MONICA CROWLEY SHOULD BE DUMPED BY TRUMP

THE KUHNS REPORT

CALIF-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

Wow! President-elect Trump's pick for "National Security Communications" position should be scuttled. Why? Well, it appears Monica Crowley apparently tends to rely on other peoples words and thoughts. In June, 2012, she wrote the book"What the (Bleep) Just Happened." And the book  was reported to be a NY Times bestseller, published by Harper Collins. Can you imagine? However, according to media reports as recent as January 6th. and 7th., 2017, Ms. Crowley was said to have  PLAGIARIZED not only words and sentences from other peoples writing, she supposedly stole paragraph, after paragraph. To substantiate the claim of the plagiarized work CNN Money printed page after page of the stolen material and each and every word, sentence and paragraph was side by side with the area  highlighted in yellow marker. Whew! What was Crowley thinking when she plagiarized all of the material and the claim "she" wrote it?

Did Crowley scam the public? Did she misrepresent to the readers of the book? Many people across the country hold that opinion.

There were more than (50)  examples of her gross plagiarism taken from numerous sources that included news articles, other columnists work and writings, think tanks, and Wikileaks.

This lady holds herself out a a radio host, a columnist, and served as a FOX NEWS contributor. And now the Trump transition team wants her to serve as, get this: " SENIOR DIRECTOR of STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS for NATIONAL SECURITY." Are you kidding me? Why would the Trump administration want to be burdened with all this baggage. There are to many other fine journalists that offer writings and have communication skills, and who played by the book.

It seems to me  that Ms. Crowley has a problem coming up  with an original thought of her own. It has been reported that Crowley had also plagiarized in the past. According to reports in the media back on or about 1999, Crowley wrote a column  in the Wall Street Journal and her articled "mirrored" a 1988 article in the Commentary, a neoconservative  magazine. When confronted with the alleged plagiarism regarding the article, Crowley, at the time, denied the charge saying "I did not, nor would I ever use material from a source without citing it." Really? A journal editor that published her "mirrored" article said, (I'll paraphrase) "had we known of the parallels we would not have published the article."

I suspect that Crowley, over the years may have found it easier to further her career by copying other individuals and firms written works and claim it as her own , a basic CUT & PASTE job. And my question is: "If Crowley plagiarized in the past, (1999), and now does it again, more than a decade later, what's to stop her from doing it in the future? Some people think leopards can't change their spots. Maybe they're  correct. Crowley's actions are akin to a car thief: If  she has stolen 25 RED CORVETTES, chances are, the 26th.,car she steals will be a RED CORVETTE too. Folks, people are predisposed to do certain things. According to the reports on Monica Crowley. she tends to be predisposed to claiming other peoples and firms work as her own.

In the past there have been a number of journalists, newspaper reporters researchers, doctors, and think tank people that were caught plagiarizing and paid a stiff price for their false reporting. Many lost their jobs and many lost their careers.

Even after all of this information about Crowley's plagiarism  the Trump team is still seriously considering standing by Crowley, saying " Any attempt to discredit Monica is nothing more than a politically motivated attack that is meant to distract from the real issues facing this country." Sure, and that response is like  Hillary and Bill Clinton saying, "It's a Republican conspiracy.  Wake up team Trump! National Security communications is a "real issue." Especially "Strategic Communications."

What's this say about the Trump teams vetting procedures?  Presently, they are having enough trouble in the vetting of cabinet nominees. According to the Office of Government Ethics, team Trump's people have still not properly been vetted. But yet, they willy-nilly, without vetting Crowley's work and background choose to have her as a senior communications director of national security. The Trump team could have accessed numerous programs to check Crowley's work, but apparently they did not.

Instead of telling the lady that her past actions may present a huge problem and then looking to other applicants for the position I think they wrongfully choose to support someone that possibly could be detrimental to the Trump White House. Who's going to have confidence in someone who plagiarizes others materials?

There is also the question as to FOX NEWS and Crowley. How many at the network knew that she plagiarized her book?  How many knew and didn't say a word?It's very clear that the commentators and hosts at FOX are constantly pushing their books for sale and most all say their particular book is a bestseller and if any read Crowley's book, why wasn't she called out on the plagiarism?

Finally, I was a Trump supporter from the get-go.  From the day he announced, I was in his corner. I believed in my heart of hearts that he would bring a great change to this country. I've always voted for the person that I though would do the best job in office and I've cast ballots for Republicans, Democrats, and Independents and this election I thought Trump was the best for our country. However, to hear that his team is closing it's eyes to the facts of plagiarism that is laid out in "black & white, highlighted with yellow maker is a big disappointment. Come on! Senior Director of Strategic Communications of "NATIONAL SECURITY." If  the Trump team wants to hire Crowley, hey--- let her proof read speeches, or write invitations for  the White House parties, not have her hand in national security matters.

If Crowley is hired by the Trump team I really couldn't trust and won't trust any communications coming out of the White House or from the administration. I could not be sure if the printed word or correspondence being offered was in fact, THE TRUTH. Here's a woman that made big dollars off of a book that was  put together using materials from others and passed off as her own legitimate work. It looks like the book was a BIG LIE.  How can I, or anyone be expected to accept the truth, words and communications from a person that finds it so easy to cheat to advance a career. Lastly, where was Harper Collins, the publisher when they took Crowley's work on? Where was their vetting of the material before they published it? Like people say, --"It's all about the money." And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

BRADLEY KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
______________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

DON'T FEEL LEFT OUT. FOCUS ON YOUR NEW ATTITUDE & PERSONALITY. BE THAT WINNER. 

THE KUHNS REPORT

CALIF-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

Reply to Sandra P., in San Diego, California .--

Your inquiry was : How do I become more accepted in social gatherings? You said you felt left out, alone and unwanted .
Sandra, I'd like to see you build up your self-esteem, confidence, and attitude. That will go a long way. If you have a great personality and attitude you can achieve success in most any task or endeavor you choose to undertake,

You mentioned you just bought my recent book "SUCCEED IN LIFE, BE A SUCCESS. Using Relaxation, Visualization and Imagery" That's a good start. First, thank  you for considering my book. It was just released a couple of weeks ago. I hope you enjoy the book. In it, you'll find that if you seek out the positive qualities of all those people around you, and compliment them and point out their positive traits people will gravitate to you more and more. Sandra, when you recognize and comment on the good in others you will find that you will begin to become more interested in those people. And, the plus side is, with that positive attitude it will inspire you to look inside yourself to see how you are growing.

Sandra, in the book, you will find many beneficial affirmations that will help you achieve your desires. You'll learn how to demand the best from yourself. Using the relaxation, visualization, and imagery techniques in the book you will find that it will give you a big step up to build your self-confidence and self-esteem. You will find  yourself taking on tasks and pushing limits, allowing you  to set new goals in life. All this will allow you to improve your entire life.  I venture to say that once you start to acquire and build your new attitude and personality you will not feel left out anymore.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

YES, CHINESE MEDICINE CAN OFFER GOUT RELIEF.

THE KUHNS REPORT

CALIF-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

For Ronnie T, in Tampa, Florida.

Your inquiry said that you are experiencing painful episodes of the gout. You wanted to know if there is some oriental medicine and/or an alternative medicine regimen that might bring some relief.

My first response is "yes." In this particular ailment, Oriental Medicine would suggest you begin with eating more fruit and vegetables. Lay off the smoked meats and stick to lean beef. Rather that eating large portions of meats try to replace the meat with beans and lentils; at least, try to eat fish once a week. And yes, eggs are good for you.Along with the fruits, veggies and fish, they provide good protein. Myself, I'm not a fan of dairy products so I limit them in my diet to a large degree. Possibly you can try limiting your dairy intake also. If you rearrange your eating habits to these mentioned here I am sure you will find some relief  regarding your gout situation. And, check in with your doctor once you've begun to frame your diet and food choices to see if he or she can offer even more suggestions in this matter. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
__________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

POSSIBLE BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER.

THE KUHNS REPORT

CALIF-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

This memo goes out to Marcia B., in Texas.

In regards to your inquiry wherein you describe areas of your sister's life situation. I would suggest that you seek out professional help for her. The sooner she gets into therapy the sooner you will find the  stress, anxiety and concern you are experiencing for her will be alleviated to a great extent.

From all the information you provided me, I would say it appears your sister can't accept rejection, of any kind. Basically, no one can reject JB because she will just keep coming back, over and over again.  For JB, having people in her life is like oxygen to her. She also has serious trust issues, especially when she told her fiance, in a rage,  that "you don't get to leave me"!
From your information, it also appears she  has problems on the job and clearly cannot take any constructive criticism. She feels as though people are stabbing her in the back. Chances are, your sister will sabotage everything in her life. With the actions, you describe  regarding your sister I would  say she has a "Borderline Personality Disorder." Some people with this disorder know they are sick  but cannot get a grip on their behavior.

I hope this information  will help you make the right decisions. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
  




.

HILLARY CLINTON GOES FOR THE MUCK , FILTH AND MUD -AGAIN!

THE KUHNS REPORT

CALIF-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

Wow! The Clinton campaign is really stooping to a new low. In order to pander and  court the black vote a few days  prior to election day Clinton and her staff hold a rally in Cleveland featuring the vulgar Rap person, Jay Z and Black Lives Matter supporter, Beyonce.

For all the flack that Trump took from Clinton about his language, she stands with, and embraces Jay Z, whose songs are  nothing but filthy, dirty uncouth ramblings that  pretend to be music. Are you kidding me? My view on Rap music is nothing but someone talking or yelling the words into a microphone to the same old tired cadence in the background. The big difference with Jay Z is  he spews out the "F" word, Motherf-----, and the "N" word. He didn't  say these  filthy words just once. Instead, most every other word out of his mouth was the  F, MF or N word.

And, believe it or not, I've heard that this pandering candidate is going to show up in Pennsylvania, and possibly other states with these same "down in the gutter" so called entertainers in the closing days of this campaign. It makes me wonder if Clinton sold her soul long ago. It appears nothing is beneath her in order to get what she wants. That's sad.

Can you imagine  what would happen if a white performer used even one of those words in a speech or song? They would be crucified, without a doubt. Yet Clinton is smiling and cozying up to this garbage mouth. I would think this presidential candidate would have more class than to accept the  filth pouring out of Jay Z's mouth in support of her. She may say she has  class, but to me, it's all "fourth class."

For a person who is accused of being untrustworthy, dishonest and an outright liar she still never ceases to amaze me as to  how low she can continue to slide into the muck , manure, and dirt.

I submit that any reasonable, intelligent, competent, rational person would not have allowed a vile, garbage mouth man to stand on a stage representing the democratic party and a presidential candidate to act as an ambassador for them. It's a disgrace. It's disgusting. Clinton has no shame whatsoever.

People may not like either presidential candidate but really, come on! Does America want someone with Clinton's misguided values, attitude, and personality to represent the United States around the globe? It appears this woman and her Clinton machine will do anything to pander to get elected. And believe me, if she is elected she will take all of those perverted actions right back into the White House.

I, as a voter, a vet,  an  American and a patriot, who loves America  sees no contest between the two candidates we have to choose from. Clinton who has been mired and entrenched  in sleazy, dirty politics  and tricks for over forty years versus a businessman who has never been in politics and says he wants to change  the country for the better. Trump says he is beholden to no one or  any lobby due to his fortune. To me,  that's a game changer right there, a breath of fresh air. Any newcomer is worth a shot. Especially, when they can't be bought. A non-politician can't be any worse that what Clinton and her friends did to this country over the past eight years. And, hey, if Trump doesn't keep his pact with the  country, throw him out after his four years in office. But I believe the man  deserves a chance to right this ship. And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

BRADLEY KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_____________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

FOX NEW: KELLY FILE, ALWAYS LOOKING FOR A GOT YA MOMENT. IT'S SAD!

THE KUHNS REPORT

CALIF: Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

Fox News, "The Kelly File" tends to have a large tendency for bias. On  October 25, 2016. Megyn Kelly interviewed Mike Pence, V-P  running mate of Donald Trump.  She quickly brought up the subject of Trump and sex with women. She clearly seemed obsessed  with the titillating, salacious,   sex conversation. Pence avoided getting down in the muck with her and handled the situation with class. Then, Kelly brought on Newt Gingrich, and again, brought up the Trump sex matter. When Gingrich called her on it and said something like "you're obsessed with sex" Kelly retorted, "I am not obsessed with sex. Then she went on with a rambling dissertation saying something to the effect that she's a woman and is concerned about such things. As Gingrich scolded her about her obvious obsession relating to the sexual conversations, she as host, and in charge of the microphone attempted to cover her tracks by interrupting and accusing Gingrich of having "anger issues." After being called out by Gingrich for her obvious bias she acted like an upset, little child,  and the only thing she could say to close the segment was making a comment  about Gingrich having anger issues. Wow! When did Kelly get a degree in psychology? What a joke this show is.

It looks to me as though Kelly makes the attempt to pretend that she is an objective host but it appears she is not what she is pretending to be.  I have seen earlier shows where she tries to push bad press on Trump into her conversations with her guests. I think she should be right up front and tell the viewers she has a bias for Trump.

It's very clear that the Kelly File and other shows on Fox are  all set up ahead of time to coincide with what  these teleprompter readers are going to say at any particular or specific time. They act as if they are spontaneous but then they magically bring up a TV clip of whatever they were talking about. I say that's not fair and that's not balanced. That's fixed, set in stone, and prepped.

Fox News tries to sell themselves as fair and balanced but when one looks at  some of the Fox hosts and their presentations, a prudent, reasonable person can come to the conclusion that there is nothing fair and balanced on the shows. -And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

THE ZIKA VIRUS IS RAMPANT.

THE KUHNS REPORT

CALIF: Hello America, and how is the world treating you?


The horrific Zika plague- running rampant in places like Africa, Southeast Asia and Central and South America is now playing havoc in the Unites States. And, my views is, it didn't have to be this way. It appears the U.S. is always a day late and a dollar short.

I submit that if the U.S. would have attacked the Zika virus in cooperation with other countries when it first reared its ugly head and then took specific action against this terrifying threat, our country would have been much better off. Instead, what did we do? Officials said, "don't worry about it," it's nit in the U.S., just don't travel to countries where the virus is. Then, when  some people did travel to the infected countries and  returned to the United States, carrying this dreaded infection, some government officials told the country that the cases were isolated incidents and there was nothing to worry about.

But,Zika  cases broke out in Florida and what did the government people say? It's only  in the area of "one block." Tey warned people not to travel to that block. Ir wasn't long until the bureaucrats told the people of Flordia that the  Zika virus was only in a one-mile radius zone, so no big deal, don't worry. They told people to stay away from the one-mile area.  Hell, the virus kept creeping further and further and finally, the officials  became concerned. Can you believe it? Then these same state and government people started pointing fingers of blame using the old worn out phrases: "We could have, or we should have. They played the ol' could-a , should-a  game.

Why is it our incompetent government officials nearly always fail to take action at the onset of situations, but instead allow bad things to occur and then after the fact, play arm-chair quarterback trying to explain what should have been done, in the first place? That's when all the so-called experts and talking heads hit television and start spouting gobbly-goop.

How many times have you heard government officials, politicians and  groups tell the Amercian people: "We're taking this action so  an occurrence like this will "never happen again?" But, guess what people? It always happens again --doesn't it.

I would estimate that at the present time there are about 3,000 cases of this mosquito-borne illness across our country, and growing larger each and every day.

Remember, this mystery illness that shrinks infants brains in-utero actually causes a myriad of defects in the baby. There is no prevention against the virus,  The only way to hopefully avoid this scary virus and avoid infection is having our dumb-bunny bureaucrats tell everyone: "Avoid traveling to any infected areas, avoid mosquito bites, and to wear condoms when having sexual intercourse.

Now, I bet the rush is on to find a vaccine. But again, I would say that if, and when, the Zika virus was first discovered and the healthcare researchers were actually on the ball they could have tested monkeys, rodents, and other primates to have possibly had a vaccine in tge bucket well before this horrendous visus hit our shores.