THE DOCTOR IS IN _______________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Anthony Weiner is still refusing to resign. That is why we need a very easy way to have some ejected from Congress. As it stands now, if someone wanted to get rid of a lawmaker in Congress the process would take at least two years. There are hearings, committee meetings and investigations that drag on and all the while the offending Congress person still goes on day to day collecting taxpayer money and hoping that the facts of their crime(s) will fade from the memory of everyone in the nation. The people should insist that Congress streamlines a procedure to "FIRE" lawmakers that commit such crimes that bring disrepute to the halls of Congress. I'm disgusted with lawmakers making laws only to protect themselves and their own private club. Folks, laws that they pass and insist we have to abide by are laws that they exempt themselves from. Why? These privileged few should be held accountable to the same laws, in the same way, that they pass for all of us across this country to adhere too.
It is because of these elaborate exemptions that they constructed which do not apply to Congress (but applies to everyone of us in the country) that will allow Weiner to skate for months, even years without being held accountable if he does not resign..
I suspect that Weiner has and has had a psychological defect probably since childhood. The psychological problem(s) Weiner has been displaying recently probably have manifested themselves over and over again through his life as he grew up. However for reasons known only to Weiner and his family the psychological issues eating at this man were ignored or never addressed.
Weiner says he is not going resign. Some of his reasons are from his own mouth. He says he is not a lawyer, never held a steady job in his life and that being a lawmaker in Washington is the only job he knows. Wow! Qualification to be a lawmaker in Washington has hit an all time low. He wants to keep working as a Washington lawmaker because he has no experience at any other type of work or profession. It appears a life of privilege and money equals "lawmaker".
During a media interview he was also heard saying: I have personal failing and I will seek help so I can "TRY" to continue to do my job. Folks, key word here is "TRY". He's going to" try" to do his job as a lawmaker. Come On!
Weiner has gone into hiding and "rehab". Rehab? For what? You don't rehab a person for exposing their penis over the Internet. To me that's a crime. People across this country are arrested every day for showing their private parts on the Internet. My feelings as a professional person is that you DO NOT run to rehab and expect to be rehabilitated for acts such as those committed by Weiner. Rehab is an excuse. It's the "in word" and the flavor of the month for celebrities and lawmakers. They expect the people across the nation to believe that if they check into rehab for a 30 day stint that all of their past inappropriate or criminal actions will be resolved and they are "CURED". Hogwash!!! I would suspect that all of these people checking in to rehab is a rouse for a legal defense and redemption of sorts.
Rehab is a good thing for those with drug and alcohol problems. It does work if rehab is structured and lengthly. Psychological problems as the ones I suspect Weiner has is a matter to be treated by a psychiatrist or psychologist and/or a Marriage, Family therapist. The same goes for Governor Schwarzenegger, Tiger Wood, etc.--. There is some problems that fall into the realm of rehab but others clearly fall under the auspices of clinical professionals with a very structured treatment plan. Folks, rehab for many of these celebrities and lawmakers is just another excuse- , no more , no less.
In any event, in Weiner's case. I hope he takes my advice once again. My words to Weiner: Do the country, the state of New York, the party, Congress, the world and yes, your wife, a polite and sincere gesture. Bow out gracefully. RESIGN, RESIGN NOW. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_________________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Thursday, June 9, 2011
Weiner Has to Resign; Women Involved In Weiner Internet Sex Clearly Not Victim's
THE DOCTOR IS IN
_______________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Well, as I predicted in a previous blog regarding Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-NY, the truth came out. I said that if you believe Weiner's original story there was bridge in Brooklyn that he could sell you.
Finally, and hopefully he followed my advice recommended in my last blog and came clean. Now the question is- "Will he resign." Personally I think he should. I've seen and treated people like him in the past. The man appears to have a very strong tendency to be an exhibitionist, a closet variety pervert.
Here is a man that is supposed to adhere to the laws of the land and represent constituents in his district while also representing the face of the United States around the world.
Even after the first photo was released the man looked into media cameras and told the people of the United States that he did not send lewd pictures to women on the Internet. He blatantly lied to our faces. He did this not once, but a number of times. So, my question to the people of New York and the United States is: How can you believe this pervert NOW? How can you trust his political decisions now and in the future? In my mind the man's credibility is zilch! Zero.
In addition, how can his colleagues in Congress rationalize his actions? He brought disrepute to the entire lawmaking body in Washington. Hell, Congress approval ratings are at one of the lowest ebbs in history and this lawmakers sexual perversion actions only brings approval ratings of Congress to a deeper, darker depth.
I would suggest Weiner resign and seek professional help for his sexual, deviant problems. This problem that he has been displaying in recent weeks just didn't happen over night. I would suspect that his desire to expose himself sexually has been a strong desire for many years and I would not be surprised that if a very pointed deep in depth check into Weiner's background there would be evidence that he has been predisposed to the sexual deviant acts for years.
If our lawmakers in Washing does not force this man to resign, the stain on politicians will be enormous. Weiner can not be trusted, HE LIED, numerous times. His credibiilty is shot and if he remains in Washington as a representative of the people you can just imagine how his political and lawmaking decisions on important issues will be affected to satisfy his own sexual desires. Any further statements from Weiner that may say that he is a changed man and that he will not do this again will be hollow empty statements. He had his chance on the first photo. Instead, LIED and DENIED.
I would say that any lawmaker in Congress and all of Washington that tries to rationalize Weiner's behavior and make excuses for him should be on the fast track out of Washington too. Any rationalizations and excuses by his collegues for Weiner's protection should be a very big red flag as to their mind set and way of thinking. to There is no excuse for this man's sexual behavior and clearly he should not be continuing to represent the people of this nation.
Now, a brief word about one of the women Weiner was having e-mail sex with. The casino dealer in Las Vegas (which we will call Lisa) was interviewed on a major news network and when asked "What she would say to Weiner's wife", she only said she would say she is sorry. This 30 something casino dealer continued e-mail after e-mail, describing explicit sex with Weiner, knowing that he was married. What does that say about this lady and her morals, values, credibility and honestly? What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. Are you kidding? What is her motive for exchanging sexual explicit e-mails with Weiner "unless" she had ulterior motives. What could they be---ummmm- maybe "money? " Her fifteen minutes of fame? Why would any intelligent woman do this unless possibly she herself had a sexual deviant desire and/or problem also? I would think any reasonable person could not have favorable feelings about a woman that would commit these acts knowing that the man was married with a pregnant wife.
Folks, this, Las Vegas casino worker is clearly not a victim of any kind and from what I can garner from news media reports about the other women (not ladies) they cannot wear the cloak of victim. All of these women were active participants in sexual deviant acts with Weiner for one reason or another. So, if they start to cry and say that is not their fault or they did nothing wrong I would suggest that you think for a moment and read some of the e-mails exchanged between them and Weiner while at the same time ask yourself what they want out of this scandal. What's in it for them.
In this case both Weiner and all of these e-mail, web, Internet players in this situation has their share of sexual perversion to go round.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions, you decide .
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
_______________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Well, as I predicted in a previous blog regarding Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-NY, the truth came out. I said that if you believe Weiner's original story there was bridge in Brooklyn that he could sell you.
Finally, and hopefully he followed my advice recommended in my last blog and came clean. Now the question is- "Will he resign." Personally I think he should. I've seen and treated people like him in the past. The man appears to have a very strong tendency to be an exhibitionist, a closet variety pervert.
Here is a man that is supposed to adhere to the laws of the land and represent constituents in his district while also representing the face of the United States around the world.
Even after the first photo was released the man looked into media cameras and told the people of the United States that he did not send lewd pictures to women on the Internet. He blatantly lied to our faces. He did this not once, but a number of times. So, my question to the people of New York and the United States is: How can you believe this pervert NOW? How can you trust his political decisions now and in the future? In my mind the man's credibility is zilch! Zero.
In addition, how can his colleagues in Congress rationalize his actions? He brought disrepute to the entire lawmaking body in Washington. Hell, Congress approval ratings are at one of the lowest ebbs in history and this lawmakers sexual perversion actions only brings approval ratings of Congress to a deeper, darker depth.
I would suggest Weiner resign and seek professional help for his sexual, deviant problems. This problem that he has been displaying in recent weeks just didn't happen over night. I would suspect that his desire to expose himself sexually has been a strong desire for many years and I would not be surprised that if a very pointed deep in depth check into Weiner's background there would be evidence that he has been predisposed to the sexual deviant acts for years.
If our lawmakers in Washing does not force this man to resign, the stain on politicians will be enormous. Weiner can not be trusted, HE LIED, numerous times. His credibiilty is shot and if he remains in Washington as a representative of the people you can just imagine how his political and lawmaking decisions on important issues will be affected to satisfy his own sexual desires. Any further statements from Weiner that may say that he is a changed man and that he will not do this again will be hollow empty statements. He had his chance on the first photo. Instead, LIED and DENIED.
I would say that any lawmaker in Congress and all of Washington that tries to rationalize Weiner's behavior and make excuses for him should be on the fast track out of Washington too. Any rationalizations and excuses by his collegues for Weiner's protection should be a very big red flag as to their mind set and way of thinking. to There is no excuse for this man's sexual behavior and clearly he should not be continuing to represent the people of this nation.
Now, a brief word about one of the women Weiner was having e-mail sex with. The casino dealer in Las Vegas (which we will call Lisa) was interviewed on a major news network and when asked "What she would say to Weiner's wife", she only said she would say she is sorry. This 30 something casino dealer continued e-mail after e-mail, describing explicit sex with Weiner, knowing that he was married. What does that say about this lady and her morals, values, credibility and honestly? What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. Are you kidding? What is her motive for exchanging sexual explicit e-mails with Weiner "unless" she had ulterior motives. What could they be---ummmm- maybe "money? " Her fifteen minutes of fame? Why would any intelligent woman do this unless possibly she herself had a sexual deviant desire and/or problem also? I would think any reasonable person could not have favorable feelings about a woman that would commit these acts knowing that the man was married with a pregnant wife.
Folks, this, Las Vegas casino worker is clearly not a victim of any kind and from what I can garner from news media reports about the other women (not ladies) they cannot wear the cloak of victim. All of these women were active participants in sexual deviant acts with Weiner for one reason or another. So, if they start to cry and say that is not their fault or they did nothing wrong I would suggest that you think for a moment and read some of the e-mails exchanged between them and Weiner while at the same time ask yourself what they want out of this scandal. What's in it for them.
In this case both Weiner and all of these e-mail, web, Internet players in this situation has their share of sexual perversion to go round.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions, you decide .
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Thursday, June 2, 2011
Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y.Is He Another Clinton, Gore, Ensign or Craig?
THE DOCTOR IS IN _______________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America,and how is the world treating you?
Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y. seems to contradict himself and some facts regarding the post from his Twitter account showing a semi and/or soft porn image. This guy, who usually is articulate when wearing his politics hat seems a loss for words when it comes to honesty and integrity. He told NBC News-- " I can't say with certitude" whether the man in the underwear image was "his own" crotch. The image appeared on his social networking page. He claims a hacker did it.
Is this another case of a political figure trying to back pedal a possible scandal? Remember President Clinton and his intern or Vice-President Al Gore and his description of questionable fundraising or even Senator Larry Craig, R-Idaho and recently Ensign, from Nevada. Explanations such as-"depends on what the meaning of " is" is; or," no controlling legal authority" or " I was using a wide stance in that bathroom stall." Or like Ensign said: " The $96,000 was a gift to my mistresse's family" Weiner's answer to this situation of his rivals all the politicians previously mentioned.
The newspapers reported the woman on the other end of the post saying she did friend Weiner and they had some sort of personal correspondence between them. But once the image and situation hit the media she then said it was probably a hacker that transmitted the image. That's a friend. Wouldn't you say?
On May 31, 2011 and June 1, 2011 during a news conference Weiner then said " I don't know the woman, never met her or had corresponded with her. Really? She already made statements to the media that she and Weiner were friends on the social network. So, who's lying, who's mistaken?
I would say to both Weiner and the woman , if you lied then, are you lying now?
Why doesn't Weiner simply and clearly articulate whether he is the person in the photo? If it was indeed him, he would have a very clear recollection and idea about the photo. What is strange is that: First, Weiner failed to contact authorities and file a complaint regarding this matter. Second, he says he hired an attorney and a security firm to investigate the matter. Why? I would think if someone did hack into Rep. Weiner's social network it would immediately become a matter for the authorities.
I would submit that the whole matter will eventually come out. It may take a while but it will come out. The problem with things like this when it involves lawmakers is that the they spend too much time trying to put a spin on the incident (s) and try to out any flames rather than getting out in front of it, no matter how embarrassing the matter might be. It's the lying, deceiving and coverup that comes back to bite them in the butt.
There is already contradictions in Weiner's story about his alleged contact with the female in question and I would suggest that he makes the decision to be forthcoming with answers such as: Is that you in the underwear? Did you post that photo of the man wearing the underwear? Did you send that post to the female in question? If it was a mistake tell us?
People, the above questions are very simple questions. Anyone could answer them honestly if in fact, the person had nothing to hide. I would think that the "hacker" story is a reach. Out of all the high ranking politicians on the hill - - Weiner is the only one that gets his personal social network hacked? Maybe! But maybe Weiner has a bridge in Brooklyn to sell also.
If Weiner doesn't get out in front of this with a clear, honest answer the matter will fester like a sore and it will eventually come to a head and you can believe that if it shows that he has been lying about the situation his credibility as a useful lawmaker will be zero. If he is attempting to cover up I predict that in the near future many people on the Internet, world-wide will make a joke out of his situation using his name as a focal point for the jokes. I can hear some of them now. I mean, with a name like Weiner and a situation which includes underwear, a woman or women and photos being transmitted over the internet--- Come on! The jokes can go on forever.
My advice to Rep. Weiner. Get it all out now from your own mouth. Like they say Weiner, the truth will set you free. Learn from the past and from all of those lawmakers that came before you and tried to cover their tracks.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
,
LAS VEGAS- Hello America,and how is the world treating you?
Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y. seems to contradict himself and some facts regarding the post from his Twitter account showing a semi and/or soft porn image. This guy, who usually is articulate when wearing his politics hat seems a loss for words when it comes to honesty and integrity. He told NBC News-- " I can't say with certitude" whether the man in the underwear image was "his own" crotch. The image appeared on his social networking page. He claims a hacker did it.
Is this another case of a political figure trying to back pedal a possible scandal? Remember President Clinton and his intern or Vice-President Al Gore and his description of questionable fundraising or even Senator Larry Craig, R-Idaho and recently Ensign, from Nevada. Explanations such as-"depends on what the meaning of " is" is; or," no controlling legal authority" or " I was using a wide stance in that bathroom stall." Or like Ensign said: " The $96,000 was a gift to my mistresse's family" Weiner's answer to this situation of his rivals all the politicians previously mentioned.
The newspapers reported the woman on the other end of the post saying she did friend Weiner and they had some sort of personal correspondence between them. But once the image and situation hit the media she then said it was probably a hacker that transmitted the image. That's a friend. Wouldn't you say?
On May 31, 2011 and June 1, 2011 during a news conference Weiner then said " I don't know the woman, never met her or had corresponded with her. Really? She already made statements to the media that she and Weiner were friends on the social network. So, who's lying, who's mistaken?
I would say to both Weiner and the woman , if you lied then, are you lying now?
Why doesn't Weiner simply and clearly articulate whether he is the person in the photo? If it was indeed him, he would have a very clear recollection and idea about the photo. What is strange is that: First, Weiner failed to contact authorities and file a complaint regarding this matter. Second, he says he hired an attorney and a security firm to investigate the matter. Why? I would think if someone did hack into Rep. Weiner's social network it would immediately become a matter for the authorities.
I would submit that the whole matter will eventually come out. It may take a while but it will come out. The problem with things like this when it involves lawmakers is that the they spend too much time trying to put a spin on the incident (s) and try to out any flames rather than getting out in front of it, no matter how embarrassing the matter might be. It's the lying, deceiving and coverup that comes back to bite them in the butt.
There is already contradictions in Weiner's story about his alleged contact with the female in question and I would suggest that he makes the decision to be forthcoming with answers such as: Is that you in the underwear? Did you post that photo of the man wearing the underwear? Did you send that post to the female in question? If it was a mistake tell us?
People, the above questions are very simple questions. Anyone could answer them honestly if in fact, the person had nothing to hide. I would think that the "hacker" story is a reach. Out of all the high ranking politicians on the hill - - Weiner is the only one that gets his personal social network hacked? Maybe! But maybe Weiner has a bridge in Brooklyn to sell also.
If Weiner doesn't get out in front of this with a clear, honest answer the matter will fester like a sore and it will eventually come to a head and you can believe that if it shows that he has been lying about the situation his credibility as a useful lawmaker will be zero. If he is attempting to cover up I predict that in the near future many people on the Internet, world-wide will make a joke out of his situation using his name as a focal point for the jokes. I can hear some of them now. I mean, with a name like Weiner and a situation which includes underwear, a woman or women and photos being transmitted over the internet--- Come on! The jokes can go on forever.
My advice to Rep. Weiner. Get it all out now from your own mouth. Like they say Weiner, the truth will set you free. Learn from the past and from all of those lawmakers that came before you and tried to cover their tracks.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
,
Monday, May 23, 2011
Israel Continues To Sabotage Peace In The Middle East-Decades of Excuses
THE DOCTOR IS IN
_______________
LAS VEGAS-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu chooses to rebuff Obama when Obama suggests a return to 1967 borders. Netanyahu and many in his administration does not want peace in the Middle East. The Israeli government has been making excuses why they cannot seriously sit down and discuss peace with the Palestinians for decade after decade. Israel enjoys being an occupier and they have used force over those many decades to restrict the movement of the Palestinian people.
Israel is a nation armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons (even though they deny nuclear capability) and they have American military weapons at their disposal and they have no qualm about using them against the Palestinians whenever they want to agitate disruption in the Middle East.
How would Israel like a country to invade their territory and become occupiers and begin restricting peoples movement? They wouldn't. Yet, they continue to act as an occupation force in the region. Decade after decade Israel refused to negotiate in good faith and allow a two state solution. Instead they rely on their military might and the backing of the United States government so they can run amok thumbing their nose at the world community.
I would suggest it is time for the world leaders to insist that Israel define borders so both the Israelis and the Palestinians can have their own sovereign territory - - separate states for each country. If I were the negotiator handling the process I would set a time frame with a definite date in the near future for Israel to comply. If they did not comply I would have the world community and it's leaders set the borders for Israel. The different countries under the auspice of NATO could put troops on the ground both inside Israel and the Palestinian territories and immediately enforce boundaries that are agreed to by the nations of the world.
I say that what is required is that all of the other countries around the world unite and intervene because the United States has not been and cannot be an honest broker in forming a peace agreement as a sole negotiator. Every United States president in recent history have always taken the side of Israel in disputes and confrontations between Israel and Palestinians. That's wrong. The United States actions when dealing with the peace process in the Middle East are blatantly obvious. The table has always between tilted in favor of Israel. That's sad. That's why it will take world action to bring peace to the Middle East.
Such action can be undertaken. We, the United States and other countries did not have any second thoughts when troops were used in Bosnia and other countries in order to separate warring factions, so why not in Israel?
I would say that using troops on the ground and enforcing borders for both the Israelis and the Palestinians will be the only way to have a two state solution. If the Israelis don't like the situation- -that's tough. With the world powers setting out the borders they will have to live with it.
Also if the Israelis drag their feet or continue with their many excuses why they cannot negotiate peace the United States should cut off all foreign aid to that nation. We have been coddling and pandering to Israeli basically since 1947 and that country receives billions and billions of dollars in foreign aid from the United States each and every year. I believe it is the highest foreign aid made to any country in the world. An added note -Israel's lobby arm organizations here in the U.S. has has Israel agents pass United States secrets to their country over the years. My question, why, if Israel is such a good ally do they have to steal American secrets which I would think tend to look like espionage .
Does the reader remember Jonathan Pollard, a Navy analyst who spied for Israel and sent classified data to Israel. He was convicted and imprisoned since 1985, with a sentence of life. As a side note the Jewish lobby in the U.S. is pressuring our Congress and the Democrats are asking president Obama to release Pollard. Their rationale is that it will promote peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians. What a load of manure that is. This guy committed espionage and gave Israel some of the most sensitive secrets the United States had in their files. The sentence was life and he should do life. However, the Israeli's has this scum bag down as a "hero" and they want him back in Israel so they can anoint him with medals and honors. That shows you where Israels mindset is at. On their one hand they steal and take classified secrets from the United States and call their spy a hero and want him sent back home. Their other hand is always out for freebies of billions of dollars in aid and many more billions in advanced weapons from the U.S.
It certainly appears Israel takes, and takes, from the United States and feels that they are some how entitled but they clearly do not give the United States much in return.
So, call in the world military and put boots on the ground in Israel and Palestine until borders are drawn up and adhered to by both countries. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
_______________
LAS VEGAS-Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu chooses to rebuff Obama when Obama suggests a return to 1967 borders. Netanyahu and many in his administration does not want peace in the Middle East. The Israeli government has been making excuses why they cannot seriously sit down and discuss peace with the Palestinians for decade after decade. Israel enjoys being an occupier and they have used force over those many decades to restrict the movement of the Palestinian people.
Israel is a nation armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons (even though they deny nuclear capability) and they have American military weapons at their disposal and they have no qualm about using them against the Palestinians whenever they want to agitate disruption in the Middle East.
How would Israel like a country to invade their territory and become occupiers and begin restricting peoples movement? They wouldn't. Yet, they continue to act as an occupation force in the region. Decade after decade Israel refused to negotiate in good faith and allow a two state solution. Instead they rely on their military might and the backing of the United States government so they can run amok thumbing their nose at the world community.
I would suggest it is time for the world leaders to insist that Israel define borders so both the Israelis and the Palestinians can have their own sovereign territory - - separate states for each country. If I were the negotiator handling the process I would set a time frame with a definite date in the near future for Israel to comply. If they did not comply I would have the world community and it's leaders set the borders for Israel. The different countries under the auspice of NATO could put troops on the ground both inside Israel and the Palestinian territories and immediately enforce boundaries that are agreed to by the nations of the world.
I say that what is required is that all of the other countries around the world unite and intervene because the United States has not been and cannot be an honest broker in forming a peace agreement as a sole negotiator. Every United States president in recent history have always taken the side of Israel in disputes and confrontations between Israel and Palestinians. That's wrong. The United States actions when dealing with the peace process in the Middle East are blatantly obvious. The table has always between tilted in favor of Israel. That's sad. That's why it will take world action to bring peace to the Middle East.
Such action can be undertaken. We, the United States and other countries did not have any second thoughts when troops were used in Bosnia and other countries in order to separate warring factions, so why not in Israel?
I would say that using troops on the ground and enforcing borders for both the Israelis and the Palestinians will be the only way to have a two state solution. If the Israelis don't like the situation- -that's tough. With the world powers setting out the borders they will have to live with it.
Also if the Israelis drag their feet or continue with their many excuses why they cannot negotiate peace the United States should cut off all foreign aid to that nation. We have been coddling and pandering to Israeli basically since 1947 and that country receives billions and billions of dollars in foreign aid from the United States each and every year. I believe it is the highest foreign aid made to any country in the world. An added note -Israel's lobby arm organizations here in the U.S. has has Israel agents pass United States secrets to their country over the years. My question, why, if Israel is such a good ally do they have to steal American secrets which I would think tend to look like espionage .
Does the reader remember Jonathan Pollard, a Navy analyst who spied for Israel and sent classified data to Israel. He was convicted and imprisoned since 1985, with a sentence of life. As a side note the Jewish lobby in the U.S. is pressuring our Congress and the Democrats are asking president Obama to release Pollard. Their rationale is that it will promote peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians. What a load of manure that is. This guy committed espionage and gave Israel some of the most sensitive secrets the United States had in their files. The sentence was life and he should do life. However, the Israeli's has this scum bag down as a "hero" and they want him back in Israel so they can anoint him with medals and honors. That shows you where Israels mindset is at. On their one hand they steal and take classified secrets from the United States and call their spy a hero and want him sent back home. Their other hand is always out for freebies of billions of dollars in aid and many more billions in advanced weapons from the U.S.
It certainly appears Israel takes, and takes, from the United States and feels that they are some how entitled but they clearly do not give the United States much in return.
So, call in the world military and put boots on the ground in Israel and Palestine until borders are drawn up and adhered to by both countries. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
Crying, Screaming Babies In Restaurants & Public Places: Who Needs Them?
THE DOCTOR IS IN _______________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
In reference to an inquiry by Patricia: She states that she is fed up with crying, screaming children in some of the public places she frequents and wants my opinion on this issue.
Patricia, there is a recent movement to have a separate section on airplanes to accommodate parents with infants or small children. Passengers have been complaining for years now about babies and small children crying, screaming and being disruptive while on the aircraft. Some airlines are seriously considering separating the crying babies and their parents from the rest of the passengers. I tend to agree with the flying public who say they want to have some type of relief and separation from a crying, disorderly child or children.
Regarding this same issue and being a captive audience let's talk "restaurants." A customer who has sat down with his/her family and friends and ordered their food is stuck. I've also heard many complaints from people who go to restaurants and feel that cannot enjoy a good meal because of parents having a crying or screaming baby in the restaurant and refuse to take the the child to the restroom or outside until they stop crying or being disruptive. These parents continue to sit there and eat because they don't want to leave their food or have their food get cold. I say that's the price of raising a child. Get up from the table with the child even if your food gets cold. That child is the parents problem.
I would think it would be common courtesy for the parent to take the crying, screaming child or children away from the restaurant area so as not to disturb the other dining patrons but it appears that somewhere along the line some parents have lost the ability to be courteous.
However, some good news for many of you who are upset over crying and screaming babies and children n restaurants. There have been a few restaurants in the Midwest and back east that have posted signs (at the request of their dining customers) that people with infants are not welcome in the restaurant and some restaurants have signs saying if the baby or child is crying, screaming, upset, unruly and annoying to other customers the restaurant reserves the right to ask the parents to leave the restaurant. There was one restaurant I read about that had a sign reading: No service to parents with infants or small children and it had an age bracket indicated on the sign.
Personally, I dislike to be in a restaurant or anywhere elsewhere that adults socialize and have to hear screaming and crying children. I have gotten up and left many a restaurant because of them. I have also asked some parents to take their child to the restroom or outside until they quiet down. I have also had occasion to ask the manager of the restaurant to speak with the parents of the offending children but I have have found that many restaurant are afraid to approach the parents and advise them to have their children quiet down or leave.
At one major casino restaurant here in Las Vegas, I even had the manager of the restaurant call security and have security talk to the parents. That's sad when it has to come down to security officers speaking to the parents and asking them to leave the restaurant. One of the parents should have been intelligent enough to take their disruptive screaming, crying child out of the restaurant on the first indication that this child was not going to quiet down.
Patricia, I have even observed some parents just sit in their booth or at their table and laugh about the fact that their child is screaming or crying. They think it is funny. What does that say about the parents? They seem to be oblivious to the needs and respect of others in the restaurant. I have also seen this same scenario play out here in Las Vegas, in the casinos. Why any parent in their right mind would want to drag crying and screaming babies into a gambling establishment (both on the casino floor and in the restaurants) and disrupt other adults social life is beyond me.
I would think that if the parents know their child is prone to crying, screaming, acting out, etc., they would make family time around their own table at home and have their meals there until such time the child is old enough to know how to act in a public restaurant, on an airplane, or in any public arena. But if the parents are really intend about eating out they should also consider a babysitter or relative to take care of the infant or child for the few hours they want to spend in restaurants or public places. It seems like a no-brainer. The parents would have private time for themselves to enjoy a nice quiet and peaceful meal. Go figure! Patricia, somewhere in the past few generations family values and courtesy have fell by the wayside. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own judgment and decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
In reference to an inquiry by Patricia: She states that she is fed up with crying, screaming children in some of the public places she frequents and wants my opinion on this issue.
Patricia, there is a recent movement to have a separate section on airplanes to accommodate parents with infants or small children. Passengers have been complaining for years now about babies and small children crying, screaming and being disruptive while on the aircraft. Some airlines are seriously considering separating the crying babies and their parents from the rest of the passengers. I tend to agree with the flying public who say they want to have some type of relief and separation from a crying, disorderly child or children.
Regarding this same issue and being a captive audience let's talk "restaurants." A customer who has sat down with his/her family and friends and ordered their food is stuck. I've also heard many complaints from people who go to restaurants and feel that cannot enjoy a good meal because of parents having a crying or screaming baby in the restaurant and refuse to take the the child to the restroom or outside until they stop crying or being disruptive. These parents continue to sit there and eat because they don't want to leave their food or have their food get cold. I say that's the price of raising a child. Get up from the table with the child even if your food gets cold. That child is the parents problem.
I would think it would be common courtesy for the parent to take the crying, screaming child or children away from the restaurant area so as not to disturb the other dining patrons but it appears that somewhere along the line some parents have lost the ability to be courteous.
However, some good news for many of you who are upset over crying and screaming babies and children n restaurants. There have been a few restaurants in the Midwest and back east that have posted signs (at the request of their dining customers) that people with infants are not welcome in the restaurant and some restaurants have signs saying if the baby or child is crying, screaming, upset, unruly and annoying to other customers the restaurant reserves the right to ask the parents to leave the restaurant. There was one restaurant I read about that had a sign reading: No service to parents with infants or small children and it had an age bracket indicated on the sign.
Personally, I dislike to be in a restaurant or anywhere elsewhere that adults socialize and have to hear screaming and crying children. I have gotten up and left many a restaurant because of them. I have also asked some parents to take their child to the restroom or outside until they quiet down. I have also had occasion to ask the manager of the restaurant to speak with the parents of the offending children but I have have found that many restaurant are afraid to approach the parents and advise them to have their children quiet down or leave.
At one major casino restaurant here in Las Vegas, I even had the manager of the restaurant call security and have security talk to the parents. That's sad when it has to come down to security officers speaking to the parents and asking them to leave the restaurant. One of the parents should have been intelligent enough to take their disruptive screaming, crying child out of the restaurant on the first indication that this child was not going to quiet down.
Patricia, I have even observed some parents just sit in their booth or at their table and laugh about the fact that their child is screaming or crying. They think it is funny. What does that say about the parents? They seem to be oblivious to the needs and respect of others in the restaurant. I have also seen this same scenario play out here in Las Vegas, in the casinos. Why any parent in their right mind would want to drag crying and screaming babies into a gambling establishment (both on the casino floor and in the restaurants) and disrupt other adults social life is beyond me.
I would think that if the parents know their child is prone to crying, screaming, acting out, etc., they would make family time around their own table at home and have their meals there until such time the child is old enough to know how to act in a public restaurant, on an airplane, or in any public arena. But if the parents are really intend about eating out they should also consider a babysitter or relative to take care of the infant or child for the few hours they want to spend in restaurants or public places. It seems like a no-brainer. The parents would have private time for themselves to enjoy a nice quiet and peaceful meal. Go figure! Patricia, somewhere in the past few generations family values and courtesy have fell by the wayside. - And, that's my opinion. Make your own judgment and decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Obama Continues to Lie To the People
THE DOCTOR IS IN _______________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The words coming out of president Obama's mouth continue to contradict his previous statements. It appears as though the lies continue to keep on coming.
Here' s just a few more lies over the past few days.
1. Obama said that the U.S. would halt air strikes over Libya. They didn't stop. Instead , he said he would continue the air strikes for another 48 hours and possibly more.
2. During his campaign Obama said and promised he would close Guantanamo Bay if elected. However, just a few days ago he said he would continue to keep the facility open.
3. Obama said that he would try Muslim terrorists in the civilian courts here in in the United States. He did a 180 degree and now states that the terrorists will be tried in a military court.
In an earlier blog I mentioned that Obama had the tendency to lie and that fact has now been brought to the forefront by even more of the lies being highlighted in the media each and every day.
We taxpayers cannot depend on much of anything that this man says from day to day. Apparently he is swayed by his people around him from minute to minute and day to day and does not have the capacity to think for himself. He is clearly a disappointment to me because I voted for him. -And, that's my opinion. Make your own judgment and decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The words coming out of president Obama's mouth continue to contradict his previous statements. It appears as though the lies continue to keep on coming.
Here' s just a few more lies over the past few days.
1. Obama said that the U.S. would halt air strikes over Libya. They didn't stop. Instead , he said he would continue the air strikes for another 48 hours and possibly more.
2. During his campaign Obama said and promised he would close Guantanamo Bay if elected. However, just a few days ago he said he would continue to keep the facility open.
3. Obama said that he would try Muslim terrorists in the civilian courts here in in the United States. He did a 180 degree and now states that the terrorists will be tried in a military court.
In an earlier blog I mentioned that Obama had the tendency to lie and that fact has now been brought to the forefront by even more of the lies being highlighted in the media each and every day.
We taxpayers cannot depend on much of anything that this man says from day to day. Apparently he is swayed by his people around him from minute to minute and day to day and does not have the capacity to think for himself. He is clearly a disappointment to me because I voted for him. -And, that's my opinion. Make your own judgment and decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Saturday, April 2, 2011
Wal-Mart Should Close All Stores In the U.S. If they Lose This Case
THE DOCTOR IS IN _______________
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The Supreme Court is supposed to rule on a legal case involving Wal-Mart stores. It involves alleged discrimination against women working at Wal-Mart. The women suing want the action brought as a class action suit so the claims can cover millions of women who worked at Wal-Mart over the years.
I would suggest that bringing such a class action suit against the retailing giant is inappropriate and unwarranted. I would like to see the U.S. Supreme Court side with Wal-Mart's argument. If the court found for the women bringing the lawsuit it would be a devastating blow to the entire corporate structure here in America. It is this writer's wish that the the Supreme Court justices see through the lame arguments by the attorney's for these greedy women.
Greedy women? Yes. Let me give you readers an example of greed. - -I will cite one female employee that is in the lawsuit. First, she has been a Wal-Mart employee for 25 years. She went into work day in and day out for over two decades taking Wal-Mart's paycheck and living comfortably all those many years. Comfortable? You bet. This woman's salary was a whopping $60,000 a year. However, now that she feels it's time for het to quit working she sees a big lottery bonanza and wants still more from her old employer Wal-Mart.
Folks, she's not the only woman that worked for Wal-Mat for a number of years that has this same idea. Since Wal-Mart is the world's largest retailer these women have dollar ($$) signs in their eyes.
All these women are claiming discrimination. Many say they were passed over for promotion. Maybe, just maybe there were a few women that may have been passed over for promotion. I say, if that in fact is the case then these particular individuals should file an individual suit against Wal-Mart and have their attorney(s) argue their case in a court of law before a jury. But to roll all the women up that ever worked for Wal-Mar t into one big package and say everyone of these women deserve a lottery payday is foolish and ridiculous.
People, the only ones that will make any real money from this frivolous lawsuit is the attorneys. They love "class action" lawsuits because the attorneys fees can run into the millions and even billions of dollars when they sue a large corporation or entity.
I'm sure many of you have had experience with "class action" lawsuits. Let me give you another example. A few years ago, I received a card in the mail stating I was a person in a class action lawsuit against LEVI Corporation. The card indicated that since at sometime in the past I bought a pair of Levi jeans I am eligible to be included in the lawsuit. A number of attorneys brought the lawsuit claiming numerous violation by the company. About a year later I received a coupon in the mail from Levi stating that since I was a person in the lawsuit my award is: "a coupon for $2.00) that I could use toward my next purchase of a pair of Levi jeans.Over the years at other times I received "class action" cards from electronic companies, appliance companies, clothing companies, airlines, etc., and each time the consumer (you and me) that were in these so-called "class-action" lawsuits only receive a coupon for anywhere from $0.25 to $2.00 toward the purchase of a new item in the future. However, ALERT - - - the attorneys that brought the "class-action" lawsuits against these large companies billed for millions and billions of dollars in attorneys fees. Is that fair? No way.
Congress should have stepped in years ago and put a stop to these lousy "class-action" lawsuits where the only objective is to have attorneys reach into the deep pockets of large companies and corporations only too be paid millions in legal fees. The attorneys live large but the people , other than a very few individuals they are supposed to be representing in the lawsuit only receive coupons for a few dollars toward their next purchase of an item.
So, again-the lawyers see billions of dollars they can bill for by suing Wal-Mart. My view on this Wal-Mart caper is that many of these women who now say they were wronged had worked for Wal-Mart for years enjoying the salaries and benefits and discounts that Wal-Mart offered them.
Many of these women continued their years of employment at the company even though they say they were discriminated against because they were passed over for promotion. If I were being being passed over for promotion I would ask why I didn't receive that promotion and if I felt it was discrimination I would hire an attorney and file suit and argue (my case) before the proper court or agency. Or, I have the choice to quit if I thought I didn't like the way the company was treating me. I would find employment elsewhere.
Remember, all of these women, and there all a lot of women who work in Wal-Mart stores around the world clearly know what the job entails when they hire on and accept the position. One clear. glaring fact that everyone knows it that Wal-Mart is a non-union work place. Right away, that woman applicant knows that if she is looking for union benefits and wages Wal-Mart is the wrong employer to look for a job.
Through my research and interviews I have found that most of the millions of women that work Wal-Mart take the job for extra monies and/or as a part-time position. Wal-Mart is one of those employers that even hire the elderly employee because that employee only wants the job for extra money and something to do. Then there are the young employees, right out
of school who are just starting out and want to gain experience in the work force.
For whatever reason these young and old women (and) men apply and accept a job with Wal-Mart they are told up front the terms of their employment when they hire on. At the time of application for the job they can make their own determination as to whether they want to accept and/or refuse the employment terms. And, these same individuals have the right to resign or quit the job at Wal-Mart at their leisure. I say, each and every employee working at any job in the country( not just Wal-Mart) can knowingly and willingly accept or reject a job offer.
It amazes me that when someone works for a company for two or three decades making a great salary ($60,000) a year and then decides to sue the company screaming "I was passed over" for a promotion is a little much. Something fishy in Denmark, folks. I submit that if the job at Wal-Mart was so bad, why didn't she leave years ago or file complaints with the proper labor agencies? It appears women like this are only seeking a big payday.
Side note: Lawsuits like this do not only happen against Wal-Mart. One can read the newspaper and see an article of a person working years on the job and then decides to sue because they want to report company wrongdoing. Mind you, they continued to collect a paycheck and closed their eyes to alleged wrongdoing for years but now when there is no more paycheck from the company, they sue. People like this tend to go along as long as they have a job and are getting paid a salary but as soon as the money train stops they attempt to play the innocent victim and deny knowledge of wrongdoing.
It's time to stop these deep pocket lawsuits by way of "class actions". If a person thinks they have been wronged by a company or corporation, I say they should file an individual lawsuit and have their day in court addressing the alleged wrong against themselves.
If I were Wal-Mart CEO and lost this case I would close up shop. I would immediately close each and every Wal-Mart store in the USA and I would relocate headquarters overseas and hire people from those other countries that appreciate a job. Then, let's see how all of these women feel when there is no Wal-Mart job too go to. No living to make. No paycheck. Millions of people out of work overnight. Let's see how that would affect our economy. Wal-Mart has been doing the United States a favor by hiring millions of people and these women should thank God they have or had a job.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own judgment and decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
LAS VEGAS- Hello America, and how is the world treating you?
The Supreme Court is supposed to rule on a legal case involving Wal-Mart stores. It involves alleged discrimination against women working at Wal-Mart. The women suing want the action brought as a class action suit so the claims can cover millions of women who worked at Wal-Mart over the years.
I would suggest that bringing such a class action suit against the retailing giant is inappropriate and unwarranted. I would like to see the U.S. Supreme Court side with Wal-Mart's argument. If the court found for the women bringing the lawsuit it would be a devastating blow to the entire corporate structure here in America. It is this writer's wish that the the Supreme Court justices see through the lame arguments by the attorney's for these greedy women.
Greedy women? Yes. Let me give you readers an example of greed. - -I will cite one female employee that is in the lawsuit. First, she has been a Wal-Mart employee for 25 years. She went into work day in and day out for over two decades taking Wal-Mart's paycheck and living comfortably all those many years. Comfortable? You bet. This woman's salary was a whopping $60,000 a year. However, now that she feels it's time for het to quit working she sees a big lottery bonanza and wants still more from her old employer Wal-Mart.
Folks, she's not the only woman that worked for Wal-Mat for a number of years that has this same idea. Since Wal-Mart is the world's largest retailer these women have dollar ($$) signs in their eyes.
All these women are claiming discrimination. Many say they were passed over for promotion. Maybe, just maybe there were a few women that may have been passed over for promotion. I say, if that in fact is the case then these particular individuals should file an individual suit against Wal-Mart and have their attorney(s) argue their case in a court of law before a jury. But to roll all the women up that ever worked for Wal-Mar t into one big package and say everyone of these women deserve a lottery payday is foolish and ridiculous.
People, the only ones that will make any real money from this frivolous lawsuit is the attorneys. They love "class action" lawsuits because the attorneys fees can run into the millions and even billions of dollars when they sue a large corporation or entity.
I'm sure many of you have had experience with "class action" lawsuits. Let me give you another example. A few years ago, I received a card in the mail stating I was a person in a class action lawsuit against LEVI Corporation. The card indicated that since at sometime in the past I bought a pair of Levi jeans I am eligible to be included in the lawsuit. A number of attorneys brought the lawsuit claiming numerous violation by the company. About a year later I received a coupon in the mail from Levi stating that since I was a person in the lawsuit my award is: "a coupon for $2.00) that I could use toward my next purchase of a pair of Levi jeans.Over the years at other times I received "class action" cards from electronic companies, appliance companies, clothing companies, airlines, etc., and each time the consumer (you and me) that were in these so-called "class-action" lawsuits only receive a coupon for anywhere from $0.25 to $2.00 toward the purchase of a new item in the future. However, ALERT - - - the attorneys that brought the "class-action" lawsuits against these large companies billed for millions and billions of dollars in attorneys fees. Is that fair? No way.
Congress should have stepped in years ago and put a stop to these lousy "class-action" lawsuits where the only objective is to have attorneys reach into the deep pockets of large companies and corporations only too be paid millions in legal fees. The attorneys live large but the people , other than a very few individuals they are supposed to be representing in the lawsuit only receive coupons for a few dollars toward their next purchase of an item.
So, again-the lawyers see billions of dollars they can bill for by suing Wal-Mart. My view on this Wal-Mart caper is that many of these women who now say they were wronged had worked for Wal-Mart for years enjoying the salaries and benefits and discounts that Wal-Mart offered them.
Many of these women continued their years of employment at the company even though they say they were discriminated against because they were passed over for promotion. If I were being being passed over for promotion I would ask why I didn't receive that promotion and if I felt it was discrimination I would hire an attorney and file suit and argue (my case) before the proper court or agency. Or, I have the choice to quit if I thought I didn't like the way the company was treating me. I would find employment elsewhere.
Remember, all of these women, and there all a lot of women who work in Wal-Mart stores around the world clearly know what the job entails when they hire on and accept the position. One clear. glaring fact that everyone knows it that Wal-Mart is a non-union work place. Right away, that woman applicant knows that if she is looking for union benefits and wages Wal-Mart is the wrong employer to look for a job.
Through my research and interviews I have found that most of the millions of women that work Wal-Mart take the job for extra monies and/or as a part-time position. Wal-Mart is one of those employers that even hire the elderly employee because that employee only wants the job for extra money and something to do. Then there are the young employees, right out
of school who are just starting out and want to gain experience in the work force.
For whatever reason these young and old women (and) men apply and accept a job with Wal-Mart they are told up front the terms of their employment when they hire on. At the time of application for the job they can make their own determination as to whether they want to accept and/or refuse the employment terms. And, these same individuals have the right to resign or quit the job at Wal-Mart at their leisure. I say, each and every employee working at any job in the country( not just Wal-Mart) can knowingly and willingly accept or reject a job offer.
It amazes me that when someone works for a company for two or three decades making a great salary ($60,000) a year and then decides to sue the company screaming "I was passed over" for a promotion is a little much. Something fishy in Denmark, folks. I submit that if the job at Wal-Mart was so bad, why didn't she leave years ago or file complaints with the proper labor agencies? It appears women like this are only seeking a big payday.
Side note: Lawsuits like this do not only happen against Wal-Mart. One can read the newspaper and see an article of a person working years on the job and then decides to sue because they want to report company wrongdoing. Mind you, they continued to collect a paycheck and closed their eyes to alleged wrongdoing for years but now when there is no more paycheck from the company, they sue. People like this tend to go along as long as they have a job and are getting paid a salary but as soon as the money train stops they attempt to play the innocent victim and deny knowledge of wrongdoing.
It's time to stop these deep pocket lawsuits by way of "class actions". If a person thinks they have been wronged by a company or corporation, I say they should file an individual lawsuit and have their day in court addressing the alleged wrong against themselves.
If I were Wal-Mart CEO and lost this case I would close up shop. I would immediately close each and every Wal-Mart store in the USA and I would relocate headquarters overseas and hire people from those other countries that appreciate a job. Then, let's see how all of these women feel when there is no Wal-Mart job too go to. No living to make. No paycheck. Millions of people out of work overnight. Let's see how that would affect our economy. Wal-Mart has been doing the United States a favor by hiring millions of people and these women should thank God they have or had a job.- And, that's my opinion. Make your own judgment and decisions. You decide.
Bradley W. Kuhns, Ph.D., O.M.D.
_______________________
Dr. Kuhns can be reached by e-mail at:
bradleykuhns@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)