected to believe that she does not read communications that come through the State Department from her representatives and ambassador's? What good is she to the State Department id she fails to oversee its operations?

I submit there are paper trails that would clearly show  what communications were received, by whom, and who the communication were passed on to.  I would submit that everyone who had access to the cables, emails, correspondence, etc., should be held accountable and heads should roll. But to date - -nothing! Stonewall and cover up. That's our government in action folks.-And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com