PAUL RYAN, PRIEBUS AND WASHINGTON ESTABLISHMENT LIE.

THE KUHNS REPORT

CALIF:  Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

The Republican party elite has been doing everything in its power to sabotage Donald Trump and his march to the presidency.

The inappropriate remarks from Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan is disgusting. He says he is not ready to support Donald Trump. Really? Where's the unity of the party. This failed vice-presidential clown in his now high ranking position should be the first to support Trump. He has to begin unifying the party, not Trump. Trump unified millions and millions of voters and brought millions into the Republican party. If that's not unity on Trump's part, I don't know what is.

When the election first got under way he said he would support the nominee. So, he lies? Another individual, Reince Priebus, the Republican Party Chairman is waffling also. I suggest that it is up to these high ranking mucky-mucks to get out front and begin the unification by telling all of their colleagues that: "Trump is the nominee and we have to do everything within our power to get him elected."

Both of these men said they would support the nominee but for a number of reasons decided to change their minds and torpedo Trumps chances.

It was no secret that when the race first began,all of the candidates swore to support the Republican nominee, as did Priebus and Ryan and numerous Republican elites in Congress. Fact is, they  continued to pressure Trump into the pledge of supporting the Republican nominee and insisted that he not try an Independent run for the office. Trump signed the pledge and kept his word. Now these Washington insiders refuse to keep their word. What does that tell you, folks?

Sarah Palin came out today and said that Paul Ryan is toast. I agree. First, if you can't trust the Speaker of the House and his word, what can you believe from him when he says he will look out for the people of the United States.

I agree partly with Palin's view that this guy is looking to be President in the near future and is pandering to his Washington colleagues. But if you can't trust this guys word, why would anyone want him as president. After his lie, I wouldn't vote for him if he were running for dog catcher. I guess he caught a dose of "Clinton-citis,"and you can't believe anything he says.

I also believe that like many Republican establishment wanna-be's Ryan has another reason to deep-six Trump. Remember, he was running mate with his good ol' buddy, Mitt Romney, and when Romney started to blast Trump with all the negative ads and unwarranted statements, Ryan jumped on board Romney's wagon. These two, along with many in the Republican party seem to have a "Liwinsky" type relationship with each other. These politico idiots, who are ruining the Republican party are so close you couldn't pry them apart with a butter knife.

The current Washington representatives who are supposedly looking out for our best interests has lost touch with the American people. They live in their own crazy little dysfunctional world, in the Washington Beltway, only looking to enrich themselves, family and friends.

The entrenched Republicans who have been running Washington brought this situation on themselves. Why? Because  they held the majority in Washington but failed to act. They wouldn't challenge Obama and his policies. They wouldn't say" no" to Obama. These morons gave Obama a free hand and buckled under to Obama's whims at every turn. The Republicans gave the store away for eight years - - and they can't get it though their head why people are angry.

Even though it was them that screwed up, they do not want to lose their status in Washington. They want to carry on the same way they have been.  These goof-ups are afraid that" the will of the people,"by  putting Trump in Washington, will turn their world up-side-down.  And, should Trump become president, he should shake up the system.

Remember, Trump owes these mental cases "nothing." He is a billionaire, money to burn. He doesn't have to take money from special interests, lobbyists, or politicians. He doesn't have to play the Washington game of one-hand-washes the other.

I predict that if Trump gets to the White House he will surround himself with some of the best knowledgeable people around in various areas that need addressed, such as, military, education, economy, foreign affairs etc. - -

Hell, Trump can't do any worse that Obama. Obama, never held a job in his life before becoming president and he was never in the military - -yet, he is commander-in-chief our military forces and he sticks his nose in most every aspect of government, like he's an expert on everything. The only claim to fame of Obama is, he was a "street organizer" in Chicago. So, I say if those credentials qualify him for the highest office in the land, Trump has him beat by a mile.

These fat cat politicians should give Trump a chance. If he fouls it up, we dump Trump after his first term. But I predict that change will come, change will be good, if they get on board the "Trump Train."

Kudo's to Senator John McCain. Apparently he came out today saying he supports Trump as nominee. He, McCain, should take his colleagues to task for lying to the American people by telling us they would support the Republican nominee and then doing an "about face."

All of these old school, over the hill, "has been's" running Washington should be relegated to the trash heap. We the people asked for change, we need change, and Trump is change.

Finally, Trump and his campaign staff should  replay statements of Ryan, Priebus, and all of the other candidates and their Washington friends that promised to support the nominee. He should remind them that he signed his pledge to do that but  the other people's signed pledge is not worth the paper it's written on.

And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

THE OREGON STANDOFF SHOULD BE PUT DOWN, NOW! DON'T REPEAT THE 2014 FIASCO. LAWBREAKERS ARE LAWBREAKERS

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

The seizure of the Federal Wildlife Preserve in Oregon by ARMED anti-government extremists is unwarranted. These idiots are nothing but a bunch of radicals trying to provoke the federal government into an armed confrontation. All of these malcontents who ILLEGALLY took over the wildlife refuge by  brandishing rifles, sidearms and other weapon, who try to act macho implying that they will use the weapons against federal officers and other law enforcement people is ludicrous.

This groups first excuse was that they didn't want the Hammond father and son (TWO ARSONISTS) to go to prison. When the two arsonists reported to prison to serve their sentence this group of anti-government armed radicals then decided to continue to occupy the wildlife refuge saying they're fighting for  all of our rights. What a crock!

Once the Hammond clan went to prison the local sheriff asked the Bundy family and their toughies to leave the Oregon county and go back home to Nevada and where ever else they resided. But Ammon Bundy refused to do so and said he and his motley crew is going to stay and occupy the wildlife refuge.

Folks this situation all started when Cliven Bundy from Nevada failed to pay at least a million dollars in fees to the federal government. The government made a move to confiscate the Bundy families cattle in 2014. The move resulted in the Bundy family and  others organizing, taking up weapons and threatening to fight off any law enforcement that took their cattle. Because these idiots were armed the federal officers and local law enforcement backed down and refused to confiscate the law breaking Bundy families cattle. What did that do? That emboldened this wannabe soldier group to look for other excuses to act out in other parts of the country. Fact is, many of the same people now in Oregon who are occupying the wildlife refuge  were involved in the Cliven Bundy fiasco in 2014.

If these armed militia people really wanted to get their point across they should follow the laws of the land. They can contact their senators, contact congress people, contact local and state lawmakers, use the court system, etc.,  - - these anti-government people could also start internet petitions, use the social media to gather support and network through media. BUT, they SHOULD NOT arm themselves, invade and occupy government and/or local properties.

These men and women who like to threaten people with guns,who forcefully take over and occupy property that they have no right to do should be taken to task.   At the time of the Bundy family stand off in 2014 here in Nevada  I predicted that the government should have not backed down against this rag tag group of lawbreakers. I said that if the government DID NOT prosecute some of the Bundy family members and many of the armed radicals who openly threatened to use lethal force against law enforcement this same group would rear their ugly head again some place else in the near future. WELL! Was I right? You bet. People, the feds should have scooped up the Bundy family cattle, sold them at auction and sent Cliven Bundy to prison. That would have put an end to this families urge to confront the federal government and local law enforcement with weapons.

Since the federal government turned tail and ran away from what should have been a lawful, legal arrest of the Bundy family and cohorts in 2014, we now have this INSURRECTION playing out in a small town in Oregon. This shouldn't have happened folks but because  these make believe soldiers who claim to be a militia got away with having the feds and local law enforcement back down a couple years ago they think they have the right to pull the same crap again. Thus, Ammon and  Ryan Bundy decided to call on their fake army of idiots to occupy the wildlife refuge in Oregon.

Folks, if you or I owed the federal government a MILLION DOLLARS in fees, taxes, etc.,  how long do you think it would be before they would have us sitting out many years in prison? But this Bundy clan failed to pay the government a million dollars for about TWENTY YEARS. Go figure. Fact is, the father of the Bundy family is still a very free man - -and to date has not paid the money he owes the federal government.

My position  is that when the federal government chickened out, backed down and failed to enforce the law at gunpoint, it gave the group of radicals the energy to push their crazy movement.

Do these radical bums really think that they will actually shoot at and try to kill federal agents or local law enforcement? If they do, they are crazier than I think they are.They like to be brag and flash guns around and make implied threats that they will use the guns against law enforcement but when it comes to dying, will they? I doubt it. The feds and local law enforcement should call their bluff. The authorities should give these anti-government idiots a short time frame to pack up and leave ---else, they will  be taken into custody and arrested. The authorities should not repeat the same tactics they did  in the 2014 Bundy fiasco and back down. - -again, I say - -PROSECUTE. After spending a few years in prison I'm sure some of these pretend soldiers, militia, patriots, (whatever they call themselves) will have an entirely different outlook of using weapons and threats to occupy property.

If, in the event one of these crazy idiots does decide to fire a weapon at federal agents or local law enforcement, the authorities should respond in kind and shoot, maim and kill a few of these lawbreakers. I would predict that the group would then turn tail and  scurry back home. However, I  tend to believe that the Bundy brothers and their band of misfits in Oregon want to provoke the feds and local law enforcement into a confrontation. I say - -,so be it. The authorities should take these clowns on. First thing is to arrest the people  who are occupying the wildlife refuge -- see if they resist. If they do and it comes to armed force the authorities shouldn't hesitate. Do the job.

Another concern of mine is why the local sheriff is coddling this bunch of losers. He asked them to leave, they should have left, but didn't. I'm also sure there's many laws on the books in Oregon that the sheriff could use to place these occupiers in custody. Come on! Trespass; Civil Disobedience; Disturbing the Peace . Hey, even spitting on the ground. My point--there is a law somewhere on the books to take action against these people. Use it.

Final though folks, do you think for one moment that if this group of WHITE agitators, who seem to hate the government with a passion were  a group of ARMED BLACKS, HISPANICS, ASIANS, or even MUSLIMS, who illegally took over and occupied a government facility they would still be allowed to occupy the premises for days at a time. If you believe that I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn. I say that if it were anybody but this WHITE group of so-called patriots in Oregon, there would be armed federal agents and armed local law enforcement surrounding the compound, helicopters buzzing the area, armored vehicles in position and snipers at the ready. People, if these occupiers =ere anybody but WHITE (so-called patriots) it would be a situation like Ruby Ridge or Waco, Texas. The situation would be treated like a  fire fight in Chicago streets.

My suggestion to the federal and local government authorities: Order the group to leave; if they don't -- arrest the entire group and prosecute this time around. If worse comes to worse and these crazies decide to take up arms against law enforcement - -take them out, period. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

"JUMP FOR TRUMP"- HE'S  WORTH YOUR CONSIDERATION

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?


When Donald Trump first entered the race for president I predicted he would quickly jump to the head of the pack of Republican candidates. And, WOW! He did just that. My prediction was not based on him having a reality show and being a well known TV personality but instead, based on the type of man he appeared to be.

The man is very intelligent, a business mogul that clearly knows how to run and administer a business empire second to none-WORLD WIDE. Trump employs millions of people of diverse ethnicity from around the globe. He has contacts with numerous leaders of other nations. Other countries have no problem dealing with the Trump organization and continue to build Trumps projects in their countries. You can bet none of the other Republican candidates can claim the same bragging rights.

It appears when Trump sets his sights on a project he  takes it on and follows it through to completion and from all of the information I can garner, he is a man of his word. So when he tells Americans that he will build a wall on the Southern border to manage our immigration problem I take him at his word. When her tells us Americans that he will surround himself with some of the best minds in  the country as advisers to manage the economy and  infrastructure of the United States, I take hi at his word. I truly believe Trump" says what he means and means what he says.

Some of the talking heads in the media on cable and television  networks along with the  Democratic party continually try to make Trump look foolish. They joke and laugh about his comments and actions. They play "gotcha" with much of what Trump says. Fact is, much of the media today are not reporting  news, instead they tend to inject themselves and their opinions into a story segment and tend to take sides when reporting political news.

Example: Trump originally was leading the polls in Iowa and some news outlets began to question Trump's religious values and pit them against other Republican candidates religious values. Some of the other Republican candidates went into Iowa and implied that Trump was not as "religious" a person as they were. The candidates wanted to capture the Evangelical vote and degrade Trumps momentum in Iowa.What a joke.

I'm sure many people in Iowa believe in clean living, family values, virtue and success and I believe Trump is the epitome of  that. Lets compare him to some of the politicians and entertainers that have been found to be corrupt, who have been caught doing illegal acts and who did prison time for their wrongdoing. On the other hand, Trump is a well respected business titan. As a family man he raised his children under a doctrine of clean living to be honest intelligent exceptional people in their own right who now enjoy their own careers. To my knowledge there has never been even a hint of scandal surrounding Trump. That to me, speaks volumes as to  the character and integrity of a person and how that person approaches life and faces challenges that may confront them.

Some plus points for Trump, in my view: He's financing his own campaign for the presidency. He is beholden to no one for money. I think at one time he said that if he becomes president  he will not take a salary. He has good family values and a fine family unit. To me it appears that Trump (an outsider, non-politician) actually wants to try to clean up the mess in this country that was dumped on we Americans by both  the Democratic and Republican politicians who continue to  fight among themselves for their own vested interests and agendas.

Folks, it's time for a change in Washington. Enough of the old school politicians that waste away in their power seats in Washington for 5,6, 7 and  8 terms or more. I would suggest that America give an outsider, an upstanding business man who has some good ideas to bring America back form the brink a shot at fixing the problem(s). Hey, if he doesn't produce as advertised - - VOTE him out after only four.years. Any new blood in Washington will be better than what is there now. Any new blood and ideas in Washington CAN'T be any worse than what has been occurring in the past seven years.

As I've been telling people here in Nevada and where ever I travel: "JUMP FOR TRUMP." Would that make a great slogan? You Bet.  Also, if you're on the fence about what candidate might actually do what they say they will do: "JUMP TO TRUMP."- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

OBAMA'S WANTS  SYRIAN REFUGEES IN USA-I SAY NO!

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

Obama wants to allow tens of thousands of Syrian refugees come to America. I believe it's a very bad idea. Why?  One reason is because the Paris terrorists entered France by mingling with other refugees pretending to be one of the displaced people. France let the terorists in. Another reason is because the Iraq intelligence service had credible information that there was going to be a  terrorist attack in France, specifically the city of Paris. Did officials in France heed the warning? No. Did they take any preventive actions against attack? No.

What's scary about Obama's take on the refugees resettlement to the USA is:  Just hours, on Friday morning  before the news of the horrific attack splashed across the world that terrorists killed over 100 people and injured many, many more in multiple blood soaked attacks in Paris, President Obama told us Americans this - -"we have contained" the advance of the Islamic State. Obama's judgement clearly needs questioned. A few days ago Obama mockingly said some in Congress are afraid to let grandmothers and three-year-olds into America. Today Democratic Pelosi said the same thing parroting Obama's rhetoric.

Where the hell has Obama, Pelosi and the other refugee lovers been over the past decades. Didn't they read history and/or keep up with what occurred during  past wars. Fact, in World War II, the Germans and Japanese were using women and children  strapped with bombs and grenades to "blow" up our soldiers. The women and children were used JUST BECAUSE they were women, grandmothers and children. The same thing happened in the Korea conflict and it was usually an every day occurrence in Vietnam. I urge Obama , Pelosi and  their ilk to check with some of the disabled Nam vets and/or the dead vets families that were either maimed or killed by small children and grandmothers. Christ, the enemy used the women and children knowing that some of out soldiers wouldn't check them out.

As to current day events, present day:  - as of a few days ago  a terrorist organization group used a 13-year-old girl and an 18-year-old girl to be suicide bombers in the Nigerian city of a Kano at a marketplace

Just yesterday it was confirmed that the most wanted man in the world (the Islamic terrorist-Abdelhamid Abaroud, 27) who masterminded the Paris attacks was killed and his female cousin (the first European female suicide bomber) Hasna Aitboulahce, blew herself up in an act of suicide bombing. Has ISIS used both women and children to act as suicide bombers? The answer is "YES."So yes, we Americans should be concerned that grandmothers, women and small children can and probably will be used as suicide bombers at one time or another here in the United States. The customs, culture an ideology  of  the terrorists preach this practice, condone this practice and carries out this practice (using women and children) as suicide bombers.

Obama and his people say that the thousands of refugees will be vetted and that  he has security measures in place to assure the American people there will not be any terrorists among the massive influx of the refugees being brought to America. Question: How can our government people run background checks on these refugees when they don't even know anything about them, who the person actually is, where they specifically came from, etc.--my answer is: They CAN'T. Fact is, the vetting plan the Obama administration has in place now can take up to TWO YEARS to complete. That's stupid! A lot of damage can be done in TWO YEARS.

My take on Obama's refugee stance is that we, in America, should question this dysfunctional administration who wants to welcome tens and hundreds of thousands of people from the Middle East without actually knowing who each of them are.

Folks, currently Obama and his administration CANNOT even locate people from other countries that have come to America and OVERSTAYED their visa's. Fact is, that's how some of the 9/11 terrorists got into and stayed in the United States prior to them committing the tragic, devastating terrorist attack on 9/11. It's no secret that our nation has been battling an "illegal immigration" problem for decades. There is an estimated ELEVEN MILLION illegal aliens already living  in the United States and as Donald Trump rightly pointed out, MANY (not all)  are  dangerous criminals who clearly commit rapes, murder,robbery, etc.

The Obama administration and past administrations have  failed miserably in securing our borders. The people entering America "illegally" grows each and every day but apparently for the sake of votes lawmakers choose to refuse to deport or control the  illegal alien and immigrant problem.

Hell, even Homeland Security refuses to abide by the laws and deport "illegal aliens" they have files on, courtesy of this administration. Our TSA people at ports of entry and the airports fail to recognize illegal entrants. The TSA officers at ports of entry into the United States fail over and over again to detect weapons, explosives, chemicals and other dangerous items that could cause extreme damage to facilities and the people in America. So, I ask you? How can you expect these same government employees to protect you from a sleeper or covert terrorist intent on harming America?

It's these same government officials and lawmakers that refuse to SECURE our borders that want to allow the mass immigration of possible terrorists into the USA. Remember, terrorists have no respect for International borders. Look at the European Union now - - Europe wanted a ONE WORLD ORDER, using ONE CURRENCY,with no borders, no frontiers.. They wanted people to come and go throughout Europe freely. Well, now you see how that is working out. Terrorist are coming and going all over Europe and immigrants are overwhelming a number of countries wanting to be taken care of.

 I would suggest that BEFORE any refugees from these war torn countries, particularly Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq and Africa  are allowed on our soil the American people insist that our borders be COMPLETELY secured with fences/walls;  E-Verify identification methods be utilized on every entrant coming into the U.S.;  each individual (man, woman and/or child ) will have to provide complete documentation as to date of birth, place of birth, prior residences, employment records, military service completed, prior travel records throughout the world, history of all relatives and where the relatives are living at the time that person applies for entry into the United States. That is just some ( not all) of the information I would require a person to provide before entry into our country. If any of the information is found to be fabricated, forged or the person made misrepresentations or LIED on any of the documents they will immediately sent back to their country of origin.

Readers, there are a number of Governor's of states in our country who oppose Obama's plan and refuse to accept any of the  refugees Obama and his posse want resettled in America. Personally I can't blame the Governor's for not wanting possible terrorists in their state. However, there are a lot of nanny-kissing people that say it's okay to allow these refugees into America because it's the right thing to do. Really? I say it is not the right thing to do.  I predict that in the event of any massive resettlement of the refugees there will be a number of them that, like in France,will con, lie and fake their way into America. Further, I will say that it's not a question of IF a terrorist attack will take down a mall, theater, school or university or other soft targets like concerts, stadiums, sports arenas, parades, conventions and department stores here in America but WHEN. Mark my words folks. it will happen and  I also predict it will be discovered that the  terrorist(s)  did in fact enter our country under the guise of a crying, suffering refugee. - And, that's mu opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

MY TAKE ON THE REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC DEBATES, SO FAR.

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

I watched the Democratic debate last night,November 14, 2015. First, It was another Democratic love fest. The audience was again packed with Hillary Clinton supporters. As far as a debate - -it really wasn't.  On a whole all three candidates agreed on most everything.  Clinton was allowed to shine by the other two candidates. Again, Sanders often said he agreed with Clinton and even mentioned the email scandal against Clinton again as a nothing subject which brought a laugh from Clinton and applause from the audience.

I'm disappointed in Bernie Sanders. I like a lot of what he says but he continually agrees with Clinton and refuses to take a challenging approach toward her. He's often said they were friends and he constantly sticks up for her. Friends are nice but I think that when one is running for the same office the challenger should  actually show some backbone and seriously debate the issues. Sander's fails in this respect.

It looks to me like Sanders is running only to support Hillary Clinton. If he was serious about wanting to be president for the United States he should take her on, head to head.  Bring up the issues like Benghazi , the email scandal, the many falsehoods she had told in the past, her support for the Iraq war, her failures as Secretary of State and the host of other weaknesses she has.

Does Sanders really want to be president? So far, to me, it sure doesn't look like it. Is he hoping for a Vice-President consideration with his good friend Hillary? Possibly. But I don't think she would ever consider him for the V-P spot. Right now he appears to be only a lap dog to Clinton. He should change his tactics.

If Sanders wants to be president and get the Democratic nomination he clearly has to take the gloves off, stop saying he agrees with her on most every issue that is discussed and fight her tooth and nail. Remember the old saying - - "nice guys finish last."


Now, lets talk about the Republicans debate: The moderators were more professional  during this last debate. There was substance in the questions. It allowed the candidates to try to prove what they had. As to Kasich, he seemed an angry, irritated person. He came across like he was the only one  who deserved  to be president and acted as though all the rest of the candidates on the stage were little people beneath him. He is a self-righteous wanna-be.

Marco Rubio's presentation on defense spending won him a lot of points. However, if his poll numbers remain low I see him having a tough time in this race. Also, because he used a government credit card for his own personal use doesn't help him. If someone knowingly breaks the rules as Rubio did while in office it says a lot as to their credibility, honesty and trust. No matter what excuse the person comes up with it doesn't rationalize the wrongdoing.

Rand Paul had his best night so far in the debates. He is a principled man--standing by his convictions - - no matter what.

Carly Fiorina, keeps repeating her same ol', same ol'  song. She sounds like a "one trick" pony. She tries to come  across strong using the same blather-- saying basically,-"they would, I wouldn't, "they won't, I will." It's a great sound bite but I don't know how far that tack will get her.Plus, I think her stump campaign presentation is fading fast. She doesn't appear to do as good on the campaign trail as she does on the debate stage. Is she still on the main stage because of her gender? Some people think so.

Jeb Bush, didn't falter. He held his own  this time around. But he is a person that just seems  blah, milk toasty and someone who still thinks politics of the past,  I believe he fails to impress voters and this chance at the presidency may be his last. if he stays in the single digits I don't see him gaining any traction so that  he can keep himself in the race. However, with the Bush name it's possible that  he will be allowed to remain on the  main stage. Is that fair? Who knows?

Cruz, holds his own. He is articulate, polished and comes across with knowledge of the facts - - a sincere man. I see him as having a very strong chance of grabbing the nomination.

Trump is a steamroller even though he lost points on foreign policy during the debate.Trump holds his own even though he is vague on issues and policy.  His appeal to the voters is that he says what he wants and is pressing the right buttons that Americans are very concerned about. Here's a man that did well all his life, He knows how to run business around the world and when he said he would do things, he actually did them. I get the feeling voters trust him and  trust that he will do what he says he will do. Trump clearly has no large amounts of baggage like many other candidates  in the race, either Democrat or Republican. He's a good family man. A family that appears never to have been in trouble. His kids are super intelligent who apparently stayed out of trouble and put their nose to the grindstone to pursue their own career goals. Trump also is spending his own money in the race for the White House. This man has a lot going for him when compared to many of the other candidates on both sides of the aisle.

Ben Carson has a credibility and trust problem to overcome - - a big one. With this guy you don't know when he's telling the truth or fabricating and making things up. That seems a big hurdle to overcome. Like Rubio, I think Carson has a credibility, honesty and trust problem.

Chris Christie really came out on top in the under card debate. He should have been included in the tier one candidates on the main stage.

I think some of these candidates will fall by the wayside soon. That may occur  possibly after the next debate of either party and/or after the Iowa primaries. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

DR. BEN CARSON-LIAR, LIAR, PANTS ON FIRE.

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

As I predicted, the hits just keep coming and coming with Ben Carson, candidate for president of the United States. News media continued to find false and admitted untruthful statements regarding Carson's life.

The Wall Street Journal looked into statements Carson made in his 1990 autobiography, "Gifted Hands." Dr. Carson wrote that while a Junior at Yale he was in a psychology class called Perceptions 301 and the professor told the class that their final exam had been burned up and the entire class of 150 students had to retake the exam.In  his book Carson said the new exam was even much tougher than the first. He went on to say that all of the students but himself walked out of if the class. He also related that the female professor and a photographer from the Yale Daily News "walked up to me, paused and snapped a picture of me." He also said that the teacher told him the incident was a  "hoax." Supposedly the teacher said "We wanted to see who was the most honest student in the class." Carson wrote; "The professor handed me a $10.00 bill." BUT FOLKS --according to the Wall Street Journal: No photos of Carson ever ran in the Yale Daily News. They even went back and checked the newspapers  archives.  During the time Carson said this incident happened there was no such class as "Perceptions 301." In addition, Yale Librarian, Claryn Spies said there was "NO" psychology course by that name OR class number during any of the time Mr. Carson spent at Yale.

The Wall Street Journal also shined a light on another Ben Carson falsehood which he posted on Facebook where he claimed that "Every signer of the Declaration of Independence had no elected office experience." The newspaper interviewed Benjamin Carp, associate professor of history at Brooklyn College, who is also author of books on the American Revolution. "  Mr. Carp  stated that Thomas Jefferson;  Samuel Adams; John Hancock and many other signers of the document had been "elected members" of their colonial assemblies before signing the Declaration of Independence,"

Looking at the success of  Carson's Scholarship Fund to other non-profits, Carson continues to claim that 9 out of 10 non-profits fail. But the Washington Post Fact Checker rated his statements as false and the paper calls  Carson's assertions regarding the matter "WHOPPER'S." It should be noted in an article by Charles Blow, noted  columnist, that out of 19 claims made by Ben Carson, so far, the fact-checking site PolitiFact said none had been ruled "true."

Also when Carson claims he DID NOT have an involvement with the nutritional supplement company Mannatech (who committed many alleged illegal and unlawful acts) have also been proved false.He was involved with this thieving company.

Side Note: The other day a newspaper article  reported on the people in Iowa supporting Dr.Carson for president . Some interviewed said they DO NOT care if he lied and they will vote for him in their upcoming election, anyway. What?   Here's a man that has been caught in NUMEROUS falsehoods and being dishonest on many, many subjects during his run for president. Some people have even said Carson was a "serial, dishonest storyteller." If that be the case, does the people of Iowa really want someone  like that as our Commander-In -Chief", the president of the United States? Why would someone want to vote for a person that has no compunction about weaving known falsehoods?

I suggest that if the people in Iowa cast a vote for Dr. Carson in their upcoming elections they will be voting for someone similar to Hillary Clinton who apparently loves to tell falsehoods - -which some call LIES. Remember the Benghazi whopper? Hillary Clinton told the  American public that the attack in Benghazi was the result of a "video." while telling her relatives, family and leaders around the world that the Benghazi attack was done by terrorists. If individuals like that lied to the the American people then, what makes you think they will not lie when it suits their purpose and their agenda?

Finally, I saw a campaign ad by Ben Carson last night.  In essence, the ad shows him telling the American people that they need someone they can trust and someone who is honest.Really?  That seems to be a contradiction on his part, doesn't it? - And, that's my opinion.Make your own decisions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com

DR, BEN CARSON'S STORIES AND ACTIONS LEAVE A LOT TO BE DESIRED. WOULD YOU VOTE FOR THIS MAN?

THE KUHNS REPORT

LAS VEGAS - Hello America, and how is the world treating you?

What the devil is the matter with Dr. Ben Carson, a candidate for the president of the United States? Many Americans question his veracity and  wonder if he can be trusted to be the leader of the free world. Let's look at just some of the claims this man has made. Many people believe they are a total fabrication.

First: In his biography he made the statement that he was offered a full blown scholarship to West Point by General William Westmoreland. West Point has no record of  such an offer. And to my recollection -West Point  DOES NOT offer scholarships." Dr. Carson also  told Charlie Rose, of the "Charlie Rose Television Show"  " I was offered a full scholarship to West Point." Now he and his handlers are trying to parse the  statements by offering up  such excuses as:  "It was a verbal offer."

Second: Dr.Carson also said that he tried to stab a number of people. He said he stabbed one person and the man's belt buckle stopped the blade from killing the guy. He also said he had anger issues while growing up.

Third: He also said he tried to hit his mother in the head with a hammer or a brick, depending on when the story is being told.. My question about that is: Why would anyone want to hit anyone else in the head with a hammer, let alone your own mother, unless there was some sort of intent to possibly maim and/or kill the other person.

Fourth: Dr. Carson tells the world that the pyramids of Egypt was built to "store grain" in them. Really? Come On! Most every expert in the study of the Egyptian culture and customs have long ago concluded that the pyramids were built for the sole purpose as a burial site and monument to their kings. Fact is, all evidence gathered by the experts over the centuries show that the kings themselves commissioned the building of their own pyramid. The pyramids have ample carving and hieroglyphics describing the burial site and what the pyramid is specifically meant for (burial of the king) and usually designated items stored in the pyramid  to be used to help the king cross into the next world.

Note: Here is a couple other little goodies that Carson claimed he did. According to the Wall Street Journal none of what he claims in these tidbits can be substantiated. He said while attending one of the most prestigious universities in the country he took a "psychology" course and further said his class was given an "honesty" test. He reported that out of all of his fellow students he was the "only" one that passed the honesty test. After checking their records the university said there was "no such" psychology course and there was no "honesty test" administered. Phew!! When is the other shoe going to drop? It looks like the hits keep coming when it comes to Ben Carson's truthfulness, integrity and character.

Folks, the above examples are just a sample of  the stories (some in the media branded as tall tales) that this presidential candidate has been espousing. It also has been mentioned that Carson himself said he had pathological problems. If that is true it should give Americans pause and consider what type of person they want to lead this country. Dr. Carson's action and statements give  me concern. His character certainly comes into question, doesn't it?

People, remember back in 1972, the late Thomas  F. Eagleton, former senator, was removed from  being a vice-presidential candidate because he had a mental illness and he was also treated with "electroschock" (ECT) therapy. He was disqualified from running the country.

At this particular time I suspect that Dr. Carson tends to fabricate. In fact, "confabulate."What's confabulate? Well, the  easy explanation can be described as: " It is the spontaneous product of false memories, either for memories and for events which never occurred." Confabulation can further be described as a product of fabricated, distorted and misinterpreted memories "about oneself or the world?

Here's and example: A therapist is interviewing an alcoholic and asks about something that never even happened: "Charlie, did you rob that gas station last night?" Alcoholic: "Yes, yes I did. I pulled a knife and stuck it in the clerks face and asked for money. Then I put the money in my pocket. I ran out the door and I grabbed my bicycle parked outside and rode away." Point being folks, a person that fabricates and confabulates can just keep embellishing on the simplest phase(s) and/or story and each time it can become a bigger more elaborate event. Even though  the event never, ever happened.

Also, I notice that when challenged on his remarks Dr.Carson displays a latent anger and lashes out at others and then he tries to back pedal his remarks such as: "What I really meant was ---;  Or, when he was asked something that  went like this: "Do you "agree"with the use of using the "rap song" we saw in your ads?" His  answer was a clear "yes" but in the next breath he took another stand and said something to the effect that he would do something different. He's looks to be very ambivalent. If one notices, Dr. Carson has a tendency to take this approach when asked specific questions about issues and policy. He tends to refuse to offer up a definitive  "yes" or "no" when he is asked if he agrees or disagrees with something. It appears he fails to hold a strong or solid opinion on an issue or policy "without" qualifying the response with a "but."

Dr. Carson is currently bashing the media, blaming them for looking into his personal life. Well, what the devil did he expect? When you are a person in the top tier of candidates for becoming president of the United States there is going to be scrutiny and tough questions about  your words, actions and writings - -you're a PUBLIC FIGURE. Any candidates life should be an open book so that Americans can make an intelligent decision as to who they would like to vote for. I will predict that there will be even more contradictions come up regarding Carson's, life, background, writings and actions. Stay tuned.

As everyone knows, I am an Independent voter, always have been. I have always prided myself on choosing the best person for the job whether they are Democrat, Republican  or Independent, or even a Democrat Socialist like Bernie Sanders claims he is. I want to hear from all of the candidates before making up my mind. I don't have a dog in this hunt. However, with that said, after hearing Dr. Ben Carson speak and present himself and considering all of his stories I believe I would have a problem giving him my vote. Carson, like Hillary Clinton, comes to the table with a lot of baggage, a lot of which I believe are made up stories and trust issues. At this point I can say I narrowed my choice for president down. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.

BRADLEY W. KUHNS, Ph.D., O.M.D.
________________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by email at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com