MASS MAIL IN VOTING IS THE SOCIALIST DEMOCRATS BIG, BIG, LIE

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

What a scam the socialist democratic lawmakers pulled on the American people when it came to voting in the 2020 elections.

The Democratic lawmakers used the excuse of COVID-19 in order to initiate mass mail in voting. They said people could not stand in line to vote or they would "die." What a big, big lie.

It was certainly okay with the Democratic politician scam artists to have seniors stand in very long lines at the supermarkets to shop for groceries, and stand in lines at big box stores, or stand in line at the Post Office, and other places. It was okay with them to have seniors stand in long, long lines and required to show ID to receive their COVID shots, BUT it was "NOT" okay to stand in line to cast their vote. It was  also okay with them for people to cast their vote without showing ID. These hypocrites insisted that voting ballots had to be mailed out to everyone, including "dead people," "people who were out of state residents," (who have moved and relocated in another state), illegal aliens, and multiple ballots to people so those individuals could cast their vote more than one time.

Folks, we have to get back to requiring every individual who wants to cast a vote in elections SHOW UP, STAND IN LINE, SHOW ID, and then cast their ballot. PERIOD. Personally, I favor returning to voting by paper ballots. The paper trail is important in event of any problems arising about the vote. Lastly, Congress and these Washington lawmakers have to clean up the voting system and outline a clean format for all states to follow. We citizens do need rigged elections here in the "Good Ol' USA.

 And,  that's my opinion. I suggest you  consider the situation and come to your own conclusions. You decide.

BRADLEY KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.

Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:

bradleykuhns@gmail.com

MORE PEOPLE SHOULD SAY BYE, BYE,  TO FOX NEWS NETWORK.

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

It  appears FOX NEWS is sinking  further into the fake news pool. This network is nothing but a hypocrite. Their hosts  use promotional ads saying they have free rein to speak their mind and are never told what to say or do. What a CROCK!

The other day Neil Cavuto intentionally cut away from White House  Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany speech when she was commenting on the alleged fraud in our election process. Cavuto then went on a spiel about things that  he thought were untrue and basically implied he cut her off because things she said showed no evidence of fraud "according to Cavuto's world."He interjected his own opinion to decide what us viewers should see and here, and apparently his  FOX network agrees. 

He should have broadcast McEnany's entire speech and any remarks she chose to make and let us, we, the viewing audience, come to our own conclusions. Get this people,  FOX NEWS constantly bad mouths CNN and all the major media networks for not airing speeches by the President and/or White House staff and events. But now--here is FOX , adopting that same type of censoring the news.

It's not the first time this has happened. During a FOX Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum segment when  one of their guests was speaking on how Fox News called the Arizona elections too early. It appears they took offense and quickly cut off any comments and did not want to discuss the matter with the guest or others regarding FOX tactics of calling Arizona so early. This network  CANNOT take criticism. WOW!

Folks, in my opinion FOX NEWS is becoming worse everyday. Contrary to what these hosts advertise via promotional ads about letting them speak their minds, it appears these hosts are told what to say and do with their producer and program directors talking in their ears while on air. Their supposedly freedom to say what they want has certainly been compromised.

As I stated many times before. I check in on Fox from time to time to see if they have decided to STOP running FIVE MINUTES worth of commercials and only five minutes worth of program content. I used to faithfully watch this channel each and every day. I stopped when they cut their program content to FIVE minute between FIVE full minutes of never ending commercials. When they were showing at least TEN MINUTES of program content and then FIVE minutes of  commercials I bit my tongue and continued watching.But I refuse to watch a television show or network that runs thirty(30) minutes of commercials in an hour program. What is the use when the  television viewing audience only gets  one-half hour of actual news  or program content in an hour of programming? Ridiculous. 

My suggestion to FOX and these other networks that  run  commercials every FIVE minutes and then only FIVE minutes of the program show should charge their paying sponsors and advertisers more money for the advertising time and STOP shortchanging and cheating television viewers and their audience out of program viewing time. Further, I believe that there should be laws and regulations set forth by the Federal government mandating that  the television networks shall allow at least ten (TEN) minutes worth of viewing time  between commercials and program content, and  that commercials cannot exceed FIVE minutes, (excepting infomercials.)

In any even folks, it is my belief that FOX NEWS network is nothing more than and informercial running "Flash and Dash"news between FIVE minutes of snippet news and interviews.

When I stopped watching FOX news when they began running five minutes worth commercials  and  only five minutes of actual program content I accidently ran across the ONE AMERICA NEWS NETWORK. I was highly impressed with this network. They present news and other program content  in a concise and straight-forward, excellent presentation . AND, they have not been running FIVE minutes worth of commercials and showing only FIVE minutes worth of actual program time. If and when they follow the example of FOX and others and begin running five minutes worth of commercials and five minutes of program content, I will cease watching this channel also. But so far, I highly  recommend ONE AMERICAN NEWS (OAN) for  viewers. Plus, the OAN news commentator assured the viewers that they will NEVER CUT AWAY from and presidential speech or a member of the White House staff during speeches and comments. With that assurance they locked me in as a permanent viewer of their channel. I hope they keep up the good work.- And, that's my opinion. I suggest you look at the situation and come to your own conclusions.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.

Dr. Kuhns ca be reached by email at:

bradleykuhns@gmail.com 

PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE WAS A TRAIN WRECK. GET RID OF DEBATE COMMISSION.

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

Wow! The long awaited Presidential debate finally rolled around and it turned out to be nothing but a  sad, sad, dog and pony show. Both President Trump and Ex-VP Biden should be totally ashamed of their performance. Both men failed to talk about their policies or issues. All they did was talk over and interrupt each other and tried to insult each other.  It was like two 5-year-old children fighting among themselves over an ice cream cone, or, "I dare you to knock this chip off my shoulder." This first presidential debate fell as flat as pancake. And moderator Chris Wallace was no better. He appeared to be biased against the president and scolded him a number of times like a child and seemed to favor Biden when presenting questions. True to form, Wallace always presents "got ya" type question to  stir the pot and cause conflict rather than having the  participants respond to clear, clean issue questions.

Wallace should not be allowed to moderate a debate of any kind in future. I mean how hard it is to formulate actual policy and issue questions to present to the debaters, instead of "got ya" questions? Example sample questions: 

BIDEN:  What will you do as president to improve the economy?  And then Wallace should keep quiet  and let Biden respond for his two minutes on how Biden would do that.

TRUMP: How have you improved the economy since  being elected and what will you do to improve the economy in the next four years if you are reelected? Then again, Wallace should be quiet and allow Trump to respond for his two minutes.

Biden began interrupting Trump first.When he did that, president Trump should have just ignored Biden's interruption and went on responding for his two minutes. And  Trump should have remained silent for the two minutes Biden was responding to the question put to him and when his turn to have his two minutes he could have rebutted Biden's view and then pivoted and said what he would do. For example, as to the subject of COVID-19, he should have let Biden give his view without interrupting then responded with something like:  As to COVID-19, this is what I did and then  proceed to run the list of  all  the things that he did he did to combat COVID-19, and then go on to say, in my next four years I will do this, etc., etc., --

When Law and Order came up the president should have let Biden  answer(without interruption), how he would handle the situation and then when it came his turn he could  have rattled off what he did (i.e.) asking the Governors if they needed federal assistance and say he begged the Governors and Mayors to let him  put the riots down. He would have had the opportunity to point out the mobs are  supported by the Democrats  and the riots are mostly in the Democratic run cities, after which he could move to what he would do to  stop the riots in the next four years.

President Trump missed the opportunity to use his two minutes to solidify what he has done in each area of questioning  (Economy, Law and Order, COVID-19, etc.,and how he would  handle and  improve the situation in the next four years.  During his two minutes he could have found opportunity to throw a few digs and jabs at Biden as he answered the question at hand. Both he and Biden squandered their two  minutes by  interrupting, insulting, making funny faces(Trump), or snickering and laughing (Biden.)

The supposed debate coaches for Trump, Chris Christie, and  Rudy Giuliani receives a grade of (F) as   debate coaches if that is how they instructed the president to respond and rebut Biden. How difficult would it be to call on an expert debate coach from one of the  famed colleges or universities who actually teach and show  students how to debate The person could give the president a few pointers on what to do and how to react to his opposition. Bad debates and knowledge of debates is why Christie and  Giuliana are not the president of the United States. If they were good debaters they would be the ones sitting in the Oval Office.

If both Trump and Biden kept their mouth shut while the other person was talking the viewing audience would have had an opportunity to evaluate each candidate accordingly.

My personal feeling is that the debate could  be much better without a moderator interjecting their views into the debate. Why not have the Democratic  and Republican party representatives get together and agree on what the subject issues will be in the debate-Example: Economy, COVID-19, Law and Order, etc., then allow both participants, in an agreed to amount of time for each, go head to head,  even arguing with each other and express their views and policy on each issue. Then, they move on the the next block(subject) until all blocks of the agreed to subject matter is covered.  Who needs a moderator?

I also have problems with this looney-tune idiotic debate commission. It should be dismantled. What's with this group of  8 0r 9 old " has beens"making up the rules for these debates. Who needs them? No one, is my answer. The debate format could be an agreed to set of protocols put together by both the Republican and Democratic party representatives and using only a "host," (no moderator), who's  only  duty is to introduce  the  participants in the debate at the start of the debate, and announces time for the next block and issue at hand. The host can use a bell and/or buzzer to alert the  debaters time is up and that he/she will introduce the next subject matter to be discussed. Then, when the debate is concluded the host thanks the two debaters and makes any announcement of the next debate. Folks, it's a simple and clean format which allows the two debating persons to get their points across on each issue at hand without some idiot interjecting "got ya" questions. CLEAN and SIMPLE.- And, that's my opinion. I suggest you look at the situation and come to your own conclusions. You decide.

FOX NEWS LEAVES A LOT TO BE DESIRED. THEY OFFER  ONLY  "FLASH and DASH NEWS.

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

Boy is FOX NEWS falling down on the job. They have been changing for the worst, especially during this last year. Their motto "Fair and Balanced" is a bunch of pablum. The  shows hosts use an ad promo saying "no one tells us what to say or do," "we have our own  voice, etc,., etc., - but folks, that is just a bunch of hogwash.

Just the other day they began a conversation on who is behind the funding of the Black Lives Matter and Antifia radical movement and the placement of radical District Attorney's and politicians in offices around the country. But as soon as George Soros name came up, the  hosts immediately became silent, (crickets). They didn't even want to say his name. The subject was immediately changed.

That makes one wonder, people. What kind of a stranglehold or infiltration George Soros  has on FOX NEWS NETWORK. It should also be noted that recently FOX NEW has been having more Democratic guests on  their shows in addition the the old stale, worn out, "used to be's," the "formally was," and "was an aide to" type Fox contributor talking heads. As soon as these same Democratic guests show their face and speak their first word, you know what they are going to say. The Democrat guests  have their same old talking points and turn the conversation to bashing the Administration and Trump, Trump, Trump while the same ol' stale "used to be" conservatives say the same things most shows.  There is not an honest conversation between these two factions. Ridiculous!

In the Soros matter previously mentioned I submit FOX news had an opportunity to present the case against the radical George Soros organization but weaseled  and wimped out, afraid to talk and discuss the Soros ties in the liberal cities across the nation. What a joke FOX NEWS is becoming. So much for "no one tells us what to say."

With the exception of "The Tucker Carson Show," FOX hosts runs a very drab "cut and paste" program format. MAC CULLAM, HANNITY, INGRAHAM , WATTERS, and others continually show video inserts and interrupt guests. They have a "no matter what" attitude to get their video clip into their conversation. These  show hosts might as well just honestly say, "we are going to run video clips and do all the talking for the duration of the show."  And to top it off, the hosts pass the same  video clips from show to show , beating the dead horse, "over and over" again.  No originality whatsoever. 

I suggest if these  show hosts claim to be opinion hosts they should just do the show by themselves giving their own opinion on various issues  and allow the viewing audience to tune in for their opinions. It would be better than filling the segments with constant video clip inserts or having 3,4, or 5 guests in a block segment where the guests only  gets about one to one-and- a-half minutes to respond to an issue. All FOX NEWS is doing now is just filling air time for FIVE minutes in order to run FIVE MINUTES of advertisement commercials.  These hosts are there just to "beat the clock" before they are shut down by the FIVE MINUTE commercial break.

It appears these hosts care less about what the guests  are actually saying, All they want to do is squeeze in a particular video that is already queued up to fit into the five minutes they have before running  FIVE MINUTES of commercials.

Why would any reasonable person be crazy enough to sit through only FIVE MINUTES of program content followed by FIVE MINUTES of advertisement commercials?  THIRTY MINUTES out of an hour of a program on FOX NEWS is commercials?  That's nuts! 

The television viewing audience should be outraged about what the television networks are doing. In years past the TV audicence had at least fifteen (15) and twenty (20) minutes of a program before being interrupted by commercials. When the networks  began cutting program viewing time to ten (10) minutes before running a commercial people were unhappy and became upset but now with only FIVE MINUTES of program content before being interrupted by  A LONG, LONG, FIVE minutes of commercials should not be allowed.

I say, if people want to protest. This is really  something they should be out in the streets protesting about.  There is probably no household in America that  does not have a television set, which is their only source of entertainment and what these television networks like FOX are doing with only presenting 30 minutes of a show out of a hour is unwarranted. FOX NEWS was one of the first television networks to start this trend of only showing FIVE minutes of a program, followed by FIVE minutes of commercials and then others followed their lead. Now it appear this format will become the norm UNLESS  people begin to protest and raise their voices against having FIVE minutes of commercials thrown at them EVERY FIVE minutes.

If these television networks  want to increase their profits I suggest they charge the advertisers and sponsors more money for the air time and give back the television viewers more viewing time between commercials. They should not penalize the  viewing public.And, that's my opinion. I suggest you look at the situation and  come to your own conclusions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.

Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:

bradleykuhns@gmail.com

INVESTIGATE GEORGE SOROS AND OTHERS WHO  MAY FUND  ANTIFA AND BLM.

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

The Democratic party endorses elements of the leftist radical, marxist, anarchists who are rioting across the nation. Extremist Billionaire, George Soros,who is one of the people allegedly funding the anarchist is a clear "attack on our nation." The Democratic party promotes the "Freedom Fund," which is allegedly  headed up by criminals who have long criminal records and the Democrats push for donations to the Marxist "Black Lives Matter," (BLM),  organization. The (BLM) organization has collected millions of dollars in only a few short weeks. And believe it or not  the (BLM) organization does not have any official offices or buildings in any city set up showing the internal structure of (BLM), so that poses the question "Where is all of these millions of dollars in donations going?"

The Freedom Fund post bail for all of the rioting anarchist who belong to Antifa, and Black Lives Matter who are destroying public and private property, committing arson, assaulting law enforcement officers and private citizens. Some of these anarchists and criminals that  the Democratic party actually springs from jail are murders and rapists. Fact is, some of these same people the Democrats arranged release from jail went out and committed rapes, robbery and murder, and then continued to riot without missing a beat. The Democrats set up a revolving door for these criminals to continue  to commit chaos and ravage even more aggressively.

The rioting anarchist undermine law and order. I suggest that the Feds immediately set up an investigation into George Soros and  other billionaires  and groups who allegedly support and fund these Marxist anarchist groups with the intent to tear down  and destroy the United states from within. 

We have to defend America and the American way.I believe what these anarchist Marxist groups Antifa and Black Lives Matter (BLM) are doing is committing treason. They are betraying our country.  

Further, if these radical anarchists of Antifa and Black Lives Matter hate the United States so much let them pick up their cowardly butts and leave America. If they really do not enjoy the  freedoms and the way of economic life most Americans enjoy hey,---go to any other country on the planet and see if they feel better in those countries. - And, that's my opinion.  I suggest you look at the situation and come to your own conclusions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.

Dr. Kuhns can be reached  by email at:

bradleykuhns@gmail.com

PRESIDENT TRUMP, ADMINISTRATION, DON'T SELL OUR U.S. F-35  AIRCRAFT TO THE UAE. IT'S A BAD, BAD,  NATIONAL  SECURITY MOVE .

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

President Trump should reconsider his deal with the UAE as they want to enter the coalition with Israel. True, brokering a peace deal with  the Middle East countries is a great move. But, I would suggest that if the UAE wants, and insists on the United States selling them  our F-35 fighter jets as part of any deal  it should be "nixed," "thumbs down,"with a strong "no" from the Administration.

If the UAE wants to enter a pact with the U.S. and Israel in order to renew relations it should be without the U.S. and/or Israel agreeing to a F-35 jet sale as part of the deal.

I submit that the U.S. Military F-35 jet fighter is the  crown jewel of our airforce. The technology that went into  the F-35 is something that should not be shared with other nations. There are very hard security issues here. The F-35 is so stealthy that it can be dispatched to a war zone without the enemy knowing it is even present in their airspace. It is basically undetectable. The advanced technology in the F-35 should not be available to other nations military, especially the UAE and other Arab states.

Keep in mind the UAE has done and currently does business with Iran, China and Russia. I suggest that if the UAE  has access to our F-35 aircraft technology they will  covertly give access to Iran, the Chinese Communist Party and Russia.  Once the Iranians, Chinese and Russia have access to the F-35, you can bet they will  duplicate our sensitive technology and incorporate  into their aircraft. That is a given, people. The Chinese Communist Party, Russia and Iran have been stealing our technology for decades to advance their military might and if they have direct access to the F-35 and all of it specs  we, the United States, will lose our military superiority in the air very quickly.

If you have any doubts whatsoever that this scenario would happen, you just have to look at what the Chinese Communists have done since we allowed them into the  World Trade Organization (WTO). They have stolen  U.S. innovations, research, inventions, military, aerospace. and high tech technology and duplicated  it for their own use and are now selling it back to us here in America. So, what do you think is going happen when the Arab states share the U.S. F-35  technology with Iran, Communist China and Russia?

Foks, this would be one of the dumbest, bone-headed  deals in history if the Administration decides to go through with a deal to sell or allow any Arab states access to our top of the line, superior airspace technology. I suggest that if the UAE wants to renew ties with the Israel they do it without demanding the United States F-35 aircraft as part of a deal.  If that is a dealbreaker for them, then the U.S. and Israel should not broker the peace deal.  If  the UAE refuses to enter a peace deal without the  sale of our U.S., F-35 aircraft, I can only assume they have ulterior motives and are not intent on  peace but are only interested in our superior air technology and military secrets. - And, that's my opinion. I suggest you look at the situation and come to your own conclusions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.

Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:

bradleykuhns@gmail.com

TRUMP SHOULD SAVE BRISTOL BAY FROM GREEDY MINING COMPANIES. THUMBS DOWN ON THE PEBBLE MINE.

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

The Trump administration should preserve the pristine  land mass of Bristol Bay, Alaska. There is a Canadian company attempting to activate and operate the "Pebble Mine" in  the area. Bad, Bad, idea.

Anyone that cares about our environment should contact their representatives in Congress and let them know to oppose any legislation that would allow this Canadian mining company to set up a mining operation at Bristol Bay.

Bristol Bay Alaska is the world's largest sockeye salmon breeding grounds in the world.  The residents of Bristol Bay make their living off of the fishing in this wonderful Bay. Bristol Bay also supports great wild life such as bears,sea and river otters,  beavers,  walrus, seals , orcas, and beluga  whales. In addition, there is bald eagles, waterfowl and  numerous migratory types of birds.

I would say, in my opinion, Bristol Bay is akin to the Grand Canyon here in the lower United States. It has majestic beauty, natural habitat and wildlife that should not be disrupted or disturbed in any way whatsoever.

If this Canadian company wants to mine let them mine in their own country, their own territory. The residents of Bristol Bay have been involved in the fishing industry for decades providing the entire world with excellent seafood like salmon. They depend on their fishing industry to survive and have been doing quite well over these many decades. They survive and make a living by supplying the entire world with salmon and other seafood. 

This company's argument is "it will offer jobs to the locals. WRONG! It will only provide about 200 jobs, if that. The mining company relies heavily on automation to extract the minerals from the area. The people of Bristol Bay are doing  very well without the  assist of a mining company promising to provide  about 200  jobs. Don't let this  mining company pull the wool over our Congress people's eyes.

I submit that if this Canadian company was allowed to begin mining the Pebble Mine, it would destroy Bristol Bay, Alaska. This mining project would ravage the entire area of Bristol Bay and do  excessive harm to all of the natural wildlife  that lives on, and in the area. The wildlife lives and survives here. The mining company would poison the crystal clear waters with all of the dangerous and toxic chemicals they use in their mining production and that in turn would certainly kill off wildlife which depend on the waters to survive. Plus, the worldwide sockeye salmon would  be decimated overnight by the mining operation in this area.

I suggest that President Trump and his administration and all of the  feckless Congress people take swift and immediate action to put a thumbs down on this idiotic idea of allowing a mining company to  tear up a very beautiful, natural environment in the great state of Alaska.- And, that's my opinion. I suggest you  look at the situation and come to your own conclusions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.

Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:

bradleykuhns@gmail.com