Ralph Lauren Olympic Uniform- UPDATE
DO THE RIGHT THING LAUREN
USA Uniforms Can Be Made in 2-Weeks
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS
I received word from a few sources regarding the Olympic uniform fiasco. Ralph Lauren states that he will make all future Olympic uniforms in the USA starting in 2014. Mr. Ralph Lauren, for me, that is not good enough. Folks, Lauren could trash all of the uniforms he had "Made in China" and immediately replace them with "Made in the USA" label if he wanted too. Why doesn't he do that? Could it be GREED? Possibly.
According to a few source of mine and ABC News network a complete batch of "Made in the USA" Olympic uniforms could be made in "TWO WEEKS." Mind you, that is not word from one American company but the same time frame was quoted by at least 20 companies. So, my message and suggestion to Lauren and his shabby company would be. Throw out the Chinese uniforms and have the "MADE IN AMERICA" uniforms done in the two week time span.. That is the only thing that will gain back some of Ralph Laurens credibility in my eyes.-And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Saturday, July 14, 2012
The U.S. Had 620,000 Fatalities in Our Civil War.
Let Syria Fight Their Own Civil War. We Did.
SYRIA IS NOT OUR FIGHT
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS:
Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Why is the United States stirring up the Middle East by sticking our nose into Syria's internal problems? We should not be poking around in their business. Folks, Syria is not America's problem. It is not our war. Using U.S. military power and arming insurgents for anti-regime forces "inside Syria's borders is unwarranted.
The U.S. has had relations with the Assad regime for about 40 years.. First we dealt with Bashar's Assad's father and then Basher himself. For those many decades things went well. Now, we are war mongering in the region to impose a democratic society on people that have their own culture and morals, thinking "WE" the USA knows best, telling people how to live.
The uprising in Syria should be left alone and let the people of Syria handle their difference on their own. Our lawmakers say a civil war in Syria is evident. I say, SO WHAT. Let the Syrians fight it out among themselves and then we deal with the regime left standing. I think the Syrians are smart enough to fight their own battles in their own country.
CIVIL WAR. People dying. What does the U.S. lawmakers expect when there is a civil war? People are going to die. Both civilian and military people. If the Syrian people want to rise up and fight for their freedoms let them do it without outside help. Freedom fought with their own hands is freedom earned and appreciated.
People, if you want to talk about "civil war." you need not look any further than us Americans. We had our own hard fought civil war. Our country was divided - -the North versus the South. What about our fatalities in our own civil war. To refresh some of our lazy Congress people's memory. We Americans lost 620,000 good men in the American Civil War. Our civil war was one of the most deadliest in American history. And yes, in addition to those 620,000 deaths don't forget that many civilians lost their lives also.We Americans fought our "Civil War" on our own without troops from other countries settling our differences. The war was fought, North Versus South . The North won and our nation came together, on our own , to prosper and unite. I say, Let Syria fight their on war. Let them sort out their own government on their own.
Our news media shows a 30 second shot of a wounded child or 100 people are killed in one action.and we express outrage.. What the devil does Obama and our Congress expect when a civil war is being fought? That is the fog of war. But it is Syria's war. Syria has a long way to go to have 620,000 fatalities like we Americans lost in our civil war.
Finally, we should stop being the worlds police force. And we should stop trying to force our values on other countries. The only thing we are doing by sticking our nose in other countries strife is taking billions of dollars from us taxpayers and throwing it down a never ending hole. Christ, Obama is spending $4 billion dollars a day to fight a war in Afghanistan, one of the most corrupt countries on the planet. It has been ongoing for over 10 years. And, don't forget Iraq. We are still spending billions there each and every day. Also, don't forget the covert actions and undeclared wars we are supporting in Pakistan and Iran. We have military drones , cyber agents and covert military groups involved in those countries.
It seems our lawmakers always want to have a war going on so as to take the attention off of all of our domestic problems we are experiencing here at home. All of the billions of tax dollars Obama and our Government lawmakers (both Democrats and Republican) are spending could be used right here in America, making the country whole again. We have poverty and hunger going on here in the good Ol' USA. We need infrastructure repairs. Our cities are falling apart. Those billions going out every day to these other nations could and "should" be spent here in America . My view is, America first. Then, and only then, if we have some monies left over we can be charitable. The trouble with our Congress and all lawmakers is that if they find or come into an extra $100. dollars, they spend $150.00. That is no way to run a country. I would say "Charity begins at home. " -And, that is my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
___________
_____________________
Friday, July 13, 2012
Food Prices Up Because of Drought?
Get Water to the Drought Stricken Areas
From Flooded States.
THE KUHNS REPORT
LAS VEGAS
Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The news media just yesterday said the country is in a severe drought and because of lack of water crops like corn is dying. The media went on to say price for food is going to go up at leas three-percent. Christ, food prices have been rising for the past year. If the crops in the Midwest need water then I say, "Get water to the crops." How? Easy. Transport the water from the states that have it to the water starved bread basket of the country. It can't be done you say? Wrong. It can. Currently all over the world we cart water in water trucks to areas in Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries on a daily basis.
Here are some suggestions for out lazy politicians sitting on their butts in Washington. Transport water. At any given time in this country there is a city or state experiencing a flood. Those waters can be used for irrigation in times of drought. The water from the floods in a city or state can be caught and stored in large tanks, above or below the ground. It serves a two fold purpose. First, the water being reclaimed and put into the storage tanks will give relief to the flooded city or state and Second, that water can be transported to the states like Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri, etc., that need the water for their crops. Folks, it is a no-brainer. The water being stored from a flood ravaged area in one state can be stored in tanks or better yet, why not have a pipe line system transport water from state to state when required. The idea of- - we have a drought so the farmers are going to raise food prices is unacceptable. The problem with that is when the food prices are raised, they stay up and never, ever, come back down. The farmers and yes, the government, hate to reduce the food prices once they got their raise. The food prices always go up but they never come back down once the freeze, drought, or whatever is over. It's not unlike the government saying "we're going to impose a temporary tax." "It's just temporary." But once the tax is there, "IT IS NEVER TEMPORARY." It is there for ever. Never reversed.
It would be cheaper in the long run to lay pipe lines between states to transfer needed water to irrigate and feed the drought infested areas or even cheaper to build large water tank storage areas above and below ground for use in emergency drought times. People, it would not take that much to have water shifted from flood ravaged areas to areas that need it. If the crops have the water needed to have them produce there would be no reason to constantly use the excuse " we have to raise food prices." It seems our country does not plan ahead for emergencies or disasters. Instead, the government always acts "after the fact." and then squeals that someone should have seen the problem coming. The result, the politicians pass the buck and say they will form a committees to investigate the problem. What a joke.
If our government can transport convoy's of tanker trucks full of water to people in other countries, why not here? We have the technology and skills. And if the water transport pipe lines or storage tanks were built in different states across the country that would put tens of thousands of people to work. It would be a win, win situation and another upside would be food prices could remain stable. And, - that is my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Olympic Team USA Uniforms Should Be Trashed.
The Olympic Committee & Greedy Clothes Designers Should Be Ashamed.
THE KUHNS REPORT
___________________
LAS VEGAS:
Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The Olympics Committee had team USA uniforms made in CHINA? What a bonehead move.We have plenty of garment manufacturers here in the Good Ol' USA and those workers certainly could have used the jobs.What is Ralph Lauren thinking. Here's a guy that made a name for himself as a designer but has no qualms about having his stuff made in CHINA. Talk about cheap. This has been designer takes the cake. Because of his celebrity and to save a buck and for personal gain and profit has the garments "Made in China."- I wonder why the well known celebrities buy his crap? They should boycott it. Who wants to wear clothes that are made on the cheap in another country. But I guess that says a lot for these celebrities that swoon and pander to this clothes designer. Folks, did you see the Team USA uniforms? They look silly and stupid. Instead of a "French Beret" the team could wear a cap like the USA World War II military wore and carried on their shoulder when they were not wearing them ( color optional) to match a blazer. The cap could have a USA insignia emblazoned on it . Even a USA white sailor cap with a USA insignia would look very smart with any color blazer. Last but not least , as a suggestion - - Have the USA team where a "Cowboy" hat. Again (color optional). If that isn't American and tells the world that the team is USA, I don't know what is. And, all of the Olympic uniforms should be "MADE IN AMERICA", Period.
What is it with our country and these big companies and institutions "outsourcing " good jobs to CHINA and elsewhere? This outsourcing of garments, shoes, and all the other items that can clearly be manufactured and"Made in the USA" has to stop. Congress should take steps to have these clothing manufacturers make their items here in America. These big clothing designers like Lauren are a blight on America. They lack patriotism , concern and love of the United States all in the name of greed and profit.
Hell, people. A first year college student studying design could have designed a better looking uniform that this alleged famous designer. And Lauren is going to sell the uniforms for a couple grand or more. COME ON! In my opinion, Lauren and other designers of his ilk had their day decades ago. I think people should refuse to continue to support these designers that offer expensive clothes that in reality are nothing more than a cheaply made, flimsy excuse for a quality garment. People across the country should demand that these current Olympic uniforms be done over and "MADE IN THE USA." And, - That's my opinion, Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
The Olympic Committee & Greedy Clothes Designers Should Be Ashamed.
THE KUHNS REPORT
___________________
LAS VEGAS:
Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The Olympics Committee had team USA uniforms made in CHINA? What a bonehead move.We have plenty of garment manufacturers here in the Good Ol' USA and those workers certainly could have used the jobs.What is Ralph Lauren thinking. Here's a guy that made a name for himself as a designer but has no qualms about having his stuff made in CHINA. Talk about cheap. This has been designer takes the cake. Because of his celebrity and to save a buck and for personal gain and profit has the garments "Made in China."- I wonder why the well known celebrities buy his crap? They should boycott it. Who wants to wear clothes that are made on the cheap in another country. But I guess that says a lot for these celebrities that swoon and pander to this clothes designer. Folks, did you see the Team USA uniforms? They look silly and stupid. Instead of a "French Beret" the team could wear a cap like the USA World War II military wore and carried on their shoulder when they were not wearing them ( color optional) to match a blazer. The cap could have a USA insignia emblazoned on it . Even a USA white sailor cap with a USA insignia would look very smart with any color blazer. Last but not least , as a suggestion - - Have the USA team where a "Cowboy" hat. Again (color optional). If that isn't American and tells the world that the team is USA, I don't know what is. And, all of the Olympic uniforms should be "MADE IN AMERICA", Period.
What is it with our country and these big companies and institutions "outsourcing " good jobs to CHINA and elsewhere? This outsourcing of garments, shoes, and all the other items that can clearly be manufactured and"Made in the USA" has to stop. Congress should take steps to have these clothing manufacturers make their items here in America. These big clothing designers like Lauren are a blight on America. They lack patriotism , concern and love of the United States all in the name of greed and profit.
Hell, people. A first year college student studying design could have designed a better looking uniform that this alleged famous designer. And Lauren is going to sell the uniforms for a couple grand or more. COME ON! In my opinion, Lauren and other designers of his ilk had their day decades ago. I think people should refuse to continue to support these designers that offer expensive clothes that in reality are nothing more than a cheaply made, flimsy excuse for a quality garment. People across the country should demand that these current Olympic uniforms be done over and "MADE IN THE USA." And, - That's my opinion, Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Thursday, June 7, 2012
IT'S TIME FOR NEW YORKER'S TO BAN MAYOR BLOOMBERG
HE SHOULD GET A LIFE
THE KUHNS REPORT
___________________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Downsizing and restricting soft drinks to 16 ounces "could" curb obesity consumption say New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg. He and his puppet regime , the "Health and Human Services Commission and Thomas Farley continue to chip away at peoples freedom and choice. To rationalize his ban he falls back on the " Beating the dead Horse" argument "It's a health issue." That's baloney. Everything a person eats or drinks is a health issue. Could and should can be interpreted in many ways. Bloomberg's pastrami and corn beef sandwiches he eats COULD , and is, a health issue, his tea or coffee COULD, and is, a health issue. desserts he, his family and relatives consume COULD, and is, a health issue.
This guy, with his billions of dollars bought himself an extra term in office is nothing more that a dictator. He waves his hand and mandates what is good for New Yorkers telling them what they can eat and drink and, how much. First Bloomberg banned smoking in the city's bars, restaurants, parks and beaches. Why? Because he was a non-smoker. Talk about a conflict of interest? He had his own personal agenda and because he was a nonsmoker he banned tobacco use for everyone in the city. If he were honest he would admit it. He called in favors using his power and money and instructed his Health and Human Services zombies who do not want to offend him to control Trans Fats for everyone in the city. That not being enough, he again ordered his zombie Health Service people to regulate calories, and now - - SODA.
This guy reminds me of those small inadequate leaders in Korea and Iran who pass laws, institute bans and mandates telling their people what they can eat, drink and how to live. Those dictators, not unlike Bloomberg tells their people it is for their own good and that he is looking out after them. He says he knows what is good for them. WOW!
Why is it that all these small inadequate leaders try to make up for their own inadequacies by using their money and power to control people and their behavior? Bloomberg's close circle of friends and colleagues have been rubber stamping all of his demands and wishes much too long. He is a small man, with a small mind who has a small view of the world about what this great country was founded on- - life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness AND freedom of choice.
When are the people of New York City going to say, "enough is enough?" Wake up New Yorker's. Quit being a bunch of sheep.Ba, Ba, Ba, - -stop following Bloomberg's destructive bans. Stripping people of their freedom of choice like this little wanna-be do-gooder has been doing is tearing down America,
Mark my word: If New Yorker's do not stand up to this little man his next move will be how much food and what food you are allowed to eat. It will not stop with burgers, bacon, pies, cakes, and anything Bloomberg feels can bring on diabetes, high blood pressure and heart problems.
BUT PEOPLE, there are literally thousands and thousands of food and drink items that might contribute to anyone being diagnosed with those ailments Bloomberg drags out and holds up as an example for his crazy silly bans.
Parents can educate their children as to what foods and how much they want them to eat and adults are smart enough to make their own choices. In this country, for centuries, the free American people have been doing just fine making their own choices. Instead of passing bans on food and drink, or for that fact, any legal product that a person might want to put into their body our lawmakers should do what they already have been doing for decades. Just put warning labels on the product and allow the people to make up their own mind as to whether they was to consume it. Warning labels is all the American people need. What we do not need is a little Napoleon running amok in or society, using their money and power to enjoy what they like while at the same time suppressing what others might like.
Finally, the people of New York and other states all around the country should rise up in peaceful protest and demonstrate their opposition to the Big Brother, Nanny state mentality.I say if, little guy, Bloomberg, doesn't want to drink more that 16 ounces of Soda, eat Trans Fat, enjoy a fine cigar or a cigarette, -- or wants to keep his calorie count down that is certainly his choice and rightly so. But it is not his prerogative to dictate and his force his personal likes and dislikes on the rest of us.
People are going to live and die each and every day like they have been doing since the beginning of time by way of making their own choices and lifestyle throughout their life. That's the cycle of life. Bloomberg's doctrine is lame and it stinks. And,- that is my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
__________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
HE SHOULD GET A LIFE
THE KUHNS REPORT
___________________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Downsizing and restricting soft drinks to 16 ounces "could" curb obesity consumption say New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg. He and his puppet regime , the "Health and Human Services Commission and Thomas Farley continue to chip away at peoples freedom and choice. To rationalize his ban he falls back on the " Beating the dead Horse" argument "It's a health issue." That's baloney. Everything a person eats or drinks is a health issue. Could and should can be interpreted in many ways. Bloomberg's pastrami and corn beef sandwiches he eats COULD , and is, a health issue, his tea or coffee COULD, and is, a health issue. desserts he, his family and relatives consume COULD, and is, a health issue.
This guy, with his billions of dollars bought himself an extra term in office is nothing more that a dictator. He waves his hand and mandates what is good for New Yorkers telling them what they can eat and drink and, how much. First Bloomberg banned smoking in the city's bars, restaurants, parks and beaches. Why? Because he was a non-smoker. Talk about a conflict of interest? He had his own personal agenda and because he was a nonsmoker he banned tobacco use for everyone in the city. If he were honest he would admit it. He called in favors using his power and money and instructed his Health and Human Services zombies who do not want to offend him to control Trans Fats for everyone in the city. That not being enough, he again ordered his zombie Health Service people to regulate calories, and now - - SODA.
This guy reminds me of those small inadequate leaders in Korea and Iran who pass laws, institute bans and mandates telling their people what they can eat, drink and how to live. Those dictators, not unlike Bloomberg tells their people it is for their own good and that he is looking out after them. He says he knows what is good for them. WOW!
Why is it that all these small inadequate leaders try to make up for their own inadequacies by using their money and power to control people and their behavior? Bloomberg's close circle of friends and colleagues have been rubber stamping all of his demands and wishes much too long. He is a small man, with a small mind who has a small view of the world about what this great country was founded on- - life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness AND freedom of choice.
When are the people of New York City going to say, "enough is enough?" Wake up New Yorker's. Quit being a bunch of sheep.Ba, Ba, Ba, - -stop following Bloomberg's destructive bans. Stripping people of their freedom of choice like this little wanna-be do-gooder has been doing is tearing down America,
Mark my word: If New Yorker's do not stand up to this little man his next move will be how much food and what food you are allowed to eat. It will not stop with burgers, bacon, pies, cakes, and anything Bloomberg feels can bring on diabetes, high blood pressure and heart problems.
BUT PEOPLE, there are literally thousands and thousands of food and drink items that might contribute to anyone being diagnosed with those ailments Bloomberg drags out and holds up as an example for his crazy silly bans.
Parents can educate their children as to what foods and how much they want them to eat and adults are smart enough to make their own choices. In this country, for centuries, the free American people have been doing just fine making their own choices. Instead of passing bans on food and drink, or for that fact, any legal product that a person might want to put into their body our lawmakers should do what they already have been doing for decades. Just put warning labels on the product and allow the people to make up their own mind as to whether they was to consume it. Warning labels is all the American people need. What we do not need is a little Napoleon running amok in or society, using their money and power to enjoy what they like while at the same time suppressing what others might like.
Finally, the people of New York and other states all around the country should rise up in peaceful protest and demonstrate their opposition to the Big Brother, Nanny state mentality.I say if, little guy, Bloomberg, doesn't want to drink more that 16 ounces of Soda, eat Trans Fat, enjoy a fine cigar or a cigarette, -- or wants to keep his calorie count down that is certainly his choice and rightly so. But it is not his prerogative to dictate and his force his personal likes and dislikes on the rest of us.
People are going to live and die each and every day like they have been doing since the beginning of time by way of making their own choices and lifestyle throughout their life. That's the cycle of life. Bloomberg's doctrine is lame and it stinks. And,- that is my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
__________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Thursday, May 10, 2012
USA Wants to Stir the Pot Again;Iran is the Target
THE KUHNS REPORT
_______________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Here we go again folks. The Administration is trying to beat war drums pointed toward Iran.
Hasn't the lawmakers learned anything from the lies and deceptions that brought about the Iraq war?
Lets see, there was accusations of yellow cake; the scare of mushroom clouds;lies that Saddam aided and abetted the 9/11 attack in New York City; and, remember the bold faced lies by Colin Powell who went before Congress and said with a straight face that there were (WMD's) weapons of mass destruction being dragged around in trailers.
People. now Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State goes before the world media and begins to threaten Iran with the power of the presidency behind her. Clinton states that Iran was behind an assassination plot to take out the Saudi ambassador to the United States on American soil? Whoa! Does that sound familiar? A bag full of allegations, inuendo and suppositions to rally up the masses and stir the pot.
The administration says, the United States considers the alleged plot to be an act of terrorism so using terrorism as the catalyst the United States is attempting to gain a coalition involving other nations to support the United states argument.
The United States said they foiled the plot. But did they? Or, is it another make believe scenario to ratchet up another war or attack on another regime for the sole purpose of taking the countries mind off of its domestic and foreign problems?
I would suggest that those other countries that the United States does approach to listen to their song and patter should look at the materials and statements with a jaundice eye. I trust that China and Russia are skeptical and as to our allies like France and the U.K., I would say DO NOT be a lap dog and jump on the bandwagon like Blair did in the Iraq war.
Why? Look at what happened in the Iraq fiasco. The war was built on total fabrication and lies by lawmakers in the United States. For example, the U.S. continued to beat the war drums against Iraq and tell the people of this nation that Iraq had nuclear weapons. What the U.S. didn't tell its people was that Iraq quit and shut down its nuclear program way back in 1991. However, in March 2003, we, the United States invaded Iraq using that rationalization.
Then, the lawmakers and administration proclaimed that there were secret meeting by Iraq and other powers to obtain yellow cake so that nukes could be advanced. The administration continued to beat the war drums and have high level individuals in the administration even go before Congress to promote outright lies in order to gain support for their views as to why the United States should invade another sovereign nation.
Once the Iraq war was on there were more than 100,000 people killed because of our action and most of those that died were Iraqi civilians.
Remember the snitch that informed to our government that Iraq had WMD's. This guys code name was "Curveball" and using him, I have to say the administration did throw up citizens a curveball. This is the guy that the United States believed and chose to act on his false statements even though many in government has their doubts and misgivings about this idiot.. But, the U.S. wanted to go to war and this man's statements were another justification.
This informant, "Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi"later told this government and other foreign nations that he actually lied to everyone about the state of Iraq's government, facilities, military and weapons because he did not like Saddam and had a grudge against him.
Can you imagine , a country like the United States allowing one man to advise the lawmakers and President with lies and falsehoods so as to justify a war the administration wanted to engage in?
So, people of the United States and any foreign nation abroad - - - be skeptical of the words coming out of the mouths of our lawmakers when it come to taking action against another nation, PLEASE. Don't we learn by our mistakes?
The practice in this country used to be: when a crime is "committed", then we go after the culprit and bring them to justice. It should not be our practice to initiate any preemptive action against anyone or any country on "something that might have happened." My view is that when the act itself happens, whether it be robbery, rape,burglary, murder, arson or assassination, then you take action and handle it. Once the crime has been committed then you gather the evidence and go out and arrest the perpetrator(s). No one person or country should be allowed to think that a crime "might be committed." That is the kind of crazy and inappropriate thinking that got us into the Iraq war. Now we are in three wars. Those being: Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Isn't three wars enough for this administration? Now,, they want to ramp up support to attack Iran.
Did it ever occur to most of you that every time the United States is having domestic difficulty and cannot solve the problems here at home the administration starts a war? It's happened over and over again in the past. The Congess and lawmakers want to take the heat of their their own bumbling in-actions and their failure to address the problems we may be experiencing here at home so their watch word is :"WAR" or "CONFLICT with another nation. Their feeling is that if the countries mind is on a war or foreign conflict, the people will rally around the lawmakers for support and put aside any home grown problems. And, who makes out on that approach to solving problems? The military defense firms, the corporations, the banks, and of course the lawmakers who are hoping to retain their seats in power.
I would suggest that the people of this country hold our lawmakers feet to the fire and insist that they do not lie to the American people as they have done in the past and using the guise of war or threats of invasion or preemptive strikes to circumvent the real problems here at home while hoping all the while that they will retain their power in government. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
_______________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Here we go again folks. The Administration is trying to beat war drums pointed toward Iran.
Hasn't the lawmakers learned anything from the lies and deceptions that brought about the Iraq war?
Lets see, there was accusations of yellow cake; the scare of mushroom clouds;lies that Saddam aided and abetted the 9/11 attack in New York City; and, remember the bold faced lies by Colin Powell who went before Congress and said with a straight face that there were (WMD's) weapons of mass destruction being dragged around in trailers.
People. now Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State goes before the world media and begins to threaten Iran with the power of the presidency behind her. Clinton states that Iran was behind an assassination plot to take out the Saudi ambassador to the United States on American soil? Whoa! Does that sound familiar? A bag full of allegations, inuendo and suppositions to rally up the masses and stir the pot.
The administration says, the United States considers the alleged plot to be an act of terrorism so using terrorism as the catalyst the United States is attempting to gain a coalition involving other nations to support the United states argument.
The United States said they foiled the plot. But did they? Or, is it another make believe scenario to ratchet up another war or attack on another regime for the sole purpose of taking the countries mind off of its domestic and foreign problems?
I would suggest that those other countries that the United States does approach to listen to their song and patter should look at the materials and statements with a jaundice eye. I trust that China and Russia are skeptical and as to our allies like France and the U.K., I would say DO NOT be a lap dog and jump on the bandwagon like Blair did in the Iraq war.
Why? Look at what happened in the Iraq fiasco. The war was built on total fabrication and lies by lawmakers in the United States. For example, the U.S. continued to beat the war drums against Iraq and tell the people of this nation that Iraq had nuclear weapons. What the U.S. didn't tell its people was that Iraq quit and shut down its nuclear program way back in 1991. However, in March 2003, we, the United States invaded Iraq using that rationalization.
Then, the lawmakers and administration proclaimed that there were secret meeting by Iraq and other powers to obtain yellow cake so that nukes could be advanced. The administration continued to beat the war drums and have high level individuals in the administration even go before Congress to promote outright lies in order to gain support for their views as to why the United States should invade another sovereign nation.
Once the Iraq war was on there were more than 100,000 people killed because of our action and most of those that died were Iraqi civilians.
Remember the snitch that informed to our government that Iraq had WMD's. This guys code name was "Curveball" and using him, I have to say the administration did throw up citizens a curveball. This is the guy that the United States believed and chose to act on his false statements even though many in government has their doubts and misgivings about this idiot.. But, the U.S. wanted to go to war and this man's statements were another justification.
This informant, "Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi"later told this government and other foreign nations that he actually lied to everyone about the state of Iraq's government, facilities, military and weapons because he did not like Saddam and had a grudge against him.
Can you imagine , a country like the United States allowing one man to advise the lawmakers and President with lies and falsehoods so as to justify a war the administration wanted to engage in?
So, people of the United States and any foreign nation abroad - - - be skeptical of the words coming out of the mouths of our lawmakers when it come to taking action against another nation, PLEASE. Don't we learn by our mistakes?
The practice in this country used to be: when a crime is "committed", then we go after the culprit and bring them to justice. It should not be our practice to initiate any preemptive action against anyone or any country on "something that might have happened." My view is that when the act itself happens, whether it be robbery, rape,burglary, murder, arson or assassination, then you take action and handle it. Once the crime has been committed then you gather the evidence and go out and arrest the perpetrator(s). No one person or country should be allowed to think that a crime "might be committed." That is the kind of crazy and inappropriate thinking that got us into the Iraq war. Now we are in three wars. Those being: Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Isn't three wars enough for this administration? Now,, they want to ramp up support to attack Iran.
Did it ever occur to most of you that every time the United States is having domestic difficulty and cannot solve the problems here at home the administration starts a war? It's happened over and over again in the past. The Congess and lawmakers want to take the heat of their their own bumbling in-actions and their failure to address the problems we may be experiencing here at home so their watch word is :"WAR" or "CONFLICT with another nation. Their feeling is that if the countries mind is on a war or foreign conflict, the people will rally around the lawmakers for support and put aside any home grown problems. And, who makes out on that approach to solving problems? The military defense firms, the corporations, the banks, and of course the lawmakers who are hoping to retain their seats in power.
I would suggest that the people of this country hold our lawmakers feet to the fire and insist that they do not lie to the American people as they have done in the past and using the guise of war or threats of invasion or preemptive strikes to circumvent the real problems here at home while hoping all the while that they will retain their power in government. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
PRESIDENT OBAMBA PANDERS FOR THE GAY VOTE
"A HAIL MARY MOVE FOR RE-ELECTION"
THE KUHNS REPORT
___________________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America and how is the world treating you?
Obama stands up for gay marriage? The first sitting president in history who decided to stick his nose in a social issue as hot as "gay marriage. Is there a method to his madness? You bet!
Folks, I see president Obama's move as a way of doing everything he can to win reelection.. This is a political move on his part. In the past he opposed gay marriage. He was adamant about his feelings toward marriage and expressed them over and over while running for president. Now, he flip-flops and says he found the light. Hallelujah !! According to him "today" Gay marriage is a good thing.
Obama even has the gall to use his daughters as a pawn in his move to accept gay marriage. He said he was hit with this wonderous revelation only after he talked with his children.. It appears Obama and his ilk will do anything to be reelected. I see his move as pandering for votes from the gay communities across the nation. Nothing more, nothing less.
Even after he appeared on television saying gay marriage is okay he still waffled and rationalized his decision and parsed words to try to strike a middle ground. But he should know that there is nothing like half pregnant. "Your either pregnant or your not." You can't have it both ways Mr. President.
People, if you believe that Obama's new found acceptance for gay marriage is not a play for votes from one segment of society - - do you wanna buy a bridge in Brooklyn? Such a deal.---
And, that's my opinion. Make up your own minds. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)